[
Akerson, V.L., Cullen, T.A., & Hanson, D.L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113. doi: 10.1002/tea.2030310.1002/tea.20303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buysse, V., Sparkman, K.L., & Wesley, P.W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 263–277.10.1177/001440290306900301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danielson, C. (2016). Creating communities of practice. Educational Leadership, 73(8), 18–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department of Education. (1988). Tomorrow’s schools: The reform of educational administration in New Zealand. Wellington: Government Printer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzgerald, T. (2009). The tyranny of bureaucracy: Continuing challenges of leading and managing from the middle. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(1), 51–65. doi: 10.1177/174114320809816410.1177/1741143208098164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzgerald, T., Youngs, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2003). Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy? Performance management in New Zealand schools. School Leadership & Management, 23(1), 91–105. doi: 10.1080/136324303200008005010.1080/1363243032000080050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11 (1), 33–49.10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLellan, J., & Ramsey, P (2007). Can peformance appraisal work in schools. New Zealand Principals’ Federation Magazine, 1–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (1998). Professional standards: Criteria for quality teaching Wellington: Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington: Learning Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
New Zealand Teachers Council. (2009). Registered teacher criteria. Wellington: New Zealand Teachers Council. Offen, B. (2015). Impact of teacher appraisal on student learning outcomes: What does it take to make a difference? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University: Palmerston North.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palincsar, A.S., Magnusson, S.J., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00057-710.1016/S0742-051X(97)00057-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piggot-Irvine, E. (2000). Appraisal – The impact of increased control on the “state of play” in New Zealand schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 331–351. doi: 10.1108/0957823001037360610.1108/09578230010373606
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piggot-Irvine, E. (2003). Key features of appraisal effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(4), 170–178. doi: 10.1108/0951354031047439210.1108/09513540310474392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Printy, S.M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. doi: 10.1177/0013161x0731295810.1177/0013161X07312958
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Punch, K. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, V.M., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinnema, C.E.L., & Robinson, V.M.J. (2007). The leadership of teaching and learning: Implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343. doi: 10.1080/1570076070143160310.1080/15700760701431603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 19/10/09, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/services/publications/educational-practices.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuckett, A.G. (2005). Part II. Rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions. Nurse Researcher, 13(1), 29–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 891–899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.00410.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.10.1177/135050840072002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E., McDermott, R.A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved 15/12, 2017, from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
