[
Bąk, A. (2004). Dekompozycyjne metody pomiaru preferencji w badaniach marketingowych. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bąk, A. (2013). Mikroekonometryczne metody badania preferencji konsumentów. Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Billard, L., and Didyay, E. (2006). Symbolic Data Analysis. Conceptual Statistics and Data Mining. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bock, H.-H., and Diday, E. (Eds.). (2000). Analysis of Symbolic Data. Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borg, I., and Groenen, P. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling. Theory and Applications. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burton, M. L., and Nerlove, S. B. (1976). Balanced Design for Triads Tests: Two Examples from English. Social Science Research, 5, 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(76)90002-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. K., and Heiser, W. J. (2005). Avoiding Degeneracy in Multidimensional Unfolding by Penalizing on the Coefficient of Variation. Psychometrika, 1, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-001-0908-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Design. (2nd ed.). Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional Scaling. John Wiley and Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Souza, R. M. C. R., Queiroz, D. C. F., and Cysneiros, F. J. A. (2011). Logistic Regression-based Pattern Classifiers for Symbolic Interval Data. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 14(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-011-0222-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diday, E., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M. (Eds.). (2008). Symbolic Data Analysis with SODAS Software. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dudek, A. (2013). Metody analizy danych symbolicznych w badaniach ekonomicznych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dudek, A., Walesiak, M., and Pełka, M. (2020). Symbolic DA Package for R Software. www.r-project.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Philippines.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, P., Goldberg, S., and Montemayor, M. (1981). A Hybrid Utility Estimation Model for Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groenen, P. J. (1993). The Majorization Approach to Multidimensional Scaling: Some Problems and Extensions. DSWO Press. Leiden University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groenen, P. J. F., Winsberg, S., Rodríguez, O., and Diday E. (2005). Multidimensional Scaling of Interval Dissimilarities. Econometric Report, no. 2005-15, Erasmus University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groenen, P. J. F., Winsberg, S., Rodríguez, O., and Diday, E. (2006). I-Scal Multidimensional Scaling of Interval Dissimilarities. Computational Statistics and Data Mining, 51(1), 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (Sixth edition), Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helm, R., Scholl, A., Manthey, L., and Steiner, M. (2004). Measuring Customer Preferences in New Product Development: Comparing Compositional and Decompositional Methods. International Journal of Product Development, 1, 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2004.004888
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hensel-Börner, S., and Sattler, H. (2000). Validity of Customized and Adaptive Hybrid Conjoint Analysis. In R. Decker, et al. (Eds.), Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium (pp. 320-329). Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lechevallier, Y. (Ed.) (2001). Scientific Report for Unsupervised Classification, Validation and Cluster Representation. Analysis of Symbolic Official Data. Project number IST-2000-25161, Technical Report for SODAS project.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mair, P., De Leeuw, J., Groenen, P. J. F., and Borg, I. (2020). Smacof Package for R Software. www.r-project.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris, M. (2010). Design of Experiments: An Introduction Based on Linear Models. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., and Brito, P. (2011). Far beyond the Classical Data Models: Symbolic Data Analysis. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 4(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.10112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pieterse, A. H., Berkers, F., Baas-Thijssen, M. C. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., and Stiggelbout, A. M. (2010). Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as Individual Preference Assessment Tool: Feasibility through the Internet and Reliability of Preferences. Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rink, D. R. (1987). An Improved Preference Data Collection Method: Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(3), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207038701500107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roskam, E. E. (1970). The Methods of Triads for Multidimensional Scaling. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie, 25, 404-417.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sagan, A. (2009). Analiza preferencji konsumentów z wykorzystaniem program Statistica – analiza conjoint i skalowanie wielowymiarowe. https://media.statsoft.pl/_old_dnn/downloads/analiza_preferencji_konsumentow.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sattler, H., and Hensel-Börner, S. (2007). A Comparison of Conjoint Measurement with Self-explicated Approaches. In A. Gustafson, A. Herrmann (Eds.), Conjoint Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smoluk, A. (Ed.) (2000). Elementy metrologii ekonomicznej. Algebraiczne modelowanie pomiaru. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varian, H. R. (1997). Mikroekonomia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zaborski, A. (2017). The Influence of Triad Selection on the Preference Scaling Results. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 4(330), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.330.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zaborski, A. (2020). The Use of the Incomplete Tetrad Method for Measuring the Similarities in Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 20(1), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2020-0030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zwerina, K. (1997). Discrete Choice Experiments in Marketing. Physica-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar