[1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, et al. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1123-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.053.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.05324491689]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Lahoz R, Fagan A, McSharry M, Proudfoot C, Corda S, Studer R. Recurrent heart failure hospitalizations are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure in Clinical Practice Research Datalink. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;10.1002/ehf2.12727. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12727.10.1002/ehf2.12727737393632383551]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147-239. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8807.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e880723741057]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46-e215. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.19266720019324]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Guglin M, Zucker MJ, Borlaug BA, et al. Evaluation for heart transplantation and LVAD Implantation: JACC council perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1471-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.034.10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.03432216916]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Goldstein DJ, Naka Y, Horstmanshof D, et al. Association of clinical outcomes with left ventricular assist device use by bridge to transplant or destination therapy intent: the multicenter study of MagLev technology in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:411-419. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323.10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323699074631939996]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lui C, Suarez-Pierre A, Zhou X, et al. Effects of systemic and device-related complications in patients bridged to transplantation with left ventricular assist devices. J Surg Res. 2020;246:207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.016.10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.01631605947]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Williams ML, Trivedi JR, McCants KC, et al. Heart transplant vs left ventricular assist device in heart transplant-eligible patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1330-1333. doi: 10.1016/j. athoracsur.2011.01.062.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.062]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Karason K, Lund LH, Dalen M, et al. Randomized trial of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy versus guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Rationale and design of the SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:739-750. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1773.10.1002/ejhf.177332100946]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Brandt EJ, Ross JS, Grady JN, et al. Impact of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplants on acute myocardial infarction and heart failure mortality and readmission measures. PloS one. 2020;15:e0230734. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0230734.10.1371/journal.pone.0230734]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Schramm R, Morshuis M, Schoenbrodt M, et al. Current perspectives on mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55(Suppl 1):i31-i37. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy444.10.1093/ejcts/ezy444652609830608535]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mariani S, Chatterjee A, Hanke JS, et al. Is this the right MOMENTUM? – evidence from a HeartMate 3 randomized trial. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:5626-5630. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.60.10.21037/jtd.2019.11.60698804132030285]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Schmitto JD, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, et al. Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:90-97. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1284.10.1002/ejhf.128430052304]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Mehra MR, Uriel N, Naka Y, et al. A fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device – final report. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1618-1627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486.10.1056/NEJMoa190048630883052]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Boruah P, Saqib N, Barooah J, Baruah D, Sharma P. Left Ventricular Assist Device: what the internist needs to know. A review of the literature. Cureus. 2019;11:e4399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4399.10.7759/cureus.4399655967631245189]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005.10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.00528942782]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kilic A, Acker MA, Atluri P. Dealing with surgical left ventricular assist device complications. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:2158-2164. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.64.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Olmsted RZ, Critsinelis A, Kurihara C, et al. Severe LVAD-related infections requiring surgical treatment: Incidence, predictors, effect on survival, and impact of device selection. J Card Surg. 2019;34:82-91. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13987.10.1111/jocs.1398730710496]Search in Google Scholar
[19. O'Horo JC, Abu Saleh OM, Stulak JM, Wilhelm MP, Baddour LM, Rizwan Sohail M. Left Ventricular Assist Device infections: a systematic review. ASAIO J. 2018;64:287-294. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000684.10.1097/MAT.0000000000000684592073729095732]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Rogers JG, Pagani FD, Tatooles AJ, et al. Intrapericardial left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:451-460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602954.10.1056/NEJMoa160295428146651]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1386-1395. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800866.10.1056/NEJMoa180086629526139]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Han JJ, Acker MA, Atluri P. Left ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2018;138:2841-2851. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035566.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.03556630565993]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Patel CB, Blue L, Cagliostro B, et al. Left ventricular assist systems and infection-related outcomes: A comprehensive analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;S1053-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.002.10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.00232276809]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Tam MC, Patel VN, Weinberg RL, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of FDG PET/CT in Suspected LVAD Infections: A Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc imaging. 2020;13:1191-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.024.10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.024698025731326483]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Leebeek FWG, Muslem R. Bleeding in critical care associated with left ventricular assist devices: pathophysiology, symptoms, and management. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019;2019:88-96. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2019000067.10.1182/hematology.2019000067691350231808855]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Molina TL, Krisl JC, Donahue KR, Varnado S. Gastrointestinal bleeding in left ventricular assist device: octreotide and other treatment modalities. ASAIO J. 2018;64:433-439. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000758.10.1097/MAT.000000000000075829406356]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Shah P, Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Bleeding and thrombosis associated with ventricular assist device therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1164-1173. doi: 10.1016/j. healun.2017.05.008.10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Uriel N. Therapeutic strategy for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist device. Circulation. 2018;82:2931-2938. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0883.10.1253/circj.CJ-18-088330369592]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Juricek C, Imamura T, Nguyen A, et al. Long-acting octreotide reduces the recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with a continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. J Card Fail. 2018;24:249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.01.011.10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.01.011589711629427603]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Namdaran P, Zikos TA, Pan JY, Banerjee D. Thalidomide use reduces risk of refractory gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2020;66:645-651. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001054.10.1097/MAT.000000000000105431425265]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Elder T, Raghavan A, Smith A, et al. Outcomes after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review of literature. World Neurosurgery. 2019;132:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.211.10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.21131493616]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Veasey TM, Floroff CK, Strout SE, et al. Evaluation of anticoagulation and nonsurgical major bleeding in recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2019;43:736-744. doi: 10.1111/aor.13456.10.1111/aor.1345630868618]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Scandroglio AM, Kaufmann F, Pieri M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment algorithm for blood flow obstructions in patients with left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2758-2768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.573.10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.57327282897]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Alnabelsi T, Shafii AE, Gurley JC, Dulnuan K, Harris DD, 2nd, Guglin M. Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Obstruction: A Complication Specific to Polytetrafluoroethylene Covering. A Word of Caution! ASAIO J. 2019;65:e58-e62. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000929.10.1097/MAT.000000000000092930575627]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Maltais S, Kilic A, Nathan S, et al. PREVENtion of HeartMate II Pump Thrombosis Through Clinical Management: The PREVENT multi-center study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.10.001.10.1016/j.healun.2016.10.00127865732]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Sato T, Fujino T, Higo T, et al. Flow pattern of outflow graft is useful for detecting pump thrombosis in a patient with left ventricular assist device. Int Heart J. 2019;60:994-997. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-600.10.1536/ihj.18-60031257336]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Hurst TE, Xanthopoulos A, Ehrlinger J, et al. Dynamic prediction of left ventricular assist device pump thrombosis based on lactate dehydrogenase trends. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6:1005-1014. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12473.10.1002/ehf2.12473681606331318170]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Ferrera C, Gonzalez Fernandez O, Bouzas N, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is related to thrombotic complications and survival in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2020;66:199-204. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000971.10.1097/MAT.000000000000097130913104]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Usman MS, Ahmed S, Yamani N, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative atrial fibrillation on outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.038.10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.03831047654]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Ono M, et al. Implication of preoperative existence of atrial fibrillation on hemocompatibility-related adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. Circulation. 2019;83:1286-1292. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1215.10.1253/circj.CJ-18-121531019163]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Gordon JS, Maynes EJ, Choi JH, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review. Artif Organs. 2020;10.1111/aor.13665. doi: 10.1111/aor.13665.10.1111/aor.1366532043582]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Grinstein J, Garan AR, Oesterle A, et al. Increased rate of pump thrombosis and cardioembolic events following ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients supported with left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2020;10.1097/MAT.0000000000001155. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001155.10.1097/MAT.000000000000115533136600]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Saeed O, Colombo PC, Mehra MR, et al. Effect of aspirin dose on hemocompatibility-related outcomes with a magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device: An analysis from the MOMENTUM 3 study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:518-525. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.001.10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.001765030432340871]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Imamura T, Narang N, Kim G, et al. Decoupling between diastolic pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures is associated with right ventricular dysfunction and hemocompatibility-related adverse events in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e014801. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014801.10.1161/JAHA.119.014801742862432223394]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Myers SL, Pagani FD, Colombo PC. Quantifying the impact from stroke during support with continuous flow ventricular assist devices: An STS INTERMACS analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020; S1053-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.04.006.10.1016/j.healun.2020.04.00632376278]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Lanfear AT, Hamandi M, Fan J, DiMaio JM, George TJ. Trends in HeartMate 3: What we know so far. J Card Surg. 2020;35:180-187. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14319.10.1111/jocs.1431931692113]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Cho SM, Starling RC, Teuteberg J, et al. Understanding risk factors and predictors for stroke subtypes in the ENDURANCE trials. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;S1053-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.1330.10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.133032044205]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Cho SM, Moazami N, Katz S, Bhimraj A, Shrestha NK, Frontera JA. Stroke risk following infection in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Neurocrit Care. 2019;31:72-80. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0662-1.10.1007/s12028-018-0662-130644037]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Hassett CE, Cho SM, Rice CJ, et al. Cerebral microembolization in left ventricular assist device associated ischemic events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29:104660. doi: 10.1016/j. jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104660.10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104660]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Vieira JL, Pfeffer M, Claggett BL, et al. The impact of statin therapy on neurological events following left ventricular assist system implantation in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:582-592. doi: 10.1016/j. healun.2020.02.017.10.1016/j.healun.2020.02.017]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Imamura T, Narang N, Kim G, et al. Aortic Insufficiency during HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: AI in HeartMate 3. J Card Fail. 2020;S1071-9164. doi: 10.1016/j. cardfail.2020.05.013.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Kagawa H, Aranda-Michel E, Kormos RL, et al. Aortic insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation: predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; S0003-4975. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.030.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.03031991135]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Imamura T, Kim G, Nitta D, et al. Aortic insufficiency and hemocompatibility-related adverse events in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Card Fail. 2019;25:787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.003.10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.003682312431419485]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Goodwin ML, Bobba CM, Mokadam NA, et al. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices and the aortic valve: interactions, issues, and surgical therapy. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020;10.1007/s11897-020-00464-0. doi: 10.1007/s11897-020-00464-0.10.1007/s11897-020-00464-032488504]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Kar B, Prathipati P, Jumean M, Nathan SS, Gregoric ID. Management of aortic insufficiency using transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular assist device support. ASAIO J. 2020;66:e82-e6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001053.10.1097/MAT.000000000000105331425270]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Yehya A, Rajagopal V, Meduri C, et al. Short-term results with transcatheter aortic valve replacement for treatment of left ventricular assist device patients with symptomatic aortic insufficiency. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:920-926. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.001.10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.00130898555]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:141-156. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.004.10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.00423352390]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Movahedi F, Kormos RL, Lohmueller L, et al. Sequential pattern mining of longitudinal adverse events after Left Ventricular Assist Device implant. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019;24:2347-2358. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2958714.10.1109/JBHI.2019.2958714846252531831453]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Kilic A, Seese L, Pagani F, Kormos R. Identifying temporal relationships between in-hospital adverse events after implantation of durable left ventricular assist devices. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015449. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015449.10.1161/JAHA.119.015449742853432285751]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Jiritano F, Coco VL, Matteucci M, Fina D, Willers A, Lorusso R. Temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2020;6:1-7. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.02.10.15420/cfr.2019.02711130332257388]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Crowley J, Cronin B, Essandoh M, D'Alessandro D, Shelton K, Dalia AA. Transesophageal echocardiography for Impella placement and management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33:2663-2668. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.048.10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.04830770179]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Monteagudo-Vela M, Simon A, Riesgo Gil F, et al. Clinical indications of IMPELLA short-term mechanical circulatory support in a tertiary Centre. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2020;21:629-637. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.010.10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.01031859100]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Maniuc O, Salinger T, Anders F, et al. Impella CP use in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6:863-866. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12446.10.1002/ehf2.12446667628031095902]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Johannsen L, Mahabadi AA, Totzeck M, et al. Access site complications following Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54277-w.10.1038/s41598-019-54277-w688283431780769]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Elkayam U, Schäfer A, Chieffo A, et al. Use of Impella heart pump for management of women with peripartum cardiogenic shock. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42:974-981. doi: 10.1002/clc.23249.10.1002/clc.23249678847331436333]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Wernly B, Seelmaier C, Leistner D, et al. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock – a critical appraisal of current data. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108:1249-1257. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01458-2.10.1007/s00392-019-01458-230900010]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Rohm CL, Gadidov B, Leitson M, Ray HE, Prasad R. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of acute severe cardiogenic shock treated with the Impella device. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.039.10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.03931262498]Search in Google Scholar