[
Balodis, R. (2021). The procedure for amending the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the substance of restrictions established by it. Journal of the University of Latvia: Law, 14, 21–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BNS. (2014, 7 November). Straujuma: Latvijā juridiski nav atrisināts jautājums par partnerattiecībām. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/straujuma-latvija-juridiskinav-atrisinats-jautajums-par-partnerattiecibam.a105467/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cabinet of Ministers. (2022, 14 December). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Arturs Krisjanis Karins. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/14490/download
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cabinet of Ministers. (2023, 15 September). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Evika Silina. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/16704/download
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cerna, C. M. (2010). European Court of Human Rights: Schalk & Kopf v. Austria. International Legal Materials, 49(5), 1302–1324. DOI:10.5305/intelegamate.49.5.1302
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delfi . (2012, 1 June). TM darba kārtībā nav jautājuma par viendzimuma partnerattiecību reģistrāciju. Delfi. https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/42402772/tm-darba-kartiba-nav-jautajuma-parviendzimuma-partnerattiecibu-registraciju
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delfi . (2024, 2 November). Izmantojot jauno likuma regulējumu, četros mēnešos nodibinātas 277 partnerattiecības. Delfi. https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/120048716/izmantojot-jauno-likuma-regulejumu-cetros-menesos-nodibinatas-277-partnerattiecibas
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diversity Shop. (n.d.). Mātei Latvijai [‘Latvia loves all its children’]. https://diversityshop.org/product-category/0_9_9_8_matei_latvijai
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eniņa, Z. (2023) Tiesnese par viendzimuma pāru attiecību atzīšanu: Tiesas ir gājušas pa priekšu likumdevējam. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/28.07.2023-tiesnese-par-viendzimumaparu-attiecibu-atzisanu-tiesas-ir-gajusas-pa-prieksu-likumdevejam.a518041/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eng.LSM.lv. (2022, 31 May). Court legally recognizes same-sex relationships for the fi rst time in Latvia. https://eng.lsm.lv/article/society/society/court-legally-recognizes-same-sex-relationship-forthe-first-time-in-latvia.a459319/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engīzers, K., & Melnika, M. (2021, 2 February). Defining the modern family: The Latvian Constitutional Court, the defi nition of ‘family’, and parliamentary bitterness. Verfassungsblog. DOI:10.17176/20210202-235854-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garlicki, L. (2007). Constitutional courts versus supreme courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 44–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giles, J. (2016). Oliari and Others v. Italy: Application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11: European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section): Hirvelä, Raimondi, Bianku, Tsotsoria, Mahoney, Vehabović, Grozev JJ; Mahoney, joined by Tsotsoria and Vehabović concurring: 21 July 2015. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5(1), 176–177. DOI:10.1093/ojlr/rwv054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gill-Pedro, E. (2023, 27 January). No new rights in Fedotova. Verfassungsblog. DOI:10.17176/20230130-202753-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodson, L. (2011). A marriage by any other name? Schalk and Kopf v. Austria. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 170–179. DOI:10.1093/hrlr/ngq054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 7 November 2018 on the case “On Compliance of Section 50.4 of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia (hereinafter – the Code) establishes the regime for serving the sentence in closed prisons, inter alia, that men, who have been sentenced to the deprivation of liberty for committing a serious or a particularly serious crime, serve the sentence in a closed prison”, no. 2018-25-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018-25-01_Judgement.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 November 2020 on the case “On compliance of Section 155(1) of the Labour Law with the first sentence of Article 110 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia”, no. 2019-33-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-33-01_Judgment.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 June 2010 on the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, application no. 30141/04.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 July 2015 on the case of Oliari and Others v. Italy, application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 January 2023 on the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia, applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Supreme Court (Senate) of 10 December 2021 on the case “The State’s Duty to Legally Recognize Families Formed by Same-Sex Couples and Acknowledge the Existence of Legal Relationships Between Family Members”, no. SKA-[B1]/2021 https://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/8243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2005). Explanatory Report of the Draft Law ‘Amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia’. https://www.saeima.lv/Lapas/8Sae_Lprj/lasadd=LP1400_0.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2015). Minutes of Sitting no. 35 of 24 February 2015. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/860b9e221fc9de81c2257df100391469/$FILE/PR_24_02_2015_10_00_JK.doc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2021). Minutes of Sitting no. 169 of 19 January 2021. https://titania.Parliament.lv/livs/Parliamentsnotikumi.nsf/0/b96c87ffadfb7a12c225865c004d8464/$FILE/PR_2021_01_19_10_00_JK.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lipša, I. (2017). LGBTI vēsture Latvijā pēdējos 100 gados. Dardedze hologrāfija.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LSM. (2018, 7 March). Saeimas Komisijas Zoraida Kopdzīves likuma iniciatīvu. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeimas-komisija-noraida-kopdzives-likumainiciativu.a270507/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LSM. (2022, 31 March). Saeimā sāk skatīt Civilās savienības likumu viendzimuma pāru ģimeņu aizsardzībai. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeima-sakskatit-civilas-savienibas-likumu-viendzimuma-paru-gimenu-aizsardzibai.a450431/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LSM. (2024, 11 January). CVK oficiāli apstiprina – referenduma par partnerības regulējumu nebūs. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/11.01.2024-cvk-oficialiapstiprina-referenduma-par-partneribas-regulejumu-nebus.a538599/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LSM. (2024, 1 July). Stājas spēkā Partnerības regulējums; pirmais viendzimuma pāris reģistrē attiecības. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.07.2024-stajas-spekapartneribas-regulejums-pirmais-viendzimuma-paris-registre-attiecibas.a559690/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LSM. (2024, 1 August). Mēneša laikā partnerību noslēguši 95 pāri. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.08.2024-menesa-laika-partneribu-noslegusi-95-pari.a563521/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
manabalss.lv. (2015, 23 March). Par kopdzīves likuma pieņemšanu latvijā. https://manabalss.lv/par-kopdzives-likuma-pienemsanu-latvija/show
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandates, Ethics and Submissions Committee of the Saeima. (2018). Minutes of Sitting no. 127 of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9d1c971e95fc349ac22582240027420c/$FILE/Nr.127_PR_2018_31_01_1200_MEIK.doc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marzano, V. J. (2017). Oliari and the European Court of Human Rights: Where the court failed. Pace International Law Review, 29(1), 250–287. DOI:10.58948/2331-3536.1370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tieslietu ministrija. (2023, 26 October). Par likumprojektu iesniegšanu. https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/media_file/tm_pavadvestule_261023.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mita, D. (2024). Cieņa pret atšķirīgo. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 31). Augstākā tiesa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monciunskaite, B. (2022). The risks to judicial independence in Latvia: A view eighteen years since EU accession. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 18, 129–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mos, M. (2020). The anticipatory politics of homophobia: Explaining constitutional bans on same-sex marriage in post-communist Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 395–416. DOI:10.1080/215 99165.2020.1733983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mozaīka. (2021, 11 December). Viendzimuma partner ģimenes atzīšana tiesas ceļā. https://www.mozaika.lv/l/mozaika-nodrosinas-atbalstu-tiesa-atzit-viendzimuma-partneru-gimenes-pastavesanasfaktu/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ombudsman. (2018). Report of 29 October 2018 ‘On the Recognition of Different Forms of Families’. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palazzo, N. (2023). Fedotova and Others v. Russia: Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(2), 216–228. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4612696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plepa, D. (2024). Satversmīga kopdzīve jeb radniecības un ģimenes tiesību tvērums Latvijas likumkopā. In K. Sedlenieka (Ed.), Radniecība un valsts īstenošana mūsdienu Latvijā (pp. 147–178). Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pleps, J., Pastars, E., & Plakane, I. (2022). Constitutional law. Latvijas Vēstnesis. https://juristavards.lv/wwwraksti/JV/BIBLIOTEKA/GRAMATAS/KT_ENG.PDF
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polgári, E. (2022). Fedotova v. Russ (Eur. Ct. H. R.). International Legal Materials, 61(3), 438–452. DOI:10.1017/ilm.2021.55
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prime Minister of Latvia. (2022, 21 March). On the submission of a draft law. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/84487ED0DCD7420CC225880C00497AA4?OpenDocument
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pustorino, P. (2014). Same-sex couples before the ECtHR: The right to marriage. In D. Gallo, L. Paladini, & P. Pustorino (Eds.), Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions (pp. 399–408). Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-973-642-35434-2_17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Latvia. (1922). The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/57980-the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-latvia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Latvia. (1996). The Constitutional Court Law of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/63354-constitutional-court-law
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Latvia. (2001). Labour Law of 20 June 2001 (consolidated text of 2022, article 155, as amended). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/26019-darba-likums
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Latvia. (2023a). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Notariate Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/349238-grozijumi-notariata-likuma
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Latvia. (2023b). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Register of Natural Persons Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/347527-grozijumi-fizisko-personu-registra-likuma
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rezevska, D. (2024). General principles of law: Natural rights, legal methods and system principles. Brill/Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodiņa, A., & Spale, A. (2012). Constitutional status of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Конституционное Правосудие [Constitutional Justice], 4, 36–80. https://www.concourt.am/pdf/uploads/62c81a405baba_4(58)%202012.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2005). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 5 December 2005. https://saeima.lv/Likumdosana/8S_DK/lasdk-dd=20051215.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2018a). Agenda of the Sitting of the Mandates, Ethics, and Submissions Committee of the Saeima of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9D1C971E95FC349AC22582240027420C
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2018b). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 15 March 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/24EEC09C320F58B1C2258267003FBD0F
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2019). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 20 June 2019. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs13.nsf/0/3B2A66723AFECB61C225885300358630
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2020). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 29 October 2020. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/A892369C38C20F3DC22586230049F9A1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2022a). Transcript of Plenary Session of 26 May 2022. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/15D9FED46F96EA50C2258869002F1DFE?OpenDocument
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2022b). Transcript of Plenary Session of 15 December 2022. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS14/Parliamentlivs14.nsf/0/A92703427893BD8EC22589210038EC20?OpenDocument
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeima of Latvia. (2023, 10 November). Saeima: Two adults will be able to enter into a partnership to be registered by a notary. https://www.Parliament.lv/en/news/Parliament-news/32825-Parliament-two-adults-will-be-able-to-enter-into-a-partnership-to-be-registered-by-a-notary
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spolītis, V. (2015, 30 January). On proposals for draft law ‘Amendments to the Civil Code’. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AE031B89B11B728AC2257DDD004EA58E
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiesībsargs. (2018a). 21. gadsimta ģimenei nepieciešams atbilstošs juridisks ietvars. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/news/21-gadsimta-gimenei-nepieciesams-atbilstoss-juridisks-ietvars/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiesībsargs. (2018b). Par dažādu ģimenes formu atzīšanu. Atzinums pārbaudes lietā Nr.2018-38-26G. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trabucco, F. R. (2020). The Latvian direct democracy tools in a comparative European context. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 10(4), 744–788. DOI:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1075
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Baltic Times (2022). 26 LGBT couples ask court to recognize their relationships as de facto families. https://www.baltictimes.com/26_lgbt_couples_ask_court_to_recognize_their_relationships_as_de_facto_families/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viens pret vienu (2020). Tiesnese Osipova: Patiesa vienlīdzība ir iespējama vien tad, ja ir iecietība. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/tiesnese-osipova-patiesa-vienlidziba-ir-iespejama-vientad-ja-ir-iecietiba.a384401/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vikarská, Z. (2023, 24 January). The many troubles of the Fedotova judgment. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-many-troubles-of-the-fedotova-judgment/. DOI:10.17176/20230124-215932-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Višņakova, G. (2024). Atmiņas. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 208). Augstākā tiesa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zālītis, K. (2023). Nepieciešams cieņpilns partnerattiecību regulējums, lai izvairītos no tiesvedībām. https://ir.lv/2023/10/23/nepieciesams-cienpilns-partnerattiecibu-regulejums-lai-izvairitos-notiesvedibam/
]Search in Google Scholar
, 