1. bookVolume 59 (2022): Edition 3 (September 2022)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1336-9083
Première parution
22 Apr 2006
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

First report of Hemicycliophora conida from Russia

Publié en ligne: 17 Dec 2022
Volume & Edition: Volume 59 (2022) - Edition 3 (September 2022)
Pages: 317 - 320
Reçu: 17 Jan 2022
Accepté: 19 Jul 2022
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1336-9083
Première parution
22 Apr 2006
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Introduction

Hemicycliophora conida (Thorne, 1955) was originally described from soil samples collected from a sugar-beet field near the village of Ballyculane in Ireland. This species was also reported in the Netherlands (Thorne, 1955, Loof, 1968), Belgium, England, Germany, Switzerland, Italy (Loof, 1968), Poland (Loof, 1968, Brzeski, 1998), Iran (Loof, 1984, Azimi et al., 2020), Spain (Castillo et al., 1989), the United States (Zeng et al., 2012, Subbotin et al., 2014), and Iceland (Flis et al., 2020).

Recently, H. conida was found near the roots of wild red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) in Serebryany Bor Forest Park in Moscow, Russia. The geographical location of the sampling site is 55°47’10.6”N; 37°24’30.3”E. This is the first record of this species in Russia.

Material and Methods

Nematodes were extracted using a modification of the decanting and sieving method (Flegg, 1967). For morphological studies, the nematodes were killed with hot water, fixed in a 5 % formalin solution, and mounted in glycerin on slides using the Seinhorst technique (Seinhorst, 1959). Molecular studies were performed using the scientific equipment of Core Research Facility of the “Bioengineering” Center (Moscow, Russia). For this work, nematodes frozen in distilled water were used. There were three replicates. Each replicate was a test tube with several specimens of H. conida. Their total DNA was extracted using the Wizard Kit (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The forward Nem_18S_F (5′-CGCGAATRGCTCATTACAACAGC-3′) and the reverse Nem_18S_R (5′-GGGCGGTATCTGATCGCC-3′) primers (Floyd et al., 2005) were used to amplify the fragment of the 18S rRNA gene. The D2-D3 expansion segments of the 28S rRNA gene were amplified using the forward D2A (5′-CAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′) and the reverse D3B (5′-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3′) primers (Nunn, 1992). Internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and a partial sequence of 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene were amplified with the forward primer TW81 (5′-GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3′) and the reverse primer 5.8SM5 (5′-GGCGCAATGTGCATTCGA-3′) (Zheng et al., 2000). The amplifications were performed in a Tetrad thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR products were purified using the Wizard PCR Preps Kit (Promega, USA). The sequencing of the PCR products was carried out with the same primers using the genetic analyzer ABI 3730 (Applied Biosystems, USA). Low-quality segments of sequences at the 5′ and 3′ ends were removed. Then, the newly obtained sequences were submitted to the GenBank database under accession numbers OL765280 (18S rRNA gene), OL765287 (28S rRNA gene), and OL913796 (ITS1).

Ethical Approval and/or Informed Consent

For this study formal consent is not required.

Results and Discussion
Hemicycliophora conida (Thorne, 1955)

(Fig. 1, Table 1)

Fig. 1

Light photomicrographs of Hemicycliophora conida.

A) Entire female, B) Anterior end, C) Lateral field at mid-body, D) Posterior end

Measurements of 15 females of Hemicycliophora conida from Moscow, Russia. If not otherwise stated, measurements are in μm and in the form: mean ± standard deviation (range).

CharactersMeasurements
L823 ± 68 (710–930)
Body width41.5 ± 4.3 (35–50)
Pharynx length153 ± 12.5 (132.5–165)
Tail length80 ± 9.8 (66–95)
a19.8 ± 2 (17.4–24.2)
b5.3 ± 0.1 (5.1–5.5)
c10.5 ± 1.2 (8.9–12.5)
c'2.8 ± 0.3 (2.3–3.3)
V, %85.4 ± 0.8 (84.3–87.1)
VL/VB3.2 ± 0.3 (2.7–3.9)
Lip width19 ± 1.5 (16–22.5)
Lip height6.6 ± 0.6 (5.6–7.8)
Stylet85.6 ± 6 (75–92.5)
DGO9.7 ± 1.2 (8–12)
R236.9 ± 14.8 (206–257)
Rst23.9 ± 3 (18–27)
Roes42.6 ± 4.8 (36–49)
Rex45.4 ± 4.5 (39–52)
RV45.1 ± 2.7 (41–51)
RVan13.2 ± 2.8 (10–18)
Ran32.7 ± 3.1 (28–38)

Female. Body straight to slightly ventrally arcuate. Cuticular sheath fitting closely or loosely to body, more loosely on posterior end. Lateral field with occasional breaks of transverse striae and anastomoses bordered by two lines for a short distance; sometimes it looks like two longitudinal rows of blocks. Each annulus with two rows of scratches. Labial region broad, truncated, with two distinct annuli. Stylet with posteriorly sloping knobs sized about 7 μm across. Excretory pore 3–4 annuli posterior to pharynx base. Hemizonid distinct or indistinct, two annuli long, located anterior to excretory pore. Reproductive system mono-prodelphic, outstretched, oocytes in single row except for anterior end. In studied specimens, spermatheca of only one female was filled with sperm. Eggs (n=3) 78–82 x 24–26 μm in size, one per uterus. Vulval lips modified, elongated. Tail elongate conoid, tip is usually straight; in some specimens, it is curved slightly dorsally, while on others, it is curved slightly ventrally. Males were not found.

Remarks. Morphology and morphometric data of the Moscow population of H. conida resemble the original description and other descriptions of the species (Chitambar & Subbotin, 2014). According to Loof (1968), H. conida can be divided into two morphological forms (I and II), differing in the number of annuli (227–284 vs 180–220), the excretory pore position from the anterior end (42–53 annuli vs 36–43), and the stylet length (78–96 vs 69–86 μm). He considered these forms to be “conspecific.” The population does not exactly correspond to Form I and overlaps with Form II. Some specimens from the studied population had a slightly smaller number of annuli, as compared to those in Form I, while other specimens had a slightly smaller stylet length, as compared to those in Form I.

Molecular characterization. The sequences of the 18S rRNA gene, the D2-D3 expansion segments of the 28S rRNA gene, and the ITS1 obtained from different individuals in this study were identical within each marker. The sequences of the 18S rRNA gene of the studied specimens were identical to the sequence AJ966471.

Three other sequences of H. conida deposited in GenBank EU669914, KJ934172, KJ934173 share only 98.23 %, 98.12 %, and 97.56 % similarity, respectively. However, according to Van den Berg et al. (2018), the sequences under the accession numbers: KJ934172–KJ934174 identified in GenBank as H. conida actually belong to H. parvana.

The sequences of the D2–D3 expansion segments of the 28S rRNA gene were identical to the sequences of H. conida KF430448, KF430447, FN433875 and share 99.69 % similarity with H. conida sequence MN628433.

The sequences of Internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) were identical to the sequence of H. conida from Spain (KF430580), share 99.77 % similarity with the sequence of H. conida from Iran (MT901584), whereas similarity to the sequence of this species from the United States (KF430579) was only 97.92 %.

Fig. 1

Light photomicrographs of Hemicycliophora conida.
A) Entire female, B) Anterior end, C) Lateral field at mid-body, D) Posterior end
Light photomicrographs of Hemicycliophora conida. A) Entire female, B) Anterior end, C) Lateral field at mid-body, D) Posterior end

Measurements of 15 females of Hemicycliophora conida from Moscow, Russia. If not otherwise stated, measurements are in μm and in the form: mean ± standard deviation (range).

Characters Measurements
L 823 ± 68 (710–930)
Body width 41.5 ± 4.3 (35–50)
Pharynx length 153 ± 12.5 (132.5–165)
Tail length 80 ± 9.8 (66–95)
a 19.8 ± 2 (17.4–24.2)
b 5.3 ± 0.1 (5.1–5.5)
c 10.5 ± 1.2 (8.9–12.5)
c' 2.8 ± 0.3 (2.3–3.3)
V, % 85.4 ± 0.8 (84.3–87.1)
VL/VB 3.2 ± 0.3 (2.7–3.9)
Lip width 19 ± 1.5 (16–22.5)
Lip height 6.6 ± 0.6 (5.6–7.8)
Stylet 85.6 ± 6 (75–92.5)
DGO 9.7 ± 1.2 (8–12)
R 236.9 ± 14.8 (206–257)
Rst 23.9 ± 3 (18–27)
Roes 42.6 ± 4.8 (36–49)
Rex 45.4 ± 4.5 (39–52)
RV 45.1 ± 2.7 (41–51)
RVan 13.2 ± 2.8 (10–18)
Ran 32.7 ± 3.1 (28–38)

Azimi, S., Abolafia, J., Pedram, M. (2020): Hemicycliophora ahvasiensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Hemicycliophoridae), and data on a known species, from Iran. J Nematol, 52: 1–19. DOI: 10.21307/jofnem-2020-128 Azimi S. Abolafia J. Pedram M. 2020 Hemicycliophora ahvasiensis n sp. (Nematoda: Hemicycliophoridae), and data on a known species, from Iran. J Nematol 52 1 19 10.21307/jofnem-2020-128801528633829170Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brzeski, M.W. (1998): Nematodes of Tylenchina in Poland and temperate Europe. Warszawa: Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS. 397 pp. Brzeski M.W. 1998 Nematodes of Tylenchina in Poland and temperate Europe Warszawa Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS 397 ppSearch in Google Scholar

Castillo, P., Gomez-Barcina, A., Loof, P.A.A. (1989): On two species of Hemicycliophora de Man 1921 (Nematoda, Criconematoidea) found in Spain. Nematol Mediterr, 17: 77–82 Castillo P. Gomez-Barcina A. Loof P.A.A. 1989 On two species of Hemicycliophora de Man 1921 (Nematoda, Criconematoidea) found in Spain Nematol Mediterr 17 77 82Search in Google Scholar

Chitambar, J. J., Subbotin, S.A. (2014): Systematics of the sheath nematodes of the superfamily Hemicycliophoroidea. Nematology Monographs and Perspectives 10 (Series editors: Hunt, D.J. & Perry, R.N.). The Netherlands: Brill, 732 pp. DOI: 10.1163/9789004187894 Chitambar J. J. Subbotin S.A. 2014 Systematics of the sheath nematodes of the superfamily Hemicycliophoroidea. Nematology Monographs and Perspectives 10 (Series editors: Hunt, D.J. & Perry, R.N.) The Netherlands Brill 732 pp 10.1163/9789004187894Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fleg, J. J. M. (1967): Extraction of Xiphinema and Longidorus species from soil by a modification of Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique. Ann Appl Biol, 60(3): 429–437. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1967.tb04497.x Fleg J. J. M. 1967 Extraction of Xiphinema and Longidorus species from soil by a modification of Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique Ann Appl Biol 603 429 437 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1967.tb04497.xOuvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Flis, L., Kornobis, F.W., Kubicz, M., Guðmundson, J. (2020): New records of plant-parasitic nematodes from Iceland. Polar Biol, 43: 1655–1661. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-020-02732-0 Flis L. Kornobis F.W. Kubicz M. Guðmundson J. 2020 New records of plant-parasitic nematodes from Iceland Polar Biol 43 1655 1661 10.1007/s00300-020-02732-0Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Floyd, R.M., Rogers, A.D., Lambshead, P.J.D., Smith, C.R. (2005): Nematode-specific PCR primers for the 18S small subunit rRNA gene. Mol Ecol Notes, 5(3): 611–612. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01009.x Floyd R.M. Rogers A.D. Lambshead P.J.D. Smith C.R. 2005 Nematode-specific PCR primers for the 18S small subunit rRNA gene Mol Ecol Notes 53 611 612 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01009.xOuvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Loof, P.A.A. (1968): Taxonomy of Hemicycliophora species from west and central Europe (Nematoda: Criconematoidea). Meded. LandbHogesch. Wageningen, 68-14: 1–49 Loof P.A.A. 1968 Taxonomy of Hemicycliophora species from west and central Europe (Nematoda: Criconematoidea) Meded. LandbHogesch. Wageningen 68-14 1 49Search in Google Scholar

Loof, P.A.A. (1984): Hemicycliophora species from Iran (Nematoda: Criconematoidea). Nematologica, 30(1): 22–41. DOI: 10.1163/187529284X00437 Loof P.A.A. 1984 Hemicycliophora species from Iran (Nematoda: Criconematoidea) Nematologica 301 22 41 10.1163/187529284X00437Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nunn, G. (1992): Nematode molecular evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham Nunn G. 1992 Nematode molecular evolution. Ph.D. thesis Nottingham, UK University of NottinghamSearch in Google Scholar

Seinhorst, J.W. (1959): A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica, 4(1): 57–69. DOI: 10.1163/187529259X00381 Seinhorst J.W. 1959 A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin Nematologica 41 57 69 10.1163/187529259X00381Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Subbotin, S.A., Chitambar, J.J., Chizhov, V.N., Stanley, J.D., Inserra, R.N., Doucet, M.E., Clure, M.M., Ye, W., Yeates, G.W., Mollov, D.S., Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, C., Vovlas, N., Van den Berg, E., Castillo, P. (2014): Molecular phylogeny, diagnostics, and diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes of the genus Hemicycliophora (Nematoda: Hemicycliophoridae). Zool J Linn Soc, 171(3): 475–506. DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12145 Subbotin S.A. Chitambar J.J. Chizhov V.N. Stanley J.D. Inserra R.N. Doucet M.E. Clure M.M. Ye W. Yeates G.W. Mollov D.S. Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C. Vovlas N. Van den Berg E. Castillo P. 2014 Molecular phylogeny, diagnostics, and diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes of the genus Hemicycliophora (Nematoda: Hemicycliophoridae) Zool J Linn Soc 1713 475 506 10.1111/zoj.12145Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thorne, G. (1955): Fifteen new species of the genus Hemicycliophora with an emended description of H. typica de Man (Tylenchida Criconematidae). Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash., 22(1): 1–16 Thorne G. 1955 Fifteen new species of the genus Hemicycliophora with an emended description of H typica de Man (Tylenchida Criconematidae). Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash 221 1 16Search in Google Scholar

Van den Berg, E., Tiedt, L.R., Liébanas, G., Chitambar, J.J., Stanley, J.D., Inserra, R.N., Castillo, P., Subbotin, S.A. (2018): Morphological and molecular characterisation of two new Hemicycliophora species (Tylenchida: Hemicycliophoridae) with a revision of the taxonomic status of some known species and a phylogeny of the genus. Nematology, 20(4): 319–354. DOI: 10.1163/1568541100003143 Van den Berg E. Tiedt L.R. Liébanas G. Chitambar J.J. Stanley J.D. Inserra R.N. Castillo P. Subbotin S.A. 2018 Morphological and molecular characterisation of two new Hemicycliophora species (Tylenchida: Hemicycliophoridae) with a revision of the taxonomic status of some known species and a phylogeny of the genus Nematology 204 319 354 10.1163/1568541100003143Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zeng, Y., Ye, W., Tredway, L., Martin, S., Martin, M., Tredway, L. (2012): Taxonomy and morphology of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA. Zootaxa, 3452(1): 1–46. DOI: 10.11646/ZOOTAXA.3452.1.1 Zeng Y. Ye W. Tredway L. Martin S. Martin M. Tredway L. 2012 Taxonomy and morphology of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA Zootaxa 34521 1 46 10.11646/ZOOTAXA.3452.1.1Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zheng, J., Subbotin, S.A., Waeyenberge, L., Moens, M. (2000): Molecular characterisation of Chinese Heterodera glycines and H. avenae populations based on RFLPs and sequences of rDNA-ITS regions. Russ. J. Nematol., 8(2): 109–113 Zheng J. Subbotin S.A. Waeyenberge L. Moens M. 2000 Molecular characterisation of Chinese Heterodera glycines and H avenae populations based on RFLPs and sequences of rDNA-ITS regions. Russ. J. Nematol. 82 109 113Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo