Accès libre

Designing Legitimate Institutions for Non-Territorial Autonomies. Insights from the Debates within the Hungarian Communities of Serbia and Romania

À propos de cet article

Citez

BAKK, Miklós. 1999. Az RMDSZ mint a romániai magyarság önmeghatározási kísérlete 1989 után. Regio 10(2): 81–116.Search in Google Scholar

BAKK, Miklós. 2004. Az autonómia-tervek két szakasza Erdélyben 1989 után. Magyar Kisebbség 10 (1–2): 39–60.Search in Google Scholar

BÁRDI, Nándor–ÉGER, György (eds). 2000. Útkeresés és integráció. Határon túli magyar érdekvédelmi szervezetek dokumentumai 1989–2000. Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Search in Google Scholar

BARTOLINI, Stefano. 1999. Collusion, Competition and Democracy. Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4): 435–470.10.1177/0951692899011004001Search in Google Scholar

BENEDIKTER, Thomas. 2010. The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems. Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bolzano/Bozen: EURAC Research.Search in Google Scholar

BERETKA, Katinka–SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2016. The National Councils of National Minorities in the Republic of Serbia. Autonomy Arrangements in the World. Available at: http://www.world-autonomies.info/ntas/serb/Pages/default.aspx (last accessed: 3 August 2020).Search in Google Scholar

BOCHSLER, Daniel. 2007. Local Politics and Intra-ethnic Party Competition: Multi-Party Systems among Ethnic Minorities in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the 4th ECPR General Conference, 6–8 September 2007, Pisa.Search in Google Scholar

BOCHSLER, Daniel–SZŐCSIK, Edina. 2013. Building Inter-Ethnic Bridges or Promoting Ethno-Territorial Demarcation Lines? Hungarian Minority Parties in Competition. Nationalities Papers 41(5): 761–779.10.1080/00905992.2013.801411Search in Google Scholar

BOGNÁR, Zoltán. 2006. Romániai magyar autonómiakoncepciók. Az 1989 és 2006 között kidolgozott törvénytervezetek. In: Autonómia, liberalizmus, szociáldemokrácia. Fejtő Ferenc, Salat Levente, Ludassy Mária, Egry Gábor és Bognár Zoltán írásai. Budapest: Európai Összehasonlító Kisebbségkutatások Közalapítvány. 85–117.Search in Google Scholar

BRUNNER, Georg–KÜPPER, Herbert. 2002. European Options of Autonomy: A Typology of Autonomy Models of Minority Self-Governance. In: GÁL, Kinga (ed.), Minority Governance in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative, Open Society Institute. 11–36.Search in Google Scholar

COAKLEY, John. 2008. Ethnic Competition and the Logic of Party System Transformation. European Journal of Political Research 47(6): 766–793.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00824.xSearch in Google Scholar

EIDE, Asbjørn–VIBEKE, Greni–LUNDBERG, Maria. 1998. Cultural Autonomy: Concept, Content, History and Role in the World Order. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International: 251–276.Search in Google Scholar

>HEINTZE, Hans-Joachim. 1998. On the Legal Understanding of Autonomy. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International. 7–32.Search in Google Scholar

HOROWITZ, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

KISS, Tamás–BARNA, Gergő. 2011. Közélet és közérzet Erdélyben. 2011. december. Research report. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities.Search in Google Scholar

KISS, Tamás–SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2016. Shifting Linkages in Ethnic Mobilization: The Case of RMDSZ and the Hungarians in Transylvania. Nationalities Papers 44(4): 591–610.10.1080/00905992.2016.1149157Search in Google Scholar

KISS, Tamás–SZÉKELY, István Gergő–TORÓ, Tibor–BÁRDI, Nándor–HORVÁTH, István (eds). 2018. Unequal Accommodation of Minority Rights: Hungarians in Transylvania. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-78893-7Search in Google Scholar

KORHECZ, Tamás. 2004. Valóra válhat-e az autonómia-álom? – A Vajdaságban megalakult a Magyar Nemzeti Tanács. In: BLÉNESI, Éva–MANDEL, Kinga (eds), Kisebbségek és Kormánypolitika Közép-Európában. Budapest: Gondolat. 193–208.Search in Google Scholar

LUSTICK, Ian. 1979. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control. World Politics 31(3): 325–344.10.2307/2009992Search in Google Scholar

MALLOY, Tove H.–OSIPOV, Alexander–VIZI, Balázs (eds). 2015. Managing Diversity through Non-Territorial Autonomy. Assessing Advantages, Deficiencies, and Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738459.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

MALLOY, Tove H.–PALERMO, Francesco (eds). 2015. Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746669.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

MÁRTON, János–ORBÁN, Balázs. 2005. Elemzés a 2005-ös kisebbségi törvénytervezetről. In: BODÓ, Barna (ed.), Romániai Magyar Évkönyv 2004–2005. Timişoara: Szórvány Alapítvány–Marineasa. 155–198.Search in Google Scholar

MCGARRY, John–O’LEARY, Brendan. 1993. Introduction: The Macro-Political Regulation of Ethnic Conflict. In: MCGARRY, John–O’LEARY, Brendan (eds), The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. London–New York: Routledge. 1–40.Search in Google Scholar

MEDIANU, Narcisa. 2002. Analysing Political Exchanges between Minority and Majority Leaders in Romania. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics 1(4): 28–41.10.1080/14718800208405111Search in Google Scholar

MIRNICS, Károly. 2000. Politikai önszerveződés. In: GÁBRITYNÉ MOLNÁR, Irén–MIRNICS, Zsuzsa (eds), Vajdasági marasztaló. Tanulmányok, kutatások. Szabadka: Magyarságkutató Tudományos Társaság. 249–280.Search in Google Scholar

MITCHELL, Paul–EVANS, Geoffrey–O’LEARY, Brendan. 2008. Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems Is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland. Political Studies 57(2): 397–421.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00769.xSearch in Google Scholar

NIMNI, Ephraim. 2007. National–Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism. Ethnopolitics 6(3): 345–364.10.1080/17449050701487363Search in Google Scholar

OSIPOV, Alexander. 2013. Non-Territorial Autonomy as a Way to Diversity Policies: The Case of Russia. In: NIMNI, Ephraim–OSIPOV, Alexander–SMITH, David J. (eds), The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Peter Lang Academic Publishers. 133–148.Search in Google Scholar

PRINA, Federica–SMITH, David J.–MOLNÁR SANSUM, Judit. 2018. National Cultural Autonomy and Linguistic Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. In: HOGAN-BRUN, Gabrielle–O’ROURKE, Bernadette (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 181–205.10.1057/978-1-137-54066-9_7Search in Google Scholar

PURGER, Tibor. 2016. Etnopolitikai érdekképviselet: Hatékonyság vagy pluralizmus? A vajdasági magyarok politikai pártjai és érdekszervezetei hárompólusú erőtérben. Magyar Kisebbség 21(3–4): 81–92.Search in Google Scholar

RABUSHKA, Alvin–SHEPSLE, Kenneth. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus: Charles E. Merill.Search in Google Scholar

RECHEL, Bernd. 2009. Introduction. In: RECHEL, Bernd (ed.), Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. London–New York: Routledge. 3–16.10.4324/9780203883655Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, David J. 2011. National-Cultural Autonomy. In: CORDELL, Karl–WOLFF, Stefan (eds), Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict. Abingdon: Routledge. 277–287.Search in Google Scholar

STOKES, Donald E. 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–377.10.2307/1952828Search in Google Scholar

SUKSI, Markku. 1998. Introduction. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International. 1–5.Search in Google Scholar

SUKSI, Markku. 2008. Personal Autonomy as Institutional Form – Focus on Europe Against the Background of Article 27 of the ICCPR. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 15(2–3): 157–178.10.1163/157181108X332587Search in Google Scholar

SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2014. Dynamics of Party Politics, Electoral Competition and Cooperation within the Hungarian Minorities of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. PhD thesis. Budapest: Central European University.Search in Google Scholar

TKACIK, Michael. 2008. Characteristics of Forms of Autonomy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 15(2–3): 369–401.10.1163/157181108X332668Search in Google Scholar

TORÓ, T. Tibor. 1998. Az RMDSZ kormánykoalíciós szerepvállalása: zsákutca vagy kiút egy hatékonyabb politikai érdekképviselet felé? Magyar Kisebbség 4(1): 222–251.Search in Google Scholar

TSEBELIS, George. 1991. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley–Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

VÁRADY, Tibor. 2009. Gyakorlat nincs, magunknak kell kialakítanunk. Interjú dr. Várady Tiborral. Kitekintő 28 December 2009. Available at: http://kitekinto.hu/karpat-medence/2009/12/28/gyakorlat_nincs_magunknak_kell_kialakitanunk_-_interju_dr._varady_tiborral/ (last accessed: 19 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

VIZI, Balázs. 2002. Minority Groups and Autonomy from an International Political Perspective. In: GÁL, Kinga (ed.), Minority Governance in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative, Open Society Institute. 37–55.Search in Google Scholar

ZUBER, Christina Isabel. 2013. Beyond Outbidding? Ethnic Party Strategies in Serbia. Party Politics 19(5): 758–777.10.1177/1354068811410368Search in Google Scholar

ZUBER, Christina Isabel–MUS, Jan Jakub. 2013. Representative Claims and Expected Gains. Minority Council Elections and Intra-ethnic Competition in Serbia. East European Politics 29(1): 52–68.10.1080/21599165.2012.757737Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2068-7583
Langue:
Anglais