This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ahmed, U. (2019), The importance of Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation in an Era of Digital Trade, World Trade Review, Vol. 18, No. S1 (Digital Trade), pp. 99–120.AhmedU.2019The importance of Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation in an Era of Digital Trade18S1(Digital Trade),9912010.1017/S1474745618000514Search in Google Scholar
Agreement between the United States of America and Japan concerning digital trade (2019), accessible at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/japan/Agreement_between_the_United_States_and_Japan_concerning_Digital_Trade.pdf (22 October 2020).2019accessible at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/japan/Agreement_between_the_United_States_and_Japan_concerning_Digital_Trade.pdf (22 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (2019), accessible at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/agreement-between (22 September 2020).2019accessible at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/agreement-between (22 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Banga, R. (2019), Growing trade in electronic transmissions: Implications for the South, UNCTAD Research Paper No. 29, accessible: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ser-rp-2019d1_en.pdf (22 October 2020).BangaR.2019accessible: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ser-rp-2019d1_en.pdf (22 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Chander, A. (2019), The Internet of Things: Both goods and services, World Trade Review, Vol. 18, No. S1 (Digital Trade), pp. 9–22.ChanderA.2019The Internet of Things: Both goods and services18S1(Digital Trade),92210.1017/S1474745619000089Search in Google Scholar
China – Publications and Audiovisual Products (2009), Panel Report, China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363/R (adopted 12 August 2009); Appellate Body Report (2009) WT/DS363/AB/R (adopted 21 December 2009).China – Publications and Audiovisual Products2009Search in Google Scholar
Ciuriak, D., Ptashina, M. (2018), The Digital Transformation and the Transformation of International Trade, accessible at: https://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/RTA-Exchange-Digital-Trade-Ciuriak-and-Ptashkina-Final.pdf (15 October 2020).CiuriakD.PtashinaM.2018accessible at: https://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/RTA-Exchange-Digital-Trade-Ciuriak-and-Ptashkina-Final.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Commission (2015), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, COM/2015/0192 final.Commission2015Search in Google Scholar
Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, OJ L 11, 14.1.2017.Search in Google Scholar
Costa-Cabral, F., Lynskey, O., (2017), Family ties: The intersection between data protection and competition in EU law, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 11–50.Costa-CabralF.LynskeyO.2017Family ties: The intersection between data protection and competition in EU law541115010.54648/COLA2017002Search in Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 130/92, 17.5.2019.Search in Google Scholar
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), OJ L 108, 24.04.2002.Search in Google Scholar
Economics and Statistics Administration and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2016), Measuring the Value of Cross-Border Data Flows, accessible at: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/measuring_cross_border_data_flows.pdf (15 October 2020).Economics and Statistics Administration and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration2016accessible at: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/measuring_cross_border_data_flows.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission (2020a), Communication Shaping Europe's digital future, COM(2020) 67, 19.02.2020.European Commission2020aCOM(2020) 67, 19.02.2020.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission (2020b), Communication A European strategy for data COM(2020) 66, 19.02.2020.European Commission2020bCOM(2020) 66, 19.02.2020.Search in Google Scholar
European Union (2019), Joint Statement on electronic commerce, EU Proposal for WTO Disciplines and Commitments Relating to Electronic Commerce, Communication from the European Union, INF/ECOM/22, 26.04.2019.European Union2019INF/ECOM/22, 26.04.2019.Search in Google Scholar
Eurostat Digital Economy and Society Index, as visualized by DESI DELab app, accessible at: https://desi.delabapps.eu (29 March 2021)accessible at: https://desi.delabapps.eu (29 March 2021)Search in Google Scholar
Ferencz, J. (2019) The OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 221, OECD Publishing, Paris.FerenczJ.2019OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 221,OECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
Ferencz, J., Gonzales, F. (2019) Barriers to trade in digitally enabled services in the G20, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 232, OECD Publishing, Paris.FerenczJ.GonzalesF.2019OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 232,OECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
Ford, C. (2017), Technology and production fragmentation: Domestic versus Foreign Sourcing, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 650–687.FordC.2017Technology and production fragmentation: Domestic versus Foreign Sourcing842650687Search in Google Scholar
Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, OJ L 127, 14.5.2011.Search in Google Scholar
Free trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore, OJ L 267, 25.10.2018.Search in Google Scholar
Horn, B., Mavroidis P., Sapir, A. (2009), Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements, The World Economy, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1565–1588.HornB.MavroidisP.SapirA.2009Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements33111565158810.1002/9781444343991.ch8Search in Google Scholar
International Trade Centre (2016), Bringing SMEs onto the e-Commerce Highway, International Trade Centre, Palais des Nations, Switzerland, XIII, accessible at: http://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/Bringing%20SMEs%20onto%20the%20e-Commerce%20Highway_final_250516_Low-res.pdf (15 October 2020).International Trade Centre2016accessible at: http://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/Bringing%20SMEs%20onto%20the%20e-Commerce%20Highway_final_250516_Low-res.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Lee, K.F. (2018), AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.LeeK.F.2018Houghton Mifflin HarcourtNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
López González, J., Ferencz, J. (2018), Digital Trade and Market Openness, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 217, OECD Publishing, Paris.López GonzálezJ.FerenczJ.2018OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 217,OECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
MacKinsey Global Institute (2016), Digital Globalization: the New Era of Global Flows, accessible at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows (15 October 2020).MacKinsey Global Institute2016accessible at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Maxwell, W., Bourreau M. (2014), Technology neutrality in Internet, Telecoms and Data Protection Regulation, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, accessible at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2529680 (15 October 2020).MaxwellW.BourreauM.2014Technology neutrality in Internet, Telecoms and Data Protection Regulationaccessible at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2529680 (15 October 2020).10.2139/ssrn.2529680Search in Google Scholar
Mazur, J., Śledziewska, K., Zięba, D. (2018), Regulation of Geo-blocking: does it address the problem of low intraEU iTrade?, Working Papers from Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, accessible at: https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/files/6415/3933/3486/WNE_WP279.pdf (15 October 2020).MazurJ.ŚledziewskaK.ZiębaD.2018Working Papers from Faculty of Economic Sciences,University of Warsawaccessible at: https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/files/6415/3933/3486/WNE_WP279.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Mexico – Telecoms, (2004) Panel Report, Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services, WT/DS204/R, (adopted 2 April 2004).Mexico – Telecoms2004WT/DS204/R, (adopted 2 April 2004).Search in Google Scholar
Monteiro, J.-A., Teh, R. (2017), Provisions on electronic commerce in regional trade agreements, WTO Staff Working Paper: No. ERSD-2017-11, accessible at: http://dx.doi.org/10.30875/82592628-en (15 October 2020).MonteiroJ.-A.TehR.2017WTO Staff Working Paper: No. ERSD-2017-11, accessible at: http://dx.doi.org/10.30875/82592628-en (15 October 2020).10.30875/82592628-enSearch in Google Scholar
Neeraj, R.S. (2019) Trade Rules for the Digital Economy: Charting New Waters at the WTO, World Trade Review, Vol. 18, No. S1 (Digital Trade), pp. 121–141.NeerajR.S.2019Trade Rules for the Digital Economy: Charting New Waters at the WTO18S1(Digital Trade),12114110.1017/S1474745618000423Search in Google Scholar
OECD (2019a), Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing, Paris.OECD2019aOECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
OECD (2019b), Unpacking E-Commerce: Business Models, Trends and Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris.OECD2019bOECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
OECD (2021), OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index: Policy trends up to 2021, accessible at: https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/oecd-stri-policy-trends-2021?fr=sMGVlMjI5ODk2NDE (11 February 2021).OECD2021accessible at: https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/oecd-stri-policy-trends-2021?fr=sMGVlMjI5ODk2NDE (11 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Sen, N. (2018), Understanding the role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path? Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 323–348.SenN.2018Understanding the role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path?21232334810.1093/jiel/jgy021Search in Google Scholar
Śledziewska K, Włoch R. (2020), Gospodarka cyfrowa. Jak nowe technologie zmieniają świat, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.ŚledziewskaKWłochR.2020Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu WarszawskiegoWarszawa10.31338/uw.9788323541943Search in Google Scholar
Śledziewska, K., Pugacewicz, A., Sobolewski, M., Gyódi, K., Okoń, B., Ziembiński, M. (2016), Analysis of the geo-blocking mechanism in the context of price differentiation in cross-border e-commerce in the European Union. Poland's Perspective Expert Opinion Commissioned by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, accessible at: http://www.delab.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ANALYSIS-OF-THE-GEO-BLOCKING-MECHANISM.docx.pdf (15 October 2020).ŚledziewskaK.PugacewiczA.SobolewskiM.GyódiK.OkońB.ZiembińskiM.2016Analysis of the geo-blocking mechanism in the context of price differentiation in cross-border e-commerce in the European Unionaccessible at: http://www.delab.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ANALYSIS-OF-THE-GEO-BLOCKING-MECHANISM.docx.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Słok-Wódkowska, M. (2016), The Architecture of the EU Regional Trade Agreements – Are They Still About Trade, in: J. Nowakowska-Małusecka, (Ed), New Challenges for International Organizations, Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice, pp. 134–145.Słok-WódkowskaM.2016The Architecture of the EU Regional Trade Agreements – Are They Still About Tradein:Nowakowska-MałuseckaJ.(Ed),Uniwersytet ŚląskiKatowice134145Search in Google Scholar
Słok-Wódkowska, M. (2017), Chapter 2: Regional Trade Agreements of the EU and the US – What is a Common Ground?’, in: E. Czarny, A. Kuźnar, J. Menkes, (Eds), The Impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership on International Cooperation, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main-Bern-Berlin-Bruxelles-New York-Oxford-Warszawa-Wien, pp. 34–53.Słok-WódkowskaM.2017Chapter 2: Regional Trade Agreements of the EU and the US – What is a Common Ground?’in:CzarnyE.KuźnarA.MenkesJ.(Eds),Peter LangFrankfurt am Main-Bern-Berlin-Bruxelles-New York-Oxford-Warszawa-Wien3453Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade And Development (2017), The «New» Digital Economy And Development, UNCTAD Technical Notes on ICT for Development N°8, accessible at: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tn_unctad_ict4d08_en.pdf (15 October 2020).United Nations Conference on Trade And Development2017accessible at: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tn_unctad_ict4d08_en.pdf (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
US – Gambling (2004), Panel Report, United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services, WT/DS285/R, (adopted 10 November 2004); Appellate Body Report (2005) WT/DS285/AB/R, (adopted 7 April 2005).US – Gambling2004WT/DS285/R, (adopted 10 November 2004); Appellate Body Report (2005) WT/DS285/AB/R, (adopted 7 April 2005).Search in Google Scholar
World Customs Organization (2018), Cross-Border E-commerce: Framework of Standards, accessible at: http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/ecommerce/wco-framework-of-standards-on-crossborder-ecommerce_en.pdf?la=en (15 October 2020).World Customs Organization2018accessible at: http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/ecommerce/wco-framework-of-standards-on-crossborder-ecommerce_en.pdf?la=en (15 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar
WTO (1998a), Ministerial Declaration: Declaration On Global Electronic Commerce Adopted on 20 May 1998, WT/MIN(98)/DEC/2.WTO1998aSearch in Google Scholar
WTO (1998b) Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, Adopted by the General Council on 25 September 1998, WT/L/274.WTO1998bSearch in Google Scholar
WTO (1999) Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, Progress Report to the General Council, Adopted by the Council for Trade in Services on 19 July 1999, S/L/74.WTO1999Search in Google Scholar
Yakovleva S. (2020), Privacy Protection(ism): The Latest Wave of Trade Constraints on Regulatory Autonomy, University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 74, pp. 416–519.YakovlevaS.2020Privacy Protection(ism): The Latest Wave of Trade Constraints on Regulatory Autonomy74416519Search in Google Scholar