This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alperstein, N.M. (1991). Imaginary social relationships with celebrities appearing in television commercials. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35(1), 43–58.AlpersteinN.M.1991Imaginary social relationships with celebrities appearing in television commercials351435810.1080/08838159109364101Search in Google Scholar
Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2018). Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect. Convergence, 24(1), 85–98.BerrymanR.KavkaM.2018Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect241859810.1177/1354856517736981Search in Google Scholar
Biel, J.I., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2011). Vlogsense: Conversational behavior and social attention in YouTube. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 7(1), article 33. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2037676.2037690BielJ.I.Gatica-PerezD.2011Vlogsense: Conversational behavior and social attention in YouTube71article 33. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2037676.203769010.1145/2037676.2037690Search in Google Scholar
Bishop, S. (2018). Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence, 24(1), 69–84.BishopS.2018Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm241698410.1177/1354856517736978Search in Google Scholar
Chen, C.P. (2016). Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(1), 232–254.ChenC.P.2016Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube16123225410.1177/1469540514521081Search in Google Scholar
Conway, J.C., & Rubin, A.M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18(4), 443–463.ConwayJ.C.RubinA.M.1991Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation18444346310.1177/009365091018004001Search in Google Scholar
de Bérail, P., Guillon, M., & Bungener, C. (2019). The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 99(1), 190–204.de BérailP.GuillonM.BungenerC.2019The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework99119020410.1016/j.chb.2019.05.007Search in Google Scholar
Dekavalla, M. (2020). Gaining trust: the articulation of transparency by You Tube fashion and beauty content creators. Media, Culture & Society, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719846613DekavallaM.2020Gaining trust: the articulation of transparency by You Tube fashion and beauty content creators421https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371984661310.1177/0163443719846613Search in Google Scholar
Dibble, J.L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S.F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44.DibbleJ.L.HartmannT.RosaenS.F.2016Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures421214410.1111/hcre.12063Search in Google Scholar
Erfani, S.S., & Abedin, B. (2018). Impacts of the use of social network sites on users’ psychological well-being: A systematic review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(7), 900–912.ErfaniS.S.AbedinB.2018Impacts of the use of social network sites on users’ psychological well-being: A systematic review69790091210.1002/asi.24015Search in Google Scholar
Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., & LaGroue, J. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88–96.FerchaudA.GrzesloJ.OrmeS.LaGroueJ.2018Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels80889610.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041Search in Google Scholar
Giles, D.C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04GilesD.C.2002Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research43279305https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_0410.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04Search in Google Scholar
Gregg, P.B. (2020). Social responses to and motivation involving knitting vlog viewing. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520960287GreggP.B.2020Social responses to and motivation involving knitting vlog viewinghttps://doi.org/10.1177/135485652096028710.1177/1354856520960287Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104–1121.HartmannT.GoldhoornC.2011Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction6161104112110.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.xSearch in Google Scholar
Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.HortonD.WohlR.R.1956Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance19321522910.1080/00332747.1956.1102304913359569Search in Google Scholar
Ko, H.C., & Wu, W.N. (2017). Exploring the determinants of viewers’ loyalty toward beauty YouTubers: a parasocial interaction perspective. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 81–86).KoH.C.WuW.N.2017InProceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology818610.1145/3124116.3124130Search in Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4 ed). London, UK: Sage.KrippendorffK.20194 edLondon, UKSage10.4135/9781071878781Search in Google Scholar
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027LadhariR.MassaE.SkandraniH.2020YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise54102027https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.10202710.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027Search in Google Scholar
Lee, M., & Lee, H.H. (2022). Do parasocial interactions and vicarious experiences in the beauty YouTube channels promote consumer purchase intention? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 235–248.LeeM.LeeH.H.2022Do parasocial interactions and vicarious experiences in the beauty YouTube channels promote consumer purchase intention?46123524810.1111/ijcs.12667Search in Google Scholar
Mardon, R., Molesworth, M., & Grigore, G. (2018). YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 92, 443–454.MardonR.MolesworthM.GrigoreG.2018YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship9244345410.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.017Search in Google Scholar
Marôpo, L., Jorge, A., & Tomaz, R. (2020). “I felt like I was really talking to you!”: Intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil. Journal of Children and Media, 14(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1699589MarôpoL.JorgeA.TomazR.2020“I felt like I was really talking to you!”: Intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil1412237https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.169958910.1080/17482798.2019.1699589Search in Google Scholar
Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(1), 226–234.MunnukkaJ.MaityD.ReinikainenH.Luoma-ahoV.2019“Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements93122623410.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014Search in Google Scholar
Oliver, M.B., Bilandzic, H., Cohen, J., Ferchaud, A., Shade, D.D., Bailey, E.J., & Yang, C. (2019). A penchant for the immoral: Implications of parasocial interaction, perceived complicity, and identification on liking of anti-heroes. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 169–201.OliverM.B.BilandzicH.CohenJ.FerchaudA.ShadeD.D.BaileyE.J.YangC.2019A penchant for the immoral: Implications of parasocial interaction, perceived complicity, and identification on liking of anti-heroes45216920110.1093/hcr/hqy019Search in Google Scholar
Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280–294.RasmussenL.2018Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities71280294Search in Google Scholar
Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736983RaunT.2018Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube24199113https://doi.org/10.1177/135485651773698310.1177/1354856517736983Search in Google Scholar
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781ReinikainenH.MunnukkaJ.MaityD.Luoma-ahoV.2020‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing363–4279298https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.170878110.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781Search in Google Scholar
Rihl, A., & Wegener, C. (2019). YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships. Convergence, 25(3), 554–566.RihlA.WegenerC.2019YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships25355456610.1177/1354856517736976Search in Google Scholar
Rosaen, S.F., Dibble, J.L., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Does the experience of parasocial interaction enhance persuasiveness of video public service messages? Communication Research Reports, 36(3), 201–208.RosaenS.F.DibbleJ.L.HartmannT.2019Does the experience of parasocial interaction enhance persuasiveness of video public service messages?36320120810.1080/08824096.2019.1598854Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, A.M., & Perse, E.M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246–268.RubinA.M.PerseE.M.1987Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation14224626810.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.xSearch in Google Scholar
Rubin, A.M., & Step, M.M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635–654.RubinA.M.StepM.M.2000Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening44463565410.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7Search in Google Scholar
Sakib, M.N., Zolfagharian, M., & Yazdanparast, A. (2020). Does parasocial interaction with weight loss vloggers affect compliance? The role of vlogger characteristics, consumer readiness, and health consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(1), 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.002SakibM.N.ZolfagharianM.YazdanparastA.2020Does parasocial interaction with weight loss vloggers affect compliance? The role of vlogger characteristics, consumer readiness, and health consciousness521101733https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.00210.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011SokolovaK.KefiH.2020Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.01110.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011Search in Google Scholar
Sokolova, K., & Perez, C. (2021). You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58(1), 102276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276SokolovaK.PerezC.2021You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise581102276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.10227610.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., & Cash, S. (2021). Bullying discussions in UK female influencers’ YouTube comments. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 49(3), 480–493.ThelwallM.CashS.2021Bullying discussions in UK female influencers’ YouTube comments49348049310.1080/03069885.2021.1901263Search in Google Scholar
Torjesen, A. (2021). The genre repertoires of Norwegian beauty and lifestyle influencers on YouTube. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 168–184.TorjesenA.2021The genre repertoires of Norwegian beauty and lifestyle influencers on YouTube42216818410.2478/nor-2021-0036Search in Google Scholar
Tolbert, A.N., & Drogos, K.L. (2019). Tweens’ wishful identification and parasocial relationships with YouTubers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2781.TolbertA.N.DrogosK.L.2019Tweens’ wishful identification and parasocial relationships with YouTubers10278110.3389/fpsyg.2019.02781692800731920829Search in Google Scholar
Trivedi, J., & Sama, R. (2020). The effect of influencer marketing on consumers’ brand admiration and online purchase intentions: An emerging market perspective. Journal of Internet Commerce, 19(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.1700741TrivediJ.SamaR.2020The effect of influencer marketing on consumers’ brand admiration and online purchase intentions: An emerging market perspective191103124https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.170074110.1080/15332861.2019.1700741Search in Google Scholar
Tukachinsky, R., & Stever, G. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29(3), 297–318.TukachinskyR.SteverG.2019Theorizing development of parasocial engagement29329731810.1093/ct/qty032Search in Google Scholar
Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C.J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034TukachinskyR.WalterN.SaucierC.J.2020Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis706868894https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa03410.1093/joc/jqaa034Search in Google Scholar
Tur-Viñes, V., & Castelló-Martínez, A. (2019). Commenting on Top Spanish YouTubers: “No Comment”. Social Sciences, 8(10), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100266Tur-ViñesV.Castelló-MartínezA.2019Commenting on Top Spanish YouTubers: “No Comment”810266https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci810026610.3390/socsci8100266Search in Google Scholar
Van den Stock, J., Righart, R., & de Gelder, B. (2007). Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice. Emotion, 7(3), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.487Van den StockJ.RighartR.de GelderB.2007Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice73487494https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.48710.1037/1528-3542.7.3.48717683205Search in Google Scholar
van Reijmersdal, E.A., Rozendaal, E., Hudders, L., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Cauberghe, V., & van Berlo, Z.M. (2020). Effects of disclosing influencer marketing in videos: An eye tracking study among children in early adolescence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 49(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2019.09.001van ReijmersdalE.A.RozendaalE.HuddersL.VanwesenbeeckI.CaubergheV.van BerloZ.M.2020Effects of disclosing influencer marketing in videos: An eye tracking study among children in early adolescence49194106https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2019.09.00110.1016/j.intmar.2019.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching personal information on the public Web: Methods and ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401.WilkinsonD.ThelwallM.2011Researching personal information on the public Web: Methods and ethics29438740110.1177/0894439310378979Search in Google Scholar
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514YuanS.LouC.2020How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest202133147https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.176951410.1080/15252019.2020.1769514Search in Google Scholar