[
Abuhassàn, A., & Bates, T. (2015). Grit: Distinguishing effortful persistence from conscientiousness. Journal Of Individual Differences, 36(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a00017510.1027/1614-0001/a000175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexopoulos, A., Paolucci, P., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F., Dorigo, T., & Fedi, M. et al. (2021). The colours of the Higgs boson: a study in creativity and science motivation among high-school students in Italy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00169-410.1186/s40561-021-00169-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1990). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity and beyond. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories ofcreativity (pp. 61–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M., & Fisher, C.M. (2009). Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. In E.A. Locke (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd Ed.) (pp. 481–498). London: Wiley-Blackwell10.1002/9781119206422.ch26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M., Goldfarb, P., &Brackfield, S.C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6–21.10.1080/10400419009534330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bala, T. (2015). A comparative study of creativity of students in relation to their home environment. International Journal Of Advanced Research In Management And Social Sciences, 4(4), 189–197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(03), 239. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-182610.5860/CHOICE.35-1826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S.I. Donaldson, D.E. Berger & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barai, B., &Saha, R. (2021). Social Environment and Scientific Creative Potential: Understanding the Mediating Variables Within. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 11(1 & 2), 120–139.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.10.1080/02783190509554310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berry, W., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412985208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2145010.1002/tea.21450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319060955435110.1080/02783190609554351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203357965
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M, (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Stem-berg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, C., Kaufman, J., & Mcclure, F. (2011). Non-Cognitive Constructs and Self-Reported Creativity by Domain. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Day, Ch. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203464342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Domino, G. (1979). Creativity and the Home Environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(4), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862790230041410.1177/001698627902300414
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
]Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Duckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). Journal Of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634290
]Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dunn, L.L.S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. University of North Texas, Texas, unpublisheddoctoral dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frijda, N.H., Mesquita, B., Sonnemans, J., & Van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions. In K.T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (pp. 187–225). New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garriott, P., Flores, L., Prabhakar, B., Mazzotta, E., Liskov, A., & Shapiro, J. (2013). Parental Support and Under-represented Students’ Math/Science Interests. Journal Of Career Assessment, 22(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907271351493310.1177/1069072713514933
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2026710.1002/tea.20267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire ii: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.10.1002/tea.20442
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grohman, M.G., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S.B. (2017). The Role of Passion and Persistence in Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca000012110.1037/aca0000121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.10.1037/h0063487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haller, C.S., & Courvoisier, D.S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001708410.1037/a0017084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haase, J., Hoff, E., Hanel, P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141143610.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hennessey, B.A. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraint on children’s creativity when using a computer. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 151–168.10.1080/10400418909534312
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal Of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069011009891210.1080/09500690110098912
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., et al. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.10.1002/jocb.20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karademir, E. (2016). Investigation the scientific creativity of gifted students through project-based activities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 416–427.10.21890/ijres.05662
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C. (2003). Critical thinking, creativity, and culture: An introduction. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(3), 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20032231310.5840/inquiryctnews200322313
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410611925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kunat, B. (2017). „Dzielenie się czasem wolnym z uczniem” czyli o pracy nauczycieli z pasją. [„Sharing a free time with a pupil” a Word on the work of teachers with passion]. In E. Dubas, A. Gutowska (Eds.), Time and Places in a Biography. Educational Aspects. [Czas i miejsca w biografii. Aspekty edukacyjne]. (pp. 155–165), Łódź: UŁ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kunat, B. (2018). Passion and Creativity – Together or Separately?. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-000410.1515/ctra-2018-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawson, A.E., Banks, D.L., &Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.10.1002/tea.20172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.10.1037/h0048850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meeker, M. (1982). Test of creative thinking. Vida, OR: SOI Systems.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehrinejad, S., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Creativity and the Predictability of Creativity by Parenting Styles. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 205, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.01410.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, S. (2017). Loneliness, Group Relevance, and Creativity (Masters). University of Wisconsin OshKosh.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moeller, J. (2014). Passion as concept of the psychology of motivation. Conceptualization, assessment, inter-individual variability and longterm stability (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.dbthueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-29036/DissJulia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (Eds.). (1999). Social creativity (Vol. 1). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niu, W. (2007). Individual and Environmental Influences on Chinese Student Creativity. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’hara, L.A. & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self- concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), BT self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, S., Park, K., & Choe, H. (2005). The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Scientific Giftedness in Korea. Journal Of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-47510.4219/jsge-2005-475
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pretz, J., & Nelson, D. (2017). Creativity Is Influenced by Domain, Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Esteem. In M. Karwowski & J. Kaufman, The Creative Self Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 155–170). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00009-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pugsley, L., & Acar, S. (2018). Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children’s Creativity Characteristics. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.39310.1002/jocb.393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Guay, F., & Senécal, C. (2005). Perceptions of Parental Involvement and Support as Predictors of College Students’ Persistence in a Science Curriculum. Journal Of Family Psychology, 19(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.28610.1037/0893-3200.19.2.286
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rojas, J. (2015). The Relationships Among Creativity, Grit, Academic Motivation, And Academic Success In College Students (Ph.D.). University of Kentucky.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rojas, J., & Tyler, K. (2018). Measuring the Creative Process: A Psychometric Examination of Creative Ideation and Grit. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141154610.1080/10400419.2018.1411546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12(3), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-y10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-Y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M. (2005). Motivation, Competence, and Creativity. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck, Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 609–623). Guilford Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A. (2007). Creativity Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511763205.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0221337310.1007/BF02213373
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M., Acar, S., &Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 24, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.00310.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M., Plucker, J., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_1610.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.00710.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonton, D.K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univesity Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674424753
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffin, S.A. (1983). Fighting against convergent thinking. Childhood Education, 59, 355–358.10.1080/00094056.1983.10520595
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.10.1159/000277029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.10.1111/j.1467-8721.1992.tb00002.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (1991). MSG thinking style inventory (pp. 140). Star mountain project.10.1037/t14063-000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R. (1988). Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224. doi: 10.1159/000275810
]Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584152
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–9810.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10068210.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vries, H., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.18410.1002/jocb.184
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallach, M.A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehard& Winston.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, K., Lee, L., Hong, Z., & Lin, H. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal Of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.123068510.1080/09500693.2016.1230685
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar