Open Access

Simulation of over-bark tree bole diameters, through the RFr (Random Forest Regression) algorithm


Cite

Algera, M., Kätsch, C., Chirwa, P.W., 2019. Developing a taper model for the Pinus elliottii x P. caribaea var. hondurensis hybrid in South Africa. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 81: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2018.1520027 Search in Google Scholar

Arkes, J., 2019. Regression analysis. A practical introduction. London: Routledge. 362 p.10.4324/9781351011099 Search in Google Scholar

Avery, T.E., Burkhart, H.E., 2002. Forest measurements. New York, USA: Mc Graw Hill. 456 p. Search in Google Scholar

Barna, M., Ferezliev, A., Tsakov, H., Mihál, I., 2020. Investigations of mature Scots pine stands in windthrow areas in Norway spruce forests in Western Rhodopes. Folia Oecologica, 47: 1–9. doi: 10.2478/foecol-2020-0001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bayat, M., Bettinger, P., Heidari, S., Henareh Khalyani, A., Jourgholami, M., Hamidi, S.K, 2020. Estimation of tree heights in an uneven-aged, mixed forest in northern Iran using artificial intelligence and empirical models. Forests, 11 (3): 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030324 Search in Google Scholar

Bi, H., Hamilton, F., 1998. Stem volume equations for native tree species in southern New South Wales and Victoria. Australian Forestry, 61 (4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.1998.10674752 Search in Google Scholar

Boroughani, M., Soltani, S., Ghezelseflu, N., Pazhouhan, I., 2022. A comparative assessment between artificial neural network, neuro-fuzzy, and support vector machine models in splash erosion modelling under simulation circumstances. Folia Oecologica, 49 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0003 Search in Google Scholar

Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45: 5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, A., Cutler, D.R., Stevens, J.R., 2012. Random forests. In Zhang, C., Ma, Y.Q. (eds). Ensemble machine learning. New York: Springer, 2015, p. 157–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_510.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5 Search in Google Scholar

Diamantopoulou, M.J., 2005. Artificial neural networks as an alternative tool in pine bark volume estimation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.002 Search in Google Scholar

Diamantopoulou, M.J., Milios, E., Doganos, D., Bistinas, I., 2009. Artificial neural network modeling for reforestation design through the dominant trees bolevolume estimation. Natural Resource Modeling, 22: 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2009.00051.x Search in Google Scholar

Diamantopoulou, M.J., Özçelik, R., Yavuz, H., 2018. Treebark volume prediction via machine learning: a case study based on black alder’s tree-bark production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151: 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.039 Search in Google Scholar

Draper, N.R., Smith, H., 1998. Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley. 706 p.10.1002/9781118625590 Search in Google Scholar

Furnival, G., 1961. An index for comparing equations used in constructing volume tables. Forest Science, 7: 337–341. Search in Google Scholar

Güner, S.T., Diamantopoulou, M.J., Poudel, K.P., Çömez, A., Özçelik, R., 2022. Employing artificial neural network for effective biomass prediction: an alternative approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 192: 106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106596 Search in Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2017. The elements of statistical learning data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 764 p. Search in Google Scholar

Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J.W., 2006. Exploring data tables, trends and shapes. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 538 p.10.1002/9781118150702 Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, R.P., 1991. Validation samples. Biometrics, 47: 1193–1194. [cit. 2022-01-09]. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532672 Search in Google Scholar

IBM SPSS Corp., released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Search in Google Scholar

Leite, H.G., Da Silva, M.L.M., Binoti, D.H.B., Fardin, L., Takizawa, F.H., 2011. Estimation of inside-bark diameter and heartwood diameter for Tectona grandis Linn. trees using artificial neural networks. European Journal of Forest Research, 130: 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0427-7 Search in Google Scholar

Lilliefors, H.W., 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 399–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2283970 Search in Google Scholar

Koulelis, P.P., Ioannidis, K., 2021. Constructing single-entry stem volume models for four economically important tree species of Greece. Folia Oecologica, 48 (2): 136–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2021-0014 Search in Google Scholar

Marchi, M., Scotti, R., Rinaldini, G., Cantiani, P., 2020. Taper function for Pinus nigra in central Italy: Is a more complex computational system required? Forests, 11: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040405 Search in Google Scholar

Matis, K.G., 2004. Forest biometry: II. Dendrometry. 2nd ed. Thessaloniki, Greece: Pegasus. 674 p. (In Greek). Search in Google Scholar

Meng, C.H., Tsai, W.Y., 1986. Selection of weights for a weighted regression of tree volume. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16 (3): 671–673. https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-118 Search in Google Scholar

Moore, J.A., Zhang, L., Stuck, D., 1996. Height-diameter equations for ten tree species in the Inland Northwest. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 11: 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/11.4.132 Search in Google Scholar

Nanos, N., Montero, G., 2002. Spatial prediction of diameter distribution models. Forest Ecology and Management, 161: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00498-4 Search in Google Scholar

Nicoletti, M.F., Carvalho, S.D.P.C., Do Amaral Machado, S., Costa, V.J., Silva, C.A., Topanotti, L.R., 2020. Bivariate and generalized models for taper stem representation and assortments production of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Journal of Environmental Management, 270:110865.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11086532721311 Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, M.H., Görgens, E.B., 2016. Artificial intelligence procedures for tree taper estimation within a complex vegetation mosaic in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 11: e0154738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154738487149027187074 Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, R., Karatepe, Y., Gürlevik, N., Cañellas, I., Crecente-Campo, F., 2016. Development of ecoregion-based merchantable volume systems for Pinus brutia Ten. and Pinus nigra Arnold. in southern Turkey. Journal of Forestry Research, 27: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0147-4 Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, R., Diamantopoulou, M.J., Trincado, G., 2019. Evaluation of potential modeling approaches for Scots pine stem diameter prediction in north-eastern Turkey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162: 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.05.033 Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, R., Alkan, O., 2020. Fitting and calibrating a mixed-effects segmented taper model. Cerne, 26: 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202026032737 Search in Google Scholar

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825–2830. Search in Google Scholar

Philip, M.S., 1994. Measuring trees and forests. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 310 p.10.1079/9780851988832.0000 Search in Google Scholar

Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R., Liaw, A., 2006. Newer classification and regression techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9: 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1 Search in Google Scholar

Python Software Foundation, 2022. Python 3.9. https://docs.python.org/3.9/index.html Search in Google Scholar

Ratkowsky, D.A., 1990. Handbook of nonlinear regression models. Statistics: Textbooks and Monographs, vol. 107. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. 241 p. Search in Google Scholar

Salekin, S., Catalan, C.H., Boczniewicz, D., Phiri, D., Morgenroth, J., Meason, D.F., Mason, E.G., 2021. Global tree taper modelling: a review of applications, methods, functions, and their parameters. Forests, 12: 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070913 Search in Google Scholar

Segal, M.R., 2003. Machine learning benchmarks and random forest regression. San Francisco: Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California. [cit.2022-01-09]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35x3v9t4 Search in Google Scholar

Soares, F.A.A.M.N., Flôres, E.L., Cabacinha, C.D., Carrijo, G.A., Veiga, A.C.P., 2011. Recursive diameter prediction and volume calculation of Eucalyptus trees using multilayer perceptron networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 78: 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.05.008 Search in Google Scholar

Trincado, G., Burchart, H.E., 2006. A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. Forest Science, 52: 670–682. Search in Google Scholar

Van Laar, A., Akça, A., 2007. Forest mensuration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. 383 p.10.1007/978-1-4020-5991-9 Search in Google Scholar

Van Rossum, G., Drake, F.L., 2011. The Python language reference manual. Network Theory Ltd. 150 p. Search in Google Scholar

West, P.W., 2009. Tree and forest measurement. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 191 p.10.1007/978-3-540-95966-3 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-7014
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other, Plant Science, Zoology, Ecology