Is a Board of Directors a Team?

Altman, W. (2007). ‘Executive coaching comes of age’. Engineering Management, 17(5), 26–29. AltmanW. 2007 ‘Executive coaching comes of age’ Engineering Management 17 5 26 29 10.1049/em:20070506 Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A. and Drasgow, F. (2000). ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269. ArnoldJ.A. AradS. RhoadesJ.A. DrasgowF. 2000 ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’ Journal of Organizational Behavior 21 3 249 269 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-# Search in Google Scholar

Balafas, N. and Florackis, C. (2014). ‘CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange’. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27, 97–115. BalafasN. FlorackisC. 2014 ‘CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange’ Journal of Empirical Finance 27 97 115 10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.10.011 Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, T.J. (2000). ‘Gestalt in the boardroom’. Gestalt Review, 4(3), 176–193. BentleyT.J. 2000 ‘Gestalt in the boardroom’ Gestalt Review 4 3 176 193 10.5325/gestaltreview.4.3.0176 Search in Google Scholar

Blair, M.M. and Stout, L.A. (1999). ‘A team production theory of corporate law’. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247–328. BlairM.M. StoutL.A. 1999 ‘A team production theory of corporate law’ Virginia Law Review 85 2 247 328 10.4324/9781315574288-6 Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, N. (2006). ‘Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap?’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577–593. BrennanN. 2006 ‘Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap?’ Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 6 577 593 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00534.x Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, N.M., Kirwan, C.E. and Redmond, J. (2016). ‘Accountability processes in boardrooms: A conceptual model of manager-non-executive director information asymmetry’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 135–164. BrennanN.M. KirwanC.E. RedmondJ. 2016 ‘Accountability processes in boardrooms: A conceptual model of manager-non-executive director information asymmetry’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 29 1 135 164 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1505 Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, N. and McDermott, M. (2004). ‘Alternative perspectives on independence of directors’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 325–336. BrennanN. McDermottM. 2004 ‘Alternative perspectives on independence of directors’ Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 3 325 336 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00373.x Search in Google Scholar

Buchan, P.B. (1981). ‘Boards of directors: Adversaries or advisers’. California Management Review, 24(2), 31–39. BuchanP.B. 1981 ‘Boards of directors: Adversaries or advisers’ California Management Review 24 2 31 39 10.2307/41164953 Search in Google Scholar

Carter, C.B. and Lorsch, J.W. (2004). Back to the Drawing Board. Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. CarterC.B. LorschJ.W. 2004 Back to the Drawing Board. Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World Boston, MA Harvard Business School Press Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, J.Y.J., Groysberg, B., Healy, P. and Vijayaraghavan, R. (2021). ‘Directors’ perceptions of board effectiveness and internal operations’. Management Science, 67(10), 6399–6420. ChengJ.Y.J. GroysbergB. HealyP. VijayaraghavanR. 2021 ‘Directors’ perceptions of board effectiveness and internal operations’ Management Science 67 10 6399 6420 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3789 Search in Google Scholar

Clutterbuck, D. (2013). ‘Time to focus coaching on the team’. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(1), 18–22 ClutterbuckD. 2013 ‘Time to focus coaching on the team’ Industrial and Commercial Training 45 1 18 22 10.1108/00197851311296665 Search in Google Scholar

Clutterbuck, D. and Hirst, S. (2012). Talking Business: Making Communication Work. Oxford: Butterworth Heinmann. ClutterbuckD. HirstS. 2012 Talking Business: Making Communication Work Oxford Butterworth Heinmann 10.4324/9780080518428 Search in Google Scholar

Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D. and Naveen, L. (2020). ‘Director overlap: Groupthink versus teamwork’. Available at SSRN 3650609. ColesJ.L. DanielN.D. NaveenL. 2020 ‘Director overlap: Groupthink versus teamwork’ Available at SSRN 3650609 10.2139/ssrn.3650609 Search in Google Scholar

Conger, J., Lawler, E. and Finegold, D. (2001). Corporate Boards: New Strategies for Adding Value at the Top, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. CongerJ. LawlerE. FinegoldD. 2001 Corporate Boards: New Strategies for Adding Value at the Top San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass Search in Google Scholar

Coulson-Thomas, C. (1994). ‘Harnessing the board's potential’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2(3), 135–135. Coulson-ThomasC. 1994 ‘Harnessing the board's potential’ Corporate Governance: An International Review 2 3 135 135 10.1111/j.1467-8683.1994.tb00069.x Search in Google Scholar

Coulson-Thomas, C. (2018). ‘Teamwork, motivation, complexity and the board’. Effective Executive, 21(4), 56–69. Coulson-ThomasC. 2018 ‘Teamwork, motivation, complexity and the board’ Effective Executive 21 4 56 69 Search in Google Scholar

Currall, S.C., Hammer, T.H., Baggett, L.S. and Doniger, G.M. (1999). ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors’. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 5–36. CurrallS.C. HammerT.H. BaggettL.S. DonigerG.M. 1999 ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors’ Organizational Research Methods 2 1 5 36 10.1177/109442819921002 Search in Google Scholar

Derdowski, L., Øgaard, T., Marnburg, E. and Mathisen, G.E. (2018). ‘Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: An elusive role of task-related conflicts’. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(4), 1045–1069. DerdowskiL. ØgaardT. MarnburgE. MathisenG.E. 2018 ‘Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: An elusive role of task-related conflicts’ Journal of Management and Governance 22 4 1045 1069 10.1007/s10997-018-9419-7 Search in Google Scholar

Drew, S. and Coulson-Thomas, C. (1996). ‘Transformation through teamwork: The path to the new organization?’. Management Decision, 34(1), 7–17. DrewS. Coulson-ThomasC. 1996 ‘Transformation through teamwork: The path to the new organization?’ Management Decision 34 1 7 17 10.1108/00251749610106927 Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1999). ‘Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. EdmondsonA. 1999 ‘Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams’ Administrative Science Quarterly 44 2 350 383 10.2307/2666999 Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A.C. (2012). Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. EdmondsonA.C. 2012 Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass Search in Google Scholar

Farmer, S. (2015). ‘Making sense of team coaching’. The Coaching Psychologist, 11(2), 72–80. FarmerS. 2015 ‘Making sense of team coaching’ The Coaching Psychologist 11 2 72 80 10.53841/bpstcp.2015.11.2.72 Search in Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S. (1992). ‘Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538. FinkelsteinS. 1992 ‘Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’ Academy of Management Journal 35 3 505 538 10.2307/256485 Search in Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S. and Mooney, A.C. (2003). ‘Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better’. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113. FinkelsteinS. MooneyA.C. 2003 ‘Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better’ Academy of Management Executive 17 2 101 113 10.5465/ame.2003.10025204 Search in Google Scholar

Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. (1999). ‘Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. ForbesD.P. MillikenF.J. 1999 ‘Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’ Academy of Management Review 24 3 489 505 10.4324/9780203888711.ch9 Search in Google Scholar

Francoeur, C., Aubé, C., Sponem, S. and Farzaneh, F. (2018). ‘What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?’. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(5–6), 250–264. FrancoeurC. AubéC. SponemS. FarzanehF. 2018 ‘What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?’ Team Performance Management: An International Journal 24 5–6 250 264 10.1108/TPM-07-2017-0033 Search in Google Scholar

Froud, J., Leaver, A., Tampubolon, G. and Williams, K. (2008). ‘Everything for sale: How non-executive directors make a difference’. The Sociological Review, 56(1_suppl), 162–186. FroudJ. LeaverA. TampubolonG. WilliamsK. 2008 ‘Everything for sale: How non-executive directors make a difference’ The Sociological Review 56 1_suppl 162 186 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00767.x Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1st ed. New York, NY: Anchor Books. GoffmanE. 1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life 1st ed New York, NY Anchor Books Search in Google Scholar

Greenwald, J. (2001). ‘Rank and fire. Attrition isn’t working so best-to-worst grading is gaining – and those at the bottom get the boot’. Time, 18 June 2001. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1000119,00.html. Accessed 21 June 2021. GreenwaldJ. 2001 ‘Rank and fire. Attrition isn’t working so best-to-worst grading is gaining – and those at the bottom get the boot’ Time 18 June 2001. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1000119,00.html. Accessed 21 June 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D.C. (1981). ‘Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 253–275. HambrickD.C. 1981 ‘Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams’ Administrative Science Quarterly 26 2 253 275 10.2307/2392472 Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. (2017). Leadership Team Coaching: Developing Collective Transformational Leadership, third edition. London: Kogan Page Publishers. HawkinsP. 2017 Leadership Team Coaching: Developing Collective Transformational Leadership third edition London Kogan Page Publishers Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. and Hogan, A. (2014). ‘Coaching the board: How coaching boards is different from coaching executive teams’, In P. Hawkins (ed) Leadership Team Coaching in Practice,. London: Kogan Page Publishers, 171–187. HawkinsP. HoganA. 2014 ‘Coaching the board: How coaching boards is different from coaching executive teams’ In HawkinsP. (ed) Leadership Team Coaching in Practice London Kogan Page Publishers 171 187 Search in Google Scholar

Heemskerk, E.M., Heemskerk, K. and Wats, M.M. (2017). ‘Conflict in the boardroom: A participant observation study of supervisory board dynamics’. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(1), 233–263. HeemskerkE.M. HeemskerkK. WatsM.M. 2017 ‘Conflict in the boardroom: A participant observation study of supervisory board dynamics’ Journal of Management & Governance 21 1 233 263 10.1007/s10997-015-9339-8 Search in Google Scholar

Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N., Moore, P., Morais, F. and Goyal, R. (2017). Conflict and Tension in the Boardroom. London: Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators. KakabadseA. KakabadseN. MooreP. MoraisF. GoyalR. 2017 Conflict and Tension in the Boardroom London Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators Search in Google Scholar

Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (2008). The Discipline of Teams. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business Press. KatzenbachJ.R. SmithD.K. 2008 The Discipline of Teams Harvard, MA Harvard Business Press Search in Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. and Ilgen, D. (2006). ‘Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams’. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. KozlowskiS. IlgenD. 2006 ‘Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams’ Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 3 77 124 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x Search in Google Scholar

Levrau, A.. (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: A Qualitative-Orientated Inquiry into the Determinants of Board Effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent. LevrauA. 2007 Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: A Qualitative-Orientated Inquiry into the Determinants of Board Effectiveness Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent. Search in Google Scholar

Li, J. and Hambrick, D.C. (2005). ‘Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams’. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813. LiJ. HambrickD.C. 2005 ‘Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams’ Academy of Management Journal 48 5 794 813 10.5465/amj.2005.18803923 Search in Google Scholar

Lindon-Travers, K. (1990). Non-Executive Directors: A Guide to their Role, Responsibilities and Appointment, London: Director Books. Lindon-TraversK. 1990 Non-Executive Directors: A Guide to their Role, Responsibilities and Appointment London Director Books Search in Google Scholar

Maharaj, R. (2009). ‘View from the top: What directors say about board process’. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(3), 326–337. MaharajR. 2009 ‘View from the top: What directors say about board process’ Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 9 3 326 337 10.1108/14720700910964370 Search in Google Scholar

Marriage, M. and Beioley, K. (2019). ‘Patisserie Valerie report talks of fake invoices and ledgers’. Financial Times, 25 January 2019. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/657dd1c8-1feb-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65 [accessed 29.11.2020]. MarriageM. BeioleyK. 2019 ‘Patisserie Valerie report talks of fake invoices and ledgers’ Financial Times 25 January 2019. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/657dd1c8-1feb-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65 [accessed 29.11.2020]. Search in Google Scholar

McGuinness, P.B. (2019). ‘Beyond the board realm: Women in senior management and their impact on IPO capital funding’. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 389–414. McGuinnessP.B. 2019 ‘Beyond the board realm: Women in senior management and their impact on IPO capital funding’ British Journal of Management 30 2 389 414 10.1111/1467-8551.12303 Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, S.A. and McIntyre, M.L. (2007). ‘Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective’. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 209–224. MurphyS.A. McIntyreM.L. 2007 ‘Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective’ Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 7 2 209 224 10.1108/14720700710739831 Search in Google Scholar

Nadler, D.A. (2004). ‘Building better boards’. Harvard Business Review, 82(5), 102–111. NadlerD.A. 2004 ‘Building better boards’ Harvard Business Review 82 5 102 111 Search in Google Scholar

Nadler D.A., Behan B.A. and Nadler M.B. (2006). Building Better Boards. A Blueprint for Effective Governance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. NadlerD.A. BehanB.A. NadlerM.B. 2006 Building Better Boards. A Blueprint for Effective Governance San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, G., Newton, C. and McGregor-Lowndes, M. (2012). ‘The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights’. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 461–481. NicholsonG. NewtonC. McGregor-LowndesM. 2012 ‘The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights’ Nonprofit Management and Leadership 22 4 461 481 10.1002/nml.21040 Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, G., Pugliese, A., and Bezemer, P.-J. (2017). ‘Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: How boards balance control and collaboration’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 222–246. NicholsonG. PuglieseA. BezemerP.-J. 2017 ‘Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: How boards balance control and collaboration’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30 2 222 246 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2143 Search in Google Scholar

Ogunseyin, M.A., Farquhar, S.S. and Machold, S. (2019). ‘The determinants of trust in the boardroom’, In J. Gabrielsson, W. Khlif, and S. Yamak (eds) Research Handbook on Boards of Directors, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 49–75. OgunseyinM.A. FarquharS.S. MacholdS. 2019 ‘The determinants of trust in the boardroom’ In GabrielssonJ. KhlifW. YamakS. (eds) Research Handbook on Boards of Directors Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar Publishing 49 75 10.4337/9781786439758.00011 Search in Google Scholar

Pastra, A., Koufopoulos, D.N., Samac, N. and Johansson, T. (2021). ‘Behavioral integration in the boardroom’. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 27(3–4), 260–277. PastraA. KoufopoulosD.N. SamacN. JohanssonT. 2021 ‘Behavioral integration in the boardroom’ Team Performance Management: An International Journal 27 3–4 260 277 10.1108/TPM-07-2020-0058 Search in Google Scholar

Payne, T.G., Benson, G.S. and Finegold, D.L. (2009). ‘Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance’. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731. PayneT.G. BensonG.S. FinegoldD.L. 2009 ‘Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance’ Journal of Management Studies 46 4 704 731 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00819.x Search in Google Scholar

Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021a). ‘Challenge in the boardroom: Director-manager question-and-answer interactions at board meetings’. Working paper, University College Dublin. PerneletH.R. BrennanN.M. 2021a ‘Challenge in the boardroom: Director-manager question-and-answer interactions at board meetings’ Working paper, University College Dublin. 10.1111/corg.12492 Search in Google Scholar

Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021b). ‘Impression management at board meetings: Interactions in public and in private’. Working paper, University College Dublin. PerneletH.R. BrennanN.M. 2021b ‘Impression management at board meetings: Interactions in public and in private’ Working paper, University College Dublin. Search in Google Scholar

Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021c). ‘Boards of directors performing governance: A dramaturgical analysis’. Working paper, University College Dublin. PerneletH.R. BrennanN.M. 2021c ‘Boards of directors performing governance: A dramaturgical analysis’ Working paper, University College Dublin. Search in Google Scholar

Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G. and Bezemer, P.-J. (2015). ‘An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness’. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1–25. PuglieseA. NicholsonG. BezemerP.-J. 2015 ‘An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness’ British Journal of Management 26 1 1 25 10.1111/1467-8551.12074 Search in Google Scholar

Pugliese, A. and Zattoni, A. (2012). ‘Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy and innovation’, In T. Clarke and D. Branson (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance, London: Sage, 217–232. PuglieseA. ZattoniA. 2012 ‘Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy and innovation’ In ClarkeT. BransonD. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance London Sage 217 232 10.4135/9781446200995.n11 Search in Google Scholar

Rink, F., de Waal, M., Veltrop, D.B. and Stoker, J.I. (2021). ‘Managing C-suite conflict: The unique impact of internal and external governance interfaces on top management team reflexivity’. Long Range Planning, 102121, in press. RinkF. de WaalM. VeltropD.B. StokerJ.I. 2021 ‘Managing C-suite conflict: The unique impact of internal and external governance interfaces on top management team reflexivity’ Long Range Planning 102121 in press. 10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102121 Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, J. (2002). ‘Building the complementary board. The work of the plc chairman’. Long Range Planning, 35(5), 493–520. RobertsJ. 2002 ‘Building the complementary board. The work of the plc chairman’ Long Range Planning 35 5 493 520 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00106-1 Search in Google Scholar

Shekshnia, S. (2018). ‘How to be a good board chair’. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 96–105. ShekshniaS. 2018 ‘How to be a good board chair’ Harvard Business Review 96 2 96 105 Search in Google Scholar

Smith, W.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2011). ‘Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing’. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. SmithW.K. LewisM.W. 2011 ‘Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing’ Academy of Management Review 36 2 381 403 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958 Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2002). ‘What makes great boards great. It's not the rules and regulations. It's the way people work together’. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 106–113. SonnenfeldJ.A. 2002 ‘What makes great boards great. It's not the rules and regulations. It's the way people work together’ Harvard Business Review 80 9 106 113 Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenfeld, J. (2004). ‘Good governance and the misleading myths of bad metrics’. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 108–113 SonnenfeldJ. 2004 ‘Good governance and the misleading myths of bad metrics’ Academy of Management Perspectives 18 1 108 113 10.5465/ame.2004.12689497 Search in Google Scholar

Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415. SundaramurthyC. LewisM. 2003 Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance Academy of Management Review 28 3 397 415 10.5465/amr.2003.10196737 Search in Google Scholar

(The) Financial Reporting Council (2018). UK Corporate Governance Code. London, FRC. (The) Financial Reporting Council 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code London FRC Search in Google Scholar

Tricker, R.I. (2019) Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices, 4^th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. TrickerR.I. 2019 Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices 4th edition Oxford Oxford University Press 10.4324/9781315191157 Search in Google Scholar

Tusa, J. (2020). On Board. The Insider's Guide to Surviving Life in the Boardroom. London: Bloomsbury. TusaJ. 2020 On Board. The Insider's Guide to Surviving Life in the Boardroom London Bloomsbury Search in Google Scholar

Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F. and Bammens, Y. (2011). ‘Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom’. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403–420. VandewaerdeM. VoordeckersW. LambrechtsF. BammensY. 2011 ‘Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom’ Journal of Business Ethics 104 3 403 420 10.1007/s10551-011-0918-6 Search in Google Scholar

Veltrop, D.B., Bezemer, P.-J., Nicholson, G. and Pugliese, A. (2021). ‘Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring’. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 207–234. VeltropD.B. BezemerP.-J. NicholsonG. PuglieseA. 2021 ‘Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring’ Academy of Management Journal 64 1 207 234 10.5465/amj.2017.1256 Search in Google Scholar

Wageman, R., Hackman, J.R. and Lehman, E. (2005). ‘Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 373–398. WagemanR. HackmanJ.R. LehmanE. 2005 ‘Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument’ The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41 4 373 398 10.1177/0021886305281984 Search in Google Scholar

Wildenauer, M. (2015). ‘Towards a team approach to understanding board effectiveness’. Journal of Law and Governance, 10(1), 37–51. WildenauerM. 2015 ‘Towards a team approach to understanding board effectiveness’ Journal of Law and Governance 10 1 37 51 10.15209/jbsge.v10i1.843 Search in Google Scholar

Winter, J. (2019). ‘The human experience of being-in-the-board: A phenomenological approach’. In A. Levrau and S. Gobert (eds) Governance: The Art of Aligning Interests. Cambridge: Intersentia, 131–148. WinterJ. 2019 ‘The human experience of being-in-the-board: A phenomenological approach’ In LevrauA. GobertS. (eds) Governance: The Art of Aligning Interests Cambridge Intersentia 131 148 10.2139/ssrn.3319392 Search in Google Scholar