[1. Abbassi, E., K. Kahlaoui, M. A. Wilson, Y. Joanette. Processing the Emotions in Words: The Complementary Contributions of the Left and Right Hemispheres. – Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 11, 2011, No 3, pp. 372-385.10.3758/s13415-011-0034-121533883]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Adelman, J. S., Z. Estes, M. Cossu. Emotional Sound Symbolism: Languages Rapidly Signal Valence via Phonemes. – Cognition, Vol. 175, 2018, pp. 122-130.10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.00729510337]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Aryani, A., M. Conrad, A. M. Jacobs. Extracting Salient Sublexical Units from Written Texts: “Emophon,” A Corpus-Based Approach to Phonological Iconicity. – Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 4, 2013, p. 654.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654378724824101907]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Aryani, A., M. Kraxenberger, S. Ullrich, A. M. Jacobs, M. Conrad. Measuring the Basic Affective Tone of Poems via Phonological Saliency and Iconicity. – Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 10, 2016, No 2.10.1037/aca0000033]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bradley, M. M., P. J. Lang. Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings (Technical Report No C-1). Gainesville, FL: NIMH Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Buechel, S., U. Hahn. Emotion Analysis as a Regression Problem – Dimensional Models and Their Implications on Emotion Representation and Metrical Evaluation. – In: Proc. of 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, 2016, pp. 1114-1122.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Buechel, S., U. Hahn. Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation. – In: Proc. of 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 2017, pp. 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Buechel, S., U. Hahn. EMOBANK: Studying the Impact of Annotation Perspective and Representation Format on Dimensional Emotion Analysis. – In: Proc. of 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 2, Short Papers, 2017, pp. 578-585.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Buechel, S., U. Hahn. A Flexible Mapping Scheme for Discrete and Dimensional Emotion Representations: Evidence from Textual Stimuli. – In: Proc. of 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017), 2017, pp. 180-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. D’Anselmo, A., G. Prete, P. Zdybek, L. Tommasi, A. Brancucci. Guessing Meaning from Word Sounds of Unfamiliar Languages: A Cross-Cultural Sound Symbolism Study. – In: Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 10. 2019. 593 p.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00593643383630941080]Search in Google Scholar
[11. De Saussure, F. Course in General Linguistics (Trans. Roy Harris). London: Duckworth, 1916/1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Dingemanse, M., D. E. Blasi, G. Lupyan, M. H. Christiansen, P. Monaghan. Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 19, 2015, No 10, pp. 603-615.10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.01326412098]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Dolan, R. J. Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior. – Science, Vol. 298, pp. 1191-1194.10.1126/science.107635812424363]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Edmiston, P., M. Perlman, G. Lupyan. Repeated Imitation Makes Human Vocalizations More Word-Like. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 285, 2002, No 1874.10.1098/rspb.2017.2709587962929514962]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Ekman, P. Basic Emotions. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, 1999, pp. 45-60.10.1002/0470013494.ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Fuster, J. Cortex and Mind. New York City, Oxford University Press, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Imai, M., S. Kita. The Sound Symbolism Bootstrapping Hypothesis for Language Acquisition and Language Evolution. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 369, 2014, No 1651.10.1098/rstb.2013.0298412367725092666]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Jakobson, R. Linguistics and Poetics. – In: Style in Language. MA, MIT Press, 1960, pp. 350-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Jones, J. M., G. Vigliocco. Iconicity in Word Learning: What Can We Learn from Cross- Situational Learning Experiments? – In: Proc. of Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Society, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kawahara, S., K. Shinohara. A Tripartite Trans-Modal Relationship among Sounds, Shapes and Emotions: A Case of Abrupt Modulation. – In: Proc. of Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 34, 2012, No 34.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Köhler, W. Gestalt Psychology. New York, NY: Liveright, 1929.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Maddock, R. J., A. S. Garrett, M. H. Buonocore. Posterior Cingulate Cortex Activation by Emotional Words: fMRI Evidence from a Valence Decision Task. – Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 18, 2003, No 1, pp. 30-41.10.1002/hbm.10075]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Macoir, J., C. Hudon, M. P. Tremblay, R. J. Laforce, M. A. Wilson. The Contribution of Semantic Memory to the Recognition of Basic Emotions and Emotional Valence: Evidence from the Semantic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia. – Social Neuroscience, 2019, pp. 1-12.10.1080/17470919.2019.1577295]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Marinkovic, K., R. P. Dhond, A. M. Dale, M. Glessner, V. Carr, E. Halgren. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Modality-Specific and Supramodal Word Processing. – Neuron, Vol. 38, 2003, No 3, pp. 487-497.10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00197-1]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ortiz-Rios, M., P. Kuśmierek, I. DeWitt, D. Archakov, F. A. Azevedo, M. Sams, J. P. Rauschecker. Functional MRI of the Vocalization-Processing Network in the Macaque Brain. – Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 9, 2015.10.3389/fnins.2015.00113]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Russell, J. A., A. Mehrabian. Evidence for a Three-Factor Theory of Emotions. – Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 11, 1977, No 3, pp. 273-294.10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Scott, G. G., A. Keitel, M. Becirspahic, B. Yao, S. C. Sereno. The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 Words on Nine Scales. – In: Behavior Research Methods. 2018, pp. 1-13.10.31234/osf.io/akzyx]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Shklovsky, V. Theory of Prose. Transl. B. Sher. Elmwood Park, IL: Dalkey Archive, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Sidhu, D. M., P. M. Pexman. Five Mechanisms of Sound Symbolic Association. – In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 25. No 5. 2018, pp. 1619-1643.10.3758/s13423-017-1361-128840520]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Slavova, V. Towards Emotion Recognition in Texts – A Sound-Symbolic Experiment. – International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, Vol. 7, 2019, No 2, pp. 41-51.10.5937/IJCRSEE1902041S]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Slavova, V., A. Soschen. On Mental Representations: Language Structure and Meaning Revised. – International Journal Information Theories & Applications, Vol. 2, 2015, No 4, pp. 316-325.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Slavova, V., H. Sahli, W. Verhelst. Multimodal Emotion Recognition – More Cognitive Machines. – In: L. Fernando, J. de Mingo Lopez, C. K. Markov, K. Ivanova, I. Mitov, Eds. New Trends in Intelligent Technologies: Supplement to the Journal Information Technologies and Knowledge, Sofia, Institute of Information Theories and Applications FOI ITHEA, 2009, pp. 70-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Ullrich, S., A. Aryani, M. Kraxenberger, A. M. Jacobs, M. Conrad. On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-Lexical Features of Poetic Texts – A Case Study Using 57 Poems of HM Enzensberger. – In: Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 7. 2017, 2073.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02073522514428123376]Search in Google Scholar
[34. VanOrden, G. C., J. C. Johnston, B. L. Hale. Word Identification in Reading Proceeds from Spelling to Sound to Meaning. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 14, 1988, No 3.10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.371]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Warriner, A. B., V. Kuperman, M. Brysbaert. Norms of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 13,915 English Lemmas. – Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 45, 2013, No 4, pp. 1191-1207.10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x23404613]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Whissell, C. Phonosymbolism and the Emotional Nature of Sounds: Evidence of the Preferential Use of Particular Phonemes in Texts of Differing Emotional Tone. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 89, 1999, No 1, pp. 19-48.10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.1910544399]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Winter, B., M. Perlman, L. K. Perry, G. Lupyan. Which Words are Most Iconic?. – Interaction Studies, Vol. 18, 2017, No 3, pp. 443-464.10.1075/is.18.3.07win]Search in Google Scholar
[38. EmoBank Corpus [8]. Internet Resource. https://github.com/JULIELab/EmoBank]Search in Google Scholar