Accès libre

Probiotic bacteria can modulate murine macrophage’s superoxide production in Trichinella spiralis infection

À propos de cet article

Citez

Fig. 1

Production of superoxide anion by peritoneal macrophages from mice treated with probiotic bacteria (enterococci) and infected with T. spiralis. *P<0.05; **P<0.01– statistically significant differences from T. spiralis infected group without probiotic treatment (control).
Production of superoxide anion by peritoneal macrophages from mice treated with probiotic bacteria (enterococci) and infected with T. spiralis. *P<0.05; **P<0.01– statistically significant differences from T. spiralis infected group without probiotic treatment (control).

Fig. 2

Production of superoxide anion by peritoneal macrophages from mice treated with probiotic bacteria (lactobacilli) and infected with T. spiralis. *P<0.05; **P<0.01– statistically significant differences from T. spiralis infected group without probiotic treatment (control).
Production of superoxide anion by peritoneal macrophages from mice treated with probiotic bacteria (lactobacilli) and infected with T. spiralis. *P<0.05; **P<0.01– statistically significant differences from T. spiralis infected group without probiotic treatment (control).

Parasite burden in mice treated with probiotic bacteria and infected with T. spiralis.

Intestinal phase (numbers of adults)
Days post infection
51118
(mean ± S.D. )reduction (%)(mean ± S.D.)reduction (%)(mean ± S.D.)reduction (%)
T.spiralis (control)295 ± 24229 ± 372±2
E.faecium EF55 + T.spiralis293 ± 380.7160 ±3930.10±0100
E.faecium CCM8558 + T.spiralis244 ± 2517.3*107 ±2553.30±0100
E.faecium CCM7420 + T.spiralis235 ± 3520.3*112±1451.10±0100
E.durans ED26E/7 + T.spiralis256 ±713.2*142 ±29381±250
L.fermentum CCM7421 + T.spiralis209 ± 2129.2210 ±278.340 ±120
L.plantarum 17L/L1 + T.spiralis326 ± 480192 ±816.21±20
eISSN:
1336-9083
ISSN:
0440-6605
Langue:
Anglais