Evaluation of treatment risks and the quality of information contained within the websites of specialist orthodontists

1. Arun M, Usman Q, Johal A. Orthodontic treatment modalities: a qualitative assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 2017;44:82-9.10.1080/14653125.2017.131354628436301Search in Google Scholar

2. McMorrow SM, Millett DT. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 2016;43:186-92.10.1080/14653125.2016.119459927485895Search in Google Scholar

3. Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e103-e9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.01921300220Search in Google Scholar

4. Nasser S, Mullan J, Bajorek B. Assessing the quality, suitability and readability of internet-based health information about warfarin for patients. Australas Medical J 2012;5:194-203.10.4066/AMJ.2012.86Search in Google Scholar

5. Cheng C, Dunn M. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39:309-14.10.1111/1753-6405.1234125716142Search in Google Scholar

6. Ní Ríordáin R, McCreary C. Dental patients’ use of the Internet. Br Dent J 2009;207:583-6.10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.113720019727Search in Google Scholar

7. Chestnutt IG, Reynolds K. Perceptions of how the Internet has impacted on dentistry. Br Dent J 2006;200:161-5.10.1038/sj.bdj.481319516474364Search in Google Scholar

8. Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ 2002;324:569-73.10.1136/bmj.324.7337.5697899311884320Search in Google Scholar

9. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105-11.10.1136/jech.53.2.105175683010396471Search in Google Scholar

10. LIDA. Minervation Validation Instrument for Healthcare Websites. Viewed November 2018, <http://www.minervation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Minervation-LIDA-instrument-v1-2.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

11. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277:1244-5.10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039Search in Google Scholar

12. The Health On the Net Foundation. The HON Code of Conduct for Medical and Health Web Sites (HONcode). Viewed November 2018, <http://www.hon.ch/>.Search in Google Scholar

13. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948;32:221-33.10.1037/h005753218867058Search in Google Scholar

14. Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA. Evaluation of Internet Information about Lingual Orthodontics Using DISCERN and JAMA Tools. Turk J Orthod 2018:31:50-4.10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17042604663430112514Search in Google Scholar

15. Verhoef WA, Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Assessing the standards of online oral hygiene instructions for patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Am Dent Assoc 2015;146:310-7.10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.00425925523Search in Google Scholar

16. Parekh J, Gill DS. The quality of orthodontic practice websites. Br Dent J 2014;216:E21.10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.40324853010Search in Google Scholar

17. Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2012;83:500-6.10.2319/052512-435.1876307123025687Search in Google Scholar

18. Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre GT. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 2011;34:466-9.Search in Google Scholar

19. Pithon MM, dos Santos ES. Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: a careful review. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:86-92.10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar434741525628084Search in Google Scholar

20. Doğramaci EJ, Rossi-Fedele G. The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod 2016;43:47-58.10.1080/14653125.2015.111471126751763Search in Google Scholar

21. Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Internet-derived information on cleft lip and palate for families with affected children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:75-80.10.1597/07-206.119115798Search in Google Scholar

22. Patel A, Cobourne MT. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:447-52.10.1093/ejo/cju07825488944Search in Google Scholar

23. Dental Board of Australia. Guidelines for advertising regulated health services 2014. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines/Policies-Codes-Guidelines/Guidelines-for-advertising-regulated-health-services.aspx>.Search in Google Scholar

24. Meade MJ, Weston A, Dreyer CW. Valid consent and orthodontic treatment. Aust Orthod J 2019;35:35-45.10.21307/aoj-2020-031Search in Google Scholar

25. Wishney M. Potential risks of orthodontic therapy: a critical review and conceptual framework. Aust Dent J 2017;62 Suppl 1:86-96.10.1111/adj.12486Search in Google Scholar

26. Statistica. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.statista.com/forecasts/822773/popular-search-engines-in-australia>.Search in Google Scholar

27. Statcounter. Viewed November 2018, <http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/australia/2016>.Search in Google Scholar

28. Australian Society of Orthodontists. Brighter Future Newsletter - The benefits and risks of orthodontic treatment 2017. Viewed November 2018, <https://3-aso.cdn.aspedia.net/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/field_f_content_file/brighter_futures_2017-1.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

29. British Orthodontic Society. Orthodontic treatment. What are the risks? Viewed November 2018, <https://www.bos.org.uk/Portals/0/Public/docs/PILs/risksmay09.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

30. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Health literacy: Taking action to improve. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Health-Literacy-Taking-action-to-improve-safety-and-quality.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

31. Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 2004;19:440-6.10.1093/her/cyg046Search in Google Scholar

32. Charnock D. The DISCERN handbook. Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. University of Oxford and The British Library: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

33. Soobrah R, Clark SK. Your patient information website: how good is it? Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e90-e4.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02792.xSearch in Google Scholar

34. Klare GR. The Measurement of Readability. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

35. Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, Emmerton LM. Interventions to assist health consumers to find reliable online health information: a comprehensive review. PloS ONE 2014;9:e94186.10.1371/journal.pone.0094186Search in Google Scholar

36. Rogers v. Whitaker. ALR 1091992. p. 625.Search in Google Scholar

37. Rosenberg v. Percival. CLR2001. p. 434.Search in Google Scholar

38. Meade MJ, Millett D. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists. J Orthod 2013;40:318-25.10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000066Search in Google Scholar

39. Padmos JA, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:496-504.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013Search in Google Scholar

40. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:462-76.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021Search in Google Scholar

41. Meade MJ. Sports mouthguards and orthodontic treatment. Dent Update 2018;45:848-58.10.12968/denu.2018.45.9.848Search in Google Scholar

42. Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:151-5.10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6Search in Google Scholar

43. Hargrave DR, Hargrave UA, Bouffet E. Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2006;8:175-82.10.1215/15228517-2005-008187193916533758Search in Google Scholar

44. Riordain RN, Hodgson T. Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Br Dent J 2014;217:E15.10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.88625303608Search in Google Scholar

45. Leira-Feijoo Y, Ledesma-Ludi Y, Seoane-Romero JM, Blanco-Carrión J, Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it? Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1276-80.10.1111/clr.1245125041413Search in Google Scholar

46. Langille M, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Shanavaz SA, Massoud E. Systematic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea websites on the internet. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;41:265-72.Search in Google Scholar

47. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4228.0 – Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, Australia 2011-2012 [Internet]. Canberra (AUST ): ABS; 2013. Viewed November 2018, <https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4228.0main+features992011-2012>.Search in Google Scholar

48. Kalsi JS, Hemmings KW, Cunningham SJ. Patient-centred care: how close to this are we? Dent Update 2018;45:557-68.Search in Google Scholar