[Abramowitz, M. & Stegun I.E. (1972). Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alahuhta, J., Kosten, S., Akasaka, M., Auderset, D., Azzella, M.M., Bolpagni, R., Bove, C.P., Chambers, P.A., Chappuis, E., Clayton, J., de Winton, M., Ecke, F., Gacia, E., Gecheva, G., Grillas, P., Hauxwell, J., Hellsten, S., Hjort, J., Hoyer, M.V., Ilg, C., Kolada, A., Kuoppala, M., Lauridsen, T., Li, E.H., Lukács, B.A., Mjelde, M., Mikulyuk, A., Mormul, R.P., Nishihiro, J., Oertli, B., Rhazi, L., Rhazi, M., Sass, L., Schranz, C., Søndergaard, M., Yamanouchi, T., Yu, Q., Wang, H., Willby, N., Zhang, X.K. & Heino J. (2017). Global variation in the beta diversity of lake macrophytes is driven by environmental heterogeneity rather than latitude. J. Biogeogr., 44, 1758−1769. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12978.10.1111/jbi.12978]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Andreeva, R.V. (1990). Identification key to gadfly larvae (in Russian). Kiev: Naukova dumka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayuke, F.O., Karanja, N.K., Muya, E.M., Musombi, B.K., Munyati, J. & Nyamasyo G.H. (2009). Macrofauna diversity and abundance across different land use systems in Embu, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosytems, 11, 371−384.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baselga, A. (2010). Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 19, 134−143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Belgard, A.L. (1950). The forest vegetation of the south east of the Ukraine (in Russian). Kiev: Kiev University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belgard, A.L. (1971). Steppe forestry (in Russian). Moscow: Forest Industry.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg, M.P. & Bengtsson J. (2007). Spatial and temporal variation in food web composition. Oikos, 116, 1789−1804. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15748.x.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15748.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Berg, M.P. (2012). Patterns of biodiversity at fine and small spatial scales. In D.H. Wall, R.D. Bardgett, V. Behan-Pelle-tier, J.E. Herrick, T.H. Jones, K. Ritz, J. Six, D.R. Strong & W.H. van der Putten (Eds.), Soil ecology and ecosystem services (pp. 136−152). Oxford: Oxfod University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bockheim, J.G., Gennadiyev, A.N., Hartemink, A.E. & Brevik E.C. (2014). Soil-forming factors and Soil Taxonomy. Geoderma, 226−227, 231−237. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.02.016.10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.02.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bonato, L., Minelli, A., Lopresti, M. & Cerretti P. (2014). ChiloKey, an interactive identification tool for the geophilomorph centipedes of Europe (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha). ZooKeys, 443, 1−9. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.443.753010.3897/zookeys.443.7530420550025349493]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Burton, V.J. & Eggleton P. (2016). Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash - Field Maple woodland. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 75, 97−106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.012.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Buzuk, G.N. (2017). Phytoindication using ecological scales and regression analysis: ecological index (in Russian). Vestnik Farmacii, 2(76), 31−37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpenter, D., Hammond, P.M., Sherlock, E., Lidgett, A., Leigh, K. & Eggleton P. (2012). Biodiversity of soil macrofauna in the New Forest: a benchmark study across a national park landscape. Biodivers. Conserv., 21, 3385−3410. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0369-0.10.1007/s10531-012-0369-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cesarz, S., Fahrenholz, N., Migge-Kleian, S., Platner, C. & Schaefer M. (2007). Earthworm communities in relation to tree diversity in a deciduous forest. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 43, S61−S67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.003.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cherny, N.G. & Golovach S.J. (1993). Millipedes of the lowland territory of Ukraine (in Russian). Kiev.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chust, G., Pretus, J.L., Ducrot, D., Bedo`s, A. & Deharveng L. (2003). Response of soil fauna to landscape heterogeneity: determining optimal scales for biodiversity modeling. Conserv. Biol., 17, 1712−1723. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00564.x.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00564.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chust, G., Pretus, J.L., Ducrot, D. & Ventura D. (2004). Scale dependency of insect assemblages in response to landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol., 19, 41−57. DOI: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018368.99833.f2.10.1023/B:.0000018368.99833.f2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dauber, J., Hirsch, M., Simmering, D., Waldhardt, R., Otte, A. & Wolters V. (2003). Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 98, 321−329. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00092-6.10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00092-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dauber, J., Purtauf, T., Allspach, A., Frisch, J., Voigtlander, K. & Wolters V. (2005). Local vs. landscape controls on diversity: a test using surface-dwelling soil macroinvertebrates of different mobility. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 14, 213−221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00150.x.10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00150.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[de Wijs, H.J. (1951). Statistics of ore distribution: Part I. Frequency distribution of assay values. Journal of the Royal Netherlands Geological and Mining Society, New Series, 13, 365−375.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Wijs, H.J. (1953). Statistics of ore distribution: Part II. Theory of binomial distribution applied to sampling and engineering problems. Journal of the Royal Netherlands Geological and Mining Society, New Series, 15, 12−24.]Search in Google Scholar
[De’ath, G. (2012). The multinomial diversity model: Linking shannon diversity to multiple predictors. Ecology, 323, 116−119. DOI: 10.1890/11-2155.1.10.1890/11-2155.123185889]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De’ath, G. (2013). Code for mdm was adapted from multinom in the nnet package. MDM: Multinomial Diversity Model. R package version 1.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MDM]Search in Google Scholar
[Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J.J., Gioia, C., Measey, G.J. & Lavelle P. (2006). The values of soil animals for conservation biology. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 42(1), S23−S38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.001.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Didukh, Ya.P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kiev: Phytosociocentre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didukh, Ya.P. (2012). The principles of the bioindication (in Ukranian). Kiev: Naukova dumka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dinno, A. (2012). Paran: Horn’s Test of Principal Components/Factors. R package version 1.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=paran]Search in Google Scholar
[Dokuchaev, V.V. (1883). Russian Chernozem. Selected works of V.V. Dokuchaev, vol. I. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem (translated in 1967).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dolin, V.G. (1978). Identification key to larvae of click beetles fauna of the USSR (in Russian). Kiev: Urozhay.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eggleton, P., Vanbergen, A.J., Jones, D.T., Lambert, M.C., Rockett, C., Hammond P.M., Beccaloni, J., Marriott, D., Ross, E. & Giusti A. (2005). Assemblages of soil macrofauna across a Scottish landuse intensification gradient: influences of habitat quality, heterogeneity and area. J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 1153−1164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01090.x.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01090.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ellenberg, H. (1974). Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta Geobotanica, 9, 197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gholami, S., Sayad, E., Gebbers, R., Schirrmann, M., Joschko, M. & Timmer J. (2016). Spatial analysis of riparian forest soil macrofauna and its relation to abiotic soil properties. Pedobiologia, 59(1), 27−36. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.12.003.10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gilarov, M.S. (1949). Pecularities of the soil as environment and its role in the evolution of insects (in Russian). Moscow.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilyarov, M.S. (Ed.) (1964). Identification key to soil-inhabiting insect larvae (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.10.1016/S0031-4056(22)00154-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Gongalsky, K.B., Gorshkova, I.A., Karpov, A.I. & Pokarzhevskii A.D. (2008). Do boundaries of soil animal and plant communities coincide? A case study of a Mediterranean forest in Russia. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 44(4), 355−363. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.04.004.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.04.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gongalsky, K.B., Zaytsev, A.S. & Savin F.A. (2009). Spatial distribution of soil animals: a geostatistical approach. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 70(6), 484−494.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gural-Sverlova, N.V. & Gural R.I. (2012). Identification book of the terrestrial molluscs of Ukraine (in Ukranian). Lviv.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handcock, M.S. & Stein M.L. (1993). A Bayesian analysis of kriging. Technometrics, 35, 403−410. DOI: 10.2307/1270273.10.2307/1270273]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and a test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179−185. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289447.10.1007/BF0228944714306381]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Huston, M.A. (1999). Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos, 86, 393− 401. DOI: 10.2307/3546645.10.2307/3546645]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jabin, M., Mohr, D., Kappes, H. & Topp W. (2004). Influence of deadwood on density of soil macro-arthropods in a managed oakebeech forest. For. Ecol. Manag., 194, 61−69. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.053.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.053]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jackson, R.B. & Caldwell M.M. (1993). Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J. Ecol., 81(4), 683−692. DOI: 10.2307/2261666.10.2307/2261666]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jackson, R.B. & Caldwell M.M. (1996). Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: modeling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environment. J. Ecol., 84, 891−903. DOI: 10.2307/2960560.10.2307/2960560]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of soil formation. A system of quantitative pedology. New York: McGraw-Hill.10.1097/00010694-194111000-00009]Search in Google Scholar
[Kabakov, O.N. (2006). Scarab beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of Russia and adjacent countries (in Russian). Moscow: Partnership Scientific Publications KMK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamau, S., Barrios, E., Karanja, N.K., Ayuke, F.O. & Lehmann J. (2017). Soil macrofauna abundance under dominant tree species increases along a soil degradation gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem., 112, 35−46. DOI: 10.1016/j.soil-bio.2017.04.016.10.1016/j.soil-bio.2017.04.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kirby, K.N. & Gerlanc D. (2013). BootES: An R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 905−927. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5.10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Korboulewsky, N.B., Pereza, G. & Chauvat M. (2016). How tree diversity affects soil fauna diversity: a review. Soil Biol. Biochem., 94, 94−106. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.02.10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.02]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Krivolutsky, D.A. (1994). Soil fauna in ecological control (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krivosheina, M.G. (2012). Identification book of the families and genera of Palaearctic dipteran insects of the suborder Nematocera, based on larvae (in Russian). Moscow: Partnership Scientific Publications KMK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kryzhanovsky, O.L. (1964). Carabidae - Ground Beetles (in Russian). In G.A. Bey-Bienko (Ed.), Insects of the European part of the USSR. V. 5. Beetles and Strepsiptera (pp. 23−68).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunah, O.N., Zhukov, O.V. & Pahomov A.Y. (2010). Earthworm morphology (Lumbricidae) (in Ukranian). Dnipropetrovsk.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavelle, P. (1997). Faunal activities and soil processes: adaptive strategies that determine ecosystem function. Adv. Ecol. Res., 27, 93−132.10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60007-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavelle, P. (2002). Functional domains in soils. Ecol. Res., 17, 441−450. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x.10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barota, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P. Mora, P. & Rossi J.-P. (2006). Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 42(1), S3−S15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Peres-Neto P.R. (2005). Analyzing beta diversity: Partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 435−450. DOI: 10.1890/05-0549.10.1890/05-0549]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lukac, M. (2017). Soil biodiversity and environmental change in European forests. Central European Forestry Journal, 63, 59−65. DOI: 10.1515/forj-2017-0010.10.1515/forj-2017-0010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marcon, E. & Herault B. (2015). Entropart: An R Package to Measure and Partition Diversity. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(8), 1−26. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i08.10.18637/jss.v067.i08]Search in Google Scholar
[Matern, B. (1986). Spatial variation. Lecture notes in statistics. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-7892-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathieu, J., Grimaldi, M., Jouquet, P., Rouland, C., Lavelle, P., Desjardins, T. & Rossi J.P. (2009). Spatial patterns of grasses influence soil macrofauna biodiversity in Amazonian pastures. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 586−593. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.020.10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mathieu, J., Rossi, J.P., Grimaldi, M., Mora, P., Lavelle, P. & Rouland C. (2004). Biol. Fertil. Soils, 40, 300. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-004-0777-8.10.1007/s00374-004-0777-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McBratney, A.B. & Pringle M.J. (1999). Estimating average and proportional variograms of soil properties and their potential use in precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 1, 125−152. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009995404447.10.1023/A:1009995404447]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Migge-Kleian, S., Cesarz, S., Fahrenholz, N., Platner, C. & Schaefer M. (2007). Earthworm communities in relation to tree diversity in a deciduous forest. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 43, 61−67.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Minasny, B. & McBratney A.B. (2005). The matern function as a general model for soil variograms. Geoderma, 128, 192−207. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003.10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nuutinen, V., Butt, K.R., Hyväluoma, J., Ketoja, E. & Mikola J. (2017). Soil faunal and structural responses to the settlement of a semi-sedentary earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in an arable clay field. Soil Biol. Biochem., 115, 285−296. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.001.10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H. & Wagner H. (2017). Community ecology package. R package version 2.4-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan]Search in Google Scholar
[Olff, H. & Ritchie M.E. (2002). Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity. Landsc. Urban Plann., 58, 83−92. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00211-0.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00211-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pélissier, R., Couteron, P., Dray, S. & Sabatier D. (2003). Consistency between ordination techniques and diversity measurements: two strategies for species occurrence data. Ecology, 84, 242−251. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0242:CBOTAD]2.0.CO;2.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0242:CBOTAD]2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pennisi, B.V. & van Iersel M. (2002). 3 ways to measure medium EC. GMPro, 22(1), 46−48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perel, T.S. (1979). Spread and regularity of the distribution of the earthworms of the USSR fauna (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reza, S.K., Nayak, D.C., Chattopadhyay, T., Mukhopadhyay, S., Singh, S.K. & Srinivasan R. (2016). Spatial distribution of soil physical properties of alluvial soils: a geostatistical approach. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62(7), 972−981. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2015.1107678.10.1080/03650340.2015.1107678]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ribeiro, P.J., Christensen, O.F. & Diggle P.J. (2003). Geostatistical software - geoR and geoRglm. DSC 2003 Working Papers. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/conferences/DSC-2003/Proceedings/RibeiroEtAl.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Ribeiro, P.J. Jr. & Diggle P.J. (2016). geoR: Analysis of geostatistical data. R package version 1.7-5.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geoR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi, J.P. (2003). Clusters in earthworm spatial distribution. Pedobiologia, 47(5−6), 490−496. DOI: 10.1078/0031-4056-00218.10.1078/0031-4056-00218]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rossi, J.-R., Lavelle, P. & Tondoh J.E. (1996). Statistical tool for soil biology. XI. Autocorrelogram and Mantel test, European. J. Soil Biol., 32, 195−203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmolzer, K. (1965). Ordnung Isopoda (Landasseln). Liferung 4, 186 S. Liferung 5, 468 S. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soinenen, J., Lennon, J.J. & Hillebrand H. (2007). A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology, 88, 2830−2838. DOI: 10.1890/06-1730.1.10.1890/06-1730.1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Soininen, J., Heino, J. & Wang J. (2017). A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 27, 96−109. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12660.10.1111/geb.12660]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sokolova, T.A. (2011). Rare plant communities of steppe sandy forests vegetation in the north of the Rostov region. Southern scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 7(4), 66−69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stein, M.L. (1999). Interpolation of spatial data: Some theory for Kriging. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, B., Zhou, S. & Zhao Q. (2003). Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma, 115, 85−99. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00078-8.10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00078-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tarasov, V.V., (2012). Flora of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporozhie regions (in Ukranian). Dnipropetrovs: Second ed. Lira.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vadunina, A.F. & Korchagina S.A. (1986). Methods for research of physical properties of the soil (in Russian). Moscow: Agropromizdat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanbergen, A.J., Watt, A.D., Mitchell, R., Truscott, A.M., Palmer, S.C., Ivits, E., Eggleton, P., Jones, T.H. & Sousa J.P. (2007). Scale-specific correlations between habitat heterogeneity and soil fauna diversity along a landscape structure gradient. Oecologia, 153(3), 713−725. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0766-3.10.1007/s00442-007-0766-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vašát, R., Pavlů, L., Borůvka, L., Drábek, O. & Nikodem A. (2013). Mapping the topsoil pH and humus quality of forest soils in the North Bohemian Jizerské hory Mts. region with ordinary, universal, and regression kriging: cross-validation comparison. Soil and Water Research, 8, 97−104.10.17221/62/2012-SWR]Search in Google Scholar
[Viana, D.S., Figuerola, J., Schwenk, K., Manca, M., Hobæk, A., Mjelde, M., Preston, C. D., Gornall, R.J., Croft, J.M., King, R.A., Green, A.J. & Santamaría L. (2016). Assembly mechanisms determining high species turnover in aquatic communities over regional and continental scales. Ecography, 39, 281−288. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01231.10.1111/ecog.01231]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vsevolodova-Perel, T.S. (1997). Earthworms of the Russian fauna (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, M.W. & Zou X. (2002). Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantations on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico. For. Ecol. Manag., 170, 161−171. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00770-8.10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00770-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Webster, R. & Oliver M.A. (2001). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Chichester John Wiley, Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittle, P. (1954). On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrika, 41, 434−449. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/41.3-4.434.10.1093/biomet/41.3-4.434]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wolters, V. (2001). Biodiversity of soil fauna and its function. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 37(4), 221−227. DOI:10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01088-3.10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01088-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zalesskaya, N.T. Identification key of centipedes of the USSR (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zbinden, Z.D. & Matthews W.J. (2017). Beta diversity of stream fish assemblages: partitioning variation between spatial and environmental factors. Freshw. Biol., 62, 1460−1471. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12960.10.1111/fwb.12960]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A.V. (2015). Phoromorphs in ecomorphs system of soil animals. The Journal of V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University,Series: Biology, 25, 254−266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A. & Zadorozhnaya G. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35, 263−278. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2016-0021.10.1515/eko-2016-0021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar