Research on Strategies for Enhancing Teachers’ Digital Resource Integration Capabilities with Artificial Intelligence Technology

Regression analysis results of influencing factors and cognitive ability

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standardization coefficient	t	p	Collinearity diagnosis
	B	Standard error	β			VIF	Toqlerance
Constant	0.492	0.138	-	3.842	0.000**	-	-
School environment constraints	-0.048	0.046	-0.042	-1.128	0.324	2.317	0.459
Social and environmental constraints	0.126	0.056	0.125	2.673	0.011*	2.819	0.375
Personal constraint	0.197	0.049	0.148	4.075	0.000**	2.687	0.396
R2	0.632
Adjusted R2	0.626
F	F=112.368p=0.000
D-W value	2.114
Note: *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Regression analysis results of influencing factors and reflective ability

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standardization coefficient	t	p	Collinearity diagnosis
	B	Standard error	β			VIF	Tolerance
Constant	-0.049	0.142	-	-0.364	0.735	-	-
School environment constraints	0.112	0.047	0.098	2.417	0.019*	2.316	0.458
Social and environmental constraints	0.092	0.049	0.093	2.127	0.042*	2.838	0.379
Personal constraint	0.276	0.051	0.258	5.722	0.000**	2.687	0.398
R2	0.605
Adjusted R2	0.597
F	F=99.564p=0.000
D-W value	1.949
Note: *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Total variance interpretation

	Initial eigenvalue			Extract the sum of squared loads			Rotating load sum of squares
Module	Total	Percentage of variance	Cumulative /%	Total	Percentage of variance /%	Cumulative /%	Total	Percentage of variance /%	Cumulative /%
1	4.278	38.085	38.085	4.278	38.085	38.085	3.724	32.458	32.458
2	2.230	19.711	57.796	2.230	19.711	57.796	2.708	23.865	56.323
3	1.690	16.876	74.672	1.690	16.876	74.672	1.986	18.349	74.672
4	0.616	4.436	79.108
5	0.529	4.162	83.27
6	0.464	3.685	86.955
7	0.442	3.529	90.484
8	0.421	2.416	92.9
9	0.386	2.121	95.021
10	0.368	2.038	97.059
11	0.343	1.709	98.768
12	0.267	1.232	100

Correlation analysis between the influencing factors and the ability dimensions

Correlation	Cognitive ability	Design capability	Evaluation ability	Reflective ability
School environment constraints	0.552**	0.583**	0.728**	0.722**
Social and environmental constraints	0.638**	0.647**	0.567**	0.514**
Personal constraint	0.678**	0.724**	0.669**	0.764**
*p<0.05, **p<0.01

Regression analysis results of influencing factors and evaluation ability

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standardization coefficient	t	p	Collinearity diagnosis
	B	Standard error	β			VIF	Tolerance
Constant	0.136	0.135	-	0.997	0.334	-	-
School environment constraints	0.089	0.045	0.086	2.107	0.042*	2.203	0.482
Social and environmental constraints	0.095	0.048	0.091	1.885	0.059	2.839	0.375
Personal constraint	0.232	0.049	0.226	4.853	0.000**	2.684	0.396
R2	0.586
Adjusted R2	0.581
F	F=89.617p=0.000
D-W value	1.985
Note: *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Regression analysis results of influencing factors and design capability

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standardization coefficient	t	p	Collinearity diagnosis
	B	Standard error	β			VIF	Tolerance
Constant	0.224	0.121	-	1.812	0.078	-	-
School environment constraints	0.036	0.042	0.035	0.841	0.416	2.327	0.458
Social and environmental constraints	0.179	0.043	0.191	4.423	0.000**	2.836	0.375
Personal constraint	0.129	0.046	0.128	3.105	0.002**	2.605	0.393
R2	0.652
Adjusted R2	0.644
F	F=121.458p=0.000
D-W value	1.929
Note: *p<0.05, **p<0.01

The component matrix after rotation

	Module
	1	2	3
Insufficient financial support from the government and educational institutions.	0.078	0.753	0.109
The content of teachers’ digital resource integration ability training is not in line with reality.	0.095	0.812	0.124
The ways and means of teacher training lack diversification.	0.123	0.819	0.057
School-enterprise cooperation, the integration of industry, university and research is not deep, and teaching lacks pertinence.	0.135	0.806	0.053
The school is not supported enough in terms of funds, salaries and benefits.	0.829	0.134	0.034
The construction of teaching infrastructure and digital equipment are backward.	0.861	0.113	0.063
Divorced from front-line positions, lack of practice in using digital resources.	0.867	0.082	0.081
It is difficult to juggle work and study.	0.849	0.055	0.066
Lack of time and space to communicate with other teachers.	0.826	0.126	0.098
Study and use of digital teaching resources cannot be met.	0.067	0.111	0.782
Lack of initiative and enthusiasm for their own development.	0.108	0.085	0.827
Their own development energy is insufficient, limited ability.	0.047	0.052	0.824

Present situation of digital resource integration ability survey

Dimensions	Categories	Number of respondents	Mean value	Expectation level
Cognitive ability	Knowledge level	784	4.02	4.14
	Perceptive ability	784	3.89	4.14
	Thinking ability	784	4.02	4.18
	Teaching expertise	784	3.90	4.09
Design capability	Mastery of subject knowledge	784	3.58	4.09
	Understanding of digital teaching resources	784	3.57	4.18
	Innovation consciousness and innovation power	784	3.94	4.12
Evaluation ability	Self-evaluation	784	3.98	4.10
	Evaluation of students	784	3.95	4.02
	Peer-reviewed	784	3.91	4.01
Reflective ability	Self-reflection	784	3.64	4.04
	Collective reflection	784	3.55	4.12