Does Success Breed Success? A Study on the Correlation between Impact Factor and Quantity in Chinese Academic Journals

Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2014). Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones? Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 89–97. AbramoG. CiceroT. D’AngeloC.A. 2014 Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones? Journal of Informetrics 8 1 89 97 10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.011 Search in Google Scholar

Chen, K., Song, Y.Y., & Yang, G.L. (2018). Quality and quantity are not always positively correlated: A case study of Chinese economics journals. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1178–1181. ChenK. SongY.Y. YangG.L. 2018 Quality and quantity are not always positively correlated: A case study of Chinese economics journals Journal of Informetrics 12 4 1178 1181 10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.001 Search in Google Scholar

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1996). Average and global impact of a set of journals. Scientometrics, 36(1), 97–107. EggheL. RousseauR. 1996 Average and global impact of a set of journals Scientometrics 36 1 97 107 10.1007/BF02126648 Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G.J. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 325–335. FeistG.J. 1997 Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important? Creativity Research Journal 10 4 325 335 10.1207/s15326934crj1004_4 Search in Google Scholar

Harzing, A.W. (2005). Australian research output in economics and business: High volume, low impact. Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 183–200. HarzingA.W. 2005 Australian research output in economics and business: High volume, low impact Australian Journal of Management 30 2 183 200 10.1177/031289620503000201 Search in Google Scholar

Havemann, F., Heinz, M., & Roland, D. (2005). Firm-like behavior of journals? Scaling properties of their output and impact growth dynamics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 3–12. HavemannF. HeinzM. RolandD. 2005 Firm-like behavior of journals? Scaling properties of their output and impact growth dynamics Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 56 1 3 12 10.1002/asi.20090 Search in Google Scholar

Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, A. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3), 625–636. HayatiZ. EbrahimyA. 2009 Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006 Scientometrics 80 3 625 636 10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3 Search in Google Scholar

Huang, D.W. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329–335. HuangD.W. 2016 Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals Journal of Informetrics 10 2 329 335 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.002 Search in Google Scholar

Jin, B., & Wang, B. (1999). Chinese science citation database: its construction and application. Scientometrics, 45(2), 325–332. JinB. WangB. 1999 Chinese science citation database: its construction and application Scientometrics 45 2 325 332 10.1007/BF02458440 Search in Google Scholar

Price, D.D.S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 27(5), 292–306. PriceD.D.S. 1976 A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 27 5 292 306 10.1002/asi.4630270505 Search in Google Scholar

Ren, S.L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A citation data analysis of jcr-covered journals in geosciences. Journal of Library & Information Science, 45(7), 1017–1025. RenS.L. RousseauR. 2002 A citation data analysis of jcr-covered journals in geosciences Journal of Library & Information Science 45 7 1017 1025 Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, R. (2016). Positive correlation between journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 567–568. RousseauR. 2016 Positive correlation between journal production and journal impact factors Journal of Informetrics 10 2 567 568 10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.012 Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, R., & van Hooydonk, G. (1996). Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10), 775–780. RousseauR. van HooydonkG. 1996 Journal production and journal impact factors Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 10 775 780 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199610)47:10<775::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-# Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, R. (1988). Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In: Informetrics 87/88 (L. Egghe & R. Rousseau, eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 249–262. RousseauR. 1988 Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals In: Informetrics 87/88 EggheL. RousseauR. eds. Amsterdam Elsevier 249 262 Search in Google Scholar

Tague, J. (1981). The success-breeds-success phenomenon and bibliometric processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(4), 280–286. TagueJ. 1981 The success-breeds-success phenomenon and bibliometric processes Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 4 280 286 10.1002/asi.4630320408 Search in Google Scholar

Tsay, M.Y., & Ma, S.S. (2003). The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 56(2), 201–222. TsayM.Y. MaS.S. 2003 The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature Scientometrics 56 2 201 222 10.1023/A:1021915127459 Search in Google Scholar

Tchetchik, A., Grinstein, A., & Manes, E. (2015). From research to practice: which research strategy contributes more to clinical excellence? Comparing high-volume versus high-quality biomedical research. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0129259. TchetchikA. GrinsteinA. ManesE. 2015 From research to practice: which research strategy contributes more to clinical excellence? Comparing high-volume versus high-quality biomedical research PLOS ONE 10 6 e0129259 10.1371/journal.pone.0129259 Search in Google Scholar

van Hooydonk, G., Gevaert, R., & Milis-Proost, G. (1994). A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines. Scientometrics, 30(1), 65–81. van HooydonkG. GevaertR. Milis-ProostG. 1994 A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines Scientometrics 30 1 65 81 10.1007/BF02017213 Search in Google Scholar

van Raan, A.F.J. (2008). Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 461–475. van RaanA.F.J. 2008 Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 461 475 10.1002/asi.20761 Search in Google Scholar

van Raan, A.F.J. (2013). Universities scale like cities. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59384. van RaanA.F.J. 2013 Universities scale like cities PLOS ONE 8 3 e59384 10.1371/journal.pone.0059384 Search in Google Scholar