Uncoupling Inter-Municipal Cooperation Capacity: Lithuanian Municipalities’ Efforts To Sustain Services Provision

1. Askim, Jostein, Jan E.Klausen, Irene S. Vabo, and Karl Bjurstrøm. “What Causes Municipal Amalgamation Reform? Rational Explanations Meet Western European Experiences 2004-13”: 59–79. In: Gerhard Bouckaert and Sabine Kuhlmann, eds. Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_4Search in Google Scholar

2. Bel, Germa, Xavier Fageda, and Melania Mur. “Does cooperation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Vol. 24, No. 1 (2012): 85–107 // DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus059.10.1093/jopart/mus059Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Bel, Germa, Xavier Fageda, and Melania Mur. “Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis.” Local Government Studies Vol. 9, No. 3 (2013): 435–454 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.10.1080/03003930.2013.781024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Brown, L. Trevor, and Mattew Potoski. “Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions.” Journal of Public Administration research and theory Vol. 13, No. 4 (2003): 441–468 // DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug030.10.1093/jpart/mug030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Civinskas, Remigijus, and Eglė Laurušonytė. “Viešųjų paslaugų tobulinimas: Jungtinių paslaugų centrų steigimas” (Modernization of the Public Services: Establishment of the Shared Public services Centers). Management 20(1) (2012): 103–110.Search in Google Scholar

6. Civinskas, Remigijus, and Jaroslav Dvorak. “Viešųjų paslaugų teikimo centrų steigimo galimybės Lietuvoje” (The Opportunities of Establishment the Public Services Centers in Lithuania). Tiltai 57(4) (2011): 77–93.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dijkgraaf, Elbert, and Raymond Gradus. “Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market.” Local government studies Vol. 33, No. 4 (2007): 573–588 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930701417601.10.1080/03003930701417601Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Eythórsson, Gretar Thor, Pekka Kettunen, Jan E. Klausen, and Siv Sandberg. “Reasons for Inter-municipal Cooperation: A Comparative Analysis of Finland, Iceland and Norway”:106–117. In: Filipe Teles and Pawel Swianiewicz, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_6Search in Google Scholar

9. Feiock, C. Richard, Annette Steinacker, and Hyung Jun Park. “Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures.” Public Administration Review Vol. 69, No. 2 (2009): 256–270 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.x.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Feiock, C. Richard. “Rational choice and regional governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs Vol. 29, No. 1 (2007): 47–63 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Feiock, Richard C., Jill Tao, and Linda Johnson. “Institutional collective action: Social capital and the formation of regional partnerships”: 147–158. In: Richard C. Feiock, ed. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

12. Franzke, Jochen, Daniel Klimovský, and Uroš Pinterič. “Does inter-municipal cooperation lead to territorial consolidation? A comparative analysis of selected European cases in times of crisis”: 81–98. In: Gerhard Bouckaert and Sabine Kuhlmann, eds. Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_5Search in Google Scholar

13. Frischtak L. Leila. “Governance capacity and economic reform in developing countries.” World Bank Technical Paper No. WTP 254 (Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 1994) // http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/765591468739783001/Governance-capacity-and-economic-reform-in-developing-countries.10.1596/0-8213-2962-6Search in Google Scholar

14. Goldsmith, J. Michael, and Edward C. Page. “Introduction”: 8–35. In: J. Michael Goldsmith and Edward C. Page, eds. Changing government relations in Europe: from localism to intergovernmentalism. Vol. 67, London: Routledge, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gradus, Raymond, Elbert Dijkgraaf, and M. Schoute “Is there still collusion in the Dutch waste collection market?” Local Government Studies Vol. 42, No. 5 (2016): 689–697 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930701417601.10.1080/03003930701417601Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Hulst, Rudie, and Andre van Montfort. “Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts.” Public Policy and Administration Vol. 27, No. 2 (2012): 121–144 // DOI: 10.1177/0952076711403026.10.1177/0952076711403026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Hulst, Rudie, and Andre Van Montfort. “Inter-municipal cooperation: A widespread phenomenon”: 1–27. In: Rudie Hulst and Andre Van Montfort, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Netherlands: Springer, 2007.10.1007/1-4020-5379-7Search in Google Scholar

18. Hulst, Rudie, Andre Van Montfort, Arto Haveri, Jenni Airaksinen, and Josephine Kelly. “Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery.” Public Organization Review 9(3) (2009): 263–285.10.1007/s11115-009-0085-8Search in Google Scholar

19. Kanapinskas, Virginijus, Žydrūnas Plytnikas, and Agnė Tvaronavičіenė. “In-house procurement exception: Threat for sustainable procedure of public procurement?” Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues 4(2) (2014): 147-158.10.9770/jssi.2014.4.2(4)Search in Google Scholar

20. Ladner, Andreas, Nicolas Keuffer, and Harald Baldersheim. “Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014).” Regional & Federal Studies Vol. 26, No. 3 (2016): 321–357 // DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911.10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Lamothe, Scott, Meeyoung Lamothe, and Richard C. Feiock. “Examining local government service delivery arrangements over time.” Urban Affairs Review Vol. 44, No. 1 (2008): 27–56 // DOI: 10.1177/1078087408315801.10.1177/1078087408315801Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lithuanian Free Market Institute. “What Municipal Enterprises are doing?” Report (2018) // https://www.llri.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PB-savivaldybi-----mon--s_20180118.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

23. Mayntz, Renate. “Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks.” Knowledge and Policy Vol. 6, No. 1 (1993): 3–16.10.1007/BF02692798Search in Google Scholar

24. Nelles, Jen. “Cooperation and Capacity? Exploring the Sources and Limits of City-Region Governance Partnerships.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Vol. 37, No. 4 (2013): 1349–1367 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.x.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Osterrieder Holger. Joining Forces and Resources for Sustainable Development. Cooperation among Municipalities – A Guide for Practitioners. Bratislava: UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

26. Raišienė, Agota. “Tarporganizacinės sąveikos turinys Lietuvos vietos savivaldos praktikų požiūriu” (Inter-organizational Relations in Lithuanian Self-governance Practice). Jurisprudencija 106(4) (2008): 50–60.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ščeponavičius, Audrius. Visuomenės sveikatos priežiūros aktualijos savivaldybėse (Public Health Services Problems in Municipalities). Ministry of Health Care of the Republic of Lithuania, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sellers, M. Jefferey, and Anders Lidström. “Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state.” Governance Vol. 20, No. 4 (2007): 609–632 // DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Silva, Patricia, Filipe Teles, and Joanna Ferreira. “Intermunicipal cooperation: The quest for governance capacity?” International Review of Administrative Sciences (2018) // DOI: 10.1177/0020852317740411.10.1177/0020852317740411Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Soukopová, Jana, and Daniel Klimovský. “Local Governments and Local Waste Management in the Czech Republic: Producers or Providers?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 9(2) (2016): 217–237.10.1515/nispa-2016-0021Search in Google Scholar

31. Soukopová, Jana, and Gabriela Vaceková. “Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?” Local Government Studies Vol. 44, No. 1 (2018): 105–126 // DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739.10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Swianiewicz, Pawel, and Filipe Teles. “Inter-municipal Cooperation Diversity, Evolution and Future Research Agenda”: 340–344. In: Filipe Teles and Pawel Swianiewicz, eds. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_20Search in Google Scholar

33. Tavares, F. Antonio, and Richard C. Feiock. “Applying an institutional collective action framework to investigate intermunicipal cooperation in Europe.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance Vol. 1. No. 4 (2018): 299-316 // DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx014.10.1093/ppmgov/gvx014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Teles, Filipe. Local governance and intermunicipal cooperation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1057/9781137445742Search in Google Scholar

35. Urvikis, Marius. Vietos savivaldos institucijų organizuojamų viešųjų paslaugų sistemos tobulinimas (Improvement of the System of Public Services Organized by Local Self-government Institutions). Doctoral Dissertation. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

36. Visser, A. James. “Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions: toward a cultural model of interlocal relations.” The American Review of Public Administration Vol. 32, No. 1 (2002): 40–65 // DOI: 10.1177/0275074002032001003.10.1177/0275074002032001003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

1. Law on Local Self-Government of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, No. I-533, last amended in 2018, No. XIII-1064.Search in Google Scholar

2. Republic of Lithuania Law on State and Municipal Enterprises. Official Gazette, 1994, No I-722.Search in Google Scholar