[
Abdel-Mohsein H., Yamamoto N., Otawa K., Tada C., Nakai Y. (2010). Isolation of bacteriocin-like substances producing bacteria from finished cattle-manure compost and activity evaluation against some food-borne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 56: 151–161.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aguiar-Pulido V., Huang W., Suarez-Ulloa V., Cickovski T., Mathee K., Narasimhan G. (2016). Metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics approaches for microbiome analysis. Evolut. Bioinf. Online, 12 (Suppl 1): 5–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahlborn N., Young W., Mullaney J., Samuelsson L.M. (2020). In vitro fermentation of sheep and cow milk using infant fecal bacteria. Nutrients, 12: 1802.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altmäe S., Franasiak J.M., Mändar R. (2019). The seminal microbiome in health and disease. Nature Reviews. Urology, 16: 703–721.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amat S., Lantz H., Munyaka P.M., Willing B.P. (2020). Prevotella in pigs: The positive and negative associations with production and health. Microorganisms, 8: 1584.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amin N., Schwarzkopf S., Kinoshita A., Tröscher-Mußotter J., Dänicke S., Camarinha-Silva A., Huber K., Frahm J., Seifert J. (2021). Evolution of rumen and oral microbiota in calves is influenced by age and time of weaning. Anim. Microb., 3: 31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker J.M., Chase D.M., Herbst-Kralovetz M.M. (2018). Uterine microbiota: residents, tourists, or invaders? Front. Immunol., 9: 208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bashiardes S., Zilberman-Schapira G., Elinav E. (2016). Use of metatranscriptomics in microbiome research. Bioinf. Biol. Insights, 10: 19–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bashir Y., Pradeep Singh S., Kumar Konwar B. (2014). Metagenomics: an application based perspective. Chinese J. Biol., 2014: 146030.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belkaid Y., Hand T. (2014). Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell, 157: 121–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berini F., Casciello C., Marcone G., Marinelli F. (2017). Metagenomics: Novel enzymes from non-culturable microbes. FEMS Microb. Lett., 364.10.1093/femsle/fnx21129029060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertin Y., Habouzit C., Dunière L., Laurier M., Durand A., Duchez D., Segura A., Thévenot-Sergentet D., Baruzzi F., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Forano E. (2017). Lactobacillus reuteri suppresses E. coli O157:H7 in bovine ruminal fluid: Toward a pre-slaughter strategy to improve food safety? PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0187229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bianchi R.M., Schwertz C.I., de Cecco B.S., Panziera W., De Lorenzo C., Heck L.C., Snel G. G.M., Lopes B.C., da Silva F.S., Pavarini S.P., Driemeier D. (2019). Pathological and microbiological characterization of mastitis in dairy cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 51: 2057–2066.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Black J.L., Davison T.M., Box I. (2021). Methane emissions from ruminants in Australia: mitigation potential and applicability of mitigation strategies. Animals, 11: 951.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blakebrough-Hall C., Dona A., D’occhio M.J., McMeniman J., González L.A. (2020). Diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle using blood 1 H NMR metabolomics. Sci. Rep., 10: 115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boersma M.G., Solyanikova I.P., Van Berkel W., Vervoort J., Golovleva L.A., Rietjens I. (2001). F NMR metabolomics for the elucidation of microbial degradation pathways of fluorophenols. J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 26: 22–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brock F.M., Forsberg C.W., Buchanan-Smith J.G. (1982). Proteolytic activity of rumen microorganisms and effects of proteinase inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 44: 561–569.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brüggemann H., Gottschalk G. (2004). Insights in metabolism and toxin production from the complete genome sequence of Clostridium tetani. Anaerobe, 10: 53–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caffarena R.D., Rabaza A., Casaux L., Rioseco M.M., Schild C.O., Monesiglio C., Fraga M., Giannitti F., Riet-Correa F. (2018). Natural lymphatic (“atypical”) actinobacillosis in cattle caused by Actinobacillus lignieresii. J. Vet. Diagnost. Invest., 30: 218–225.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calvo-Bado L.A., Oakley B.B., Dowd S.E., Green L.E., Medley G.F., Ul-Hassan A., Bateman V., Gaze W., Witcomb L., Grogono-Thomas R., Kaler J., Russell C.L., Wellington E. M.H. (2011). Ovine pedomics: The first study of the ovine foot 16S rRNA-based microbiome. ISME J., 5: 1426–1437.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carslake D., Grant W., Green L.E., Cave J., Greaves J., Keeling M., McEldowney J., Weldegebriel H., Medley G.F. (2011). Endemic cattle diseases: Comparative epidemiology and governance. Philosoph. Transact. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 366: 1975–1986.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang Y., Hou F., Pan Z., Huang Z., Han N., Bin L., Deng H., Li Z., Ding L., Gao H., Zhi F., Yang R., Bi Y. (2019). Optimization of culturomics strategy in human fecal samples. Front. Microbiol, 10: 2891.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheema T.A., Jirajaroenrat K., Sirinarumitr T., Rakshit S.K. (2012). Isolation of a gene encoding a cellulolytic enzyme from swamp buffalo rumen metagenomes and its cloning and expression in Escherichia coli. Anim. Biotechnol., 23: 261–277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen C., Zhou Y., Fu H., Xiong X., Fang S., Jiang H., Wu J., Yang H., Gao J., Huang L. (2021). Expanded catalog of microbial genes and metagenome-assembled genomes from the pig gut microbiome. Nature Commun., 12: 1106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen L., Shen Y., Wang C., Ding L., Zhao F., Wang M., Fu J., Wang H. (2019). Megasphaera elsdenii lactate degradation pattern shifts in rumen acidosis models. Front. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fmicb.2019.00162637433130792704
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chikindas M.L., Weeks R., Drider D., Chistyakov V.A., Dicks L.M.T. (2018). Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 49: 23–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clemmons B.A., Reese S.T., Dantas F.G., Franco G.A., Smith T.P.L., Adeyosoye O.I., Pohler K.G., Myer P.R. (2017). Vaginal and uterine bacterial communities in postpartum lactating cows. Front. Microbiol., 8.10.3389/fmicb.2017.01047546335528642755
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colin P.-Y., Kintses B., Gielen F., Miton C.M., Fischer G., Mohamed M.F., Hyvönen M., Morgavi D.P., Janssen D.B., Hollfelder F. (2015). Ultrahigh-throughput discovery of promiscuous enzymes by picodroplet functional metagenomics. Nature Commun., 6: 10008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conlon M.A., Bird A.R. (2014). The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrients, 7: 17–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornick N.A., Stanton T.B. (2015). Lachnospira. In: Bergey’s manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. American Cancer Society, pp. 1–6.10.1002/9781118960608.gbm00647
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costa H.N., Lage C.F.A., Malacco V.M.R., Belli A.L., Carvalho A.U., Facury E.J., Molina L.R. (2019). Frequency of microorganisms isolated at different stages of lactation and milk production loss associated with somatic cell count and to mastitis-causing pathogens. Arq. Brasil. Med. Vet. Zoot., 71: 393–403.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crowe M.A., Hostens M., Opsomer G. (2018). Reproductive management in dairy cows – the future. Irish Vet. J., 71.10.1186/s13620-017-0112-y575923729321918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dean C.J., Slizovskiy I.B., Crone K.K., Pfennig A.X., Heins B.J., Caixeta L.S., Noyes N.R. (2021). Investigating the cow skin and teat canal microbiomes of the bovine udder using different sampling and sequencing approaches. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 644–661.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delano M.L., Mischler S.A., Underwood W.J. (2002). Chapter 14 – Biology and diseases of ruminants: sheep, goats, and cattle. In: Laboratory Animal Medicine, J.G. Fox, L.C. Anderson, F.M. Loew, F.W. Quimby (eds). 2nd ed. Academic Press, pp. 519–614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emwas A.H., Roy R., McKay R.T., Tenori L., Saccenti E., Nagana Gowda G.A., Raftery D., Alahmari F., Jaremko L., Jaremko M., Wishart D.S. (2019). NMR spectroscopy for metabolomics research. Metabolites, 9.10.3390/metabo9070123668082631252628
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esteban-Blanco C., Gutiérrez-Gil B., Puente-Sánchez F., Marina H., Tamames J., Acedo A., Arranz J.J. (2020). Microbiota characterization of sheep milk and its association with somatic cell count using 16s rRNA gene sequencing. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 137: 73–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fahim K.M., Ismael E., Khalefa H.S., Farag H.S., Hamza D.A. (2019). Isolation and characterization of E. coli strains causing intramammary infections from dairy animals and wild birds. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med., 7: 61–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foroutan A., Fitzsimmons C., Mandal R., Piri-Moghadam H., Zheng J., Guo A., Li C., Guan L.L., Wishart D.S. (2020). The bovine metabolome. Metabolites, 10.10.3390/metabo10060233734508732517015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galvão K.N., Bicalho R.C., Jeon S.J. (2019). Symposium review: The uterine microbiome associated with the development of uterine disease in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 11786–11797.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gauly M., Chemineau P., Rosati A., Sartin J. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic – How and why animal production suffers? Anim. Front., 11: 3–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gupta N., Verma V.K. (2019). Next-generation sequencing and its application: empowering in public health beyond reality. Microb. Technol. Welf. Soc., 17: 313–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hameed M., Wahaab A., Shan T., Wang X., Khan S., Di D., Xiqian L., Zhang J.-J., Anwar M. N., Nawaz M., Li B., Liu K., Shao D., Qiu Y., Wei J., Ma Z. (2021). A metagenomic analysis of mosquito virome collected from different animal farms at Yunnan–Myanmar border of China. Front. Microb., 11: 591478.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamid M.E., Musa M.S. (2009). The treatment of bovine dermatophilosis and its effect on some haematological and blood chemical parameters. Rev. Sci. Tech. (Int. Office Epizoot.), 28: 1111–1118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanchi H., Mottawea W., Sebei K., Hammami R. (2018). The genus Enterococcus: between probiotic potential and safety concerns – an update. Front. Microbiol., 9: 1791.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Handelsman J. (2004). Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 68: 669–685.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanning I., Diaz-Sanchez S. (2015). The functionality of the gastrointestinal microbiome in non-human animals. Microbiome, 3: 51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hashem N.M., Shehata M.G. (2021). Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Cleome droserifolia (Forssk.) Del. and its biological effects on redox status, immunity, and gut microflora. Animals, 11: 1929.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hashem N.M., González-Bulnes A., Rodriguez-Morales A.J. (2020). Animal welfare and livestock supply chain sustainability under the COVID-19 outbreak: an overview. Front. Vet. Sci., 7: 582528.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hashem N.M., Hassanein E.M., Hocquette J.-F., Gonzalez-Bulnes A., Ahmed F.A., Attia Y.A., Asiry K.A. (2021). Agro-livestock farming system sustainability during the COVID-19 era: a cross-sectional study on the role of information and communication technologies. Sustainability, 13: 6521.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassan F., Arshad M.A., Ebeid H.M., Rehman M.S., Khan M.S., Shahid S., Yang C. (2020). Phytogenic additives can modulate rumen microbiome to mediate fermentation kinetics and methanogenesis through exploiting diet – microbe interaction. Front. Vet. Sci., 7.10.3389/fvets.2020.575801768852233263013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herath S., Lilly S.T., Fischer D.P., Williams E.J., Dobson H., Bryant C.E., Sheldon I.M. (2009). Bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces an endocrine switch from prostaglandin F2alpha to prostaglandin E2 in bovine endometrium. Endocrinology, 150: 1912–1920.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hess M., Paul S.S., Puniya A.K., van der Giezen M., Shaw C., Edwards J.E., Fliegerová K. (2020). Anaerobic fungi: past, present, and future. Front. Microbiol., 11: 584893.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Himsworth C.G., Elkin B.T., Nishi J.S., Neimanis A.S., Wobeser G.A., Turcotte C., Leighton F.A. (2010). An outbreak of bovine tuberculosis in an intensively managed conservation herd of wild bison in the Northwest Territories. Can. Vet. J., 51: 593–597.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinsu A.T., Tulsani N.J., Panchal K.J., Pandit R.J., Jyotsana B., Dafale N.A., Patil N.V., Purohit H.J., Joshi C.G., Jakhesara S.J. (2021). Characterizing rumen microbiota and CAZyme profile of Indian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in response to different roughages. Sci. Rep., 11: 9400.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hiraoka S., Yang C., Iwasaki W. (2016). Metagenomics and bioinformatics in microbial ecology: current status and beyond. Microb. Environ., 31: 204–212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holley R., Walkty J., Blank G., Tenuta M., Ominski K., Krause D., Ng L.-K. (2008). Examination of Salmonella and Escherichia coli translocation from hog manure to forage, soil, and cattle grazed on the hog manure-treated pasture. J. Environ. Qual., 37: 2083–2092.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holschbach C.L., Peek S.F. (2018). Salmonella in dairy cattle. The veterinary clinics of north america. Food Anim. Pract., 34: 133–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoque M.N., Istiaq A., Clement R.A., Sultana M., Crandall K.A., Siddiki A.Z., Hossain M.A. (2019). Metagenomic deep sequencing reveals association of microbiome signature with functional biases in bovine mastitis. Sci. Rep., 9: 13536.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang Y., Marden J.P., Julien C., Bayourthe C. (2018). Redox potential: An intrinsic parameter of the rumen environment. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 102: 393–402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hulbert L.E., Moisá S.J. (2016). Stress, immunity, and the management of calves. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 3199–3216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaja I.F., Mushonga B., Green E., Muchenje V. (2016). Prevalence of lung lesions in slaughtered cattle in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. J. South Afr. Vet. Assoc., 87: 1362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jose V.L., Appoothy T., More R.P., Arun A.S. (2017). Metagenomic insights into the rumen microbial fibrolytic enzymes in Indian crossbred cattle fed finger millet straw. AMB Express, 7: 13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamke J., Kittelmann S., Soni P., Li Y., Tavendale M., Ganesh S., Janssen P.H., Shi W., Froula J., Rubin E.M., Attwood G.T. (2016). Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation. Microbiome, 4: 56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kasa G., Tegegne B., Tadesse B. (2020). Isolation and identification of major pathogenic bacteria from clinical mastitic cows in Asella Town, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Int., 2020: e6656755.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khodakaram-Tafti A., Ikede B.O. (2005). A retrospective study of sporadic bovine abortions, stillbirths, and neonatal abnormalities in Atlantic Canada, from 1990 to 2001. Can. Vet. J., 46: 635–637.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krause J.L., Haange S.-B., Schäpe S.S., Engelmann B., Rolle-Kampczyk U., Fritz-Wallace K., Wang Z., Jehmlich N., Türkowsky D., Schubert K., Pöppe J., Bote K., Rösler U., Herberth G., von Bergen M. (2020). The glyphosate formulation Roundup® LB plus influences the global metabolome of pig gut microbiota in vitro. Sci. Total Environ., 745: 140932.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristula M. (2014). Chapter 38 – Contagious equine metritis. In: Equine Infectious Diseases, 2nd ed., D.C. Sellon, M.T. Long (eds.). W.B. Saunders, pp. 339–343.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kwok K.T.T., Nieuwenhuijse D.F., Phan M.V.T., Koopmans M.P.G. (2020). Virus metagenomics in farm animals: a systematic review. Viruses, 12: 107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakhundi S., Zhang K. (2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 31: e00020-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee Y.H., Kim S.K., Kim Y.H., Jeong Y.S., Yun M.G., Cho J.J., Kim J.M., Yun H.D., Kim H. (2010). Archaeal diversity during composting of pig manure and mushroom cultural waste based on 16S rRNA sequence. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem., 53: 230–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li B., Zhu Y., Gu Z., Chen Y., Leng J., Gou X., Feng L., Li Q., Xi D., Mao H., Yang S.-L. (2016). Screening and characterization of a novel ruminal cellulase gene (Umcel-1) from a metagenomic library of gayal (Bos frontalis). J. Integr. Agricult., 15: 855–861.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li F., Chen C., Wei W., Wang Z., Dai J., Hao L., Song L., Zhang X., Zeng L., Du H., Tang H., Liu N., Yang H., Wang J., Madsen L., Brix S., Kristiansen K., Xu X., Li J., Wu R., Jia H. (2018). The metagenome of the female upper reproductive tract. GigaScience, 7(10).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li F., Hitch T.C.A., Chen Y., Creevey C.J., Guan L.L. (2019 a). Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle. Microbiome, 7: 6.10.1186/s40168-019-0618-5633291630642389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li F., Li C., Chen Y., Liu J., Zhang C., Irving B., Fitzsimmons C., Plastow G., Guan L.L. (2019 b). Host genetics influence the rumen microbiota and heritable rumen microbial features associate with feed efficiency in cattle. Microbiome, 7: 92.10.1186/s40168-019-0699-1656744131196178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li M.M., White R.R., Guan L.L., Harthan L., Hanigan M.D. (2021). Metatranscriptomic analyses reveal ruminal pH regulates fiber degradation and fermentation by shifting the microbial community and gene expression of carbohydrate-active enzymes. Anim. Microb., 3: 32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin Y., Yang H., Ahmad M.J., Yang Y., Yang W., Riaz H., Abulaiti A., Zhang S., Yang L., Hua G. (2021). Postpartum uterine involution and embryonic development pattern in Chinese Holstein dairy cows. Front. Vet. Sci., 7.10.3389/fvets.2020.604729787408933585595
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu L., Li Y., Li S., Hu N., He Y., Pong R., Lin D., Lu L., Law M. (2012). Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2012: e251364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Long J.A. (2020). The “omics” revolution: Use of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic tools to predict male reproductive traits that impact fertility in livestock and poultry. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 220: 106354.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lucy M.C. (2007). Fertility in high-producing dairy cows: Reasons for decline and corrective strategies for sustainable improvement. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 64: 237–254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mach N., Berri M., Estellé J., Levenez F., Lemonnier G., Denis C., Leplat J.-J., Chevaleyre C., Billon Y., Doré J., Rogel-Gaillard C., Lepage P. (2015). Early-life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. Environ. Microbiol. Rep., 7: 554–569.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mao S., Zhang M., Liu J., Zhu W. (2015). Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle: Membership and potential function. Sci. Rep., 5: 16116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markowiak P., Śliżewska K. (2018). The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathogens, 10: 21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matsumoto N., Taniwaki T., Kinuta M., Murase T. (2008). Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and coliform bacilli from bile and liver obtained from slaughter cattle in Western Japan. J. Food Protect., 71: 1228–1231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthews C., Crispie F., Lewis E., Reid M., O’Toole P.W., Cotter P.D. (2018). The rumen microbiome: A crucial consideration when optimising milk and meat production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency. Gut Microb., 10: 115–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merchen N.R., Elizalde J.C., Drackley J.K. (1997). Current perspective on assessing site of digestion in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci., 75: 2223–2234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miao Y., Mei Q., Fu C., Liao M., Liu Y., Xu X., Li X., Zhao S., Xiang T. (2021). Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify candidate genes and pathways for feed conversion ratio in pigs. BMC Genom., 22: 294.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohamed H.A., Klink E.V., ElHassan S.M. (2016). Damage caused by spoilage bacteria to the structure of cattle hides and sheep skins. Int. J. Anim. Health Livest. Prod. Res., 2: 39–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molina N.M., Sola-Leyva A., Saez-Lara M.J., Plaza-Diaz J., Tubić-Pavlović A., Romero B., Clavero A., Mozas-Moreno J., Fontes J., Altmäe S. (2020). New opportunities for endometrial health by modifying uterine microbial composition: present or future? Biomolecules, 10: 593.10.3390/biom10040593722603432290428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore D.P., Cantón G.J., Louge Uriarte E.L. (2021). Editorial: Infectious diseases affecting reproduction and the neonatal period in cattle. Front. Vet. Sci., 8: 679007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moraïs S., Mizrahi I. (2019). Islands in the stream: From individual to communal fiber degradation in the rumen ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 43: 362–379.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moreira G.C.M., Poleti M.D., Pértille F., Boschiero C., Cesar A.S.M., Godoy T.F., Ledur M.C., Reecy J.M., Garrick D.J., Coutinho L.L. (2019). Unraveling genomic associations with feed efficiency and body weight traits in chickens through an integrative approach. BMC Genet., 20: 83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullany P. (2014). Functional metagenomics for the investigation of antibiotic resistance. Virulence, 5: 443–447.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murphy M.R. (2011). Nutrients, digestion and absorption. Fermentation in the rumen. In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed., J.W. Fuquay (ed.). Academic Press, pp. 980–984.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muwonge A., Oloya J., Kankya C., Nielsen S., Godfroid J., Skjerve E., Djønne B., Johansen T.B. (2014). Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis isolated from humans, cattle and pigs in the Uganda cattle corridor using VNTR analysis. Infec. Genet. Evol., 21: 184–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagasawa Y., Kiku Y., Sugawara K., Yabusaki N., Oono K., Fujii K., Suzuki T., Maehana K., Hayashi T. (2020). Rapid Staphylococcus aureus detection from clinical mastitis milk by colloidal gold nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic strips. Front. Vet. Sci., 6.10.3389/fvets.2019.00504698851032039249
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nathani N.M., Patel A.K., Dhamannapatil P.S., Kothari R.K., Singh K.M., Joshi C.G. (2013). Comparative evaluation of rumen metage-nome community using qPCR and MG-RAST. AMB Express, 3: 55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nathani N.M., Patel A.K., Mootapally C.S., Reddy B., Shah S.V., Lunagaria P.M., Kothari R.K., Joshi C.G. (2015). Effect of roughage on rumen microbiota composition in the efficient feed converter and sturdy Indian Jaffrabadi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). BMC Genom., 16: 1116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neelakanta G., Sultana H. (2013). The use of metagenomic approaches to analyze changes in microbial communities. Microbiol. Insights, 6: 37–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neumann A.P., Weimer P.J., Suen G. (2018). A global analysis of gene expression in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 grown on cellulose and soluble sugars at different growth rates. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 11: 295.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neves A.L.A., Chen Y., Lê Cao K.-A., Mandal S., Sharpton T.J., McAllister T., Guan L.L. (2020). Taxonomic and functional assessment using metatranscriptomics reveals the effect of Angus cattle on rumen microbial signatures. Int. J. Anim. Biosci., 14: 731–744.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ng T.F.F., Kondov N.O., Deng X., Van Eenennaam A., Neibergs H.L., Delwart E. (2015). A metagenomics and case-control study to identify viruses associated with bovine respiratory disease. J. Virol., 89: 5340–5349.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ngara T.R., Zhang H. (2018). Recent advances in function-based metagenomic screening. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf., 16: 405–415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen N.H., Maruset L., Uengwetwanit T., Mhuantong W., Harnpicharnchai P., Champreda V., Tanapongpipat S., Jirajaroenrat K., Rakshit S.K., Eurwilaichitr L., Pongpattanakitshote S. (2012). Identification and characterization of a cellulase-encoding gene from the buffalo rumen metagenomic library. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 76: 1075–1084.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Obese F.Y., Osei-Amponsah R., Timpong-Jones E., Bekoe E. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on animal production in Ghana. Anim. Front., 11: 43–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ochiel D.O., Fahey J.V., Ghosh M., Haddad S.N., Wira C.R. (2008). Innate immunity in the female reproductive tract: role of sex hormones in regulating uterine epithelial cell protection against pathogens. Curr. Women. Health Rev., 4: 102–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owaki S., Kawabuchi S., Ikemitsu K., Shono H., Furuoka H. (2015). Pathological findings of hemorrhagic bowel syndrome (HBS) in six dairy cattle cases. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 77: 879–881.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oyama L.B., Girdwood S.E., Cookson A.R., Fernandez-Fuentes N., Privé F., Vallin H.E., Wilkinson T.J., Golyshin P.N., Golyshina O.V., Mikut R., Hilpert K., Richards J., Wootton M., Edwards J.E., Maresca M., Perrier J., Lundy F.T., Luo Y., Zhou M., Hess M., Mantovani H.C., Creevey C.J., Huws S.A. (2017). The rumen microbiome: An underexplored resource for novel anti-microbial discovery. Npj Biofilms Microbiom., 3: 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pandit R.J., Hinsu A.T., Patel S.H., Jakhesara S.J., Koringa P.G., Bruno F., Psifidi A., Shah S.V., Joshi C.G. (2018). Microbiota composition, gene pool and its expression in Gir cattle (Bos indicus) rumen under different forage diets using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches. System. Appl. Microbiol., 41: 374–385.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peng X., Wilken S.E., Lankiewicz T.S., Gilmore S.P., Brown J.L., Henske J.K., Swift C.L., Salamov A., Barry K., Grigoriev I.V., Theodorou M.K., Valentine D.L., O’Malley M.A. (2021). Genomic and functional analyses of fungal and bacterial consortia that enable lignocellulose breakdown in goat gut microbiomes. Nat. Microbiol., 6: 499–511.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peric A., Weiss J., Vulliemoz N., Baud D., Stojanov M. (2019). Bacterial colonization of the female upper genital tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20: 3405.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petri R.M., Schwaiger T., Penner G.B., Beauchemin K.A., Forster R.J., McKinnon J.J., McAllister T.A. (2013). Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge. PLoS One, 8(12): e83424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poutahidis T., Springer A., Levkovich T., Qi P., Varian B.J., Lakritz J.R., Ibrahim Y.M., Chatzigiagkos A., Alm E.J., Erdman S.E. (2014). Probiotic microbes sustain youthful serum testosterone levels and testicular size in aging mice. PLoS One, 9(1).10.1371/journal.pone.0084877387936524392159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qi X., Yun C., Pang Y., Qiao J. (2021). The impact of the gut microbiota on the reproductive and metabolic endocrine system. Gut Microb., 13: 1–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qiu Y., Wang S., Huang B., Zhong H., Pan Z., Zhuang Q., Peng C., Hou G., Wang K. (2019). Viral infection detection using metagenomics technology in six poultry farms of eastern China. PLoS One, 14(2): e0211553.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quereda J.J., Meza-Torres J., Cossart P., Pizarro-Cerdá J. (2017). Listeriolysin S: A bacteriocin from epidemic Listeria monocytogenes strains that targets the gut microbiota. Gut Microb., 8: 384–391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahimi E., Sepehri S., Safarpoor Dehkordi F., Shaygan S., Momtaz H. (2014). Prevalence of Yersinia species in traditional and commercial dairy products in Isfahan Province, Iran. Jundishapur J. Microbiol., 7: e9249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ravi R.K., Walton K., Khosroheidari M. (2018). MiSeq: A next generation sequencing platform for genomic analysis. Method. Mol. Biol. (Clifton, N.J.), 1706: 223–232.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Redington J.M., Breydo L., Almehdar H.A., Redwan E.M., Uversky V.N. (2016). α-Lactalbumin: of camels and cows. Prot. Pept. Lett., 23: 1072–1080.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reis J.A., Paula A.T., Casarotti S.N., Penna A.L.B. (2012). Lactic acid bacteria antimicrobial compounds: characteristics and applications. food engineering reviews, 4: 124–140.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rinke C., Schwientek P., Sczyrba A., Ivanova N.N., Anderson I.J., Cheng J.-F., Darling A., Malfatti S., Swan B.K., Gies E.A., Dodsworth J.A., Hedlund B.P., Tsiamis G., Sievert S.M., Liu W.-T., Eisen J.A., Hallam S.J., Kyrpides N.C., Stepanauskas R., Rubin E.M., Hugenholtz P., Woyke T. (2013). Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature, 499: 431–437.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ronner A.B., Cliver D.O. (1990). Isolation and characterization of a coliphage specific for Escherichia coli 0157:H7. J. Food Protect., 53: 944–947.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross A.A., Rodrigues Hoffmann A., Neufeld J.D. (2019). The skin microbiome of vertebrates. Microbiome, 7: 79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rzewuska M., Kwiecień E., Chrobak-Chmiel D., Kizerwetter-Świda M., Stefańska I., Gieryńska M. (2019). Pathogenicity and virulence of Trueperella pyogenes: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20: 2737.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saha T.K., Begum F., Kabir S.L., Islam M.S., Khan M.S.R. (2019). Characterization of bacterial isolates from skin lesions of sheep, goat and cattle in different rearing condition. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res., 5: 117–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samadi A., Ababneh M.MK., Giadinis N.D., Lafi S.Q. (2010). Ovine and caprine brucellosis (Brucella melitensis) in aborted animals in Jordanian sheep and goat flocks. Vet. Med. Int., 2010: 458695.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanglard L.P., Schmitz-Esser S., Gray K.A., Linhares D.C.L., Yeoman C.J., Dekkers J.C.M., Niederwerder M.C., Serão N.V.L. (2020). Investigating the relationship between vaginal microbiota and host genetics and their impact on immune response and farrowing traits in commercial gilts. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 137: 84–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scharek L., Altherr B.J., Tölke C., Schmidt M.F.G. (2007). Influence of the probiotic Bacillus cereus var. Toyoi on the intestinal immunity of piglets. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 120: 136–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt K.H., Kühnemund O., Köhler W. (1987). A screening of streptococci freshly isolated from human and animal sources for binding of human IgG. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie, und Hygiene. Series A: Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Virology, Parasitology, 265: 420–429.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seura T., Fukuwatari T. (2020). Differences in gut microbial patterns associated with salivary biomarkers in young Japanese adults. Biosci. Microb. Food Health, 39: 243–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sha Y., Hu J., Shi B., Dingkao R., Wang J., Li S., Zhang W., Luo Y., Liu X. (2020). Characteristics and functions of the rumen microbial community of cattle-yak at different ages. BioMed Res. Int., 2020: e3482692.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shabana I.I., Albakri N.N., Bouqellah N.A. (2021). Metagenomic investigation of faecal microbiota in sheep and goats of the same ages. J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 15: 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shakya M., Lo C.C., Chain P.S.G. (2019). Advances and challenges in metatranscriptomic analysis. Front. Genet., 10.10.3389/fgene.2019.00904677426931608125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shan T., Li L., Simmonds P., Wang C., Moeser A., Delwart E. (2011). The fecal virome of pigs on a high-density farm. J. Virol., 85: 11697–11708.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheldon I.M., Cronin J., Goetze L., Donofrio G., Schuberth H.-J. (2009). Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod., 81: 1025–1032.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheldon I.M., Cronin J.G., Healey G.D., Gabler C., Heuwieser W., Streyl D., Bromfield J.J., Miyamoto A., Fergani C., Dobson H. (2014). Innate immunity and inflammation of the bovine female reproductive tract in health and disease. Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 148: R41–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvestre F.T., Bartolome J.A., Kamimura S., Arteche A.C., Pancarci S.M., Trigg T., Thatcher W.W. (2009). Postpartum suppression of ovarian activity with a Deslorelin implant enhanced uterine involution in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 110: 79–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh B., Bhat T.K., Kurade N.P., Sharma O.P. (2008). Metagenomics in animal gastrointestinal ecosystem: A microbiological and biotechnological perspective. Indian J. Microbiol., 48: 216–227.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sirota I., Zarek S.M., Segars J.H. (2014). Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Semin. Reprod. Med., 32: 35–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Söllinger A., Tveit A.T., Poulsen M., Noel S.J., Bengtsson M., Bernhardt J., Frydendahl Hellwing A.L., Lund P., Riedel K., Schleper C., Højberg O., Urich T. (2018). Holistic assessment of rumen microbiome dynamics through quantitative metatranscriptomics reveals multifunctional redundancy during key steps of anaerobic feed degradation. MSystems, 3: e00038-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sorge U.S., Binger E.M., Schefers J., Plummer P.J. (2019). Short communication: Metagenomic evaluation of skin biopsies of udder sores in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 11470–11475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stephen C.P., Johnson W.H., Leblanc S.J., Foster R.A., Chenier T.S. (2019). The impact of ecbolic therapy in the early postpartum period on uterine involution and reproductive health in dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 81: 491–498.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suryawanshi P.R., Badapanda C., Singh K.M., Rathore A. (2019). Exploration of the rumen microbial diversity and carbohydrate active enzyme profile of black Bengal goat using metagenomic approach. Anim. Biotechnol., DOI:10.1080/10495398.2019.160948910.1080/10495398.2019.160948931081473
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svennesen L., Nielsen S.S., Mahmmod Y.S., Krömker V., Pedersen K., Klaas I.C. (2019). Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infection with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae in herds with automatic milking systems. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 629–639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takhampunya R., Korkusol A., Pongpichit C., Yodin K., Rungrojn A., Chanarat N., Promsathaporn S., Monkanna T., Thaloengsok S., Tippayachai B., Kumfao N., Richards A.L., Davidson S.A. (2019). Metagenomic approach to characterizing disease epidemiology in a disease-endemic environment in Northern Thailand. Front. Microbiol., 10: 00319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thames H.T., Theradiyil Sukumaran A. (2020). A review of Salmonella and Campylobacter in broiler meat: emerging challenges and food safety measures. Foods, 9: 776.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thoetkiattikul H., Mhuantong W., Laothanachareon T., Tangphatsornruang S., Pattarajinda V., Eurwilaichitr L., Champreda V. (2013). Comparative analysis of microbial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietary fiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Curr. Microbiol., 67: 130–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tosaki K., Kojima H., Akama S., Ootake Y., Inoue K., Katsuda K., Shibahara T. (2018). Bovine esophageal and glossal ulceration associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Fusobacterium spp. in a 10-month-old Holstein heifer. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 80: 1174–1178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Underwood W.J., Blauwiekel R., Delano M.L., Gillesby R., Mischler S.A., Schoell A. (2015). Chapter 15 – Biology and diseases of ruminants (sheep, goats, and cattle). In: Laboratory Animal Medicine, 3rd edition, J.G. Fox, L.C. Anderson, G.M. Otto, K.R. Pritchett-Corning, M.T. Whary (eds.). Academic Press, pp. 623–694.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uruburu F. (2003). History and services of culture collections. Int. Microbiol.: The Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 6: 101–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uyeno Y., Shigemori S., Shimosato T. (2015). Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microb. Environ., 30: 126–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uzal F.A., Vidal J.E., McClane B.A., Gurjar A.A. (2010). Clostridium perfringens toxins involved in mammalian veterinary diseases. Open Toxinol. J., 2: 24–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verdier-Metz I., Gagne G., Bornes S., Monsallier F., Veisseire P., Delbès-Paus C., Montel M.- C. (2012). Cow teat skin, a potential source of diverse microbial populations for cheese production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78: 326–333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang Y., Ametaj B.N., Ambrose D.J., Gänzle M.G. (2013). Characterisation of the bacterial microbiota of the vagina of dairy cows and isolation of pediocin-producing Pediococcus acidilactici. BMC Microbiol., 13: 19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xing S.-C., Huang C.-B., Wu R.-T., Yang Y.-W., Chen J.-Y., Mi J.-D., Wu Y.-B., Wang Y., Liao X.-D. (2021). Breed differences in the expression levels of gga-miR-222a in laying hens influenced H2S production by regulating methionine synthase genes in gut bacteria. Microbiome, 9: 177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu L., Bickhart D.M., Cole J.B., Schroeder S.G., Song J., Tassell C.P.V., Sonstegard T.S., Liu G.E. (2015). Genomic signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle. Mol. Biol. Evol., 32: 711–725.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xue M.-Y., Sun H.-Z., Wu X.-H., Liu J.-X., Guan L.L. (2020). Multi-omics reveals that the rumen microbiome and its metabolome together with the host metabolome contribute to individualized dairy cow performance. Microbiome, 8: 64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang S., Rothman R.E. (2004). PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: Uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infec. Dis., 4: 337–348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang L., Li L., Sha G., Liu C., Wang Z., Wang L. (2020). Aerobic composting as an effective cow manure management strategy for reducing the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes: An integrated meta-omics study. J. Hazard. Mat., 386: 121895.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 