[Akeroyd, J.R. (1993). Fagus L. In T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.H. Valentine & D.M. Moore (Eds.), Flora Europea. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Assmann, T., Drees, C., Schroder, E. & Ssymank A. (2008). Low species diversity of beech forests - a myth. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.), Beech Forests - a German contribution to the global forest biodiversity. Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Skripten, 233, 25-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Balandina, A., Lovén, L., Ostermann, O. & Partington R. (2012). European Charter Parks - a growing network for sustainable tourism development in Protected Areas. Parks, 18(2), 132-143.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2012.PARKS-18-2.AB.en]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbier, S., Gosselin, F. & Balandier P. (2008). Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved - A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 254(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2007.09.038.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barna, M., Kulfan, J. & Bublinec E. (Eds.) (2011). Beech and beech ecosystems of Slovakia (in Slovak). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, A.F. (1998). Linkages in the landscape: The role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. Gland, Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, G. (Ed.) (1994). Conserving Europe’s Natural Heritage: Towards a European Ecological Network. London: Graham and Trotman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bishop, K., Dudfley, N., Phillips, A. & Stolton S. (2004). Speaking a Common Language. The uses and performance of the IUCN System of Management Categories for Protected Areas. Cardiff University, IUCN - The World Conservation Union and UNEP - World Conservation Monitoring Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohn, U. & Neuhäusl R. (2003). Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas - Masstab 1: 2 500 000. Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Hrsg. Bundesamt für Naturschutz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brang, P. (2005). Virgin forests as a knowledge source for central European silviculture: Reality or myth? For. Snow Landsc. Res., 79(1/2), 19-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brändli, U.B. & Dowhanytsch Y. (Eds.) (2003). Urvälder im Zentrum Europas. Birmensdorf, Switzerland: Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL; Rakhiv, Ukraine: Karpaten-Biosphärenreservat. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, Haupt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Britz, H., Dieckmann, O., Engels, B., Frede, A., Geisel, T., Grossmann, M., Kaiser, K., Knapp, H.D., Luthardt, M.E. & Seuring J. (2009). Nomination of the “Ancient Beech Forests of Germany” as Extension to the World Natural heritage “Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians”. Nationale Naturlandschaften, Federal Republic of Germany. Niedenstein: Specialised editing Cognitio Kommunikation & Planung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bublinec, E. & Pichler V. (2001). Slovak primeval forests - Diversity and conservation. Zvolen: Ústav ekológie lesa SAV]Search in Google Scholar
[Capotorti, G., Del Vico, E., Lattanzi, E., Persiani, A.M., Ravera Blasi, C., Marchetti, M., Chiavetta, U., Aleffi, M., Audi-sio, P., Azzella, M.M., Brunialti, G., S., Tilia, A. & Burrascano S. (2010). Multi-taxon and forest structure sampling for identification of indicators and monitoring of old-growth forest. Plant Biosyst., 144(1), 160-170. DOI: 10.1080/11263500903560538.10.1080/11263500903560538]Search in Google Scholar
[Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. (1996). Tourism, ecotourism and protected areas: The state of nature based tourism around the world and guidelines forest development. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge: IUCN10.2305/IUCN.CH.1996.7.en]Search in Google Scholar
[Commarmot, B., Duelli, P. & Chumak V. (2000). Urwaldforschung - Beispiel Biosphärenreservat Transcarpatien. Bir-mensdorf, Switzerland: Naturwerte in Ost und West. Publ. zur Tagung “Forum fuer Wissen”, WSL, p. 61-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooney, R. (2004). The Precautionary Principle in Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resource Management: An issue paper for policy-makers, researchers and practitioners. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Čeŕovský, J. (Ed.) (1996). BiodiversitycConservation in transboundary protected areas in Europe. Praha: ECOPOINT Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denisiuk, Z. & Stoyko S. (2000). The East Carpathians Biosphere Reserve (Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine). In A. Breymayer & P. Dabrowski (Eds.), Biosphere Reserves on Borders (pp. 79-93). Warsaw: National UNESCO - MAB Committee of Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dierschke, H. & Bohn U. (2004). Eutraphente Rotbuchenwälder in Europa. Tuexenia, 24: 19-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dörfelt, H. (2008). Fungi of beech forests. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.), Beech forests - a German contribution to the global forest biodiversity. Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 233, 33-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drössler, L. & Lupke B. (2005). Canopy gaps in two virgin beech forest reserves in Slovakia. J. For. Sci. (Prague), 51, 446-457.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drössler, L. (2006). Stand structure and gaps of virgin beech forests in Slovakia. In Beech sylviculture in Europe’s Largest Beech Country (pp. 18-20). Proceedings of IUFRO Conference, Poliana Brasov, 4. - 8. 9. 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dudley, N. & Phillips A. (2006). Forest and protected areas: guidance on the use of the IUCN protected area management categories. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eagles, P.F.J., McCool, S.F. & Haynes Ch.D. (2002). Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUROPARK Federation (1993). Lowing Them to Death? Sustainable Tourism in Europe’s Nature and National Parks. Revised and Republished 2001. Grafenau: EUROPARK Federation.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUROPARK, IUCN (2000). Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories - Interpretation and Application of the Protected Area Management Categories in Europe. Grafenau: EUROPARK and WCPA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falkengren-Grerup, U. & Tyler G. (1991). Dynamic floristic changes of Swedish beech forest in relation to soil acidity and stand management. Vegetatio, 95,149-158. DOI: 10.1007/BF00045213.10.1007/BF00045213]Search in Google Scholar
[Gebhard, K., Meyer, M. & Roth S. (2007). Sustainable tourism management planning in Biosphere Reserve - A methodology guide. Ecological Tourism in Europe, Bonn, Germany and UNESCO MAB.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giurgiu, V., Donita, N., Bândiu, C., Radu, S., Cenusa, R., Dissescu, R., Stoiculescu, C. & Iovu A. (2001). Les ForêtsVierges de Roumanie. Asbl. Forêt Wallonne.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gömöry, D., Kukla, J. & Schieber B. (2011). Taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution of beech in Europe and in Slovakia (in Slovak). In M. Barna, J. Kulfan & E. Bublinec (Eds.), Buk a bukové ekosystémy Slovenska (pp. 19-36). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamilton, L.S., Mackay, J.C., Worboys, G.L., Jones, R.A. & Manson G.B. (1996). Transborder protected area cooperation. Canberra: Australian Alps Liaison Committee, IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamilton, L. & McMillan L. (2004). Guidelines for Planning and Managing Mountain Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamor, F. & Commarmot B. (Eds.) (2003). Natural Forests in the Temperate Zone of Europe - Values and Utilisation. International Conference in Mukachevo, Transcarpathia, Ukraine, October 13 - 17, 2003. Rakhiv, Ukraine: Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hockings, M., Stolton, S. & Dudley N. (2000). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. & Courrau J. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991). Caringfor the Earth. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[IUCN (1994). Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. CNPPA with the assistance of WCMC. Glang, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[IUCN WCPA, 2000: Financing Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaworski, A., Skrzyszewski, J. & Pach M. (1994a). Characteristic of Acer pseudoplatanus L. and Fagus sylvatica L. virgin type forests in Bieszczady National Park. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.), Research and Management of the Carpathian Natural and Primeval Forests (pp. 40-49). Ustrzyki Gorne, Poland: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaworski, A., Kaczmarski, J., Skrzysewski, J. & Swiatkowski W. (1994b). Structure and dynamics of lower subalpine timber stands of Carpathian Mts of primeval character. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.), Research and Management of the Carpathian Natural and Primeval Forests (pp. 23-39). Ustrzyki Gorne, Poland: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knapp, H.D. (2011). European beech forests and their biogeographical position. In H.D. Knapp & A. Fichtner (Eds.), Beech Forests. Joint Natural Heritage of Europe. Bonn: Bundesampt für naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 297, 9-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koop, H. & Hilgen, P. (1987). Forest dynamics and regeneration mosaic shift in unexploited beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands at Fontainebleau (France). For. Ecol. Manag., 20, 135-150. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(87)90155-1.10.1016/0378-1127(87)90155-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š. (1982). Degree of equilibrium and dynamical changes of the forest on example of natural forests of Slovakia. Acta Facultatis Forestalia Zvolen, 24, 9-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š. (1989). The primeval forests of Slovakia (in Slovak). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š. (1995). Die Urwälder der Westcarpaten. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, J., Estreguil, C. & Vogt P. (2007). Forest cover changes in the northern Carpathians in the 20th century: A slow transition. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 77-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-006-0160-4.10.1007/s10342-006-0160-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kricsfalusy, V., Ivaneha, I., Lugovoj, A., Budnikov, G., Mezö-Kricsfalusy, G., Mateleshko, A., Popov, S., Syvokhop, J., Pavlej, J. & Lesjo I. (2001). Uzhanskyi National Nature Park. Uzhgorod: Karpaty.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuemmerle, T., Hostert, P., Radeloff, V.C., van den Linden, S., Perzanowski, K. & Kruhlov I. (2008). Cross-border comparison of post-Socialist farmland abondonement in the Carpathians. Ecosystems, 11, 614-628. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9146-z.10.1007/s10021-008-9146-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Goff, J. (Ed.) (1990). Medieval Callings. London: The Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibundgut, H. (1978). Über die Dynamik europäicher Urwälder. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift, 24, 686-690.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibundgut, H. (1982). Europäische Urwälder der Bergstufe. Bern/Stuttgart: Haupt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibundgut, H. (1993). Europäische Urwälder: Wegweiser zur naturnahen Waldwirtschaft. Bern und Stuttgart: Verlag Haupt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levrel, H. (2007). Selecting indicators for the management of biodiversity. Paris: Institut Francais de la Biodiversité.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lockwood, M., Worboys, G.L. & Kothari A. (2006). Managing Protected Areas: A Global Guide. London, UK: IUCN and Earthscan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry, D., Latalowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., Van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J. & de Beaulieu J.L. (2006). A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: paleobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol, 171, 199-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x16771995]Search in Google Scholar
[Manos, P.S. & Stanford A.M. (2001). The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the northern hemisphere. Int. J. Plant Sci., 162, 77-93. DOI: 10.1086/323280.10.1086/323280]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, P. (1999). Determination of development phases and diversity of forest texture. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 170, 203-211.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mölder, A., Bernhardt-Römermann, M. & Schmidt W. (2008). Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: Raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? For. Ecol. Manag., 256, 272-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Oheimb, G., Westphal, C., Tempel, H. & Hardtle W. (2005). Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany). For. Ecol. Manag., 212, 253-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.033.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.033]Search in Google Scholar
[Otto, H. (1994). Waldökologie. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer. Peterson, G., Allen, C.R. & Holling C.S. (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems, 1, 6-18. DOI: 10.1007/s100219900002.10.1007/s100219900002]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, A. (Ed.) (2000). Financing protected areas. Guidelines for protected area managers. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2000.PAG.5.en]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, A. (2002). Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas, Protected Landscapes/Seascapes. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2002.PAG.9.en]Search in Google Scholar
[Pichler, V. & Soroková M. (2005). Utilisation of natural forests for ecotourism: Matching the goals and reality. For. Snow Landsc. Res., 79(1/2), 185-194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pichler, V., Hamor, F., Vološčuk, I. & Sukharyuk D. (2007a). Outstanding universal value of the ecological processes in the primeval beech forests of the Carpathians and their management as World Heritage Sites. Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pichler, V., Vološčuk, I. & Bublinec E. (2007b). Designation of corridors connecting primeval forests properties within the East Carpathian Biosphere Reserve (Slovak Part). In Z. Guziová (Ed.), Priorities for Conservation of Biodiversity in Biosphere Reserves in changing conditions (pp.121-126). Proceedings from the International Conference, Stará Lesná, Tatry Biosphere Reserve, Slovakia, 2-6 June. Bratislava: Slovak National Committee for UNESCO MAB Programme.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plachter, H., Hoffmann, A., Panek, N. & Schmidt P.A. (2008). European Beech forests as a Natural site on the World Heritage List of UNESCO. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.), Beech Forests - a German contribution to the global forest biodiversity. Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 233, 53-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandwith, T., Shine, C., Hamilton, L. & Sheppard D. (2001). Transboundary Protected Areas for Peace and Co-operation. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. (2002). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Rožok (in Slovak). Ochrana Prírody, 21, 207-218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. (2003). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Havešová (in Slovak). Ochrana Prírody, 22, 179-190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. (2011): Primeval beech forests. In M. Barna, J. Kulfan & E. Bublinec (Eds.), Buk a bukové ekosystémy Slovenska (pp. 209-226). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. & Klimaš V. (2004). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Stužica in 4. forest vegetation stage (in Slovak). Acta Facultatis Forestalia Zvolen, 46, 93-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. & Schütz J.Ph. (2001). Dynamik das Totholzes in zwei gemischten Urväldern der Westkarpaten in pflanz-engeographischen Bereich der Tannen-Buchen und der Buchenwälder in verschidenen Entwicklugsstadien. Schweitzerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 152, 407-416.10.3188/szf.2001.0407]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. & Schütz J.Ph. (2002). Relation of dead wood course within the development cycle of selected virgin forests in Slovakia. J. For. Sci. (Prague), 48, 513-528.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M. & Sklenár P. (2003). Structure, production and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest in National Nature Reserve Oblík (in Slovak). Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 45, 169-178.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stolton, S. & Dudley N. (Eds.) (1999). Partnership for protection. London: Earthscan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stolton, S., Hockings, M., Dudley, N., Mackinnom, K. & Written T. (2003). Reporting Progress in Protected Areas. A site-Level Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool. Gland, Switzerland: World Bank Washington, USA/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stolton, S., Dudley, N. & Shadie P. (2012). Managing Natural World Heritage. Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoyko, S., Sayik, D.S., Tatarinov, K.A., Tretyak, P.R., Tasenkevitsch, L.O., Malinovskij, K.A., Schewtschenko, S.V., Sukhariuk, D.D., Milkina, L.I., Komendar, V.I., Miller, M.P. & Manyiko M.P. (1982). The Carpathian Reserve. Uzhgorod: Karpaty.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoyko, S. & Tasenkevitch L. (1993). Some aspects of endemism in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Fragm. Florist. Geobot. Suppl., 2(1), 343-353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoyko, S. (2002). The Virgin Ecosystems of Ukraine, their polyfunctional significance for nature protection (in Ukraine). L’viv: Naukovi Praci Lisivničoji Akademii Nauk Ukrainy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Synge, H. (2004). European Models of Good Practice in Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management: IUCN..]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, L. & Middleton J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turnock, D. (2002). Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land use implications. Land Use Policy, 19, 47-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00039-4.10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00039-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Udvardy, M. (1975). A Classification of Biogeographical Provinces of the World. IUCN Occasional Paper No.18. Morges: IUCN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. (1992). Biological diversity in the Carpathians. Oecol. Mont., 2, 43-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. (1994). Conservation and Rational Use of Forest ecosystems in Carpathian Mountains. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.), Research and Management of the Carpathian Natural and Primeval Forests (pp. 5-10). Ustrzyki Gorne: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. (1995). Long-term Ecological Research and Monitoring on Carpathian National Parks and Biosphere Reserves. In F. Hamor & I. Vološčuk (Eds.), Methods of monitoring of the nature in the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas (pp. 10-22). Rakhiv: Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. (Ed.) (1999). The National Parks and Biosphere Reserves in Carpathians. The Last Nature Paradises. Tatran-ská Lomnica: ACANAP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. (2003). The geobiocenological research in the natural forest ecosystems of the Carpathian protected areas. The Monographical Studies on National Parks 3. Tatranská Štrba: State Nature Conservancy, Tatry National Park Administration.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West P.C. (2002). Reinvesting a Square Wheel: Critique of Resurgent „Protection Paradigm “in International Biodiversity Conservation. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 17-40. DOI: 10.1080/089419202317174002.10.1080/089419202317174002]Search in Google Scholar
[Zbicz, D.C. & Green M.J.B. (1997). Status of the world’s transfrontier protected areas. Parks, 7(3), 5-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zlatník, A. & Hilitzer A. (1932). The Review of Nature Reserves and their proposals in Transcarpathian Ruthenia (in Czech). Sborník Masarykovy Akademie Práce, 6(2), 33-84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zlatník, A. (1934). The Study of the State Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. First Volume. The Contribution to the history of state forests and forestry in Transcarpathian Ruthenia (in Czech). Sborník Výzkumných Ústavu Zemedelských ČSR, sv. 126. Praha: Ministerstvo zemčdčlství republiky Československé,]Search in Google Scholar
[Zlatník, A. (1935). The Study of the State Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. Second Volume and Third Volume (in Czech). Sborník Výzkumných Ústavu Zemedelských ČSR, sv. 127. Praha: Ministerstvo zemédélství republiky Československé.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zlatník, A. (1936). Luzhanskyi Virgin Forest in Subcarpathian Ruthenia, the largest Czechoslovakian Firgin Forest (in Czech). Krása Našeho Domova, 28, 110-118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zlatník, A., Korsuň, F., Kočetov, F. & Kseneman M. (1938). The Investigation of Natural Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. First Volume (in Czech). Sborník Výskumných Ústavu Zemedelských ČSR, sv. 152. Brno: Ministerstvo zemédélství republiky Československé.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zukrigl, K., Eckhardt, G. & Nather J. (1963). Standortskundliche und waldbauliche Untersuchungen in Urwaldresten der niederösterreichischen Kalkalpen. Mitteilungen der forstlichen Bundesversuchsanstalt.]Search in Google Scholar
