Accès libre

Cross-Calibration of an α-Source Used for Luminescence Dating by Applying Different Samples and Procedures

György Sipos

György Sipos

Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, Geochronological Research Group, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sipos, György
, 
Christoph Schmidt

Christoph Schmidt

  • Chair of Geomorphology, Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of BayreuthBayreuth, Germany
  • Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of LausanneLausanne, Switzerland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Schmidt, Christoph
, 
Tamás Bartyik

Tamás Bartyik

Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, Geochronological Research Group, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Bartyik, Tamás
, 
Dávid Filyó

Dávid Filyó

Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, Geochronological Research Group, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Filyó, Dávid
, 
Gergő Magyar

Gergő Magyar

Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, Geochronological Research Group, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Magyar, Gergő
, 
Viktor Havasi

Viktor Havasi

Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Havasi, Viktor
 et 
Ákos Kukovecz

Ákos Kukovecz

Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of SzegedSzeged, Hungary
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kukovecz, Ákos
  
29 juin 2021
Cross-Calibration of an α-Source Used for Luminescence Dating by Applying Different Samples and Procedures's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Conference Proceedings of the 13th International Conference “Methods of Absolute Chronology” June 5–7th, 2019, Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
Publié en ligne: 29 juin 2021
Pages: 61 - 72
Reçu: 30 mai 2020
Accepté: 12 févr. 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/geochr-2021-0003
Mots clés
© 2021 György Sipos et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig 1

Flowchart of procedures applied in the case of different cross-calibration approaches used in the study. (A) MAR measurements on α-irradiated aliquots from both laboratories. (B) α dose recovery of known α-doses using SAR. (C) α dose recovery of a known γ-dose using SAR. MAR, Multiple aliquot regeneration; SAR, Single aliquot regeneration.
Flowchart of procedures applied in the case of different cross-calibration approaches used in the study. (A) MAR measurements on α-irradiated aliquots from both laboratories. (B) α dose recovery of known α-doses using SAR. (C) α dose recovery of a known γ-dose using SAR. MAR, Multiple aliquot regeneration; SAR, Single aliquot regeneration.

Fig 2

MAR dose-response curves generated by the Szeged RISØ α-source with unknown dose rate and the normalised OSL/IRSL of calibration doses administered by the known dose rate Bayreuth Littlemore α-source. (A) quartz sample OSL, (B) polymineral sample first temperature IR50 and (C) polymineral sample pIRIR290. MAR, multiple aliquot regeneration; OSL, optically stimulated luminescence; pIRIR, Post-IR IRSL.
MAR dose-response curves generated by the Szeged RISØ α-source with unknown dose rate and the normalised OSL/IRSL of calibration doses administered by the known dose rate Bayreuth Littlemore α-source. (A) quartz sample OSL, (B) polymineral sample first temperature IR50 and (C) polymineral sample pIRIR290. MAR, multiple aliquot regeneration; OSL, optically stimulated luminescence; pIRIR, Post-IR IRSL.

Fig 3

Alpha SAR dose recovery of previously administered, incrementally increasing α-doses. Irradiation was made with the unknown dose rate Szeged α-source, while measurements were made at Bayreuth. SAR, Single aliquot regeneration.
Alpha SAR dose recovery of previously administered, incrementally increasing α-doses. Irradiation was made with the unknown dose rate Szeged α-source, while measurements were made at Bayreuth. SAR, Single aliquot regeneration.

Fig 4

Abanico plot (Dietze et al., 2016) of equivalent α-doses of the 4.81 Gy γ-dose carried by the RISØ calibration quartz, measured by the two readers at Szeged and Bayreuth.
Abanico plot (Dietze et al., 2016) of equivalent α-doses of the 4.81 Gy γ-dose carried by the RISØ calibration quartz, measured by the two readers at Szeged and Bayreuth.

Fig 5

Abanico plot (Dietze et al., 2016) of a-values concerning the RISØ calibration quartz and sample OSZ1107. Both datasets were measured at Szeged. The a-values are calculated by using the dose rate value determined by using the specific sample.
Abanico plot (Dietze et al., 2016) of a-values concerning the RISØ calibration quartz and sample OSZ1107. Both datasets were measured at Szeged. The a-values are calculated by using the dose rate value determined by using the specific sample.

Fig 6

Alpha dose-response curves of sample OSZ1107 and RISØ calibration quartz.
Alpha dose-response curves of sample OSZ1107 and RISØ calibration quartz.

Fig 7

Comparison of α- and β-dose-response curves measured at the two laboratories concerning (A) the RISØ calibration quartz and (B) sample OSZ1107. Effective α-dose stands for the β-dose equivalent of the α-dose administered, the conversion is made using the sample-specific a-value.
Comparison of α- and β-dose-response curves measured at the two laboratories concerning (A) the RISØ calibration quartz and (B) sample OSZ1107. Effective α-dose stands for the β-dose equivalent of the α-dose administered, the conversion is made using the sample-specific a-value.

Szeged a-source dose rates determined by different calibration procedures_

Sample Procedure Calculation Dose rate (Gy/s)
Quartz (OSZ 1107) MAR OSL OSLBAY → DαSZE(s) 0.071 ± 0.002
Polymineral (OSZ 1614) MAR IR50 DαSZE(s)=OSLBAY−bm {\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}{\left( s \right)}} = {{{\rm{OS}}{{\rm{L}}_{{\rm{BAY}}}} - b} \over {\rm{m}}} 0.109 ± 0.012
MAR pIRIR290 DαSZE*=DαBAY(s)DαSZE(s)DαBAY* {\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}}^* = {{{{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{BAY}}\left( {\rm{s}} \right)}}} \over {{{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}\left( {\rm{s}} \right)}}}}{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{BAY}}}^* 0.085 ± 0.010
Quartz (OSZ 1107) α-SAR OSL DαSZE*=m {\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}}^* = {\rm{m}} 0.076 ± 0.004
α-dose recovery
RISØ quartz (Batch 108) α-SAR OSL DαSZE*=DαBAY(s)DαSZE(s)DαBAY* {\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}}^* = {{{{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{BAY}}\left( {\rm{s}} \right)}}} \over {{{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{SZE}}\left( {\rm{s}} \right)}}}}{\rm{D}}_{\alpha {\rm{BAY}}}^* 0.086 ± 0.005
γ-dose recovery

Environmental dose rates for the quartz and polymineral fraction of the same loess sample, calculated by applying the lowest and highest a-source dose rate received during the cross-calibration process_

226Ra (Bq/kg) 232Th (Bq/kg) 40K (Bq/kg) w (%) Depth (m) Mineral D*α-source (Gy/s) a-value D*α (Gy/ka) D*tot (Gy/ka)
34.7 ± 0.4 34.2 ± 0.6 390.9 ± 15.1 10 ± 2 0.9 Q 0.071 ± 0.002 0.041 ± 0.003 0.35 ± 0.04 2.89 ± 0.07
0.086 ± 0.005 0.034 ± 0.003 0.29 ± 0.03 2.83 ± 0.07
PM 0.071 ± 0.002 0.077 ± 0.003 0.65 ± 0.06 3.27 ± 0.09
0.086 ± 0.005 0.063 ± 0.004 0.54 ± 0.06 3.15 ± 0.08
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
1 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Géosciences, Géosciences, autres
RSS Feed de la revue