1. bookVolume 9 (2022): Edition 1 (June 2022)
Détails du magazine
Première parution
16 Apr 2015
2 fois par an
Accès libre

Predictive Power of Social Environment, Grit, and Motivation for Creative Potential of Science Learners

Publié en ligne: 02 Sep 2022
Volume & Edition: Volume 9 (2022) - Edition 1 (June 2022)
Pages: 51 - 68
Reçu: 10 Nov 2021
Accepté: 19 May 2022
Détails du magazine
Première parution
16 Apr 2015
2 fois par an

Abuhassàn, A., & Bates, T. (2015). Grit: Distinguishing effortful persistence from conscientiousness. Journal Of Individual Differences, 36(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a00017510.1027/1614-0001/a000175 Search in Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, A., Paolucci, P., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F., Dorigo, T., & Fedi, M. et al. (2021). The colours of the Higgs boson: a study in creativity and science motivation among high-school students in Italy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00169-410.1186/s40561-021-00169-4 Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8 Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T.M. (1990). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity and beyond. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories ofcreativity (pp. 61–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T.M., & Fisher, C.M. (2009). Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. In E.A. Locke (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd Ed.) (pp. 481–498). London: Wiley-Blackwell10.1002/9781119206422.ch26 Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T.M., Goldfarb, P., &Brackfield, S.C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6–21.10.1080/10400419009534330 Search in Google Scholar

Bala, T. (2015). A comparative study of creativity of students in relation to their home environment. International Journal Of Advanced Research In Management And Social Sciences, 4(4), 189–197. Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(03), 239. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-182610.5860/CHOICE.35-1826 Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S.I. Donaldson, D.E. Berger & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar

Barai, B., &Saha, R. (2021). Social Environment and Scientific Creative Potential: Understanding the Mediating Variables Within. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 11(1 & 2), 120–139. Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.10.1080/02783190509554310 Search in Google Scholar

Berry, W., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412985208 Search in Google Scholar

Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2145010.1002/tea.21450 Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319060955435110.1080/02783190609554351 Search in Google Scholar

Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203357965 Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M, (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Stem-berg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018 Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, C., Kaufman, J., & Mcclure, F. (2011). Non-Cognitive Constructs and Self-Reported Creativity by Domain. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.x Search in Google Scholar

Day, Ch. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203464342 Search in Google Scholar

Domino, G. (1979). Creativity and the Home Environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(4), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862790230041410.1177/001698627902300414 Search in Google Scholar

Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). Journal Of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634290 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dunn, L.L.S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. University of North Texas, Texas, unpublisheddoctoral dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 Search in Google Scholar

Frijda, N.H., Mesquita, B., Sonnemans, J., & Van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions. In K.T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (pp. 187–225). New York: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Garriott, P., Flores, L., Prabhakar, B., Mazzotta, E., Liskov, A., & Shapiro, J. (2013). Parental Support and Under-represented Students’ Math/Science Interests. Journal Of Career Assessment, 22(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907271351493310.1177/1069072713514933 Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2026710.1002/tea.20267 Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire ii: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.10.1002/tea.20442 Search in Google Scholar

Grohman, M.G., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S.B. (2017). The Role of Passion and Persistence in Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca000012110.1037/aca0000121 Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.10.1037/h0063487 Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp. Search in Google Scholar

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Search in Google Scholar

Haller, C.S., & Courvoisier, D.S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001708410.1037/a0017084 Search in Google Scholar

Haase, J., Hoff, E., Hanel, P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141143610.1080/10400419.2018.1411436 Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B.A. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraint on children’s creativity when using a computer. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 151–168.10.1080/10400418909534312 Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 Search in Google Scholar

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal Of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069011009891210.1080/09500690110098912 Search in Google Scholar

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., et al. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.10.1002/jocb.20 Search in Google Scholar

Karademir, E. (2016). Investigation the scientific creativity of gifted students through project-based activities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 416–427.10.21890/ijres.05662 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J.C. (2003). Critical thinking, creativity, and culture: An introduction. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(3), 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20032231310.5840/inquiryctnews200322313 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J.C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410611925 Search in Google Scholar

Kunat, B. (2017). „Dzielenie się czasem wolnym z uczniem” czyli o pracy nauczycieli z pasją. [„Sharing a free time with a pupil” a Word on the work of teachers with passion]. In E. Dubas, A. Gutowska (Eds.), Time and Places in a Biography. Educational Aspects. [Czas i miejsca w biografii. Aspekty edukacyjne]. (pp. 155–165), Łódź: UŁ. Search in Google Scholar

Kunat, B. (2018). Passion and Creativity – Together or Separately?. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-000410.1515/ctra-2018-0004 Search in Google Scholar

Lawson, A.E., Banks, D.L., &Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.10.1002/tea.20172 Search in Google Scholar

Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.10.1037/h0048850 Search in Google Scholar

Meeker, M. (1982). Test of creative thinking. Vida, OR: SOI Systems. Search in Google Scholar

Mehrinejad, S., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Creativity and the Predictability of Creativity by Parenting Styles. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 205, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.01410.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.014 Search in Google Scholar

Miller, S. (2017). Loneliness, Group Relevance, and Creativity (Masters). University of Wisconsin OshKosh. Search in Google Scholar

Moeller, J. (2014). Passion as concept of the psychology of motivation. Conceptualization, assessment, inter-individual variability and longterm stability (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.dbthueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-29036/DissJulia Search in Google Scholar

Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (Eds.). (1999). Social creativity (Vol. 1). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Search in Google Scholar

Niu, W. (2007). Individual and Environmental Influences on Chinese Student Creativity. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.x Search in Google Scholar

O’hara, L.A. & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_7 Search in Google Scholar

Pajares, F., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self- concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), BT self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Park, S., Park, K., & Choe, H. (2005). The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Scientific Giftedness in Korea. Journal Of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-47510.4219/jsge-2005-475 Search in Google Scholar

Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 Search in Google Scholar

Pretz, J., & Nelson, D. (2017). Creativity Is Influenced by Domain, Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Esteem. In M. Karwowski & J. Kaufman, The Creative Self Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 155–170). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00009-1 Search in Google Scholar

Pugsley, L., & Acar, S. (2018). Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children’s Creativity Characteristics. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.39310.1002/jocb.393 Search in Google Scholar

Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Guay, F., & Senécal, C. (2005). Perceptions of Parental Involvement and Support as Predictors of College Students’ Persistence in a Science Curriculum. Journal Of Family Psychology, 19(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.28610.1037/0893-3200.19.2.286 Search in Google Scholar

Rojas, J. (2015). The Relationships Among Creativity, Grit, Academic Motivation, And Academic Success In College Students (Ph.D.). University of Kentucky. Search in Google Scholar

Rojas, J., & Tyler, K. (2018). Measuring the Creative Process: A Psychometric Examination of Creative Ideation and Grit. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.141154610.1080/10400419.2018.1411546 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12(3), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-y10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-Y Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. (2005). Motivation, Competence, and Creativity. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck, Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 609–623). Guilford Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A. (2007). Creativity Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511763205.026 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0221337310.1007/BF02213373 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M., Acar, S., &Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 24, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.00310.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M., Plucker, J., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_1610.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16 Search in Google Scholar

Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.00710.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007 Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D.K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univesity Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674424753 Search in Google Scholar

Steffin, S.A. (1983). Fighting against convergent thinking. Childhood Education, 59, 355–358.10.1080/00094056.1983.10520595 Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.10.1159/000277029 Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.10.1111/j.1467-8721.1992.tb00002.x Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (1991). MSG thinking style inventory (pp. 140). Star mountain project.10.1037/t14063-000 Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. (1988). Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224. doi: 10.1159/000275810 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584152 Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–9810.1207/s15326934crj1801_10 Search in Google Scholar

Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10068210.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682 Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press. Search in Google Scholar

Vries, H., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.18410.1002/jocb.184 Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, M.A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehard& Winston. Search in Google Scholar

Yang, K., Lee, L., Hong, Z., & Lin, H. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal Of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.123068510.1080/09500693.2016.1230685 Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo