Kaur and Kaur (2022) |
Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM), PU, POU, attitude |
Nadlifatin, et al. (2022) |
PU, POU, job pursuit attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control |
Schaarschmidt, Walsh and Ivens (2021) |
Discrepant information, persuasion knowledge activation, company response, trustworthiness |
Meah and Sarwar (2021) |
Data quality, reliability, recognition, networking spectrum, result demonstrability, simplicity of navigation |
Chen, Warden and Liou (2021) |
Esthetic forms, recruitment information, interactive functions, information fitness interface attributes |
Khalid, et al. (2021) |
Technology, attitude toward use, POU, PU |
Nguyen (2021) |
Computer self-efficacy, perceived privacy risk, POU, PU |
Irawan, Adiputra and Arshanty (2021) |
Perceived enjoyment, POU, PU, perceived trust, attitude toward use |
Rahman and Patra (2020) |
Usability, user experience, performance expectancy, subjective norms, trustworthiness |
Candra, et al. (2020) |
POU, critical mass, capability, perceived playfulness, PU, trustworthiness |
Grimaldo and Uy (2020) |
PU, POU, attitude |
Woon and Singh (2019) |
PU, perceived information content quality, perceived search engine optimization |
Selvanathan, et al. (2019) |
POU, PU, perceived credibility |
Banerjee and Gupta (2019) |
Perceived quality, perceived credibility, organizational attractiveness, age, gender, work experience, preview mode, employee testimonial, source of advertisement |
Priyadarshini, Sreejesh and Jha (2019) |
Information characteristics (relevancy, accuracy, timeliness), organizational attractiveness, attitude toward website |
Carmack and Heiss (2018) |
Effectiveness, past behavior, perceived behavioral control, actual behavioral control, attitudes, subjective norms |
Laumer, et al. (2018) |
Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, habit, trust, age, gender, experience, context (jobseeker) |
Poudel (2018) |
Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, subjective norms, objective norms, facilitating conditions |
Chang and Kim (2018) |
Accuracy, security, self-efficacy, individual innovation, user satisfaction, POU, PU |
Siew, et al. (2018) |
Perceived compatibility, PU, POU, attitude toward use |
Zhang, et al. (2018) |
Outcome expectation, PU, Internet self-efficacy, POU |
Arsanti and Yuliasari (2018) |
Innovativeness, PU, POU, attitude |
Mahmood and Ling (2017) |
PU, POU, trust |
Huang and Chuang (2016) |
Task characteristics, technology characteristics, task–technology fit, performance expectancy, efforts expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, habit |
Alsultanny and Alotaibi (2015) |
POU, PU, perceived enjoyment, attitude toward use |
Febriana (2015) |
POU, PU, attitude toward use |
Liyanage and Galhena (2014) |
PU, POU |
Kashi and Zheng (2013) |
Impressions of website, impressions of hiring organization, PU, POU |
Gregory, Meade and Thompson (2013) |
Website design (website usability, website esthetics), website content (job information, organizational information), P–E fit (P–J fit, P–O fit), attitudes toward organization, attitudes toward website |
RoyChowdhury and Srimannarayana (2013) |
Perceived efficiency, user-friendliness, information provision, fairness perception, Internet selection image |
Brahmana and Brahmana (2013) |
Perceived stress, POU, PU, perceived enjoyment |
De Goede, Klehe and van Vianen (2011) |
P–I fit, P–O fit, assessment of website design, OI similarity |
Lin (2010) |
PU, POU, attitude, peer influence, external influence, subjective norm, self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control |
Williamson, et al. (2010) |
Website vividness, amount of company and job attribute information on website, firm employer reputation |
Kroustalis (2009) |
P–O fit/P–J fit, website content (job information-organization information), website design (website usability-website esthetics), attitudes toward website, attitudes toward organization |
Sylva and Mol (2009) |
Individual attributes (age, gender, minority status, prior experience, Internet familiarity, applicant source, country), efficiency, Internet selection image, user-friendliness, process fairness, information provision, overall process satisfaction |
Goldberg and Allen (2008) |
Parasocial interaction, ease of use, usefulness, diversity statements, engagement, attitude toward the organization |
Allen, Mahto and Otondo (2007) |
Organization familiarity, organization image, job information, organization information, attitude toward organization, attitude toward website |
Cober, et al. (2004) |
Website façade, jobseeker's prior attitude toward the organization, initial affective reactions, website system features, perception of website usability, search behavior, familiarity, organizational image, website attitude, jobseeker individual differences |