Statistical modelling and quantitative assessment of management reforms in higher education on the enhancement of student employability
, et
25 sept. 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 25 sept. 2025
Reçu: 15 janv. 2025
Accepté: 30 avr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1005
Mots clés
© 2025 Lifen Wen, Mingxu Zhao and Zhenhua Li, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Matching sample t test results of the control group
Test index | Test time | N | Mean | Standard deviation | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professional skills | Before the experiment | 30 | 2.5 | 0.425 | -2.675 | 0.012 |
After the experiment | 30 | 3.8 | 0.769 | |||
Core quality | Before the experiment | 30 | 1.9 | 0.937 | -1.324 | 0.000 |
After the experiment | 30 | 3.9 | 1.437 | |||
Occupational personality | Before the experiment | 30 | 2.6 | 1.024 | -3.861 | 0.010 |
After the experiment | 30 | 4.1 | 1.543 | |||
Occupational potential | Before the experiment | 30 | 2.5 | 0.826 | -2.963 | 0.008 |
After the experiment | 30 | 3.9 | 1.428 | |||
Leadership quality | Before the experiment | 30 | 2.2 | 0.743 | -4.125 | 0.000 |
After the experiment | 30 | 4.2 | 1.541 | |||
Team quality | Before the experiment | 30 | 2.5 | 1.237 | -4.358 | 0.002 |
After the experiment | 30 | 4.1 | 1.414 |
Correlation analysis results
0.262** | 0.268** | 0.219** | 0.246** | 0.291** | 0.257** | 0.162** | |
0.192** | 0.259** | 0.153** | 0.249** | 0.191** | 0.277** | 0.186** | |
0.201** | 0.236** | 0.197** | 0.313** | 0.231** | 0.162** | 0.149** | |
0.257** | 0.181** | 0.135** | 0.215** | 0.226** | 0.264** | 0.197** | |
0.237** | 0.346** | 0.184** | 0.165** | 0.165** | 0.179** | 0.156** | |
0.254** | 0.157** | 0.176** | 0.144** | 0.264** | 0.235** | 0.125** | |
0.174** | 0.226** | 0.183** | 0.129** | 0.279** | 0.202** | 0.137** | |
0.213** | 0.246** | 0.158** | 0.145** | 0.218** | 0.206** | 0.128** | |
0.173** | 0.218** | 0.155** | 0.166** | 0.229** | 0.111** | 0.288** |
Multiple step-up regression analysis results
0.201*** | ||||||
0.132*** | 0.174*** | 0.196*** | 0.415*** | 0.083*** | ||
0.261*** | 0.225* | 0.473* | 0.212*** | |||
0.313* | 1.135*** | 0.179** | ||||
0.326* | ||||||
0.163* | 0.284** | 0.172** | ||||
-0.165** | -0.668*** | -0.121* | -0.171*** | |||
0.167** | 0.434* | 0.271*** | 0.088** | |||
Constants | 42.357 | 55.247 | 56.761 | 114.275 | 36.241 | 20.437 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.081 | 0.064 | 0.124 | 0.066 | 0.062 | 0.074 |
Sample size | 2735 |
Descriptive statistics of samples (N=2735)
Variable | Classification | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 1083 | 39.6% |
Female | 1652 | 60.4% | |
School level | Ordinary university | 1841 | 67.3% |
“211” university | 479 | 17.5% | |
“985” university | 415 | 15.2% | |
Hometown | City | 1392 | 50.9% |
Countryside | 1343 | 49.1% | |
School area | Northwest China | 416 | 15.2% |
Northeast China | 222 | 8.1% | |
North China | 353 | 12.9% | |
Central China | 678 | 24.8% | |
East China | 257 | 9.4% | |
South China | 429 | 15.7% | |
Southwest China | 380 | 13.9% | |
Majors | Polytechnic | 358 | 13.1% |
Finance | 351 | 12.8% | |
Management | 385 | 14.1% | |
Literary history | 307 | 11.2% | |
Medicine | 339 | 12.4% | |
Agronomy | 344 | 12.6% | |
Art | 322 | 11.8% | |
Military | 329 | 12.0% | |
Total | 2735 | 100% |
Independent sample t test results after the experiment
Test index | Group | N | Mean | Standard deviation | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professional skills | Experimental group | 30 | 3.8 | 0.769 | 1.032 | 0.028 |
Control group | 30 | 2.9 | 0.647 | |||
Core quality | Experimental group | 30 | 3.9 | 1.437 | 0.574 | 0.035 |
Control group | 30 | 3.1 | 1.246 | |||
Occupational personality | Experimental group | 30 | 4.1 | 1.543 | 1.144 | 0.024 |
Control group | 30 | 3.2 | 1.462 | |||
Occupational potential | Experimental group | 30 | 3.9 | 1.428 | 2.352 | 0.041 |
Control group | 30 | 3.4 | 1.573 | |||
Leadership quality | Experimental group | 30 | 4.2 | 1.541 | 2.146 | 0.009 |
Control group | 30 | 2.9 | 1.461 | |||
Team quality | Experimental group | 30 | 4.1 | 1.414 | 1.611 | 0.013 |
Control group | 30 | 3.1 | 1.824 |
Regression analysis results
B | β | t | P | R | R2 | F | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constants | 28.359 | 40.813 | 0.000 | ||||
0.019 | 0.077 | 2.641 | 0.014 | 0.077 | 0.006 | 7.645* |
The results of the analysis of the factors of employment ability
Classification | Dimension | Cronbach’s α coefficient | Problem number |
---|---|---|---|
Influencing factor | Target strategy | 0.778 | 3 |
Professional setting | 0.805 | 3 | |
Evaluation incentive | 0.857 | 3 | |
Campus culture | 0.814 | 3 | |
School cooperation | 0.806 | 3 | |
Innovative entrepreneurship | 0.829 | 3 | |
Teaching ability | 0.874 | 3 | |
Career guidance | 0.897 | 3 |
Independent sample t test results before the experiment
Test index | Group | N | Mean | Standard deviation | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professional skills | Experimental group | 30 | 2.5 | 0.425 | 0.124 | 0.875 |
Control group | 30 | 2.4 | 0.431 | |||
Core quality | Experimental group | 30 | 1.9 | 0.937 | -0.132 | 0.881 |
Control group | 30 | 2.1 | 0.958 | |||
Occupational personality | Experimental group | 30 | 2.6 | 1.024 | 0.758 | 0.614 |
Control group | 30 | 2.4 | 1.135 | |||
Occupational potential | Experimental group | 30 | 2.5 | 0.826 | 1.526 | 0.208 |
Control group | 30 | 2.6 | 0.839 | |||
Leadership quality | Experimental group | 30 | 2.2 | 0.743 | 0.094 | 0.957 |
Control group | 30 | 2.2 | 0.752 | |||
Team quality | Experimental group | 30 | 2.5 | 1.237 | -1.155 | 0.413 |
Control group | 30 | 2.3 | 1.305 |
The results of the analysis of the reliability of the employment ability self-rating scale
Classification | Dimension | Cronbach’s α coefficient | Problem number |
---|---|---|---|
Self-rating scale | Professional skills | 0.912 | 6 |
Core quality | 0.863 | 6 | |
Occupational personality | 0.807 | 5 | |
Occupational potential | 0.793 | 6 | |
Leadership quality | 0.826 | 5 | |
Team quality | 0.738 | 5 |