Accès libre

Genetic variability in peas (Pisum sativum L.) from Turkey asssessed with molecular and morphological markers

   | 30 juin 2019
À propos de cet article

Citez

Ahmad S., Singh M., Lamb-Palmer N.D., Lefsrud M., Singh J., 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity in 35 Pisum sativum accessions using microsatellite markers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92, 1075-1081.10.4141/cjps2011-261Search in Google Scholar

Baranger A., Aubert G., Arnau G., Lainé A.L., Deniot G., Potier J., et al., 2004. Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein and PCR-based markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 1309-1321.10.1007/s00122-003-1540-514727027Search in Google Scholar

Ceyhan E., Avci M.A., 2015. Determination of some agricultural characters of developed pea (Pisum sativum L.) lines. World Academy Sci., Eng Tech. Agricult. Biosys. Eng. 9(12), https://waset.org/Publication/10003051.Search in Google Scholar

Cuevas H.E., Prom L.K., 2013. Assessment of molecular diversity and population structure of the Ethiopian sorghum [Sorghum bicolor L. Moench] germplasm collection maintained by the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System using SSR markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 60, 1817-1830.10.1007/s10722-013-9956-5Search in Google Scholar

Cupic T., Tucak M., Popovic S., Bolaric S., Grljusic S., Kozumplik V., 2009. Genetic diversity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes assessed by pedigree, morphological and molecular data. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 343-348.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Vallve S., Palau J., Romeu A., 1999. Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1125-1134.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a02620310486968Search in Google Scholar

Georgieva N., Nikolova I., Kosev V., 2016. Evaluation of genetic divergence and heritability in pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. BioSci. Biotechnol. 5, 61-67.Search in Google Scholar

Gixhari B., Pavelková.M., Ismaili H., Vrapi H., Jaupi A., Smýkal P., 2014. Genetic diversity of Albanian pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces assessed by morphological traits and molecular markers. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 50, 177-184.10.17221/227/2013-CJGPBSearch in Google Scholar

Hanci F, Gökçe A.F., 2016a. Molecular characterization of Turkish onion germplasm using SSR markers. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 52, 71-76.10.17221/162/2015-CJGPBSearch in Google Scholar

Hanci F., Gökçe A.F., 2016b. Genetic diversity evaluations in Turkish onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes: principal component analyses (PCA) for breeding strategies. Acta Hortic. 1143, 227-234.10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1143.33Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrand C.E., Torney D.C., Wagner R.P., 1992. Informativeness of polymorphic DNA markers. In: The Human Genome Project. Deciphering the Blueprint of Hederity. N.C. Cooper (Ed.) University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, USA, 100-102.Search in Google Scholar

Izzah N.K., Lee J., Perumal S., Park J.Y., Ahn K., Fu D., et al., 2013. Microsatellite-based analysis of genetic diversity in 91 commercial Brassica oleracea L. cultivars belonging to six varietal groups. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 60, 1967-1986.10.1007/s10722-013-9966-3Search in Google Scholar

Khan T.N., Ramzan A., Jillani G., Mehmood T., 2013. Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Potowar region. J. Agric. Res. 51, 51-60.Search in Google Scholar

Kumari P., Basal N., Singh A.K., Rai V.P., Srivastava C.P., Singh P.K., 2013. Genetic diversity studies in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 12, 3540-3550.10.4238/2013.March.13.1223546983Search in Google Scholar

Kwon S.J., Brown A.F., Hu J., Mcgee R., Watt C., Kisha T., et al., 2012. Genetic diversity, population structure and genome-wide marker-trait association analysis emphasizing seed nutrients of the USDA pea (Pisum sativum L.) core collection. Genes Genom. 34, 305-320.10.1007/s13258-011-0213-zSearch in Google Scholar

Lewis G.P., Schrire B., Mackinder B., Lock M., 2005. Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Loridon K., Mcphee K., Morin J., Dubreuil P., Pilet-Nayel M.L., Aubert G., et al., 2005. Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 111, 1022-1031.10.1007/s00122-005-0014-316133320Search in Google Scholar

Nasiri J., Haghnazari A., Saba J., 2009. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on SSR markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8, 3405-3417.Search in Google Scholar

Nisar M., 2008. Genetic diversity in pea (Pisum sativum L.) for morphological characteristics and molecular markers. Doctoral thesis, Univ. Quaid-I Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.Search in Google Scholar

Nisar M., Khan A., Wadood S.F., Shah A.A., Hanci F., 2017. Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers. Turk. J. Bot. 41, 338-346.10.3906/bot-1608-17Search in Google Scholar

Ouafi L., Alane F., Rahal-Bouziane H., Abdelguerfi A., 2016. Agro-morphological diversity within field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11(40), 4039-4047.10.5897/AJAR2016.11454Search in Google Scholar

Raji A.A., 2002. Assessment of genetic diversity and heterotic relationships in African improved and local cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm. Doctoral thesis, Univ. Ibadan, Nigeria.Search in Google Scholar

Rao N.K., 2004. Plant genetic resources: advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 3, 136-145.10.5897/AJB2004.000-2025Search in Google Scholar

Simioniuc D., Uptmoor R., Friedt W., Ordon F., Swiecicki W., 2002. Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs. Plant Breed. 121, 429-435.10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.733320.xSearch in Google Scholar

Smýkal P., Hybl M., Corander J., Jarkovsky J., Flavell A.J., Griga M., 2008. Genetic diversity and population structure of pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties derived from combined retrotransposon, microsatellite and morphological marker analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117(3), 413-424.10.1007/s00122-008-0785-418504543Search in Google Scholar

Smýkal P., Coyne C., Redden R., Maxted N., 2013. Peas. In: Genetic and Genomic Resources of Grain Legume Improvement. M. Singh and H. Upadhyaya (Eds), Elsevier, Netherlands, 41-80.10.1016/B978-0-12-397935-3.00003-7Search in Google Scholar

Solberg S.O., Brantestam A.K., Olsson K., Leino M.W., Weibull J., Yndgaard F., 2015. Diversity in local cultivars of Pisum sativum collected from home gardens in Sweden. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 62, 194-203.10.1016/j.bse.2015.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Taran B., Zhang C., Warkentin T., Tullu A., Vandenberg A., 2005. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48, 257-272.10.1139/g04-11415838548Search in Google Scholar

Tatikonda L., Wani S.P., Kannan S., Beerelli N., Sreedevi T.K., Hoisington D.A., et al., 2009. AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci. 176, 505-513.10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.00626493140Search in Google Scholar

UPOV, 2009. International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, UPOV, 22 October, Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

van de Wouw M., van Hintum T., Kik C., van Treuren R., Visser B., 2010. Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: a meta analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 1241-1252.10.1007/s00122-009-1252-6283947420054521Search in Google Scholar

Yirga H., Mohammed H., Abate B., 2013. Characterization and preliminar y evaluation of dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) accessions using quantitative traits in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia. IJTEEE 1(4), 86-89.Search in Google Scholar

Ziegel E., 2006. Technometrics. In: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 1-4. A.H. El Shaarawi and W.W. Piegorsch (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, 44, 408-409.10.1198/tech.2002.s97Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-5965
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, Plant Science, Zoology, Ecology, other