This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Al-Mamari, Q., Corbitt, B. and Oyaro Gekara, V. (2013). E-government adoption in Oman: Motivating factors from a government perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 199–224.Al-MamariQ.CorbittB.Oyaro GekaraV.2013E-government adoption in Oman: Motivating factors from a government perspectiveTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy7219922410.1108/17506161311325369Search in Google Scholar
Atlas.ti. (2018). What is ATLAS.ti? Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://atlasti.com/product/what-is-atlas-ti/.Atlas.ti2018What is ATLAS.ti?Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://atlasti.com/product/what-is-atlas-ti/.Search in Google Scholar
Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (eds.) (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford: University of Oxford.BacheI.FlindersM.(eds.)2004Multi-level GovernanceOxfordUniversity of Oxford10.1093/0199259259.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bamberger, P. A., Meshoulam, I. and Biron, M. (2014). Human resource strategy: Formulation, implementation, and impact. New York: Routledge.BambergerP. A.MeshoulamI.BironM.2014Human resource strategy: Formulation, implementation, and impactNew YorkRoutledge10.4324/9780203075838Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. and Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.BennettC. J.HowlettM.1992The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy changePolicy Sciences25327529410.1007/BF00138786Search in Google Scholar
Bressers, H. Th. A. and O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2005). Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context. In Designing government: From instruments to governance. Pearl Eliades, Margaret M. Hill, and Michel Howlett (eds.). pp. 132–153: London: Montreal & Kingston.BressersH. Th. A.O’TooleL. J.Jr.2005Instrument selection and implementation in a networked contextInDesigning government: From instruments to governanceEliadesPearlHillMargaret M.HowlettMichel(eds.).132153LondonMontreal & KingstonSearch in Google Scholar
Cairney, P. (2013). Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 1–21.CairneyP.2013Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies?Policy Studies Journal41112110.1111/psj.12000Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018, July 8). Strategy for innovation and good governance at loval level. Retrieved January 5, 2018, from https://www.osce.org/eea/86380?download=true.Council of Europe2018July8Strategy for innovation and good governance at loval levelRetrieved January 5, 2018, from https://www.osce.org/eea/86380?download=true.Search in Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In Economics meets sociology in strategic management (pp. 143–166). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.2000The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fieldsInEconomics meets sociology in strategic management143166Emerald Group Publishing Limited10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1Search in Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bross.DownsA.1957An Economic Theory of DemocracyNew YorkHarper & BrossSearch in Google Scholar
EC. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of regions. Better regulation for better results – An EU agenda. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0215&from=EN.EC2015Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of regions. Better regulation for better results – An EU agendaRetrieved February 4, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0215&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. (2016). Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odprti, učinkoviti in neodvisni evropski upravi. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/JURI/DV/2016/04-20/1090614_CLEAN_SL.pdf.European Parliament and the Council2016Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odprti, učinkoviti in neodvisni evropski upraviRetrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/JURI/DV/2016/04-20/1090614_CLEAN_SL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
European Union. (2018). Regulations, Directives and other acts. Retrieved March 4, 2018, from https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en.European Union2018Regulations, Directives and other actsRetrieved March 4, 2018, from https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en.Search in Google Scholar
Farazmand, A. (1997). Bureaucrats and Politicians in comparative Perspective in Ali Farazmand (ed.). In Modern Systems of Government (pp. ix–xvii). London: SAGE Publications, Inc.FarazmandA.1997Bureaucrats and Politicians in comparative PerspectiveinFarazmandAli(ed.). InModern Systems of GovernmentixxviiLondonSAGE Publications, IncSearch in Google Scholar
Gichoya, D. (2005). Factors affecting the successful implementation of ICT projects in government. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3(4), 175–184.GichoyaD.2005Factors affecting the successful implementation of ICT projects in governmentThe Electronic Journal of E-Government34175184Search in Google Scholar
Graham, J., Plumptre, T. W. and Amos, B. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century. Ottawa: Institute on governance.GrahamJ.PlumptreT. W.AmosB.2003Principles for good governance in the 21st centuryOttawaInstitute on governanceSearch in Google Scholar
Hicklin, A. and Godwin, E. (2009). Agents of change: The role of public managers in public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 13–20.HicklinA.GodwinE.2009Agents of change: The role of public managers in public policyPolicy Studies Journal371132010.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00292.xSearch in Google Scholar
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I. and Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311, https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596.HowlettM.MukherjeeI.WooJ. J.2015From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation researchPolicy and Politics432291311https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X1399286911859610.1332/147084414X13992869118596Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.HowlettM.RameshM.2003Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy SubsystemsTorontoOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230527-6687.HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E.2005Three approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research15912771288https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230527-668710.1177/1049732305276687Search in Google Scholar
Iacovino, N. M., Barsanti, S. and Cinquini, L. (2017). Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: The Case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 61–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s111-15-015-0327-x.IacovinoN. M.BarsantiS.CinquiniL.2017Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: The Case of the Tuscany RegionPublic Organization Review1716182https://doi.org/10.1007/s111-15-015-0327-x10.1007/s11115-015-0327-xSearch in Google Scholar
IFAC. (2004). Enterprise Governance. Getting the Balance Right. Retrieved May 3, 2018, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/Enterprise_Governance.pdf.IFAC2004Enterprise Governance. Getting the Balance RightRetrieved May 3, 2018, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/Enterprise_Governance.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (n.d.). Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and Accountability. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan010193.pdf.JohnstonM.(n.d.)Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and AccountabilityRetrieved February 2, 2018, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan010193.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4.KepingY.2018Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political AnalysisFudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences11118https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-410.1007/s40647-017-0197-4Search in Google Scholar
Kerwin, C. M. and Furlong, S. R. (2018). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy (Fifth edition). American University and State University of New York at Oswego. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press.KerwinC. M.FurlongS. R.2018Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policyFifth editionAmerican University and State University of New York at Oswego.Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaCQ PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kooiman, I. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.KooimanI.2003Governing as GovernanceLondonSAGE Publications, Ltd10.4135/9781446215012Search in Google Scholar
Kotnik, Ž. and Kovač, P. (2018). Development of Public Administration and Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Content Analysis of The NISPAcee Journal. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration & Policy, 11(1), 229–252.KotnikŽ.KovačP.2018Development of Public Administration and Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Content Analysis of The NISPAcee JournalNISPAcee Journal of Public Administration & Policy11122925210.2478/nispa-2018-0010Search in Google Scholar
Kovač, P. and Bileišis, M. (Eds.). (2017). Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern European Union MS: Post-Accession Convergences and Divergences. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GOZLT0QL/dc9c67f3-b6ef-4ddb-8f03-28ef0dd1deb2/PDF.KovačP.BileišisM.(Eds.)2017Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern European Union MS: Post-Accession Convergences and DivergencesRetrieved March 3, 2018, from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GOZLT0QL/dc9c67f3-b6ef-4ddb-8f03-28ef0dd1deb2/PDF.Search in Google Scholar
Kraft, M. E. and Furlong, S. R. (2007). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.KraftM. E.FurlongS. R.2007Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives2nd ed.Washington, D.C.CQ PressSearch in Google Scholar
Laforet, S. (2011). A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(4), 380–408.LaforetS.2011A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEsInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research17438040810.1108/13552551111139638Search in Google Scholar
Lecerf, M.-A. (2012). Internationalization and innovation: The effects of a strategy mix on the economic performance of French SMEs. International Business Research, 5(6), 2–13.LecerfM.-A.2012Internationalization and innovation: The effects of a strategy mix on the economic performance of French SMEsInternational Business Research5621310.5539/ibr.v5n6p2Search in Google Scholar
Marquis, C. and Tilcsik, A. (2016). Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5), 1325–1341.MarquisC.TilcsikA.2016Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropyOrganization Science2751325134110.1287/orsc.2016.1083Search in Google Scholar
May, P. J., Workman, S. and Jones, B. D. (2008). Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda Disruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 517–41.MayP. J.WorkmanS.JonesB. D.2008Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda DisruptionJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory1845174110.1093/jopart/mun015Search in Google Scholar
Mencinger, J., Kovač, P., Jukić, T. and Vintar, M. (2017). Public Policy Design and Implementation in Slovenia. International Public Administration Review, 15(3–4), 9–38.MencingerJ.KovačP.JukićT.VintarM.2017Public Policy Design and Implementation in SloveniaInternational Public Administration Review153–493810.17573/ipar.2017.3-4.01Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.MeyerJ. W.RowanB.1977Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology83234036310.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.6Search in Google Scholar
Minor, M., Bergmann, R. and Görg, S. (2014). Case-based adaptation of workflows. Information Systems, 40, 142–152.MinorM.BergmannR.GörgS.2014Case-based adaptation of workflowsInformation Systems4014215210.1016/j.is.2012.11.011Search in Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Luetjens, J. (2017). Creating Public Value: Tightening Connections Between Policy Design and Public Management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 170–190.MintromM.LuetjensJ.2017Creating Public Value: Tightening Connections Between Policy Design and Public ManagementPolicy Studies Journal45117019010.1111/psj.12116Search in Google Scholar
MJU. (2015). Javna uprava 2020. Strategija razvoja javne uprave 2015–2020. Retrieved March 12, 2018, from http://www.mju.gov.si/fileadmin/mju.gov.si/pageuploads/JAVNA-_UPRAVA/Kakovost/Strategija_razvoja_SLO_final_web.pdfMJU2015Javna uprava 2020. Strategija razvoja javne uprave 2015–2020Retrieved March 12, 2018, from http://www.mju.gov.si/fileadmin/mju.gov.si/pageuploads/JAVNA-_UPRAVA/Kakovost/Strategija_razvoja_SLO_final_web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.NorthD. C.1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformanceCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511808678Search in Google Scholar
Nowlin, M. C. (2011). Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 41–60.NowlinM. C.2011Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trendsPolicy Studies Journal391416010.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_4.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. and van Thiel, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.OngaroE.van ThielS.(Eds.).2018The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in EuropeLondonPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3Search in Google Scholar
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). Public Administration: Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.RaadscheldersJ. C. N.2011Public Administration: Interdisciplinary Study of GovernmentOxfordOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693894.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rahman, M. S. (2015). Politics-Bureaucracy Relations, Governance and Development in Bangladesh: The Case of Local Government. Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg.RahmanM. S.2015Politics-Bureaucracy Relations, Governance and Development in Bangladesh: The Case of Local GovernmentRuprecht-Karls-Universitat HeidelbergHeidelbergSearch in Google Scholar
Robinson, S. E., Caver, F., Meier, K. J. and O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2007). Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 140–50.RobinsonS. E.CaverF.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.2007Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget ChangeAmerican Journal of Political Science5111405010.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00242.xSearch in Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.ScottW. R.1995Institutions and OrganizationsThousand Oaks, CASageSearch in Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.StokerG.2006Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?The American Review of Public Administration361415710.1177/0275074005282583Search in Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. (2006). Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process – A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(12), 953–976.SvaraJ. H.2006Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process – A Review of Themes and Issues in the LiteratureInternational Journal of Public Administration291295397610.1080/01900690600854555Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.ThomasD. R.2006A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation dataAmerican Journal of Evaluation27223724610.1177/1098214005283748Search in Google Scholar
Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G. and Hartley, M. (2005). The Uses of Institutional Culture: Strengthening Identification and Building Brand Equity in Higher Education. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 31, Number 2. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(2), 1–105.TomaJ. D.DubrowG.HartleyM.2005The Uses of Institutional Culture: Strengthening Identification and Building Brand Equity in Higher Education. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 31, Number 2ASHE Higher Education Report312110510.1002/aehe.3102Search in Google Scholar
UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. A UNDP Policy Document. New York: United Nations Development Programme.UNDP1997Governance for Sustainable Human Development. A UNDP Policy DocumentNew YorkUnited Nations Development ProgrammeSearch in Google Scholar
Vintar, M., Aristovnik, A. and Klun, M. (Eds.). (2018). Vidiki in dejavniki uspešnega izvajanja javnih politik (Aspects and factors of public policies implementation). Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration.VintarM.AristovnikA.KlunM.(Eds.)2018Vidiki in dejavniki uspešnega izvajanja javnih politik(Aspects and factors of public policies implementation)LjubljanaFaculty of AdministrationSearch in Google Scholar
Volkery, A. and Ribeiro, T. (2009). Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1198–1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009.VolkeryA.RibeiroT.2009Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factorsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change76911981207https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.00910.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M. and Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619.WoolthuisR. K.LankhuizenM.GilsingV.2005A system failure framework for innovation policy designTechnovation25660961910.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Workman, S., Jones, B. D. and Jochim, A. E. (2009). Information Processing and Policy Dynamics. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1).WorkmanS.JonesB. D.JochimA. E.2009Information Processing and Policy DynamicsThe Policy Studies Journal37110.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00296.xSearch in Google Scholar
Xie, X., Zeng, S., Peng, Y. and Tam, C. (2013). What affects the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in China? Innovation, 15(3), 271–286.XieX.ZengS.PengY.TamC.2013What affects the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in China?Innovation15327128610.5172/impp.2013.15.3.271Search in Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage publications.YinR. K.2017Case study research and applications: Design and methodsLos AngelesSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Zito, A. R. (2015). Expertise and Power: Agencies Operating in Complex Environments. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 73–89, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.81.ZitoA. R.2015Expertise and Power: Agencies Operating in Complex EnvironmentsPolitics and Governance317389https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.8110.17645/pag.v3i1.81Search in Google Scholar