The Unfolding Analysis for Symbolic Objects Based on the Example of the External Car Advertisement Evaluation

Bąk, A. (2004). Dekompozycyjne metody pomiaru preferencji w badaniach marketingowych. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu. Search in Google Scholar

Bąk, A. (2013). Mikroekonometryczne metody badania preferencji konsumentów. Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. Search in Google Scholar

Billard, L., and Didyay, E. (2006). Symbolic Data Analysis. Conceptual Statistics and Data Mining. John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Bock, H.-H., and Diday, E. (Eds.). (2000). Analysis of Symbolic Data. Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Borg, I., and Groenen, P. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling. Theory and Applications. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Burton, M. L., and Nerlove, S. B. (1976). Balanced Design for Triads Tests: Two Examples from English. Social Science Research, 5, 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(76)90002-8 Search in Google Scholar

Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. K., and Heiser, W. J. (2005). Avoiding Degeneracy in Multidimensional Unfolding by Penalizing on the Coefficient of Variation. Psychometrika, 1, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-001-0908-1 Search in Google Scholar

Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Design. (2nd ed.). Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional Scaling. John Wiley and Sons. Search in Google Scholar

De Souza, R. M. C. R., Queiroz, D. C. F., and Cysneiros, F. J. A. (2011). Logistic Regression-based Pattern Classifiers for Symbolic Interval Data. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 14(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-011-0222-1 Search in Google Scholar

Diday, E., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M. (Eds.). (2008). Symbolic Data Analysis with SODAS Software. John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Dudek, A. (2013). Metody analizy danych symbolicznych w badaniach ekonomicznych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Search in Google Scholar

Dudek, A., Walesiak, M., and Pełka, M. (2020). Symbolic DA Package for R Software. www.r-project.org Search in Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Philippines. Search in Google Scholar

Green, P., Goldberg, S., and Montemayor, M. (1981). A Hybrid Utility Estimation Model for Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251718 Search in Google Scholar

Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251756 Search in Google Scholar

Groenen, P. J. (1993). The Majorization Approach to Multidimensional Scaling: Some Problems and Extensions. DSWO Press. Leiden University. Search in Google Scholar

Groenen, P. J. F., Winsberg, S., Rodríguez, O., and Diday E. (2005). Multidimensional Scaling of Interval Dissimilarities. Econometric Report, no. 2005-15, Erasmus University. Search in Google Scholar

Groenen, P. J. F., Winsberg, S., Rodríguez, O., and Diday, E. (2006). I-Scal Multidimensional Scaling of Interval Dissimilarities. Computational Statistics and Data Mining, 51(1), 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (Sixth edition), Prentice-Hall. Search in Google Scholar

Helm, R., Scholl, A., Manthey, L., and Steiner, M. (2004). Measuring Customer Preferences in New Product Development: Comparing Compositional and Decompositional Methods. International Journal of Product Development, 1, 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2004.004888 Search in Google Scholar

Hensel-Börner, S., and Sattler, H. (2000). Validity of Customized and Adaptive Hybrid Conjoint Analysis. In R. Decker, et al. (Eds.), Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium (pp. 320-329). Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Lechevallier, Y. (Ed.) (2001). Scientific Report for Unsupervised Classification, Validation and Cluster Representation. Analysis of Symbolic Official Data. Project number IST-2000-25161, Technical Report for SODAS project. Search in Google Scholar

Mair, P., De Leeuw, J., Groenen, P. J. F., and Borg, I. (2020). Smacof Package for R Software. www.r-project.org Search in Google Scholar

Morris, M. (2010). Design of Experiments: An Introduction Based on Linear Models. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Search in Google Scholar

Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., and Brito, P. (2011). Far beyond the Classical Data Models: Symbolic Data Analysis. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 4(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.10112 Search in Google Scholar

Pieterse, A. H., Berkers, F., Baas-Thijssen, M. C. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., and Stiggelbout, A. M. (2010). Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as Individual Preference Assessment Tool: Feasibility through the Internet and Reliability of Preferences. Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.020 Search in Google Scholar

Rink, D. R. (1987). An Improved Preference Data Collection Method: Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(3), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207038701500107 Search in Google Scholar

Roskam, E. E. (1970). The Methods of Triads for Multidimensional Scaling. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie, 25, 404-417. Search in Google Scholar

Sagan, A. (2009). Analiza preferencji konsumentów z wykorzystaniem program Statistica – analiza conjoint i skalowanie wielowymiarowe. https://media.statsoft.pl/_old_dnn/downloads/analiza_preferencji_konsumentow.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Sattler, H., and Hensel-Börner, S. (2007). A Comparison of Conjoint Measurement with Self-explicated Approaches. In A. Gustafson, A. Herrmann (Eds.), Conjoint Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_4 Search in Google Scholar

Smoluk, A. (Ed.) (2000). Elementy metrologii ekonomicznej. Algebraiczne modelowanie pomiaru. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu. Search in Google Scholar

Varian, H. R. (1997). Mikroekonomia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Search in Google Scholar

Zaborski, A. (2017). The Influence of Triad Selection on the Preference Scaling Results. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 4(330), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.330.06 Search in Google Scholar

Zaborski, A. (2020). The Use of the Incomplete Tetrad Method for Measuring the Similarities in Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 20(1), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2020-0030 Search in Google Scholar

Zwerina, K. (1997). Discrete Choice Experiments in Marketing. Physica-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar