[
1. Amigud, A. (2013). Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: a survey of administrative staff. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.154110.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1541
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1). Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2010_71/bakerpaperpdf10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Betts, K., Cohen, A. H., Veit, D. P., Alphin, H. C., Broadus, C., & Allen, D. (2013). Strategies to increase online student success for students with disabilities. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(3), 49-64.10.24059/olj.v17i3.324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Chou, C., Peng, H., & Chang, C. (2010). The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: students’ perceptions, uses, and evaluations. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1004-1017. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/66863/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Coleman, M., & Berge, Z. L. (2018). A review of accessibility in online higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(1). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring211/coleman_berge211.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. EUR-lex. (2019). Directive (EU) 2016/2102. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission to European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Disability Strategy 2010–2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0636:FIN:en:PDF
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Fedynich, L., Bradley, K. S., & Bradley, J. (2015). Graduate students’ perceptions of online learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056187.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K. Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: perceived barriers and opportunities of the universal design for learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627-1649. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.136569510.1080/09687599.2017.1365695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Grimes, S., Scevak, J., Southgate, E., & Buchanan, R. (2017). Non-disclosing students with disabilities or learning challenges: characteristics and size of a hidden population. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4-5), 425-441.10.1007/s13384-017-0242-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Garcia-Magarino, I., & Romero, S. J. (2015). Analysis of the perceptions of students about biometric identification. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and teaching Technologies, 10(3), 1–18. doi:10.4018/ijwltt.201507010110.4018/ijwltt.2015070101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Heiman, T., Fichten, C. S., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Keshet, N. S., & Jorgenson. M. (2017). Access and perceived ICT usability among students with disabilities attending higher education institutions. Journal Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2727-2740.10.1007/s10639-017-9623-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Kent, M., Ellis, K., & Giles, M. (2018). Students with disabilities and eLearning in Australia: experiences of accessibility and disclosure at Curtin University. TechTrends, 62(6), 654-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Knuth, M. (2016). D5.3 – Instruments technical description and development scheduling. TeSLA Adaptive Trust-Based e-Assessment System for Learning. Retrieved from https://tesla-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/D5.3-Instruments-technical-description-anddevelopmenet-scheduling.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Kunttu, K., Pesonen, T., & Saari, J. (2017). Korkeakouluopiskelijoiden terveystutkimus 2016. [A National Survey of Finnish University Students 2016]. Helsinki: Finnish Student Health Service, Ylioppilaiden terveydenhoitosäätiön tutkimuksia 48. Retrieved from https://www.yths.fi/app/uploads/2020/01/KOTT_2016-1.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Ladonlahti, T., Laamanen, M., & Uotinen, S. (2020). Ensuring diverse user experiences and accessibility while developing the TeSLA e-assessment system. In D. Baneres, M.E. Rodríguez & A.E. Guerrero-Roldán (Eds.), Engineering Data-Driven Adaptive Trust-Based e-Assessment Systems. Series title: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies 34 (pp. 213–238). Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi:10.10007/978-3-030-29326-0. Chapter’s doi:10.10007/978-3-030-29326-0_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Lee-Post, A., & Hapke H. (2017). Online learning integrity approaches: current practices and future solution. Online Learning, 21(1), 135-145.10.24059/olj.v21i1.843
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Levy, Y., Ramim, M. M., Furnell, S. M., & Clarke, N. L. (2011). Comparing intentions to use university-provided vs vendor-provided multibiometric authentication in online exams. Campus-Wide Information System, 28(2), 102-113. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10650741111117806/full/html10.1108/10650741111117806
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Lombardi, A., Vukovic, B., & Sala-Bars, I. (2015). International comparisons of inclusive instruction among college faculty in Spain, Canada, and the United States. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(4), 447-460.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Macy, M., Macy, C., & Shaw, M. E. (2018). Bringing the ivory tower into students’ homes: promoting accessibility in online courses. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 1(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v11i01/13-2110.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v11i01/13-21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova. B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-Assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(2). doi:10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A-E. (2019). Pedagogical approaches for e-assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264-3282. doi:10.1111/bjet.1273310.1111/bjet.12733
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., & Edwards C. (2019). E-authentication for online assessment: a mixed-method study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 861-875. doi:10.1111/bjet.1260810.1111/bjet.12608
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Patton, M., Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Blagovesna, Y., & Ladonlahti, T. (2017). The potential of the TeSLA authentication system to support access to e-assessment for students with special educational needs and disabilities (Sofia University experience). Proceedings of ICERI2017 Conference 16–18 November, Seville, Spain, 4593–4602.10.21125/iceri.2017.1232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Potila, A-K., Moisio, J., Ahti-Miettinen, O., Pyy-Martikainen, M., & Virtanen, V. (2017). Opiskelijatutkimus 2017. EUROSTUDENT VI –tutkimuksen keskeiset tulokset. [Student survey 2017. Key results of Finnish Eurostudent VI survey]. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture 37. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-500-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Snyder, T. D., Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2018). Digest of Education Statistics 2016 (52nd ed.). NCES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017094.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. TeSLA. (2019). TeSLA Project. Retrieved from https://tesla-project.eu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Timmis, S., Bradfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 452-476. doi:10.1002/berj.321510.1002/berj.3215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Verdinelli, S., & Kutner, D. (2016). Persistence factors among online graduate students with disabilities. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 353-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a003979110.1037/a0039791
]Search in Google Scholar