Accès libre

Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurse behavior toward confirmed and suspected HIV/AIDS patients (NB-CSHAP) scale

À propos de cet article

Citez

Introduction

The essence of nursing is caring, which identifies the lifeline of the profession. As discussed by scholars in the field, the culture of caring in nursing should be initiated during the formative years of a prospective nurse where the concept of caring should be cultivated and nurtured to rear a culture of humanistic and caring behaviors.1 In practice, it is essential that a competent nurse does not only possess the necessary theoretical knowledge but also imbibe the discernment of caring in her workstations, especially toward patients under her care.

Review of literature

Caring can be classified into two generalized types as follows: instrumental caring and expressive caring.2 Instrumental caring involves behaviors that are related to the technical aspects of care, such as performance of nursing intervention at bedside, and performing other professional expertise in providing care. In contrast, an expressive caring behavior pertains to the psychoemotive role invested by a nurse toward the patient. Examples of such behavior may refer to actions such as active listening, offering emotional support, and ensuring genuine presence.2 In nursing practice, caring is universal and nondiscriminatory. However, its vulnerability to being influenced by several human and social factors is indisputable. Undeniably, the existence of stigma and discrimination in health care settings, particularly toward human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), continuously grow in number, causing late presentation and poor health outcomes of persons living with HIV (PLHIV).3,4 Ideally, it is projected that by the year 2030 90% of those with HIV will be diagnosed, and 90% of those diagnosed will be on HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 90% of them shall be undetectable of HIV.5 Although there are efforts initiated by different health sectors such as government, private, and non-government organizations in controlling the incidence of stigma and discrimination in their countries to meet the global goal of 90-90-90, the issue remains a challenge up to the present time, especially among low resource countries.

One of the most discussed topics in the literature that is linked to HIV/AIDS stigma and discrimination is the attitude of the health care workers toward these patients. A study strongly suggest the importance of an organization-led intervention to implement strategies where all ofits constituents and not only those on direct patient care, practice quality improvement in responding to organization-wide mitigation of HIV stigma and discrimination.6 The literature discussed that the lack of proper training and education on HIV among nurses contributes to the stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes.7,8,9 When there is a repeated opportunity to care for these patients, it is revealed that training and education reduce prejudicial attitudes and fear of HIV/AIDS.10 When nurses feel more confident and have enough awareness of how they can protect themselves, they display more willingness to care for HIV positive patients.11,12

There are instruments and scales developed by various researchers that can be used in measuring the nursing practices in HIV care, which will help in improving it. There are valid and reliable scales assessing HIV stigma among nurses and their interaction with patients, and this includes the HIV stigma instrument-nurse (HASI-N).13 Similarly, the provider perception inventory (PPI)14 assesses health provider stigma on HIV/AIDS, substance abuse, and behaviors of men having sex with men. There are also scales measuring three dimensions, including self-stigma of the patients, their social stigma, and stigma in health facilities.15 Another study came up with a scale that measures not only the inducer to stigma in health facilities but also the attitudes of the health personnel toward PLHIV.16 There are also studies examining the attitudes of the care providers such as those conducted in Iran,17 Egypt,18 and Italy.19

Notably, however, there is a scarcity of observational studies, especially on the use and development of scales measuring the behaviors of care providers, particularly the nurses caring for both suspected and confirmed HIV/AIDS patients. There is a growing number of reports suggesting the lack of awareness of nurses of them being perceived as discriminatory by their patients.20,21,22 It is on this note that the authors came up with this preliminary study to identify these behaviors and develop a measure on the nurses’ behaviors toward people with confirmed or suspected diagnosis of HIV/AIDS.

Study aim

The apparent lack of a necessary instrument that centers on the nurses’ behaviors toward these population (confirmed and suspected HIV) prompted this initiative. This study aims (1) to explore the experiences of nurses in caring for patients with suspected or confirmed HIV; (2) to develop a valid and eliable instrument to measure nurses’ behaviors toward these clients, and (3) to explain the relevance of utilizing a mixed method design in the conceptualization and development of a scale.

Methods

The study utilized a sequential exploratory mixed method design, which uses a descriptive approach in the qualitative phase and an exploratory factor analysis in the quantitative phase (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Sequential exploratory mixed method design.

Following this sequential method, we implemented two separate procedures of data collection and participant selection. Logical approaches guide the sequential exploratory mixed method design in the collection, analysis, and integration of both quantitative and qualitative data in a single study.23 The method is thought of as an ideal protocol to be used in tool development24,25,26 (Table 1).

Implementation matrix.

Items Qualitative Quantitative
Study aims Explore the experiences of nurses in caring for patients with suspected or confirmed HIV Develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure nurses’ behaviors toward these clients.
Type of data Narrative data Survey data
Date of collection February–June 2019 July–November 2019
Participants 17 nurses working in hospitals 400 nurse participants
Qualitative phase

In this phase, descriptive qualitative inquiry was utilized to assess their experiences. The participants were asked to use the guide question, “How was your experience in caring for a suspected or confirmed HIV patient?” Subsequent probing questions were asked from our informants, which facilitated gathering of rich qualitative information.

Participant recruitment, sampling, and setting

There were 17 key informant nurses who were purposively selected and interviewed face-to-face after their hospital duty. The nurses from private and government hospitals were pre-selected to represent different hospital areas or workstations. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (a) a registered nurse, with experience in caring for both suspected and confirmed patients diagnosed with HIV/AIDS; (b) has willingness to share their experiences of patient interaction. The nurses who do not have clinical functions and those who have no actual experience in caring for patients with HIV/AIDS are excluded.

Data collection

A letter of intent to conduct the study, the university approved research protocol, and ethical clearance were forwarded to the different hospitals for institutional approval. Once secured, an initial discussion with the Chief Nurse was made to identify key nurses who fit in the inclusion criteria for the interview. A participant informant packet and an informed consent were secured before the interview. An audio recorder was utilized to facilitate data gathering.

Data analysis and item development

The recorded interview was transcribed and translated into English, which was counterchecked by an English major. The qualitative texts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The transcripts were analyzed and coded by the researchers to find embossed patterns identified through the reading and re-reading process guided by Braun and Clark's framework.27 The codes that share the same meaning were grouped into one, along with the transcripts which were utilized for item pooling to be used for the NB-CSHAP instrument. Initially there were 36 items that were identified in the raw pool of items. Transcripts that share the same meaning were removed to ensure that unique items were included in the tool. There were 16 items included in version 1 of the NB-CSHAP instrument.

Rigors and trustworthiness

The results of this study were made credible through bracketing which was done prior to the first encounter with the participants. As a nurse, the researcher poured all her perceptions and biases in caring for patients with HIV in a journal. The researcher ensured that the data that will be utilized is grounded on the data gathered from the nurse participants. The researchers achieved data saturation to ensure transferability. Dependability and confirmability was achieved through intercoder reliability checks to minimize biases.

Quantitative phase

In this phase, the first draft of the instrument was explored for content validity and reliability.

Content and face validity

The first draft of the instrument was returned to the interviewees for member checking and initial face validation. There were 11 subject matter experts in the field of nursing, HIV/AIDS care, statistics, and research instrumentation who took part in the evaluation of the instrument. The experts assessed the instrument's item coherence, grammar, appropriateness to the construct the scale intends to measure as well as the scoring instructions. The validity of the content was computed using the content validity index (CVI). The CVI was calculated following the standard computation for both item and scale CVI. Specifically, item-CVI (I-CVI) was computed by counting the number of experts who gave a “very relevant” score on the item, divided by the total number of experts who rated. On the other hand, the scale-CVI (S-CVI) was computed using averaging. This was done by summing up the I-CVI score of the item divided by the total number of items. An excellent S-CVI is described for scales scoring ≥ 0.9.28

Sampling and sample size

Following DeVellis’29 protocol of 1:5 item-sample ratio, a minimum of 85 samples will suffice for the factorial analysis. However, this study was able to get 400 nurse participants or an excess of 125 samples making the sample size highly adequate for the factorial analysis.

Participant recruitment and setting

The instrument was field-tested online via Surveymonkey. The link was forwarded to different nurse organizations, cell groups, as well as nurses known to the researchers. The link was subsequently sent to their group chats for answering. A total of 400 nurses working in various health facilities participated in the survey. Inclusion criteria are nurses who are in service for at least 6 months, and had experience in caring either a suspected or confirmed case of HIV/AIDS. Excluded are nurses who do not have clinical functions. The researchers ensured the faculty of each participant by verifying from their affiliations.

Statistical data analysis

The data was analyzed for intercorrelations using Bartlett's test of sphericity, and Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test was used to determine if data is suited for factor analysis. We utilized the principal component factor as the extraction method. The Kaiser's criterion (eigenvalue >1) was used to determine the number of factors to retain in the factor solution. Varimax rotation was used for easy interpretation of the items in each of the retained factors. The identified factors, as well as the entire scale, were tested for internal consistency and reliability using Cronbach's alpha. These were analyzed using the STATA v15.1 software.

Results
Qualitative findings

There were two overarching dichotomous themes revealed from the textural interview data. The first over-arching theme found throughout the nurse participants’ stories were their quintessential behaviors: The positive or quintessential behaviors were related to the following clusters coded as Compassion, Nondiscrimination, Connecting, Self-preservation, Mentoring, Professional Competence, Confidence, Humor, Generosity, Altruism, and Presence. The second overarching theme found throughout the nurse participants’ narratives were related to some of their negative behaviors. These negative behaviors were mostly related to the following clusters: gossiping, excessive personnel protective equipment (PPE) use, refusing to care, detachment, anxiety, and fear.

Quantitative results
Profile of nurses

The nurse participants of this study are mostly females (71%), with a mean age of 29.9 years old (SD = 6.8), unmarried (72.5%), finished BS Nursing degree (83%), and have joined the profession in the last 8.2 years (SD = 6.4). Most of the nurses are holding a permanent position (67.5%) and has been working for <5 years in their present assignment (71.5%) as a staff nurse (88.3%) in medical-surgical stations (f = 130) in private hospital facilities (52.5%) located in urban areas (68.5%) (Table 2).

Characteristics of the nurse participants.

Profile variables (n = 400) Number of nurses Percentage Mean Median SD
Age (years) 29.9 29 6.8
  <30 222 55.5
  30–39 147 36.8
  40–49 24 6.0
  ≥50 7 1.8
Gender
  Female 284 71.0
  Male 116 29.0
Marital status
  Married 110 27.5
  Unmarried 290 72.5
Educational attainment
  BSN 332 83.0
  MA/MS/MAN 62 15.5
  PhD 6 1.5
Registered nurse experience (years) 8.2 7 6.4
  <10 280 70.0
  10–19 101 25.3
  20–29 15 3.8
  ≥30 4 1.0
Present assignment experience (years) 4.3 3 3.8
  <5 286 71.5
  5–9 77 19.3
  10–14 26 6.5
  ≥15 11 2.8
Location of work
  Rural 126 31.5
  Urban 274 68.5
Type of organization
  Private 210 52.5
  Public 190 47.5
Rank or position in the current workplace
  Holds managerial position 47 11.8
  Staff nurse 353 88.3
Type of contract
  Casual/part-time 130 32.5
  Permanent 270 67.5
Hospital bed capacity 301
  <100 39 13.0
  101–250 187 62.1
  >250 75 24.9
Hospital area assignment 342
  Medical-Surgical 130 35.1
  Emergency Unit 63 17.1
  Intensive Care Unit/NICU/PACU 42 10.7
  Gynecology/Obstetric 36 9.8
  Pediatric Unit 23 6.3
  Operating Room 18 4.9
  Hemodialysis Unit 16 4.3
  Outpatient Department 6 1.6
  Administration Office 5 1.4
  Tropical infectious disease unit 3 0.8
Content and face validity

The I-CVI of the NB-PHG Scale ranges from .80 to 1 point. This suggests that the items are considered as relevant items.28 The S-CVI (Ave) of the NB-PHG Scale revealed 0.95 points indicating that the scale has excellent content validity.30

Assessment of item-intercorrelations

Using Bartlett's test of sphericity, it revealed that the data on the scale is significant (p = 0.000). To further verify this, the measure of sampling adequacy test was done and revealed a KMO value of 0.84, indicating a sufficient amount of shared variance among the item scores (Table 3).

Intercorrelation coefficients of the NB-CSHAP Scale.

Coefficients
Determinant of the correlation matrix 0.004
Bartlett test of sphericity
Chi-square 2092.576
Degrees of freedom 120
P-value 0.000
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy 0.852
Extraction of factors

We utilized the principal component factor as the factor extraction method in the developed instrument. There were two methods utilized to assist the researcher in the decision of retaining factors. The first step used was the Kaiser's criterion or the eigenvalue rule, which suggests that factors with an eigenvalue of 1.0 or more are retained for further analysis. The eigenvalue of a factor represents the amount of the total variance explained by that factor. The results revealed that there were four factors that have eigenvalues of >1.00. This suggests that four factors may be extracted from the NB-CSHAP scale (Table 4). When these four factors are extracted, this can explain 59.3% of the scale's total variance. To verify this, the researcher used the second approach, which is Cattell's scree test. This is a more visual guide in determining the number of factors that were retained (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Scree plot on the factors identified in the NB-CSHAP.

Factor loadings of the NB-CSHAP Scale items.

Variables Communalities Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4
Service-oriented behaviors
I care for my patients the best the best way I know based on what I learned 0.66 0.72
I always project with bearing even when I am stressed especially in front of my patients 0.55 0.69
I offer advise to my junior nurses who are new in handling critical cases 0.49 0.66
I provide care that is compassionate and supportive to the patient needs 0.61 0.58
I care for my patients regardless of their disease condition 0.55 0.58
I observe precautionary measures 0.50 0.56
I talk to my patients even if I know they will not respond 0.50 0.48
Discriminatory behaviors
I would make jokes about HIV patients 0.77 0.86
I request from my seniors not to assign me with a possible HIV + patient 0.74 0.85
I don’t give time to talk with a possible and confirmed HIV patient 0.73 0.84
I maliciously delve into the details of a person suspected or confirmed of HIV 0.43 0.48
Openhanded behaviors
I find time to talk with my patient, making him feel I am ready to listen 0.64 0.77
I try to provide holistic nursing care activities and interventions 0.57 0.68
I would share whatever I know about HIV to the patient especially on the expected future he will be facing 0.48 0.59
Perceptive behavior
I would sometimes laugh at my carelessness to lighten the mood 0.67 0.79
I would do things that may be risky on my part, so as not to make my patient uncomfortable or offended 0.54 0.54

Eigenvalue 4.58 2.73 1.15 1.02

Explained variance (%) 28.63 17.06 7.19 6.42

Cumulative variance (%) 28.63 45.69 52.88 59.30
Reliability score

Cronbach's alpha was determined twice (Table 5): (1) totality of the scale, and (2) per factor (subscale). Results revealed an acceptable internal consistency of 0.73 reliability score31 for the entire 16-item scale. However, when per factor internal consistency was examined, it showed that Factors 1 and 2 have acceptable reliabilities, while Factors 3 and 4 have low-reliability scores. This may be because of the low number of items in the subscale.

Psychometric properties: Alpha coefficient of internal consistency of the NB-CSHAP scale.

Items Average inter-item covariance No of items in the scale Scale reliability coefficient Interpretation
All items 0.13 16 0.73 Acceptable
Service-oriented behaviors 0.19 7 0.79 Acceptable
Discriminatory behaviors 0.58 4 0.78 Acceptable
Openhanded behaviors 0.35 3 0.66 Low
Perceptive behaviors 0.40 2 0.40 Low
Scoring

The behaviors which are negatively stated are reverse-scored such that the highest score of 5 are scored as 1, and the lowest score of 1 is scored as 5. The items for reverse coding are those that belong to discriminatory behaviors subscale. The highest possible score for this scale is 80. Specifically, the scores are described as appropriate/caring behaviors (53–80 points); mediocre behaviors (26–52 points), and undesirable/stigmatizing behaviors (0–25 points).

Mixed-method results

The sequential exploratory mixed method on this study is an appropriate method in unifying techniques in designing and developing an instrument. The qual-quan sequence observed on this study illuminated qualitative exploration of the nurses’ experiences in caring for patients with HIV/AIDS which were the basis on which a reliable scale can be developed.

Discussion

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable tool to assess nurses’ behaviors in caring for suspected or confirmed HIV/AIDS patients. A sequential exploratory mixed method is a useful method in developing health-related scales32,33 which was the primary method utilized in this study. The current study was able to produce a valid and reliable instrument composed of 16 items with four distinct factors. The face-to-face interview, which the researchers did as a preliminary step, broadened our understanding of the nurses’ experiences, views, and perceptions in their care toward patients who are suspected or confirmed case of HIV/AIDS. The sequential approach from the key informant interviews and the use of experts in the field substantiate that the items generated in the scale are concise and non-ambiguous. It is a common practice to request the expertise of subject matter experts in developing quality scales and measurements.34,35 Hence, it is essential to select qualified and esteemed experts in the field to evaluate a tool being developed to ensure that relevant suggestions and critical points can be integrated for an improved version of the instrument.

Multiple approaches were utilized to test the validity of the instrument in this study. Although a weak valuation, the initial assessment through the face and content validation of the tool, suggests that the newly developed tool is a valid instrument. The constructive suggestions and recommendations of the panel of subject matter experts significantly improved the readability and coherence of the NB-CSHAP instrument. Items that seemed vague and insignificant were excluded, which enhanced the integrity of the scale.

Based on the number of subjects, we were able to meet the minimum criteria of 1:5 item-to-subject ratio to proceed for factor analysis and assess the psychometric properties of the newly developed instrument. Furthermore, both the KMO and Bartlett's test of sphericity suggests that the data is adequate for factor extraction. The acceptable internal consistency as derived after using the Cronbach's alpha is an indication that the items in the scale measure the same construct it intends to measure. The acceptable Cronbach's alpha suggests that the scale is a reliable instrument to measure the construct of nurses’ behaviors.

The NB-CSHAP scale structure and contents

The four identified factors were named discriminatory behaviors, service-oriented behaviors, openhanded behaviors, and perceptive behaviors, which were described based on the items the factor categories.

Factor 1. Refers to behaviors showing service-oriented behaviors. The seven items under this factor describes a nurse who displays behaviors true to her professional calling. Nursing is a profession that provides caring services to patients who are in need. Typical examples discussed in the literature highlights the importance of these behaviors in nurse-patient interaction.36,37,38 Service-oriented behaviors in the nursing profession are acts that imbibe the expression of compassion, professionalism, nondiscrimination, and mentoring. An example under this category is item number three that states, “I offer guidance to my junior nurses who are new in handling critical cases.” Communicating with colleagues such is vital for quality patient care.39 The behavioral exchange that transpires during this process is anchored on the goal of patient safety.

Factor 2 refers to discriminatory behaviors. These are items that describe stigmatizing and discriminatory behaviors. Here four items are included that depict acts of gossiping, avoidant behavior, and detachment. Literature explicitly discussed that care providers such as nurses are prone to display negative behaviors especially when they lack adequate knowledge of HIV.11,40

Factor 3 refers to openhanded behaviors. These are benevolent behaviors that reflect the acts of presence, generosity, and the provision of holistic care. Holistic caring behaviors are always emphasized in nursing as a necessity to be practiced by those in the profession. To be a holistic nurse entails the provision of care on the entirety of human facets comprising the physiological-psycho-social and spiritual needs. Bakar et al.41 suggest nurses have more caring attributes when they are spiritually rooted.

Factor 4 refers to perceptive behaviors. These are behaviors that pertain to being sensitive when the need arises. These are behaviors of humor and altruism. A sympathetic nurse can inject humor while at work, especially in stressful situations. Similarly, altruistic actions such as risking the self when necessary are selfless behaviors where a nurse prioritizes what is for the best interest of patients under her care. Alavi et al.42 discussed how nurses tend to possess empathetic tendencies and self-sacrifice in their workstations. Perceptive behaviors are related to the sense of the sensitivity of a nurse to make difficult situations as pleasing as possible.

In summary, the NB-CSHAP scale is generally classified into two distinct behaviors: the caring behaviors and stigmatizing behaviors. Caring behaviors comprise the SOP in caring which consists of service-oriented behaviors, openhanded behaviors, and perceptive behaviors. The SOP behaviors are the quintessential behaviors a nurse must possess when caring for patients suspected or confirmed with HIV/AIDS. On the other hand, behaviors considered as stigmatizing behaviors are prone to be misconstrued as offensive and discriminatory.

Integrated mixed-method findings

The value of the qualitative component in designing the instrument using mixed-method design relies on the fact that the items included in the devised tool were organic on the experience of the participants. Following this premise, it makes the instrument a legitimate and authentic instrument on the construct it intends to measure.

Implications to nursing practice

The scarcity of a scale to measure the nurses’ behaviors in the literature is an indication that the construct has not been explicitly contextualized, particularly toward patient care with suspected and confirmed HIV/AIDS. This novel initiative in measuring behaviors will provide a deeper understanding of specific actions that are often misinterpreted or challenging to understand. The authors believe that studies related to HIV care can be improved further and not limited to determining only the knowledge and attitudes of nurses but rather include assessment of their behaviors. These behaviors are essential in involving and engaging into the secluded life of persons with HIV.43 The newly developed NB-CSHAP scale can support studies and investigations related to the nurse's interaction with an HIV patient. The scale can be used by health facilities, especially among nurse supervisors, to assess the behaviors of their nurses to foster an improved behavior toward patients with HIV/AIDS. Nurse leaders can strategize measures to enhance the caring behaviors of nurses, which is an essential step in reducing HIV stigma in health facilities. Reducing, if not eliminating stigma prone behaviors, will not only improve the quality of nursing practice but also ultimately achieve improved patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Using a sequential exploratory design is an ideal approach to tool development. The scholarly and rigorous method of the tool development process provided a deeper understanding of the nurse behaviors and their interactions with persons suspected or diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. This study was able to contextualize the nurses’ behaviors as they interact with their suspected or confirmed HIV/AIDS patients. The findings of this study provide initial evidence that the newly developed NB-CSHAP scale composed of 16 items is a valid and reliable instrument to assess nurses’ behaviors toward patients with suspected or confirmed HIV case.

Limitations

This study is not without limitations. First is that the NB-CSHAP scale was developed in the context of Philippines. There may be cultural differences in behaviors and linguistics used compared to other countries and environments, which delimits the applicability of the items included. Second is the analysis used. The study only utilized EFA and not confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) since the intention of this study was primarily to identify the latent factors in the newly developed scale and its intercorrelation between factors. The high validity and acceptable reliability scores derived from this study were based only on the participants and circumstances when the data was gathered. Future researchers are encouraged to use CFA to test the factors as well as the validity and reliability of the scale in their respective health settings. Furthermore, behaviors are best measured when observed; hence it is suggested that the scale be validated not only by the nurses but must also involve their patients as care recipients.

eISSN:
2544-8994
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing