[
Abramo, F., Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2017). Cognitive literary anthropology and neurohermeneutics. A theoretical proposal, Enthymema, 8, 44–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 209–243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caruana F., & Viola, M. (2018). Come funzionano le emozioni: Da Darwin alle neuroscienze. Bologna: Milano.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chatterjee, A. (2014). The Aesthetic Brain: How we Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18, 7, 370–375.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, M. T., & Richardson, A. (1999). Literary studies and cognitive science: toward a new interdisciplinarity. Mosaic, 32(2), 123–140.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cuccio V. et. al. (2013). Metafore che risuonano. Linguaggio e corpo tra filosofia e neuroscienze. EC. Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana Studi Semiotici, 7 (17): 69–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York/Toronto: Pantheon Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edelman, G. (2007). Seconda natura. Scienza del cervello e conoscenza umana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esrock, E. J. (1994). The Reader’s Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier G., & Turner M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fludernik, M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London/New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fludernik, M. (2006). An Introduction to Narratology. London/New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007) Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11.5, 197-202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, M. (1995). Metaphor making meaning. Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 643–666.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Literary Studies. State of the art in Cognitive Poetics. In D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese V. (2004). Embodied simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below Theory of Mind: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - B Biological Sciences, 362. 1480, 659–669.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2009). Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Research, 73(4), 486–498.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2011) Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and memory. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13(2), 196–200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2012). Aby Warburg and the dialogue among aesthetics, biology and physiology. Ph, 2, 48–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2014). Bodily Selves in Relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V. (2016). Finding the body in the brain. From Simulation Theory to Embodied Simulation. In H. Kornblith, & B. McLaughlin (Ed.), Alvin Goldman and his Critics (pp. 297–317). New York: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese V. (2017). Visions of the body: Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience. Aisthesis, 1(1), 41–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese V. (2018). The power of images: A view from the brain-body. Phenomenology and Mind, 14, 70–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V., Rochat, M., Cossu, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology, 45, 103–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special with embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese V., & Cuccio, V. (2015). The paradigmatic body. Embodied simulation, intersubjectivity and the bodily self. In T. Metzinger, & J. M. Windt (Ed.), Open MIND. (pp. 1–23). Frankfurt: MIND Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese V., & Guerra M. (2015). Lo Schermo Empatico: Cinema e Neuroscienze. Milan:o Raffaello Cortina Editore.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino R., & Pulvirenti G. (2012). Nello specchio delle parole: Proserpina e Ifigenia Una lettura neurocognitiva di due figure del mito classico nell’opera di Goethe. Studi germanici. 1, 193–235.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino R., & Pulvirenti G. (2013). Imagination as poetics of cognition. Enthymema, 8, 83–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2014). Immaginazione come poetica della cognizione: Faust nel Regno delle Madri. In S. Calabrese, S. Ballerio (Ed.), Linguaggio, letteratura e scienze neurocognitive. (pp. 128–168) Milano LEDIpublishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2015a). Leggere Goethe al tempo delle neuroscienze: l’immaginazione e la sua rappresentazione poetica. Cultura tedesca, 161–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R.. & Pulvirenti, G. (2015b). “Ombra della carne, o suo veleno”. Il problema mente-corpo nella “Storia meravigliosa di Peter Schlemihl” di Adelbert von Chamisso. Le forme e la storia. N.S. VIII.1, 433–454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R., & G. Pulvirenti (2017). The Paradox of Ekphrasis. Metacritic Discourse, Perception and Imagination in art description. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory. 3.1. 151-179.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2018a). Storie, menti, mondi. Approccio neuroermeneutico alla letteratura. Milano: Mimesis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2018b). La mente di Heinrich von Kleist. Milano: Mimesis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanauer, D. (1997). Poetic Text Processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 26, 157–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herman, D. (1999). (ed.), Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffstaedter P. (1987). Poetic Text Processing and its Empirical Investigation. Poetics, 16: 75-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holland, N. (1988). The Brain of Robert Frost. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (1996). Towards a cognitive science of poetics. College Literature, 23, 164–178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2003). Cognitive Science. Literature and the Arts. New York and London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2009). The Mind and its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2011a). What Literature Teaches us about Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2011b). Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2013a). How Authors’ Minds Make Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2013b). Narrative Discourse: Authors and Narrators in Literature, Film, and Art. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2013c). Parallel Processing and the Human Mind: Re-understanding Consciousness with James Joyce’s Ulysses. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42, 149–164. doi:10.1515/jls-2013-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2014a). Literary brains: Neuroscience, Criticism, and Theory. Literature Compass, 11 (4), 293–304. doi:10.1111/lic3.12144
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2014b). Ulysses and the Poetics of Cognition. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, P. C. (2014c). Conversations on Cognitive Cultural Studies: Literature, Language, and Aesthetics with Frederick Luis Aldama. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iser, W. (1976). Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Fink Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iser, W. (1980). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iser, W. (1991). Das Fiktive und das Imaginäre. Perspektiven literarischer Anthropologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2013). The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 1413–1420. doi:10.1111/ejn.12135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2014). A neurobiological enquiry into the origins of our experience of the sublime and beautiful. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11 November 2014. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00891
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Towards a Neurocognitive Poetics Model of Literary Reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use, (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, A. M. (2015b). Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186, 1–21. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder A. (2015c). Worte als Worte erfahren: wie erarbeitet das Gehirn Gedichte. In A. Pompe (Ed.), Kind und Gedicht, (pp. 57–76). Berlin: Rombach.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LeDoux, J.,E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martindale, C. (1978). The Evolution of English poetry. Poetics 7, 231–248. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(78)90039-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martindale, C. (1988). Cognition, Psychobiology, and Aesthetics. In F. H. Farley, R. W. Neperud (Ed.), The Foundation of Aesthetics, Art and Art Education (pp. 7–42). New York: Praeger.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martindale, C. (2007). Response: Psychological Foundations of Literary Theory. J. Lit. Theory, 1, 447–457. doi:10.1515/jlt.2007.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S. (1988). Affect and Narrative: A Model of Response to Stories. Poetics, 17, 259–272. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(88)90034-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the Schema given: Affective Comprehension of Literary Narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78. doi:10.1080/02699938908415236
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S. (1990). Readers’ Responses to narrative: evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323–339. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(90)90002-m
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S. (1995) Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23, 275–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S. (2006) Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, Defamiliarization and Affect: Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mukarovský, J. (1964). Standard Language and Poetic Language. In Garvin, P. (1964) A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structures and Style, (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, Washington.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oakley, T. (1998). Conceptual Blending, Narrative, Discourse, and Rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 321–360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oatley, K. (1994). A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative. Poetics 23, 53–74. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)p4296-s.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paulson, W. R. (1991). Literature, Complexity, Interdisciplinarity. In Havles, N. K. (ed. by) (1991). Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science (PP. 37–53). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The Science of Art. A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 6/7, 15–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regev, M., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., & Hasson, U. (2013). Selective and Invariant Neural Responses to Spoken and Written Narratives. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 15978–15988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, A. (1999). Cognitive Science and the Future of Literary Studies. Philosophy and Literature, 23(1), 157–173. Available from: https://sites.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/Cognitive/Readings/Richardson99.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, A. (2015). Imagination: Literary and cognitive intersections. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 225–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, A., & Steen, F. F. (2002). Literature and the Cognitive Revolution. An Introduction. Poetics Today, 23–1, 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samson, W. (2015). On the neuro-turn in the humanities. Naturalism, Hyper-Empiricism, and Understanding. Chiasma 2, 2, 5. Available from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/chiasmaasiteforthought/vol2/iss2/5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scarry, E. (1999) Dreaming by the Book. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schleiermacher, Fr. D. E. [1838] (1977). Hermeneutik und Kritik, ed M. Frank. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schleiermacher, Fr. D. E. (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism, ed A. Bowie. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, S. J. (1979). Empirische Literaturwissenschaft [1] as Perspective. Poetics, 8, 557–568. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90033-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, S. J. (1983). The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm. Poetics, 12, 19–34. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(83)90003-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Hanser.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shklovskij, V. (1917). Art as Technique. In Lemon, L. T., Reiss M. J. (ed. by) (1965). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spolsky, E. (1993). Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: State University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, M. (2003). Universals of Narrative and their Cognitivist Fortunes. Poetics Today, 24, 297–395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stockwell, P. (2007). Cognitive Poetics and Literary Theory. Journal of Literary Theory, 1, 136–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009a). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18 (3), 247–264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009b). Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18 (3), 219–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment. A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsur, R. (1983). What is Cognitive Poetics? Tel Aviv: Katz Research Institute for Hebrew Literature.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsur, R. (1992a). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsur, R. (1992b). What makes Sound Patterns Expressive? The Poetic Mode of Speech Perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M. (2006) (ed). The Artful Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M. (2014). The Origins of Ideas. Blending. Creativity and the Human Spark, New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics 8, 569–608. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90034-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London, UK: Croom Helm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Peer, W. (2007). Towards a new Narratology: an Extended Review of Psychonarratology. Lang. Lit. 16, 214–224. doi:10.1177/0963947007075986
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeki, S. (1998) Art and the Brain. Dædalus 127, 2, 71-103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeki, S. (1999) Inner Vision: an Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeki, S. (2004) The Neurology of Ambiguity. Conscious Cogn. 13, 173-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeki, S. (2008). Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeki, S., Romaya, J. P., Benincasa, D. M. T., Atiyah, M. F., (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zunshine, L. (2010) (ed). Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of Literary Comprehension. A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar