This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Al-Mamari, Q., Corbitt, B. and Oyaro Gekara, V. (2013). E-government adoption in Oman: Motivating factors from a government perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 199–224.Al-MamariQ.CorbittB.Oyaro GekaraV.2013E-government adoption in Oman: Motivating factors from a government perspective7219922410.1108/17506161311325369Search in Google Scholar
Atlas.ti. (2018). What is ATLAS.ti? Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://atlasti.com/product/what-is-atlas-ti/.Atlas.ti2018Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://atlasti.com/product/what-is-atlas-ti/.Search in Google Scholar
Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (eds.) (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford: University of Oxford.BacheI.FlindersM.(eds.)2004OxfordUniversity of Oxford10.1093/0199259259.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bamberger, P. A., Meshoulam, I. and Biron, M. (2014). Human resource strategy: Formulation, implementation, and impact. New York: Routledge.BambergerP. A.MeshoulamI.BironM.2014New YorkRoutledge10.4324/9780203075838Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. and Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.BennettC. J.HowlettM.1992The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change25327529410.1007/BF00138786Search in Google Scholar
Bressers, H. Th. A. and O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2005). Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context. In Designing government: From instruments to governance. Pearl Eliades, Margaret M. Hill, and Michel Howlett (eds.). pp. 132–153: London: Montreal & Kingston.BressersH. Th. A.O’TooleL. J.Jr.2005Instrument selection and implementation in a networked contextInEliadesPearlHillMargaret M.HowlettMichel(eds.).132153LondonMontreal & KingstonSearch in Google Scholar
Cairney, P. (2013). Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 1–21.CairneyP.2013Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies?41112110.1111/psj.12000Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018, July 8). Strategy for innovation and good governance at loval level. Retrieved January 5, 2018, from https://www.osce.org/eea/86380?download=true.Council of Europe2018July8Retrieved January 5, 2018, from https://www.osce.org/eea/86380?download=true.Search in Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In Economics meets sociology in strategic management (pp. 143–166). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.2000The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fieldsIn143166Emerald Group Publishing Limited10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1Search in Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bross.DownsA.1957New YorkHarper & BrossSearch in Google Scholar
EC. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of regions. Better regulation for better results – An EU agenda. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0215&from=EN.EC2015Retrieved February 4, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0215&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. (2016). Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odprti, učinkoviti in neodvisni evropski upravi. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/JURI/DV/2016/04-20/1090614_CLEAN_SL.pdf.European Parliament and the Council2016Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/JURI/DV/2016/04-20/1090614_CLEAN_SL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
European Union. (2018). Regulations, Directives and other acts. Retrieved March 4, 2018, from https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en.European Union2018Retrieved March 4, 2018, from https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en.Search in Google Scholar
Farazmand, A. (1997). Bureaucrats and Politicians in comparative Perspective in Ali Farazmand (ed.). In Modern Systems of Government (pp. ix–xvii). London: SAGE Publications, Inc.FarazmandA.1997Bureaucrats and Politicians in comparative PerspectiveinFarazmandAli(ed.). InixxviiLondonSAGE Publications, IncSearch in Google Scholar
Gichoya, D. (2005). Factors affecting the successful implementation of ICT projects in government. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3(4), 175–184.GichoyaD.2005Factors affecting the successful implementation of ICT projects in government34175184Search in Google Scholar
Graham, J., Plumptre, T. W. and Amos, B. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century. Ottawa: Institute on governance.GrahamJ.PlumptreT. W.AmosB.2003OttawaInstitute on governanceSearch in Google Scholar
Hicklin, A. and Godwin, E. (2009). Agents of change: The role of public managers in public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 13–20.HicklinA.GodwinE.2009Agents of change: The role of public managers in public policy371132010.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00292.xSearch in Google Scholar
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I. and Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311, https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596.HowlettM.MukherjeeI.WooJ. J.2015From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research432291311https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X1399286911859610.1332/147084414X13992869118596Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.HowlettM.RameshM.2003TorontoOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230527-6687.HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E.2005Three approaches to qualitative content analysis15912771288https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230527-668710.1177/1049732305276687Search in Google Scholar
Iacovino, N. M., Barsanti, S. and Cinquini, L. (2017). Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: The Case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 61–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s111-15-015-0327-x.IacovinoN. M.BarsantiS.CinquiniL.2017Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: The Case of the Tuscany Region1716182https://doi.org/10.1007/s111-15-015-0327-x10.1007/s11115-015-0327-xSearch in Google Scholar
IFAC. (2004). Enterprise Governance. Getting the Balance Right. Retrieved May 3, 2018, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/Enterprise_Governance.pdf.IFAC2004Retrieved May 3, 2018, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/Enterprise_Governance.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (n.d.). Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and Accountability. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan010193.pdf.JohnstonM.(n.d.)Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan010193.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4.KepingY.2018Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis11118https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-410.1007/s40647-017-0197-4Search in Google Scholar
Kerwin, C. M. and Furlong, S. R. (2018). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy (Fifth edition). American University and State University of New York at Oswego. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press.KerwinC. M.FurlongS. R.2018Fifth editionAmerican University and State University of New York at Oswego.Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaCQ PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kooiman, I. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.KooimanI.2003LondonSAGE Publications, Ltd10.4135/9781446215012Search in Google Scholar
Kotnik, Ž. and Kovač, P. (2018). Development of Public Administration and Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Content Analysis of The NISPAcee Journal. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration & Policy, 11(1), 229–252.KotnikŽ.KovačP.2018Development of Public Administration and Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Content Analysis of The NISPAcee Journal11122925210.2478/nispa-2018-0010Search in Google Scholar
Kovač, P. and Bileišis, M. (Eds.). (2017). Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern European Union MS: Post-Accession Convergences and Divergences. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GOZLT0QL/dc9c67f3-b6ef-4ddb-8f03-28ef0dd1deb2/PDF.KovačP.BileišisM.(Eds.)2017Retrieved March 3, 2018, from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GOZLT0QL/dc9c67f3-b6ef-4ddb-8f03-28ef0dd1deb2/PDF.Search in Google Scholar
Kraft, M. E. and Furlong, S. R. (2007). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.KraftM. E.FurlongS. R.20072nd ed.Washington, D.C.CQ PressSearch in Google Scholar
Laforet, S. (2011). A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(4), 380–408.LaforetS.2011A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs17438040810.1108/13552551111139638Search in Google Scholar
Lecerf, M.-A. (2012). Internationalization and innovation: The effects of a strategy mix on the economic performance of French SMEs. International Business Research, 5(6), 2–13.LecerfM.-A.2012Internationalization and innovation: The effects of a strategy mix on the economic performance of French SMEs5621310.5539/ibr.v5n6p2Search in Google Scholar
Marquis, C. and Tilcsik, A. (2016). Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5), 1325–1341.MarquisC.TilcsikA.2016Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy2751325134110.1287/orsc.2016.1083Search in Google Scholar
May, P. J., Workman, S. and Jones, B. D. (2008). Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda Disruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 517–41.MayP. J.WorkmanS.JonesB. D.2008Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda Disruption1845174110.1093/jopart/mun015Search in Google Scholar
Mencinger, J., Kovač, P., Jukić, T. and Vintar, M. (2017). Public Policy Design and Implementation in Slovenia. International Public Administration Review, 15(3–4), 9–38.MencingerJ.KovačP.JukićT.VintarM.2017Public Policy Design and Implementation in Slovenia153–493810.17573/ipar.2017.3-4.01Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.MeyerJ. W.RowanB.1977Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony83234036310.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.6Search in Google Scholar
Minor, M., Bergmann, R. and Görg, S. (2014). Case-based adaptation of workflows. Information Systems, 40, 142–152.MinorM.BergmannR.GörgS.2014Case-based adaptation of workflows4014215210.1016/j.is.2012.11.011Search in Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Luetjens, J. (2017). Creating Public Value: Tightening Connections Between Policy Design and Public Management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 170–190.MintromM.LuetjensJ.2017Creating Public Value: Tightening Connections Between Policy Design and Public Management45117019010.1111/psj.12116Search in Google Scholar
MJU. (2015). Javna uprava 2020. Strategija razvoja javne uprave 2015–2020. Retrieved March 12, 2018, from http://www.mju.gov.si/fileadmin/mju.gov.si/pageuploads/JAVNA-_UPRAVA/Kakovost/Strategija_razvoja_SLO_final_web.pdfMJU2015Retrieved March 12, 2018, from http://www.mju.gov.si/fileadmin/mju.gov.si/pageuploads/JAVNA-_UPRAVA/Kakovost/Strategija_razvoja_SLO_final_web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.NorthD. C.1990CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511808678Search in Google Scholar
Nowlin, M. C. (2011). Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 41–60.NowlinM. C.2011Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends391416010.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_4.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. and van Thiel, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.OngaroE.van ThielS.(Eds.).2018LondonPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3Search in Google Scholar
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). Public Administration: Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.RaadscheldersJ. C. N.2011OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693894.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rahman, M. S. (2015). Politics-Bureaucracy Relations, Governance and Development in Bangladesh: The Case of Local Government. Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg.RahmanM. S.2015Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat HeidelbergHeidelbergSearch in Google Scholar
Robinson, S. E., Caver, F., Meier, K. J. and O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2007). Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 140–50.RobinsonS. E.CaverF.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.2007Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change5111405010.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00242.xSearch in Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.ScottW. R.1995Thousand Oaks, CASageSearch in Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.StokerG.2006Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?361415710.1177/0275074005282583Search in Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. (2006). Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process – A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(12), 953–976.SvaraJ. H.2006Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process – A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature291295397610.1080/01900690600854555Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.ThomasD. R.2006A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data27223724610.1177/1098214005283748Search in Google Scholar
Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G. and Hartley, M. (2005). The Uses of Institutional Culture: Strengthening Identification and Building Brand Equity in Higher Education. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 31, Number 2. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(2), 1–105.TomaJ. D.DubrowG.HartleyM.2005The Uses of Institutional Culture: Strengthening Identification and Building Brand Equity in Higher Education. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 31, Number 2312110510.1002/aehe.3102Search in Google Scholar
UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. A UNDP Policy Document. New York: United Nations Development Programme.UNDP1997New YorkUnited Nations Development ProgrammeSearch in Google Scholar
Vintar, M., Aristovnik, A. and Klun, M. (Eds.). (2018). Vidiki in dejavniki uspešnega izvajanja javnih politik (Aspects and factors of public policies implementation). Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration.VintarM.AristovnikA.KlunM.(Eds.)2018(Aspects and factors of public policies implementation)LjubljanaFaculty of AdministrationSearch in Google Scholar
Volkery, A. and Ribeiro, T. (2009). Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1198–1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009.VolkeryA.RibeiroT.2009Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors76911981207https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.00910.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M. and Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619.WoolthuisR. K.LankhuizenM.GilsingV.2005A system failure framework for innovation policy design25660961910.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Workman, S., Jones, B. D. and Jochim, A. E. (2009). Information Processing and Policy Dynamics. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1).WorkmanS.JonesB. D.JochimA. E.2009Information Processing and Policy Dynamics37110.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00296.xSearch in Google Scholar
Xie, X., Zeng, S., Peng, Y. and Tam, C. (2013). What affects the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in China? Innovation, 15(3), 271–286.XieX.ZengS.PengY.TamC.2013What affects the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in China?15327128610.5172/impp.2013.15.3.271Search in Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage publications.YinR. K.2017Los AngelesSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Zito, A. R. (2015). Expertise and Power: Agencies Operating in Complex Environments. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 73–89, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.81.ZitoA. R.2015Expertise and Power: Agencies Operating in Complex Environments317389https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.8110.17645/pag.v3i1.81Search in Google Scholar