[
Alassani, R., & Göretz, J. (2019). Product placements by micro and macro influencers on Instagram. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media. Communication and Social Communities (pp. 251–267). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21905-5_2010.1007/978-3-030-21905-5_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1982a). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.99710.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1982b). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(32), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728208302710.1177/0146167282083027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.39310.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: West-view.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_310.1207/s15326934crj1001_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00804.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00804.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J., Kaufman, J.C., & Gentile, C.A. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_1110.1207/s15326934crj1601_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.38910.1037/1082-989X.10.4.389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonett, D.G., & Wright, T.A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.196010.1002/job.1960
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caroff, X., & Besançon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.00110.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carson, S.H., Peterson, J.B., & Higgins, D.M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_410.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, H.H. (2014). The effect of social embeddedness on bloggers’ creativity. Online Information Review, 38(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2013-014410.1108/OIR-06-2013-0144
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheung, P.C., & Lau, S. (2010). Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children: Comparison by using the new electronic Wallach–Kogan Creativity Tests. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.48152210.1080/10400419.2010.481522
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.15510.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cseh, G.M., & Jeffries, K.K. (2019). A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the Consensual Assessment Technique for creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca000022010.1037/aca0000220
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306200106110.3102/00346543062001061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, C., Marcketti, S., & Karpova, E. (2017). Creativity of images: Using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0102-410.1186/s40691-017-0102-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, C., Son, J., & McRoberts, L.B. (2015). Comparison of novice and expert evaluations of apparel design illustrations using the Consensual Assessment Technique. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2015.101896010.1080/17543266.2015.1018960
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.3610.1002/jocb.36
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guo, J., Ge, Y., & Pang, W. (2019). The underlying cognitive mechanisms of the rater effect in creativity assessment: The mediating role of perceived semantic distance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.10057210.1016/j.tsc.2019.100572
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halpern, D.F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, L.J. (1989). Two sexes in the mind: Perceptual and creative differences between women and men. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1989.tb00514.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1989.tb00514.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, W.J. (2018). A 4-year longitudinal study of the sex-creativity relationship in childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood: Findings of mean and variability analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0233110.3389/fpsyg.2018.02331
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, W.J., & Wong, W.C. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 807–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.02710.1016/j.paid.2011.06.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, W.J., & Wong, W.C. (2021). Gender differences in the distribution of creativity scores: Domain-Specific patterns in divergent thinking and creative problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.62691110.3389/fpsyg.2021.626911
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, W.J., Wong, W.C., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2013). A study of the greater male variability hypothesis in creative thinking in mainland China: Male superiority exists. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(8), 882–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.01710.1016/j.paid.2013.07.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hedges, L., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.760427710.1126/science.7604277
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hennessey, B.A. (1994). The Consensual Assessment Technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041940953452410.1080/10400419409534524
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/334570910.2307/3345709
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.2004710.1002/hfm.20047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hung, S.-P., Chen, P.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Improving creativity performance assessment: A rater effect examination with many facet Rasch model. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.73033110.1080/10400419.2012.730331
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Creativity map: Toward the next generation of theories of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001491810.1037/a0014918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I.J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at the old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00096.x10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00096.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ju, C., Duan, Y., & You, X. (2015). Retesting the greater male variability hypothesis in mainland China: A cross-regional study. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.02110.1016/j.paid.2014.07.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Justyńska, M. (2020). The issue of assessment criteria for performance of creative tasks with the example of the Odyssey of the Mind. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 7(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-000910.2478/ctra-2020-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gajda, A., Marczak, M., Groyecka, A., & Sorokowski, P. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity outside the WEIRD world. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.122997810.1080/10400419.2016.1229978
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gralewski, J., Gajda, A., Wisniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.00510.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Agars, M.D., & Loomis, D. (2010). Creativity stereotypes and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.48152910.1080/10400419.2010.481529
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., & Cole, J.C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Cole, J.C., & Sexton, J.D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041080205992910.1080/10400410802059929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C.A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01231.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01231.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Gentile, C.A., & Baer, J. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 260–265.10.1177/001698620504900307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Niu, W., Sexton, J.D., & Cole, J.C. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00584.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00584.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J.H., & Choi, I. (2021). Choosing the level of significance: A decision-theoretic approach. Abacus, 57(1), 27–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.1217210.1111/abac.12172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lau, S., & Cheung, P.C. (2015). A gender-fair look at variability in creativity: Growth in variability over a period versus gender comparison at a time point. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.99268510.1080/10400419.2015.992685
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, W.L., Hsu, K.Y., Chen, H.C., & Wang, J.W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002624110.1037/a0026241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loewenstein, J., & Mueller, J. (2016). Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assessments. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(4), 320–348. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.014710.5465/amd.2014.0147
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Long, H. (2014). More than appropriateness and novelty: Judges’ criteria of assessing creative products in science tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.05.00210.1016/j.tsc.2014.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Long, H., & Pang, W. (2015). Rater effects in creativity assessment: A mixed methods investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 15, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.10.00410.1016/j.tsc.2014.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, L., & Wilson, N. (2017). Defining creativity with discovery. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.137654310.1080/10400419.2017.1376543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mierdel, J., & Bogner, F.X. (2019). Is creativity, hands-on modeling and cognitive learning gender-dependent? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.00110.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullineaux, P.Y., & Dilalla, L.F. (2009). Preschool pretend play behaviors and early adolescent creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01305.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01305.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Myszkowski, N., & Storme, M. (2019). Judge response theory? A call to upgrade our psychometrical account of creativity judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca000022510.1037/aca0000225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020759014300003610.1080/00207590143000036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.A. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phonethibsavads, A., Bender, S., & Peppler, K. (2019). Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to compare creativity in drama spaces. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 6(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2019-000110.1515/ctra-2019-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (Creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319910955334010.1080/02783199109553340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A.R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J.C. Chrisler, & D.R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_1710.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Said-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 238–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-001310.1515/ctra-2017-0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonton, D.K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.82910.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, C.L., & Barbot, B. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: Examining the greater male variability hypothesis in different domains and tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.11066110.1016/j.paid.2021.110661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.01010.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, A., Shen, F., & Smith, B.L. (2002). Judging advertising creativity using the Creative Product Semantic Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01067.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01067.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, W., Ren, P., & Deng, L. (2020). Gender differences in the creativity–academic achievement relationship: A study from China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.38710.1002/jocb.387
]Search in Google Scholar