[Ahmad S., Singh M., Lamb-Palmer N.D., Lefsrud M., Singh J., 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity in 35 Pisum sativum accessions using microsatellite markers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92, 1075-1081.10.4141/cjps2011-261]Search in Google Scholar
[Baranger A., Aubert G., Arnau G., Lainé A.L., Deniot G., Potier J., et al., 2004. Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein and PCR-based markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 1309-1321.10.1007/s00122-003-1540-514727027]Search in Google Scholar
[Ceyhan E., Avci M.A., 2015. Determination of some agricultural characters of developed pea (Pisum sativum L.) lines. World Academy Sci., Eng Tech. Agricult. Biosys. Eng. 9(12), https://waset.org/Publication/10003051.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cuevas H.E., Prom L.K., 2013. Assessment of molecular diversity and population structure of the Ethiopian sorghum [Sorghum bicolor L. Moench] germplasm collection maintained by the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System using SSR markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 60, 1817-1830.10.1007/s10722-013-9956-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Cupic T., Tucak M., Popovic S., Bolaric S., Grljusic S., Kozumplik V., 2009. Genetic diversity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes assessed by pedigree, morphological and molecular data. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 343-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia-Vallve S., Palau J., Romeu A., 1999. Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1125-1134.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a02620310486968]Search in Google Scholar
[Georgieva N., Nikolova I., Kosev V., 2016. Evaluation of genetic divergence and heritability in pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. BioSci. Biotechnol. 5, 61-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gixhari B., Pavelková.M., Ismaili H., Vrapi H., Jaupi A., Smýkal P., 2014. Genetic diversity of Albanian pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces assessed by morphological traits and molecular markers. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 50, 177-184.10.17221/227/2013-CJGPB]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanci F, Gökçe A.F., 2016a. Molecular characterization of Turkish onion germplasm using SSR markers. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 52, 71-76.10.17221/162/2015-CJGPB]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanci F., Gökçe A.F., 2016b. Genetic diversity evaluations in Turkish onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes: principal component analyses (PCA) for breeding strategies. Acta Hortic. 1143, 227-234.10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1143.33]Search in Google Scholar
[Hildebrand C.E., Torney D.C., Wagner R.P., 1992. Informativeness of polymorphic DNA markers. In: The Human Genome Project. Deciphering the Blueprint of Hederity. N.C. Cooper (Ed.) University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, USA, 100-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izzah N.K., Lee J., Perumal S., Park J.Y., Ahn K., Fu D., et al., 2013. Microsatellite-based analysis of genetic diversity in 91 commercial Brassica oleracea L. cultivars belonging to six varietal groups. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 60, 1967-1986.10.1007/s10722-013-9966-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Khan T.N., Ramzan A., Jillani G., Mehmood T., 2013. Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Potowar region. J. Agric. Res. 51, 51-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumari P., Basal N., Singh A.K., Rai V.P., Srivastava C.P., Singh P.K., 2013. Genetic diversity studies in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 12, 3540-3550.10.4238/2013.March.13.1223546983]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwon S.J., Brown A.F., Hu J., Mcgee R., Watt C., Kisha T., et al., 2012. Genetic diversity, population structure and genome-wide marker-trait association analysis emphasizing seed nutrients of the USDA pea (Pisum sativum L.) core collection. Genes Genom. 34, 305-320.10.1007/s13258-011-0213-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis G.P., Schrire B., Mackinder B., Lock M., 2005. Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loridon K., Mcphee K., Morin J., Dubreuil P., Pilet-Nayel M.L., Aubert G., et al., 2005. Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 111, 1022-1031.10.1007/s00122-005-0014-316133320]Search in Google Scholar
[Nasiri J., Haghnazari A., Saba J., 2009. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on SSR markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8, 3405-3417.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nisar M., 2008. Genetic diversity in pea (Pisum sativum L.) for morphological characteristics and molecular markers. Doctoral thesis, Univ. Quaid-I Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nisar M., Khan A., Wadood S.F., Shah A.A., Hanci F., 2017. Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers. Turk. J. Bot. 41, 338-346.10.3906/bot-1608-17]Search in Google Scholar
[Ouafi L., Alane F., Rahal-Bouziane H., Abdelguerfi A., 2016. Agro-morphological diversity within field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11(40), 4039-4047.10.5897/AJAR2016.11454]Search in Google Scholar
[Raji A.A., 2002. Assessment of genetic diversity and heterotic relationships in African improved and local cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm. Doctoral thesis, Univ. Ibadan, Nigeria.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rao N.K., 2004. Plant genetic resources: advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 3, 136-145.10.5897/AJB2004.000-2025]Search in Google Scholar
[Simioniuc D., Uptmoor R., Friedt W., Ordon F., Swiecicki W., 2002. Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs. Plant Breed. 121, 429-435.10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.733320.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Smýkal P., Hybl M., Corander J., Jarkovsky J., Flavell A.J., Griga M., 2008. Genetic diversity and population structure of pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties derived from combined retrotransposon, microsatellite and morphological marker analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117(3), 413-424.10.1007/s00122-008-0785-418504543]Search in Google Scholar
[Smýkal P., Coyne C., Redden R., Maxted N., 2013. Peas. In: Genetic and Genomic Resources of Grain Legume Improvement. M. Singh and H. Upadhyaya (Eds), Elsevier, Netherlands, 41-80.10.1016/B978-0-12-397935-3.00003-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Solberg S.O., Brantestam A.K., Olsson K., Leino M.W., Weibull J., Yndgaard F., 2015. Diversity in local cultivars of Pisum sativum collected from home gardens in Sweden. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 62, 194-203.10.1016/j.bse.2015.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Tar’an B., Zhang C., Warkentin T., Tullu A., Vandenberg A., 2005. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48, 257-272.10.1139/g04-11415838548]Search in Google Scholar
[Tatikonda L., Wani S.P., Kannan S., Beerelli N., Sreedevi T.K., Hoisington D.A., et al., 2009. AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci. 176, 505-513.10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.00626493140]Search in Google Scholar
[UPOV, 2009. International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, UPOV, 22 October, Geneva.]Search in Google Scholar
[van de Wouw M., van Hintum T., Kik C., van Treuren R., Visser B., 2010. Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: a meta analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 1241-1252.10.1007/s00122-009-1252-6283947420054521]Search in Google Scholar
[Yirga H., Mohammed H., Abate B., 2013. Characterization and preliminar y evaluation of dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) accessions using quantitative traits in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia. IJTEEE 1(4), 86-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziegel E., 2006. Technometrics. In: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 1-4. A.H. El Shaarawi and W.W. Piegorsch (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, 44, 408-409.10.1198/tech.2002.s97]Search in Google Scholar