1. bookVolume 70 (2022): Edition 3 (August 2022)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2449-9471
Première parution
15 Apr 2015
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

From denial to delay: Climate change discourses in Ireland

Publié en ligne: 05 Aug 2022
Volume & Edition: Volume 70 (2022) - Edition 3 (August 2022)
Pages: 59 - 84
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2449-9471
Première parution
15 Apr 2015
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Abstract

Climate change is acknowledged as a pressing – even existential – problem for societies around the world. Despite the growing body of scientific evidence concerning the extent and impacts of climate change, meaningful policy responses have not been forthcoming. Actors and organisations intent on preventing or diluting policies around climate action have adapted their discursive strategies, moving from outright denial of the reality of climate change to focus on discourses of distraction and delay. Taking the case of parliamentary debates and media coverage of the 2021 Climate Action Bill, this research examines the extent to which these discourses are prevalent in Ireland. We find that discourses of delay were present, both in Dáil debates and in the media. We discuss the influence of these discourses on later interventions which affected the implementation of provisions of the Bill and may delay transformative climate action.

Keywords

Allen, L. (2021, 18 July). Energy shortages now threaten inward investment, IDA warns. Business Post. Retrieved from https://www.businesspost.ie/energy/energy-shortages-now-threaten-inward-investment-ida-warns-aa0a276f [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

An Taisce. (2021). An Taisce calls on the Dáil to pass the Climate Bill this evening without last Friday’s amendments. Retrieved from https://www.antaisce.org/news/an-taisce-calls-on-the-dail-to-pass-the-climate-bill-this-evening-without-last-fridays-amendments [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Auer, M. R., Zhang, Y., & Lee, P. (2014). The potential of microblogs for the study of public perceptions of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5 (3), 291–6. doi:10.1002/wcc.273 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Banerjee, N., Song, L., & Hasemyer, D. (2015, 16 September). Exxon’s own research confirmed fossil fuels’ role in global warming decades ago. Retrieved from https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16092015/exxons-own-research-confirmed-fossil-fuels-role-in-global-warming/ [17 July 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Barry, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and institutional co-evolution in Ireland. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55 (3), 262–88. doi:10.1080/03585520701776076 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bressand, A., & Ekins, P. (2021). How the decarbonisation discourse may lead to a reduced set of policy options for climate policies in Europe in the 2020s. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 102118. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102118 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Burck, J., Hagen, U., Bals, C., Hohne, N., & Nascimento, L. (2020). Climate change performance index results 2021. Bonn: Germanwatch. Search in Google Scholar

Carter, L. (2021). Inside Exxon’s playbook. Retrieved from https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2021/06/30/exxon-climate-change-undercover/ [2 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003: Cultural circuits of climate change. Risk Analysis, 25 (6), 1457–69. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clifford, M. (2021, 21 May). Government thinks climate change is happening on another planet. Irish Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-40294487.html [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Commission for Regulation of Utilities. (2021). CRU proposed direction to the system operators related to data centre grid connection. Retrieved from https://www.cru.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CRU21060-CRU-consultation-on-Data-Centre-measures.pdf [21 June 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

Cook, J. (2019). Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. In I. E. Chiluwa & S. A. Samoilenko, Handbook of research on deception, fake news, and misinformation online (pp. 281–306). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

Crosson, K., & Starkey, S. (2021). Recent amendments have ‘gutted’ Climate Bill. Retrieved from https://greennews.ie/recent-amendments-gutted-climate-bill/ [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, J. (2011). Where has all the oil gone? BP branding and the discursive elimination of climate change risk. In N. Heffernan & D. Wragg (Eds), Culture, environment and eco-politics (pp. 200–25). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

EPA. (2022). Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions projections 2021–2040. Dublin: Environmental Protection Agency. Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. International Advances in Engineering and Technology, 7.10.4324/9781315834368 Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, J., McConnell, K., & Brulle, R. (2019). Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change, 9 (3), 191–5. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (3), 161–73. doi:10.1080/15239080500339638 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fine Gael Press Office. (2021). An Taisce a leading threat to future of rural Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.finegael.ie/an-taisce-a-leading-threat-to-future-of-rural-ireland [21 June 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

George, A. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds), The content analysis reader (pp. 144–55). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, M. B. (1982). CO2 ‘greenhouse’ effect. New Jersey: Exxon Research & Engineering Company. Search in Google Scholar

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (3), 175–84. doi:10.1080/ 15239080500339646 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2013). Voices of vulnerability: The reconfiguration of policy discourses. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard & D. Schlosberg (Eds), Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 96– 109). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Herrington, G. (2021). Update to Limits to Growth: Comparing the World3 model with empirical data. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25 (3), 614–26. doi:10.1111/jiec.13084 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Holmberg, K., & Hellsten, I. (2015). Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter. Internet Research, 25 (5), 811–28. doi:10.1108/IntR-07-2014-0179 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841200 Search in Google Scholar

IDA Ireland. (2021). Driving recovery and sustainable growth 2021–2024. Retrieved from https://www.idaireland.com/about-ida/driving-recovery-and-sustainable-growth-2021-2024 [21 June 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

IFA. (2021). Seanad amendments to Climate Bill important recognition of carbon removal on farms. Retrieved from https://www.ifa.ie/campaigns/seanad-amendments-to-climate-bill-important-recognition-of-carbon-removal-on-farms/ [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

IPCC. (2022). Opening remarks by the IPCC chair at the IPCC-SBSTA special event on the Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/2022/06/06/ipcc-chair-remarks-ipccsbsta-special-event-wgii-ar6/ [3 July 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.; pp. 34–61). London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781849208871 Search in Google Scholar

Kiberd, D. (2017). After Ireland: Writing from Beckett to the present. London: Head of Zeus. Search in Google Scholar

King, J., Janulewicz, L., & Arcostanzo, F. (2022). Deny, deceive, delay: Documenting and responding to climate disinformation at COP26 and beyond. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Search in Google Scholar

Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. London: Penguin books. Search in Google Scholar

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., … & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, e17. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.13. Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leahy, P. (2021, 13 May). ‘Cheese war’ will melt away but more skirmishes likely. The Irish Times. Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/pat-leahy-cheese-war-will-melt-away-but-more-skirmishes-likely-1.4563436 [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21 (5), 445–63. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

McConnell, D. (2021, 12 May). Taoiseach accused of using ‘Trump-style’ tactics with Glanbia comments. Irish Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40287818.html [25 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

McKie, R. E. (2019). Climate change counter movement neutralization techniques: A typology to examine the climate change counter movement. Sociological Inquiry, 89 (2), 288–316. doi:10.1111/soin.12246 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

McKie, R. E. (2021). Obstruction, delay, and transnationalism: Examining the online climate change counter-movement. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102217. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102217 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mann, M. E. (2021). The new climate war: The fight to take back our planet. Melbourne; London: Scribe. Search in Google Scholar

Miller Gaither, B., & Gaither, T. K. (2016). Marketplace advocacy by the U.S. fossil fuel industries: Issues of representation and environmental discourse. Mass Communication and Society, 19 (5), 585–603. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1203953 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Monbiot, G. (2017). How did we get into this mess? Politics, equality, nature. London: Verso. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (2020). Challenges and potentials for socio-ecological transformation: Considering structural aspects of change. In D. Robbins, D. Torney & P. Brereton (Eds), Ireland and the climate crisis (pp. 149–68). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Morris, H. E. (2021). Constructing the millennial ‘other’ in United States press coverage of the green new deal. Environmental Communication, 15 (1), 133–43. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1812686 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Murray, D. (2021, 26 July). Publication of carbon budgets delayed. Business Post. Retrieved from https://www.businesspost.ie/climate-environment/publication-of-carbon-budgets-delayed-10ee8580 [21 August 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Newman, T. P. (2017). Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the Working Group I Summary for Policymakers. Public Understanding of Science, 26 (7), 815–25. doi:10.1177/0963662516628477 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Callaghan, C., Kelly, S., Boyle, M., & Kitchin, R. (2015). Topologies and topographies of Ireland’s neoliberal crisis. Space and Polity, 19 (1), 31–46. doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.991120 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiermsa, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015a). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5 (4), 380–5. doi:10.1038/nclimate2535 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiermsa, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015b). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report – Supplementary material. Nature Climate Change, 5 (2), 1–9. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Ozkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10 (2), 1–13. doi:10.1002/wcc.569 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Robbins, D. (2020). Climate change in the media. In D. Robbins, D. Torney & P. Brereton (Eds), Ireland and the climate crisis (pp. 169–83). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Robbins, D., Torney, D., & Brereton, P. (Eds) (2020). Ireland and the climate crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1 Search in Google Scholar

Safire, W. (2008, 17 February). Footprint. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/magazine/17wwln-safire-t.html [6 April 2020]. Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, J. J., Schwarze, S., Bsumek, P. K., & Peeples, J. (2016). Under pressure: coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Sterba, J. P. (1977, 2 February). Problems from climate changes foreseen in a 1974 C.I.A report. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1977/02/02/75262596.html?pageNumber=10 [6 July 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2021). Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth, 4 (5), 696–719. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Torney, D. (2019). Climate laws in small European states: Symbolic legislation and limits of diffusion in Ireland and Finland. Environmental Politics, 28 (6), 1124–44. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1625159 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

UN. (2021). Secretary-general’s statement on the IPCC Working Group 1 Report on the Physical Science Basis of the Sixth Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/secretary-generals-statement-the-ipcc-working-group-1-report-the-physical-science-basis-of-the-sixth-assessment [10 June 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

UN. (2022). Secretary-general warns of climate emergency, calling intergovernmental panel’s report ‘a file of shame’, while saying leaders ‘are lying’, fuelling flames. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/press/en/2022/sgsm21228.doc.htm [15 June 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–38. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Tang, J. & Zhu, Q. (2013). Conceptualizing perceived affordances in social media interaction design. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65 (3), 289–303. doi:10.1108/00012531311330656 Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo