[BAKK, Miklós. 1999. Az RMDSZ mint a romániai magyarság önmeghatározási kísérlete 1989 után. Regio 10(2): 81–116.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAKK, Miklós. 2004. Az autonómia-tervek két szakasza Erdélyben 1989 után. Magyar Kisebbség 10 (1–2): 39–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[BÁRDI, Nándor–ÉGER, György (eds). 2000. Útkeresés és integráció. Határon túli magyar érdekvédelmi szervezetek dokumentumai 1989–2000. Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.]Search in Google Scholar
[BARTOLINI, Stefano. 1999. Collusion, Competition and Democracy. Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4): 435–470.10.1177/0951692899011004001]Search in Google Scholar
[BENEDIKTER, Thomas. 2010. The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems. Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bolzano/Bozen: EURAC Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[BERETKA, Katinka–SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2016. The National Councils of National Minorities in the Republic of Serbia. Autonomy Arrangements in the World. Available at: http://www.world-autonomies.info/ntas/serb/Pages/default.aspx (last accessed: 3 August 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[BOCHSLER, Daniel. 2007. Local Politics and Intra-ethnic Party Competition: Multi-Party Systems among Ethnic Minorities in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the 4th ECPR General Conference, 6–8 September 2007, Pisa.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOCHSLER, Daniel–SZŐCSIK, Edina. 2013. Building Inter-Ethnic Bridges or Promoting Ethno-Territorial Demarcation Lines? Hungarian Minority Parties in Competition. Nationalities Papers 41(5): 761–779.10.1080/00905992.2013.801411]Search in Google Scholar
[BOGNÁR, Zoltán. 2006. Romániai magyar autonómiakoncepciók. Az 1989 és 2006 között kidolgozott törvénytervezetek. In: Autonómia, liberalizmus, szociáldemokrácia. Fejtő Ferenc, Salat Levente, Ludassy Mária, Egry Gábor és Bognár Zoltán írásai. Budapest: Európai Összehasonlító Kisebbségkutatások Közalapítvány. 85–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[BRUNNER, Georg–KÜPPER, Herbert. 2002. European Options of Autonomy: A Typology of Autonomy Models of Minority Self-Governance. In: GÁL, Kinga (ed.), Minority Governance in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative, Open Society Institute. 11–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[COAKLEY, John. 2008. Ethnic Competition and the Logic of Party System Transformation. European Journal of Political Research 47(6): 766–793.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00824.x]Search in Google Scholar
[EIDE, Asbjørn–VIBEKE, Greni–LUNDBERG, Maria. 1998. Cultural Autonomy: Concept, Content, History and Role in the World Order. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International: 251–276.]Search in Google Scholar
[>HEINTZE, Hans-Joachim. 1998. On the Legal Understanding of Autonomy. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International. 7–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOROWITZ, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[KISS, Tamás–BARNA, Gergő. 2011. Közélet és közérzet Erdélyben. 2011. december. Research report. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities.]Search in Google Scholar
[KISS, Tamás–SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2016. Shifting Linkages in Ethnic Mobilization: The Case of RMDSZ and the Hungarians in Transylvania. Nationalities Papers 44(4): 591–610.10.1080/00905992.2016.1149157]Search in Google Scholar
[KISS, Tamás–SZÉKELY, István Gergő–TORÓ, Tibor–BÁRDI, Nándor–HORVÁTH, István (eds). 2018. Unequal Accommodation of Minority Rights: Hungarians in Transylvania. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-78893-7]Search in Google Scholar
[KORHECZ, Tamás. 2004. Valóra válhat-e az autonómia-álom? – A Vajdaságban megalakult a Magyar Nemzeti Tanács. In: BLÉNESI, Éva–MANDEL, Kinga (eds), Kisebbségek és Kormánypolitika Közép-Európában. Budapest: Gondolat. 193–208.]Search in Google Scholar
[LUSTICK, Ian. 1979. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control. World Politics 31(3): 325–344.10.2307/2009992]Search in Google Scholar
[MALLOY, Tove H.–OSIPOV, Alexander–VIZI, Balázs (eds). 2015. Managing Diversity through Non-Territorial Autonomy. Assessing Advantages, Deficiencies, and Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738459.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[MALLOY, Tove H.–PALERMO, Francesco (eds). 2015. Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746669.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[MÁRTON, János–ORBÁN, Balázs. 2005. Elemzés a 2005-ös kisebbségi törvénytervezetről. In: BODÓ, Barna (ed.), Romániai Magyar Évkönyv 2004–2005. Timişoara: Szórvány Alapítvány–Marineasa. 155–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCGARRY, John–O’LEARY, Brendan. 1993. Introduction: The Macro-Political Regulation of Ethnic Conflict. In: MCGARRY, John–O’LEARY, Brendan (eds), The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. London–New York: Routledge. 1–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[MEDIANU, Narcisa. 2002. Analysing Political Exchanges between Minority and Majority Leaders in Romania. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics 1(4): 28–41.10.1080/14718800208405111]Search in Google Scholar
[MIRNICS, Károly. 2000. Politikai önszerveződés. In: GÁBRITYNÉ MOLNÁR, Irén–MIRNICS, Zsuzsa (eds), Vajdasági marasztaló. Tanulmányok, kutatások. Szabadka: Magyarságkutató Tudományos Társaság. 249–280.]Search in Google Scholar
[MITCHELL, Paul–EVANS, Geoffrey–O’LEARY, Brendan. 2008. Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems Is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland. Political Studies 57(2): 397–421.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00769.x]Search in Google Scholar
[NIMNI, Ephraim. 2007. National–Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism. Ethnopolitics 6(3): 345–364.10.1080/17449050701487363]Search in Google Scholar
[OSIPOV, Alexander. 2013. Non-Territorial Autonomy as a Way to Diversity Policies: The Case of Russia. In: NIMNI, Ephraim–OSIPOV, Alexander–SMITH, David J. (eds), The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Peter Lang Academic Publishers. 133–148.]Search in Google Scholar
[PRINA, Federica–SMITH, David J.–MOLNÁR SANSUM, Judit. 2018. National Cultural Autonomy and Linguistic Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. In: HOGAN-BRUN, Gabrielle–O’ROURKE, Bernadette (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 181–205.10.1057/978-1-137-54066-9_7]Search in Google Scholar
[PURGER, Tibor. 2016. Etnopolitikai érdekképviselet: Hatékonyság vagy pluralizmus? A vajdasági magyarok politikai pártjai és érdekszervezetei hárompólusú erőtérben. Magyar Kisebbség 21(3–4): 81–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[RABUSHKA, Alvin–SHEPSLE, Kenneth. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus: Charles E. Merill.]Search in Google Scholar
[RECHEL, Bernd. 2009. Introduction. In: RECHEL, Bernd (ed.), Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. London–New York: Routledge. 3–16.10.4324/9780203883655]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, David J. 2011. National-Cultural Autonomy. In: CORDELL, Karl–WOLFF, Stefan (eds), Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict. Abingdon: Routledge. 277–287.]Search in Google Scholar
[STOKES, Donald E. 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–377.10.2307/1952828]Search in Google Scholar
[SUKSI, Markku. 1998. Introduction. In: SUKSI, Markku (ed.), Autonomy: Applications and Implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International. 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUKSI, Markku. 2008. Personal Autonomy as Institutional Form – Focus on Europe Against the Background of Article 27 of the ICCPR. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 15(2–3): 157–178.10.1163/157181108X332587]Search in Google Scholar
[SZÉKELY, István Gergő. 2014. Dynamics of Party Politics, Electoral Competition and Cooperation within the Hungarian Minorities of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. PhD thesis. Budapest: Central European University.]Search in Google Scholar
[TKACIK, Michael. 2008. Characteristics of Forms of Autonomy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 15(2–3): 369–401.10.1163/157181108X332668]Search in Google Scholar
[TORÓ, T. Tibor. 1998. Az RMDSZ kormánykoalíciós szerepvállalása: zsákutca vagy kiút egy hatékonyabb politikai érdekképviselet felé? Magyar Kisebbség 4(1): 222–251.]Search in Google Scholar
[TSEBELIS, George. 1991. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley–Los Angeles: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[VÁRADY, Tibor. 2009. Gyakorlat nincs, magunknak kell kialakítanunk. Interjú dr. Várady Tiborral. Kitekintő 28 December 2009. Available at: http://kitekinto.hu/karpat-medence/2009/12/28/gyakorlat_nincs_magunknak_kell_kialakitanunk_-_interju_dr._varady_tiborral/ (last accessed: 19 February 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[VIZI, Balázs. 2002. Minority Groups and Autonomy from an International Political Perspective. In: GÁL, Kinga (ed.), Minority Governance in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative, Open Society Institute. 37–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZUBER, Christina Isabel. 2013. Beyond Outbidding? Ethnic Party Strategies in Serbia. Party Politics 19(5): 758–777.10.1177/1354068811410368]Search in Google Scholar
[ZUBER, Christina Isabel–MUS, Jan Jakub. 2013. Representative Claims and Expected Gains. Minority Council Elections and Intra-ethnic Competition in Serbia. East European Politics 29(1): 52–68.10.1080/21599165.2012.757737]Search in Google Scholar