Accès libre

Optimization of container ship route and speed in Public health emergency environment

 et   
19 mars 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of ship skipping over the port
Schematic diagram of ship skipping over the port

Figure 2.

Map of route
Map of route

Figure 3.

Fuel consumption per speed for ship sailing a given distance of 500 nautical miles
Fuel consumption per speed for ship sailing a given distance of 500 nautical miles

Speed optimization and quarantine waiting time

Route Original speed Waiting time for quarantine Optimized speed Waiting time for quarantine
Route 1 13.68 9.5 8 6.3
Route 2 13.76 5.4 8.45 0

Overview of case analysis route

Route Sailing route
Route 1 Incheon-Qingdao-Shanghai-HongKong-Singapore-Port Klang
Route 2 Incheon-Qingdao-Singapore-Port Klang

Port operation time and port disbursement account

Port Time in port (days) Port disbursement account ($) If shore power installed Shore power unit consumption (kWh / time)
Incheon 1.2 17729 NO -
Qingdao 0.68 28325 YES 935.7
Shanghai 0.83 30126 YES 528.8
HongKong 0.98 18029 NO -
Singapore 0.95 15028 NO -
Port Klang 0.83 32444 NO -

Optimization results at different distances

Serial number Distance between two ports Cost (no port skipping) ($) Cost (port skipping)
(nautical miles) Cost (under original speed) Cost (under optimized speed) ($)
Route 1 453.1 638279.27 622610.12 601010.02
Route 1 600 662413.06 646743.91 640705.93
Route 1 750 701848.12 686178.97 696031.52

Calculation results of operating costs under different loading and unloading volumes

Route volume Cost (no port skipping) ($) Cost (port skipping)
Cost (under original speed) Cost (under optimized speed) ($)
Route 1 120 638279.27 622610.12 601010.02
Route 1 150 638279.27 622610.12 613010.02
Route 1 180 638279.27 622610.12 625010.02

Calculation results of operating costs under different fuel prices

Route Price of fuel oil Cost (no port skipping) ($) Cost (port skipping) The difference of cost under the condition of skipping Port & optimizing speed
($/T) Cost (under original speed) Cost (under optimized speed) ($)
Route 1 510 587327.15 573916.17 550057.90 23858.27
Route 1 560 612803.21 598263.14 575533.96 22729.19
Route 1 610 638279.27 622610.12 601010.02 21600.10
Route 1 660 663755.33 646957.09 626486.07 20471.02
Route 1 710 689231.39 671304.07 651962.13 19341.94

Optimization results under different port quarantine period

Serial number port quarantine period Total voyage cost (no port skipping ($) Total voyage cost (port skipping) The difference of total cost under the condition of skipping Port & optimizing speed
(day) Cost (under original speed) Cost (under optimized speed) ($)
Route 1 10 608941.03 595642.12 601010.02 -5367.90
Route 1 14 638279.27 622610.12 601010.02 21600.10
Route 1 18 667617.51 649578.12 601010.02 48568.10

Distances of route legs in nautical miles

Leg Distance Time (days)
Incheon-Qingdao 377.2 1.1
Qingdao-Shanghai 484.4 1.4
Shanghai-HongKong 877.9 2.7
HongKong-Singapore 1477.8 4.5
Singapore-Port Klang 453.1 1.4
Qingdao-Singapore 2840.1 8.6
Shanghai-Singapore 2355.7 7.2

Calculation results of operating costs as impacted by pandemic situation

Route Cost (no port skipping) ($) Cost (port skipping)
Cost (under original speed) Cost (under optimized speed) ($)
Route 1 638279.27 622610.12 601010.02
Route 2 546390.81 516092.57 539193.25

Cost calculation results of original voyage without pandemic situation

Route Time (days) Cost ($)
Route 1 16.57 568600.95
Route 2 14.76 506784.19