[
Adams, Fred, John A., Barker and Figurelli, Julia. 2012. “Towards closure on closure”. Synthese 188: 179–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumann, P. 2006. “Information, closure, and knowledge: on J¨ager’s objection to Dretske”. Erkenntnis 64: 403–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 1970. “Epistemic operators”. Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007–23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 1971. “Conclusive reasons”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 49(1): 1–29
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 2004. “Externalism and modest contextualism”. Erkenntnis 61: 173–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 2005. “The case against closure”. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa (ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell: 13–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 2006. “Information and closure”. Erkenntnis 64: 409–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greco, John. 2010. Achieving Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jäger, Christoph. 2004. “Skepticism, information, and closure: Dretske’s theory of knowledge”. Erkenntnis 61: 187–201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kipper, Jens. 2016. “Safety, closure, and the flow of information”. Erkenntnis 81: 1109–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattingly, James. 2021. Information and Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shackel, Nicholas. 2006. “Shutting Dretske’s door”. Erkenntnis 64: 393–401.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, Crispin. 2003. “Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference”. In New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge. Susanna Nuccetelli (ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
