[1. Arun M, Usman Q, Johal A. Orthodontic treatment modalities: a qualitative assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 2017;44:82-9.10.1080/14653125.2017.131354628436301]Search in Google Scholar
[2. McMorrow SM, Millett DT. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 2016;43:186-92.10.1080/14653125.2016.119459927485895]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e103-e9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.01921300220]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Nasser S, Mullan J, Bajorek B. Assessing the quality, suitability and readability of internet-based health information about warfarin for patients. Australas Medical J 2012;5:194-203.10.4066/AMJ.2012.86]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cheng C, Dunn M. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39:309-14.10.1111/1753-6405.1234125716142]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Ní Ríordáin R, McCreary C. Dental patients’ use of the Internet. Br Dent J 2009;207:583-6.10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.113720019727]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Chestnutt IG, Reynolds K. Perceptions of how the Internet has impacted on dentistry. Br Dent J 2006;200:161-5.10.1038/sj.bdj.481319516474364]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ 2002;324:569-73.10.1136/bmj.324.7337.5697899311884320]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105-11.10.1136/jech.53.2.105175683010396471]Search in Google Scholar
[10. LIDA. Minervation Validation Instrument for Healthcare Websites. Viewed November 2018, <http://www.minervation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Minervation-LIDA-instrument-v1-2.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277:1244-5.10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039]Search in Google Scholar
[12. The Health On the Net Foundation. The HON Code of Conduct for Medical and Health Web Sites (HONcode). Viewed November 2018, <http://www.hon.ch/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948;32:221-33.10.1037/h005753218867058]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA. Evaluation of Internet Information about Lingual Orthodontics Using DISCERN and JAMA Tools. Turk J Orthod 2018:31:50-4.10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17042604663430112514]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Verhoef WA, Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Assessing the standards of online oral hygiene instructions for patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Am Dent Assoc 2015;146:310-7.10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.00425925523]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Parekh J, Gill DS. The quality of orthodontic practice websites. Br Dent J 2014;216:E21.10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.40324853010]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2012;83:500-6.10.2319/052512-435.1876307123025687]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre GT. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 2011;34:466-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Pithon MM, dos Santos ES. Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: a careful review. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:86-92.10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar434741525628084]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Doğramaci EJ, Rossi-Fedele G. The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod 2016;43:47-58.10.1080/14653125.2015.111471126751763]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Internet-derived information on cleft lip and palate for families with affected children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:75-80.10.1597/07-206.119115798]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Patel A, Cobourne MT. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:447-52.10.1093/ejo/cju07825488944]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Dental Board of Australia. Guidelines for advertising regulated health services 2014. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines/Policies-Codes-Guidelines/Guidelines-for-advertising-regulated-health-services.aspx>.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Meade MJ, Weston A, Dreyer CW. Valid consent and orthodontic treatment. Aust Orthod J 2019;35:35-45.10.21307/aoj-2020-031]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Wishney M. Potential risks of orthodontic therapy: a critical review and conceptual framework. Aust Dent J 2017;62 Suppl 1:86-96.10.1111/adj.12486]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Statistica. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.statista.com/forecasts/822773/popular-search-engines-in-australia>.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Statcounter. Viewed November 2018, <http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/australia/2016>.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Australian Society of Orthodontists. Brighter Future Newsletter - The benefits and risks of orthodontic treatment 2017. Viewed November 2018, <https://3-aso.cdn.aspedia.net/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/field_f_content_file/brighter_futures_2017-1.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. British Orthodontic Society. Orthodontic treatment. What are the risks? Viewed November 2018, <https://www.bos.org.uk/Portals/0/Public/docs/PILs/risksmay09.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Health literacy: Taking action to improve. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Health-Literacy-Taking-action-to-improve-safety-and-quality.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 2004;19:440-6.10.1093/her/cyg046]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Charnock D. The DISCERN handbook. Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. University of Oxford and The British Library: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Soobrah R, Clark SK. Your patient information website: how good is it? Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e90-e4.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02792.x]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Klare GR. The Measurement of Readability. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1963.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, Emmerton LM. Interventions to assist health consumers to find reliable online health information: a comprehensive review. PloS ONE 2014;9:e94186.10.1371/journal.pone.0094186]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Rogers v. Whitaker. ALR 1091992. p. 625.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Rosenberg v. Percival. CLR2001. p. 434.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Meade MJ, Millett D. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists. J Orthod 2013;40:318-25.10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000066]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Padmos JA, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:496-504.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:462-76.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Meade MJ. Sports mouthguards and orthodontic treatment. Dent Update 2018;45:848-58.10.12968/denu.2018.45.9.848]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:151-5.10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Hargrave DR, Hargrave UA, Bouffet E. Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2006;8:175-82.10.1215/15228517-2005-008187193916533758]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Riordain RN, Hodgson T. Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Br Dent J 2014;217:E15.10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.88625303608]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Leira-Feijoo Y, Ledesma-Ludi Y, Seoane-Romero JM, Blanco-Carrión J, Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it? Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1276-80.10.1111/clr.1245125041413]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Langille M, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Shanavaz SA, Massoud E. Systematic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea websites on the internet. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;41:265-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4228.0 – Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, Australia 2011-2012 [Internet]. Canberra (AUST ): ABS; 2013. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4228.0main+features992011-2012>.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Kalsi JS, Hemmings KW, Cunningham SJ. Patient-centred care: how close to this are we? Dent Update 2018;45:557-68.]Search in Google Scholar