[Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511486210]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, M. (1955). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 55, 27-294.10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273]Search in Google Scholar
[Börgerding, P., Benen, M.-C., & Bergs, A. (under review). Expecting the unexpected: Predictive coding, pattern recognition and surprise in narratives.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bullock, B. E., & Almeida, J.T. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Code-Switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576331]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N. (2003). The reasons of state. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Francis, E. J., & Michaelis, L. (Eds.). (2003). Mismatch. Form-Function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043-1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043]Search in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffmann, Th. (2018). Creativity and construction grammar. Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 66(3), 259-276.10.1515/zaa-2018-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, R. (1994). Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Francke.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuperberg, G. R., Arim, Ch., Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., & Jackendoff, R. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2685-2701.10.1162/jocn.2009.21333315173219702471]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2007). An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1905-1921.10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.190517958491]Search in Google Scholar
[Sampson, G. (2016). Two ideas of creativity. In Martin Hinton (Ed.). Evidence. Experiment and argument in linguistics and philosophy of language (pp. 15-26). Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative productivity and aging. In Susan Krauss Whitbourne and Martin J. Sliwinski (eds.). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Adulthood and Aging (pp. 477-496). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118392966.ch24]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T. (2012). Exploring the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London: Bloomsbury.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziegeler, D. (2007). A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 990-1028.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.014]Search in Google Scholar
