[1. Askim, Jostein, Jan E.Klausen, Irene S. Vabo, and Karl Bjurstrøm. “What Causes Municipal Amalgamation Reform? Rational Explanations Meet Western European Experiences 2004-13”: 59–79. In: Gerhard Bouckaert and Sabine Kuhlmann, eds. Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_4]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bel, Germa, Xavier Fageda, and Melania Mur. “Does cooperation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Vol. 24, No. 1 (2012): 85–107 // DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus059.10.1093/jopart/mus059]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Bel, Germa, Xavier Fageda, and Melania Mur. “Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis.” Local Government Studies Vol. 9, No. 3 (2013): 435–454 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.10.1080/03003930.2013.781024]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Brown, L. Trevor, and Mattew Potoski. “Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions.” Journal of Public Administration research and theory Vol. 13, No. 4 (2003): 441–468 // DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug030.10.1093/jpart/mug030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Civinskas, Remigijus, and Eglė Laurušonytė. “Viešųjų paslaugų tobulinimas: Jungtinių paslaugų centrų steigimas” (Modernization of the Public Services: Establishment of the Shared Public services Centers). Management 20(1) (2012): 103–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Civinskas, Remigijus, and Jaroslav Dvorak. “Viešųjų paslaugų teikimo centrų steigimo galimybės Lietuvoje” (The Opportunities of Establishment the Public Services Centers in Lithuania). Tiltai 57(4) (2011): 77–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dijkgraaf, Elbert, and Raymond Gradus. “Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market.” Local government studies Vol. 33, No. 4 (2007): 573–588 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930701417601.10.1080/03003930701417601]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Eythórsson, Gretar Thor, Pekka Kettunen, Jan E. Klausen, and Siv Sandberg. “Reasons for Inter-municipal Cooperation: A Comparative Analysis of Finland, Iceland and Norway”:106–117. In: Filipe Teles and Pawel Swianiewicz, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_6]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Feiock, C. Richard, Annette Steinacker, and Hyung Jun Park. “Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures.” Public Administration Review Vol. 69, No. 2 (2009): 256–270 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.x.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Feiock, C. Richard. “Rational choice and regional governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs Vol. 29, No. 1 (2007): 47–63 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Feiock, Richard C., Jill Tao, and Linda Johnson. “Institutional collective action: Social capital and the formation of regional partnerships”: 147–158. In: Richard C. Feiock, ed. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Franzke, Jochen, Daniel Klimovský, and Uroš Pinterič. “Does inter-municipal cooperation lead to territorial consolidation? A comparative analysis of selected European cases in times of crisis”: 81–98. In: Gerhard Bouckaert and Sabine Kuhlmann, eds. Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_5]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Frischtak L. Leila. “Governance capacity and economic reform in developing countries.” World Bank Technical Paper No. WTP 254 (Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 1994) // http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/765591468739783001/Governance-capacity-and-economic-reform-in-developing-countries.10.1596/0-8213-2962-6]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Goldsmith, J. Michael, and Edward C. Page. “Introduction”: 8–35. In: J. Michael Goldsmith and Edward C. Page, eds. Changing government relations in Europe: from localism to intergovernmentalism. Vol. 67, London: Routledge, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gradus, Raymond, Elbert Dijkgraaf, and M. Schoute “Is there still collusion in the Dutch waste collection market?” Local Government Studies Vol. 42, No. 5 (2016): 689–697 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930701417601.10.1080/03003930701417601]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Hulst, Rudie, and Andre van Montfort. “Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts.” Public Policy and Administration Vol. 27, No. 2 (2012): 121–144 // DOI: 10.1177/0952076711403026.10.1177/0952076711403026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Hulst, Rudie, and Andre Van Montfort. “Inter-municipal cooperation: A widespread phenomenon”: 1–27. In: Rudie Hulst and Andre Van Montfort, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Netherlands: Springer, 2007.10.1007/1-4020-5379-7]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Hulst, Rudie, Andre Van Montfort, Arto Haveri, Jenni Airaksinen, and Josephine Kelly. “Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery.” Public Organization Review 9(3) (2009): 263–285.10.1007/s11115-009-0085-8]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kanapinskas, Virginijus, Žydrūnas Plytnikas, and Agnė Tvaronavičіenė. “In-house procurement exception: Threat for sustainable procedure of public procurement?” Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues 4(2) (2014): 147-158.10.9770/jssi.2014.4.2(4)]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Ladner, Andreas, Nicolas Keuffer, and Harald Baldersheim. “Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014).” Regional & Federal Studies Vol. 26, No. 3 (2016): 321–357 // DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911.10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Lamothe, Scott, Meeyoung Lamothe, and Richard C. Feiock. “Examining local government service delivery arrangements over time.” Urban Affairs Review Vol. 44, No. 1 (2008): 27–56 // DOI: 10.1177/1078087408315801.10.1177/1078087408315801]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Lithuanian Free Market Institute. “What Municipal Enterprises are doing?” Report (2018) // https://www.llri.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PB-savivaldybi-----mon--s_20180118.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Mayntz, Renate. “Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks.” Knowledge and Policy Vol. 6, No. 1 (1993): 3–16.10.1007/BF02692798]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Nelles, Jen. “Cooperation and Capacity? Exploring the Sources and Limits of City-Region Governance Partnerships.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Vol. 37, No. 4 (2013): 1349–1367 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.x.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Osterrieder Holger. Joining Forces and Resources for Sustainable Development. Cooperation among Municipalities – A Guide for Practitioners. Bratislava: UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Raišienė, Agota. “Tarporganizacinės sąveikos turinys Lietuvos vietos savivaldos praktikų požiūriu” (Inter-organizational Relations in Lithuanian Self-governance Practice). Jurisprudencija 106(4) (2008): 50–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Ščeponavičius, Audrius. Visuomenės sveikatos priežiūros aktualijos savivaldybėse (Public Health Services Problems in Municipalities). Ministry of Health Care of the Republic of Lithuania, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Sellers, M. Jefferey, and Anders Lidström. “Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state.” Governance Vol. 20, No. 4 (2007): 609–632 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Silva, Patricia, Filipe Teles, and Joanna Ferreira. “Intermunicipal cooperation: The quest for governance capacity?” International Review of Administrative Sciences (2018) // DOI: 10.1177/0020852317740411.10.1177/0020852317740411]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[30. Soukopová, Jana, and Daniel Klimovský. “Local Governments and Local Waste Management in the Czech Republic: Producers or Providers?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 9(2) (2016): 217–237.10.1515/nispa-2016-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Soukopová, Jana, and Gabriela Vaceková. “Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?” Local Government Studies Vol. 44, No. 1 (2018): 105–126 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739.10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Swianiewicz, Pawel, and Filipe Teles. “Inter-municipal Cooperation Diversity, Evolution and Future Research Agenda”: 340–344. In: Filipe Teles and Pawel Swianiewicz, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_20]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Tavares, F. Antonio, and Richard C. Feiock. “Applying an institutional collective action framework to investigate intermunicipal cooperation in Europe.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance Vol. 1. No. 4 (2018): 299-316 // DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx014.10.1093/ppmgov/gvx014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Teles, Filipe. Local governance and intermunicipal cooperation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/9781137445742]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Urvikis, Marius. Vietos savivaldos institucijų organizuojamų viešųjų paslaugų sistemos tobulinimas (Improvement of the System of Public Services Organized by Local Self-government Institutions). Doctoral Dissertation. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Visser, A. James. “Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions: toward a cultural model of interlocal relations.” The American Review of Public Administration Vol. 32, No. 1 (2002): 40–65 // DOI: 10.1177/0275074002032001003.10.1177/0275074002032001003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[1. Law on Local Self-Government of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, No. I-533, last amended in 2018, No. XIII-1064.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Republic of Lithuania Law on State and Municipal Enterprises. Official Gazette, 1994, No I-722.]Search in Google Scholar