[
Algera, M., Kätsch, C., Chirwa, P.W., 2019. Developing a taper model for the Pinus elliottii x P. caribaea var. hondurensis hybrid in South Africa. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 81: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2018.1520027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arkes, J., 2019. Regression analysis. A practical introduction. London: Routledge. 362 p.10.4324/9781351011099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avery, T.E., Burkhart, H.E., 2002. Forest measurements. New York, USA: Mc Graw Hill. 456 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barna, M., Ferezliev, A., Tsakov, H., Mihál, I., 2020. Investigations of mature Scots pine stands in windthrow areas in Norway spruce forests in Western Rhodopes. Folia Oecologica, 47: 1–9. doi: 10.2478/foecol-2020-0001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bayat, M., Bettinger, P., Heidari, S., Henareh Khalyani, A., Jourgholami, M., Hamidi, S.K, 2020. Estimation of tree heights in an uneven-aged, mixed forest in northern Iran using artificial intelligence and empirical models. Forests, 11 (3): 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bi, H., Hamilton, F., 1998. Stem volume equations for native tree species in southern New South Wales and Victoria. Australian Forestry, 61 (4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.1998.10674752
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boroughani, M., Soltani, S., Ghezelseflu, N., Pazhouhan, I., 2022. A comparative assessment between artificial neural network, neuro-fuzzy, and support vector machine models in splash erosion modelling under simulation circumstances. Folia Oecologica, 49 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45: 5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cutler, A., Cutler, D.R., Stevens, J.R., 2012. Random forests. In Zhang, C., Ma, Y.Q. (eds). Ensemble machine learning. New York: Springer, 2015, p. 157–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_510.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamantopoulou, M.J., 2005. Artificial neural networks as an alternative tool in pine bark volume estimation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamantopoulou, M.J., Milios, E., Doganos, D., Bistinas, I., 2009. Artificial neural network modeling for reforestation design through the dominant trees bolevolume estimation. Natural Resource Modeling, 22: 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2009.00051.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamantopoulou, M.J., Özçelik, R., Yavuz, H., 2018. Treebark volume prediction via machine learning: a case study based on black alder’s tree-bark production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151: 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Draper, N.R., Smith, H., 1998. Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley. 706 p.10.1002/9781118625590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furnival, G., 1961. An index for comparing equations used in constructing volume tables. Forest Science, 7: 337–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Güner, S.T., Diamantopoulou, M.J., Poudel, K.P., Çömez, A., Özçelik, R., 2022. Employing artificial neural network for effective biomass prediction: an alternative approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 192: 106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2017. The elements of statistical learning data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 764 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J.W., 2006. Exploring data tables, trends and shapes. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 538 p.10.1002/9781118150702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirsch, R.P., 1991. Validation samples. Biometrics, 47: 1193–1194. [cit. 2022-01-09]. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532672
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM SPSS Corp., released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leite, H.G., Da Silva, M.L.M., Binoti, D.H.B., Fardin, L., Takizawa, F.H., 2011. Estimation of inside-bark diameter and heartwood diameter for Tectona grandis Linn. trees using artificial neural networks. European Journal of Forest Research, 130: 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0427-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilliefors, H.W., 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 399–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2283970
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koulelis, P.P., Ioannidis, K., 2021. Constructing single-entry stem volume models for four economically important tree species of Greece. Folia Oecologica, 48 (2): 136–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2021-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchi, M., Scotti, R., Rinaldini, G., Cantiani, P., 2020. Taper function for Pinus nigra in central Italy: Is a more complex computational system required? Forests, 11: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matis, K.G., 2004. Forest biometry: II. Dendrometry. 2nd ed. Thessaloniki, Greece: Pegasus. 674 p. (In Greek).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meng, C.H., Tsai, W.Y., 1986. Selection of weights for a weighted regression of tree volume. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16 (3): 671–673. https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, J.A., Zhang, L., Stuck, D., 1996. Height-diameter equations for ten tree species in the Inland Northwest. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 11: 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/11.4.132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nanos, N., Montero, G., 2002. Spatial prediction of diameter distribution models. Forest Ecology and Management, 161: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00498-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicoletti, M.F., Carvalho, S.D.P.C., Do Amaral Machado, S., Costa, V.J., Silva, C.A., Topanotti, L.R., 2020. Bivariate and generalized models for taper stem representation and assortments production of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Journal of Environmental Management, 270:110865.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11086532721311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, M.H., Görgens, E.B., 2016. Artificial intelligence procedures for tree taper estimation within a complex vegetation mosaic in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 11: e0154738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154738487149027187074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özçelik, R., Karatepe, Y., Gürlevik, N., Cañellas, I., Crecente-Campo, F., 2016. Development of ecoregion-based merchantable volume systems for Pinus brutia Ten. and Pinus nigra Arnold. in southern Turkey. Journal of Forestry Research, 27: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0147-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özçelik, R., Diamantopoulou, M.J., Trincado, G., 2019. Evaluation of potential modeling approaches for Scots pine stem diameter prediction in north-eastern Turkey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162: 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.05.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özçelik, R., Alkan, O., 2020. Fitting and calibrating a mixed-effects segmented taper model. Cerne, 26: 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202026032737
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825–2830.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Philip, M.S., 1994. Measuring trees and forests. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 310 p.10.1079/9780851988832.0000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R., Liaw, A., 2006. Newer classification and regression techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9: 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Python Software Foundation, 2022. Python 3.9. https://docs.python.org/3.9/index.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ratkowsky, D.A., 1990. Handbook of nonlinear regression models. Statistics: Textbooks and Monographs, vol. 107. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. 241 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salekin, S., Catalan, C.H., Boczniewicz, D., Phiri, D., Morgenroth, J., Meason, D.F., Mason, E.G., 2021. Global tree taper modelling: a review of applications, methods, functions, and their parameters. Forests, 12: 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Segal, M.R., 2003. Machine learning benchmarks and random forest regression. San Francisco: Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California. [cit.2022-01-09]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35x3v9t4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soares, F.A.A.M.N., Flôres, E.L., Cabacinha, C.D., Carrijo, G.A., Veiga, A.C.P., 2011. Recursive diameter prediction and volume calculation of Eucalyptus trees using multilayer perceptron networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 78: 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.05.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trincado, G., Burchart, H.E., 2006. A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. Forest Science, 52: 670–682.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Laar, A., Akça, A., 2007. Forest mensuration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. 383 p.10.1007/978-1-4020-5991-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Rossum, G., Drake, F.L., 2011. The Python language reference manual. Network Theory Ltd. 150 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, P.W., 2009. Tree and forest measurement. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 191 p.10.1007/978-3-540-95966-3
]Search in Google Scholar