[1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. In Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), (pp. 202-232).]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/149/23010.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Anderson, T. (2010). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (ed.), Immerging technologies in education, (pp. 23-36). Edmonton: AU Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Ang, R.P. (2005). Development and validation of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), (pp. 55-73).10.3200/JEXE.74.1.55-74]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Baker, J.W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, (pp. 9-17).. Available online at http://works.bepress.com/j_wesley_baker/21/]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bonk, C.J. and Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for motivating and retaining learners. Indiana: Open World Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Brookfield, S.D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chen, C.M. and Wu, C.H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. In Computers and Education, 80, (pp. 108-121).10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Fletcher, J.D. and Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 117-133).10.1017/CBO9780511816819.008]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Griffin, D.K.; Mitchell, D. and Thompson, S.J. (2009). Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: what are the pedagogical benefits? In Computers and Education, 53(2), (pp. 532-539).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Harmon-Jones, E.; Simon, L.; Greenberg, J.; Pyszczynski, T.; Solomon, S.; McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management and self-esteem: Evidence that self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, (pp. 24-26).10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hirumi, A. (2006). Analyzing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice, (pp. 46-71). New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Jukes, I.; McCain, T.; Crockett, L. (2010). Understanding the digital generation. Kelowna, B.C.: 21st Century Fluency Project & Corwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kurtz, G. ( ). Facebook Group as a space for interactive and collaborative learning. In The International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(4), (pp. 406-418).10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.057461]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kurtz, G. ( ). Integrating Facebook Group and a Course Website: The Effect on Participation and Perceptions on Learning. In American Journal of Distance Education, 28( ), (pp. 253-263).10.1080/08923647.2014.957952]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Heatherton, T.F. and Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, (pp. 895-910).10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Lee, M.J.W. and Chan, A. (2007). Reducing the effects of isolation and promoting inclusivity for distance learners through podcasting. In Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), (pp. 85-105).]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Levi-Atzmon, G. (2014). Image-Supported Learning: Visual Language and Pedagogy. In N. Notzer (ed.), To Excel in Academic Teaching Lecturer Handbook of Updated Strategies and Competencies, (pp. 79-98). Or-Yehuda: The College for Academic Studies press (Hebrew)]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. In Learning and Instruction, 13(2), (pp. 177-189).10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00019-1]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Li, F.; Qi, J.; Wang, G. and Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom vs. e-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioural engagement. In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), (pp. 48-51).]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Lim, D.H. (2002). Perceived differences between classroom and distance education: seeking instructional strategies for learning application. In International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), (pp. 21-35).]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lomicka, L. and Lord, C. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. In System, 35(2), (pp. 208-228).10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Mayer, R.E. (2005). Principles of Multimedia Learning Based on Social Cues: Personalization, Voice and Image Principles. In R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 201-212).10.1017/CBO9780511816819.014]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Meishar-Tal, H.; Kurtz, G. and Pitterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 13(4), (pp. 33-48). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1294/2337.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Means, B.; Toyama, Y.; Murphy, R.; Bakia, M.; Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-basedpractices/ finalreport.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Moore, M.G. and Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: a systems view. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Morse, M. (2013). A quality of interrelating: describing a form of meaningful experience on a wilderness river journey. In Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), (pp. 42-55).]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree completion programs. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1042.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Noonoo, S. (2012). Flipped learning founders set the record straight. In THE Journal, Available online at http://thejournal.com/articles/2012/06/20/flipped-learning-founders-qand- a.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Palloff, R.M. and Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Piersol, L. (2014). Listening Place. In Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 17(2), (pp. 43-53).10.1007/BF03400969]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Selwyn, N. (2014). The Internet and Education. In Chairman’s Advisory, BBVA (eds.), 19 Key Essays on How Internet Changing our Lives, (pp. 191-217). OpenMind, BBVA. Available online at https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/article/the-internet-and-education/?fullscreen=true.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Subrahmanyam, K. and Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC., New York, NY. ]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Zhan, Z. and Mei. H. (2013). Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. In Computers & Education, 6, (pp. 131-138). 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002]Search in Google Scholar