This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2014). Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones? Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 89–97.AbramoG.CiceroT.D’AngeloC.A.2014Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?Journal of Informetrics81899710.1016/j.joi.2013.10.011Search in Google Scholar
Chen, K., Song, Y.Y., & Yang, G.L. (2018). Quality and quantity are not always positively correlated: A case study of Chinese economics journals. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1178–1181.ChenK.SongY.Y.YangG.L.2018Quality and quantity are not always positively correlated: A case study of Chinese economics journalsJournal of Informetrics1241178118110.1016/j.joi.2018.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1996). Average and global impact of a set of journals. Scientometrics, 36(1), 97–107.EggheL.RousseauR.1996Average and global impact of a set of journalsScientometrics3619710710.1007/BF02126648Search in Google Scholar
Feist, G.J. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 325–335.FeistG.J.1997Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?Creativity Research Journal10432533510.1207/s15326934crj1004_4Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.W. (2005). Australian research output in economics and business: High volume, low impact. Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 183–200.HarzingA.W.2005Australian research output in economics and business: High volume, low impactAustralian Journal of Management30218320010.1177/031289620503000201Search in Google Scholar
Havemann, F., Heinz, M., & Roland, D. (2005). Firm-like behavior of journals? Scaling properties of their output and impact growth dynamics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 3–12.HavemannF.HeinzM.RolandD.2005Firm-like behavior of journals? Scaling properties of their output and impact growth dynamicsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology56131210.1002/asi.20090Search in Google Scholar
Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, A. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3), 625–636.HayatiZ.EbrahimyA.2009Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006Scientometrics80362563610.1007/s11192-009-2094-3Search in Google Scholar
Huang, D.W. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329–335.HuangD.W.2016Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journalsJournal of Informetrics10232933510.1016/j.joi.2016.02.002Search in Google Scholar
Jin, B., & Wang, B. (1999). Chinese science citation database: its construction and application. Scientometrics, 45(2), 325–332.JinB.WangB.1999Chinese science citation database: its construction and applicationScientometrics45232533210.1007/BF02458440Search in Google Scholar
Price, D.D.S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 27(5), 292–306.PriceD.D.S.1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology27529230610.1002/asi.4630270505Search in Google Scholar
Ren, S.L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A citation data analysis of jcr-covered journals in geosciences. Journal of Library & Information Science, 45(7), 1017–1025.RenS.L.RousseauR.2002A citation data analysis of jcr-covered journals in geosciencesJournal of Library & Information Science45710171025Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (2016). Positive correlation between journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 567–568.RousseauR.2016Positive correlation between journal production and journal impact factorsJournal of Informetrics10256756810.1016/j.joi.2016.04.012Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R., & van Hooydonk, G. (1996). Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10), 775–780.RousseauR.van HooydonkG.1996Journal production and journal impact factorsJournal of the American Society for Information Science471077578010.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199610)47:10<775::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (1988). Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In: Informetrics 87/88 (L. Egghe & R. Rousseau, eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 249–262.RousseauR.1988Citation distribution of pure mathematics journalsIn:Informetrics 87/88EggheL.RousseauR.eds.AmsterdamElsevier249262Search in Google Scholar
Tague, J. (1981). The success-breeds-success phenomenon and bibliometric processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(4), 280–286.TagueJ.1981The success-breeds-success phenomenon and bibliometric processesJournal of the American Society for Information Science32428028610.1002/asi.4630320408Search in Google Scholar
Tsay, M.Y., & Ma, S.S. (2003). The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 56(2), 201–222.TsayM.Y.MaS.S.2003The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literatureScientometrics56220122210.1023/A:1021915127459Search in Google Scholar
Tchetchik, A., Grinstein, A., & Manes, E. (2015). From research to practice: which research strategy contributes more to clinical excellence? Comparing high-volume versus high-quality biomedical research. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0129259.TchetchikA.GrinsteinA.ManesE.2015From research to practice: which research strategy contributes more to clinical excellence? Comparing high-volume versus high-quality biomedical researchPLOS ONE106e012925910.1371/journal.pone.0129259Search in Google Scholar
van Hooydonk, G., Gevaert, R., & Milis-Proost, G. (1994). A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines. Scientometrics, 30(1), 65–81.van HooydonkG.GevaertR.Milis-ProostG.1994A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplinesScientometrics301658110.1007/BF02017213Search in Google Scholar
van Raan, A.F.J. (2008). Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 461–475.van RaanA.F.J.2008Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science systemJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology5946147510.1002/asi.20761Search in Google Scholar
van Raan, A.F.J. (2013). Universities scale like cities. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59384.van RaanA.F.J.2013Universities scale like citiesPLOS ONE83e5938410.1371/journal.pone.0059384Search in Google Scholar