This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Altman, W. (2007). ‘Executive coaching comes of age’. Engineering Management, 17(5), 26–29.AltmanW.2007‘Executive coaching comes of age’Engineering Management175262910.1049/em:20070506Search in Google Scholar
Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A. and Drasgow, F. (2000). ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.ArnoldJ.A.AradS.RhoadesJ.A.DrasgowF.2000‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors’Journal of Organizational Behavior21324926910.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar
Balafas, N. and Florackis, C. (2014). ‘CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange’. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27, 97–115.BalafasN.FlorackisC.2014‘CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange’Journal of Empirical Finance279711510.1016/j.jempfin.2013.10.011Search in Google Scholar
Bentley, T.J. (2000). ‘Gestalt in the boardroom’. Gestalt Review, 4(3), 176–193.BentleyT.J.2000‘Gestalt in the boardroom’Gestalt Review4317619310.5325/gestaltreview.4.3.0176Search in Google Scholar
Blair, M.M. and Stout, L.A. (1999). ‘A team production theory of corporate law’. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247–328.BlairM.M.StoutL.A.1999‘A team production theory of corporate law’Virginia Law Review85224732810.4324/9781315574288-6Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, N. (2006). ‘Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap?’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577–593.BrennanN.2006‘Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap?’Corporate Governance: An International Review14657759310.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00534.xSearch in Google Scholar
Brennan, N.M., Kirwan, C.E. and Redmond, J. (2016). ‘Accountability processes in boardrooms: A conceptual model of manager-non-executive director information asymmetry’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 135–164.BrennanN.M.KirwanC.E.RedmondJ.2016‘Accountability processes in boardrooms: A conceptual model of manager-non-executive director information asymmetry’Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal29113516410.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1505Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, N. and McDermott, M. (2004). ‘Alternative perspectives on independence of directors’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 325–336.BrennanN.McDermottM.2004‘Alternative perspectives on independence of directors’Corporate Governance: An International Review12332533610.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00373.xSearch in Google Scholar
Buchan, P.B. (1981). ‘Boards of directors: Adversaries or advisers’. California Management Review, 24(2), 31–39.BuchanP.B.1981‘Boards of directors: Adversaries or advisers’California Management Review242313910.2307/41164953Search in Google Scholar
Carter, C.B. and Lorsch, J.W. (2004). Back to the Drawing Board. Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.CarterC.B.LorschJ.W.2004Back to the Drawing Board. Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex WorldBoston, MAHarvard Business School PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cheng, J.Y.J., Groysberg, B., Healy, P. and Vijayaraghavan, R. (2021). ‘Directors’ perceptions of board effectiveness and internal operations’. Management Science, 67(10), 6399–6420.ChengJ.Y.J.GroysbergB.HealyP.VijayaraghavanR.2021‘Directors’ perceptions of board effectiveness and internal operations’Management Science67106399642010.1287/mnsc.2020.3789Search in Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, D. (2013). ‘Time to focus coaching on the team’. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(1), 18–22ClutterbuckD.2013‘Time to focus coaching on the team’Industrial and Commercial Training451182210.1108/00197851311296665Search in Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, D. and Hirst, S. (2012). Talking Business: Making Communication Work. Oxford: Butterworth Heinmann.ClutterbuckD.HirstS.2012Talking Business: Making Communication WorkOxfordButterworth Heinmann10.4324/9780080518428Search in Google Scholar
Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D. and Naveen, L. (2020). ‘Director overlap: Groupthink versus teamwork’. Available at SSRN 3650609.ColesJ.L.DanielN.D.NaveenL.2020‘Director overlap: Groupthink versus teamwork’Available at SSRN 365060910.2139/ssrn.3650609Search in Google Scholar
Conger, J., Lawler, E. and Finegold, D. (2001). Corporate Boards: New Strategies for Adding Value at the Top, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.CongerJ.LawlerE.FinegoldD.2001Corporate Boards: New Strategies for Adding Value at the TopSan Francisco, CAJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Coulson-Thomas, C. (1994). ‘Harnessing the board's potential’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2(3), 135–135.Coulson-ThomasC.1994‘Harnessing the board's potential’Corporate Governance: An International Review2313513510.1111/j.1467-8683.1994.tb00069.xSearch in Google Scholar
Coulson-Thomas, C. (2018). ‘Teamwork, motivation, complexity and the board’. Effective Executive, 21(4), 56–69.Coulson-ThomasC.2018‘Teamwork, motivation, complexity and the board’Effective Executive2145669Search in Google Scholar
Currall, S.C., Hammer, T.H., Baggett, L.S. and Doniger, G.M. (1999). ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors’. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 5–36.CurrallS.C.HammerT.H.BaggettL.S.DonigerG.M.1999‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors’Organizational Research Methods2153610.1177/109442819921002Search in Google Scholar
Derdowski, L., Øgaard, T., Marnburg, E. and Mathisen, G.E. (2018). ‘Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: An elusive role of task-related conflicts’. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(4), 1045–1069.DerdowskiL.ØgaardT.MarnburgE.MathisenG.E.2018‘Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: An elusive role of task-related conflicts’Journal of Management and Governance2241045106910.1007/s10997-018-9419-7Search in Google Scholar
Drew, S. and Coulson-Thomas, C. (1996). ‘Transformation through teamwork: The path to the new organization?’. Management Decision, 34(1), 7–17.DrewS.Coulson-ThomasC.1996‘Transformation through teamwork: The path to the new organization?’Management Decision34171710.1108/00251749610106927Search in Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). ‘Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.EdmondsonA.1999‘Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams’Administrative Science Quarterly44235038310.2307/2666999Search in Google Scholar
Edmondson, A.C. (2012). Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.EdmondsonA.C.2012Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge EconomySan Francisco, CAJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Farmer, S. (2015). ‘Making sense of team coaching’. The Coaching Psychologist, 11(2), 72–80.FarmerS.2015‘Making sense of team coaching’The Coaching Psychologist112728010.53841/bpstcp.2015.11.2.72Search in Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. (1992). ‘Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.FinkelsteinS.1992‘Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’Academy of Management Journal35350553810.2307/256485Search in Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. and Mooney, A.C. (2003). ‘Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better’. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.FinkelsteinS.MooneyA.C.2003‘Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better’Academy of Management Executive17210111310.5465/ame.2003.10025204Search in Google Scholar
Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. (1999). ‘Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.ForbesD.P.MillikenF.J.1999‘Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’Academy of Management Review24348950510.4324/9780203888711.ch9Search in Google Scholar
Francoeur, C., Aubé, C., Sponem, S. and Farzaneh, F. (2018). ‘What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?’. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(5–6), 250–264.FrancoeurC.AubéC.SponemS.FarzanehF.2018‘What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?’Team Performance Management: An International Journal245–625026410.1108/TPM-07-2017-0033Search in Google Scholar
Froud, J., Leaver, A., Tampubolon, G. and Williams, K. (2008). ‘Everything for sale: How non-executive directors make a difference’. The Sociological Review, 56(1_suppl), 162–186.FroudJ.LeaverA.TampubolonG.WilliamsK.2008‘Everything for sale: How non-executive directors make a difference’The Sociological Review561_suppl16218610.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00767.xSearch in Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1st ed. New York, NY: Anchor Books.GoffmanE.1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life1st edNew York, NYAnchor BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Greenwald, J. (2001). ‘Rank and fire. Attrition isn’t working so best-to-worst grading is gaining – and those at the bottom get the boot’. Time, 18 June 2001. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1000119,00.html. Accessed 21 June 2021.GreenwaldJ.2001‘Rank and fire. Attrition isn’t working so best-to-worst grading is gaining – and those at the bottom get the boot’Time18 June 2001. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1000119,00.html. Accessed 21 June 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Hambrick, D.C. (1981). ‘Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 253–275.HambrickD.C.1981‘Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams’Administrative Science Quarterly26225327510.2307/2392472Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. (2017). Leadership Team Coaching: Developing Collective Transformational Leadership, third edition. London: Kogan Page Publishers.HawkinsP.2017Leadership Team Coaching: Developing Collective Transformational Leadershipthird editionLondonKogan Page PublishersSearch in Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. and Hogan, A. (2014). ‘Coaching the board: How coaching boards is different from coaching executive teams’, In P. Hawkins (ed) Leadership Team Coaching in Practice,. London: Kogan Page Publishers, 171–187.HawkinsP.HoganA.2014‘Coaching the board: How coaching boards is different from coaching executive teams’InHawkinsP.(ed)Leadership Team Coaching in PracticeLondonKogan Page Publishers171187Search in Google Scholar
Heemskerk, E.M., Heemskerk, K. and Wats, M.M. (2017). ‘Conflict in the boardroom: A participant observation study of supervisory board dynamics’. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(1), 233–263.HeemskerkE.M.HeemskerkK.WatsM.M.2017‘Conflict in the boardroom: A participant observation study of supervisory board dynamics’Journal of Management & Governance21123326310.1007/s10997-015-9339-8Search in Google Scholar
Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N., Moore, P., Morais, F. and Goyal, R. (2017). Conflict and Tension in the Boardroom. London: Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators.KakabadseA.KakabadseN.MooreP.MoraisF.GoyalR.2017Conflict and Tension in the BoardroomLondonInstitute of Chartered Secretaries and AdministratorsSearch in Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (2008). The Discipline of Teams. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business Press.KatzenbachJ.R.SmithD.K.2008The Discipline of TeamsHarvard, MAHarvard Business PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. and Ilgen, D. (2006). ‘Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams’. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.KozlowskiS.IlgenD.2006‘Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams’Psychological Science in the Public Interest737712410.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.xSearch in Google Scholar
Levrau, A.. (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: A Qualitative-Orientated Inquiry into the Determinants of Board Effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent.LevrauA.2007Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: A Qualitative-Orientated Inquiry into the Determinants of Board EffectivenessDoctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent.Search in Google Scholar
Li, J. and Hambrick, D.C. (2005). ‘Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams’. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.LiJ.HambrickD.C.2005‘Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams’Academy of Management Journal48579481310.5465/amj.2005.18803923Search in Google Scholar
Lindon-Travers, K. (1990). Non-Executive Directors: A Guide to their Role, Responsibilities and Appointment, London: Director Books.Lindon-TraversK.1990Non-Executive Directors: A Guide to their Role, Responsibilities and AppointmentLondonDirector BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Maharaj, R. (2009). ‘View from the top: What directors say about board process’. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(3), 326–337.MaharajR.2009‘View from the top: What directors say about board process’Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society9332633710.1108/14720700910964370Search in Google Scholar
Marriage, M. and Beioley, K. (2019). ‘Patisserie Valerie report talks of fake invoices and ledgers’. Financial Times, 25 January 2019. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/657dd1c8-1feb-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65 [accessed 29.11.2020].MarriageM.BeioleyK.2019‘Patisserie Valerie report talks of fake invoices and ledgers’Financial Times25 January 2019. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/657dd1c8-1feb-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65 [accessed 29.11.2020].Search in Google Scholar
McGuinness, P.B. (2019). ‘Beyond the board realm: Women in senior management and their impact on IPO capital funding’. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 389–414.McGuinnessP.B.2019‘Beyond the board realm: Women in senior management and their impact on IPO capital funding’British Journal of Management30238941410.1111/1467-8551.12303Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, S.A. and McIntyre, M.L. (2007). ‘Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective’. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 209–224.MurphyS.A.McIntyreM.L.2007‘Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective’Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society7220922410.1108/14720700710739831Search in Google Scholar
Nadler, D.A. (2004). ‘Building better boards’. Harvard Business Review, 82(5), 102–111.NadlerD.A.2004‘Building better boards’Harvard Business Review825102111Search in Google Scholar
Nadler D.A., Behan B.A. and Nadler M.B. (2006). Building Better Boards. A Blueprint for Effective Governance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.NadlerD.A.BehanB.A.NadlerM.B.2006Building Better Boards. A Blueprint for Effective GovernanceSan Francisco, CAJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Nicholson, G., Newton, C. and McGregor-Lowndes, M. (2012). ‘The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights’. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 461–481.NicholsonG.NewtonC.McGregor-LowndesM.2012‘The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights’Nonprofit Management and Leadership22446148110.1002/nml.21040Search in Google Scholar
Nicholson, G., Pugliese, A., and Bezemer, P.-J. (2017). ‘Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: How boards balance control and collaboration’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 222–246.NicholsonG.PuglieseA.BezemerP.-J.2017‘Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: How boards balance control and collaboration’Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal30222224610.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2143Search in Google Scholar
Ogunseyin, M.A., Farquhar, S.S. and Machold, S. (2019). ‘The determinants of trust in the boardroom’, In J. Gabrielsson, W. Khlif, and S. Yamak (eds) Research Handbook on Boards of Directors, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 49–75.OgunseyinM.A.FarquharS.S.MacholdS.2019‘The determinants of trust in the boardroom’InGabrielssonJ.KhlifW.YamakS.(eds)Research Handbook on Boards of DirectorsCheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing497510.4337/9781786439758.00011Search in Google Scholar
Pastra, A., Koufopoulos, D.N., Samac, N. and Johansson, T. (2021). ‘Behavioral integration in the boardroom’. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 27(3–4), 260–277.PastraA.KoufopoulosD.N.SamacN.JohanssonT.2021‘Behavioral integration in the boardroom’Team Performance Management: An International Journal273–426027710.1108/TPM-07-2020-0058Search in Google Scholar
Payne, T.G., Benson, G.S. and Finegold, D.L. (2009). ‘Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance’. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731.PayneT.G.BensonG.S.FinegoldD.L.2009‘Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance’Journal of Management Studies46470473110.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00819.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021a). ‘Challenge in the boardroom: Director-manager question-and-answer interactions at board meetings’. Working paper, University College Dublin.PerneletH.R.BrennanN.M.2021a‘Challenge in the boardroom: Director-manager question-and-answer interactions at board meetings’Working paper, University College Dublin.10.1111/corg.12492Search in Google Scholar
Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021b). ‘Impression management at board meetings: Interactions in public and in private’. Working paper, University College Dublin.PerneletH.R.BrennanN.M.2021b‘Impression management at board meetings: Interactions in public and in private’Working paper, University College Dublin.Search in Google Scholar
Pernelet, H.R. and Brennan, N.M. (2021c). ‘Boards of directors performing governance: A dramaturgical analysis’. Working paper, University College Dublin.PerneletH.R.BrennanN.M.2021c‘Boards of directors performing governance: A dramaturgical analysis’Working paper, University College Dublin.Search in Google Scholar
Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G. and Bezemer, P.-J. (2015). ‘An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness’. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1–25.PuglieseA.NicholsonG.BezemerP.-J.2015‘An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness’British Journal of Management26112510.1111/1467-8551.12074Search in Google Scholar
Pugliese, A. and Zattoni, A. (2012). ‘Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy and innovation’, In T. Clarke and D. Branson (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance, London: Sage, 217–232.PuglieseA.ZattoniA.2012‘Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy and innovation’InClarkeT.BransonD.(eds)The SAGE Handbook of Corporate GovernanceLondonSage21723210.4135/9781446200995.n11Search in Google Scholar
Rink, F., de Waal, M., Veltrop, D.B. and Stoker, J.I. (2021). ‘Managing C-suite conflict: The unique impact of internal and external governance interfaces on top management team reflexivity’. Long Range Planning, 102121, in press.RinkF.de WaalM.VeltropD.B.StokerJ.I.2021‘Managing C-suite conflict: The unique impact of internal and external governance interfaces on top management team reflexivity’Long Range Planning102121in press.10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102121Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2002). ‘Building the complementary board. The work of the plc chairman’. Long Range Planning, 35(5), 493–520.RobertsJ.2002‘Building the complementary board. The work of the plc chairman’Long Range Planning35549352010.1016/S0024-6301(02)00106-1Search in Google Scholar
Shekshnia, S. (2018). ‘How to be a good board chair’. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 96–105.ShekshniaS.2018‘How to be a good board chair’Harvard Business Review96296105Search in Google Scholar
Smith, W.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2011). ‘Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing’. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.SmithW.K.LewisM.W.2011‘Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing’Academy of Management Review36238140310.5465/AMR.2011.59330958Search in Google Scholar
Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2002). ‘What makes great boards great. It's not the rules and regulations. It's the way people work together’. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 106–113.SonnenfeldJ.A.2002‘What makes great boards great. It's not the rules and regulations. It's the way people work together’Harvard Business Review809106113Search in Google Scholar
Sonnenfeld, J. (2004). ‘Good governance and the misleading myths of bad metrics’. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 108–113SonnenfeldJ.2004‘Good governance and the misleading myths of bad metrics’Academy of Management Perspectives18110811310.5465/ame.2004.12689497Search in Google Scholar
Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.SundaramurthyC.LewisM.2003Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governanceAcademy of Management Review28339741510.5465/amr.2003.10196737Search in Google Scholar
(The) Financial Reporting Council (2018). UK Corporate Governance Code. London, FRC.(The) Financial Reporting Council2018UK Corporate Governance CodeLondonFRCSearch in Google Scholar
Tricker, R.I. (2019) Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices, 4th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.TrickerR.I.2019Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices4th editionOxfordOxford University Press10.4324/9781315191157Search in Google Scholar
Tusa, J. (2020). On Board. The Insider's Guide to Surviving Life in the Boardroom. London: Bloomsbury.TusaJ.2020On Board. The Insider's Guide to Surviving Life in the BoardroomLondonBloomsburySearch in Google Scholar
Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F. and Bammens, Y. (2011). ‘Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom’. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403–420.VandewaerdeM.VoordeckersW.LambrechtsF.BammensY.2011‘Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom’Journal of Business Ethics104340342010.1007/s10551-011-0918-6Search in Google Scholar
Veltrop, D.B., Bezemer, P.-J., Nicholson, G. and Pugliese, A. (2021). ‘Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring’. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 207–234.VeltropD.B.BezemerP.-J.NicholsonG.PuglieseA.2021‘Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring’Academy of Management Journal64120723410.5465/amj.2017.1256Search in Google Scholar
Wageman, R., Hackman, J.R. and Lehman, E. (2005). ‘Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 373–398.WagemanR.HackmanJ.R.LehmanE.2005‘Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument’The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science41437339810.1177/0021886305281984Search in Google Scholar
Wildenauer, M. (2015). ‘Towards a team approach to understanding board effectiveness’. Journal of Law and Governance, 10(1), 37–51.WildenauerM.2015‘Towards a team approach to understanding board effectiveness’Journal of Law and Governance101375110.15209/jbsge.v10i1.843Search in Google Scholar
Winter, J. (2019). ‘The human experience of being-in-the-board: A phenomenological approach’. In A. Levrau and S. Gobert (eds) Governance: The Art of Aligning Interests. Cambridge: Intersentia, 131–148.WinterJ.2019‘The human experience of being-in-the-board: A phenomenological approach’InLevrauA.GobertS.(eds)Governance: The Art of Aligning InterestsCambridgeIntersentia13114810.2139/ssrn.3319392Search in Google Scholar