[
Ammaturo, F.R. (2014). The right to a privilege? Homonormativity and the recognition of same-sex couples in Europe. Social and Legal Studies, 23(2), 175–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolzonaro, F. (2023). Contesting same sex marriage in Western Europe: The emergence and failure of protest movements. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caprinali, A., Vitali, A., % Cortina, C. (2023). The transition from cohabitation to marriage in Spain: Differences and determinants in same-sex and different-sex couples. Genus, 79(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118–023–00201–0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crisafulli, F. (2014). Same-sex couples’ rights (other than the right to marry) before the ECtHR. In D. Gallo, L. Paladini, P. Pustorino (Eds), Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions (409–436). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Amico, M., % Nardocci, C. (2017). Homosexuality and human rights aft er Oliari v. Italy. In K. Boele-Woelki % A. Fuchs (Eds.), Same-sex relationships and beyond: Gender matters in the EU (163–178). Intersentia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 2 July 2009, no. U-I–425/06.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 8 December 2011, no. U-II–3/11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 14 March 2013, no. U-I–212/10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 28 September 2015, no. U-II–1/15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 16 June 2022, no. U-I–91/21, Up-675/19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 16 June 2022, no. U-I–486/20, Up-572/18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia of 14 December 2022, no. U-I–398/22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Digoix, M. (Ed.). (2020). Same-sex families and legal recognition. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dzehtsiarou, K., % O’Mahony, C. (2023). Evolutive interpretation of rights provisions: A comparison of the European Court of Human Rights and the U.S. Supreme Court. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 44, 309–365.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2008). Proposal for a Council Directive on Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons Irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation (COM 426 final).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament. (1975). Council Directive 75/117/EEC of 10 February 1975 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to the Application of the Principle of Equal Pay for Men and Women (O.J. L 45/19, 19.02.1975).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament. (2000). Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 Establishing a General Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation (O.J. L 303/16, 02 December 2000).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament. (2004). Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Right of Citizens of the Union and Their Family Members to Move and Reside Freely Within the Territory of the Member States Amending Regulation (EEC) no. 1612/68 and Repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (O.J. L 158/77, 30.04.2004).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. (1992). Treaty on European Union, Together with the Complete Text of the Treaty Establishing the European Community (O.J. C 224/1, 31.08.1992).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts (O.J. C 340/1, 10.11.1997).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. (2007). Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community (O.J. C 306/1, 17.12.2007).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. (2016). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 18 December 2000 (consolidated version 2016) (O.J. C 202/391, 07.06.2016).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. (2016). Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version 2016) (O.J. C 202/47, 07.06.2016).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Expósito, E. (2013). El derecho a contraer matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. Algunas reflexionies a propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional 198/2012. Revista General de Derecho Constitucional, 17, 1–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Federal Republic of Germany. (2004). Act of 15 December 2004 Amending the Law on Life Partnerships (Bundesgesetzblatt, Part 1, 2004, no. 69).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fenwick, H. (2016). Same-sex unions at the Strasbourg court in a divided Europe: Driving forward reform or protecting the Court’s authority via consensus analysis? European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 249–272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuchs, A., % Boele-Woelki, K. (Eds.). (2017). Same-sex relationships and beyond: Gender matters in the EU. Intersentia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallo, D., Paladini, L., % Pustorino, P. (Eds.). (2014). Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garlicki, L. (2023). Fedotova i inni przeciwko Rosji, czyli sformowanie europejskiego standardu nakazującego prawne uznanie związków monoseksualnych. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2, 27–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamilton, F. (2013). Why margin of appreciation is not the answer to the gay marriage debate. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 47–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamilton, F., % Noto la Diega, G. (Eds.). (2020). Same-sex relationships, law and social change. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henninger, A. (2022). Marriage equality in Germany: Conservative normalisation instead of successful anti-gender mobilisation. German Politics, 31(1), 79–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, P. (2013). Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, P., % Falcetta, S. (2018). Same-sex marriage and Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In A. Ashford % A. Maine (Eds.), Research handbook on gender, sexuality and law (1–15). Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Austria of 12 December 2003, reference B 777/03.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Austria of 4 December 2017, reference G258/2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Republic of Germany of 17 July 2002, BVerfGE 105, 313(351).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Republic of Germany of 7 July 2009,BVerfGE 124, 199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Republic of Germany of 21 July 2010, BVerfGE 126, 400.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Republic of Germany of 19 February 2013, BVerfGE 133, 59 (79).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 17 February 1998 on the case of Lisa Jacqueline Grant v. South-West Trains Ltd., C 249/96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 1 April 2008 on the case of Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen, C 267/06.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 10 May 2011 on the case of Jürgen Römer v. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, C 147/08.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2012 on the case of Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Karen Dittrich and Robert Klinke and Jörg-Detlef Müller v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Joined Cases C 124/11, C 125/11 and C 143/11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fift h Chamber) of 12 December 2013 on the case of Frédéric Hay v. Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres, C 267/12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2018 on the case of Relu Adrian Coman and Others v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne, C 673/16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2021 on the case V.M.A. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon “Pancharevo”, C 490/20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 October 1986 on the case of Rees v. the United Kingdom, application no. 9532/81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 September 1990 on the case of Cossey v. the United Kingdom, application no. 10843/84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 11 July 2002 on the case of Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, application no. 28957/95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 June 2010 on the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, application no. 30141/04.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 November 2013 on the case of Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, applications nos. 29381/09, 32684/09.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2014 on the case of Hämäläinen v. Finland, application no. 37359/09.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 July 2015 on the case of Oliari and Others v. Italy, applications nos. 18766/11, 36030/11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 June 2016 on the case of Chapin and Charpentier v. France, application no. 40183/07.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 December 2017 on the case of Orlandi and Others v. Italy, applications nos. 26431/12, 26742/12, 44057/12, 60088/12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) of 17 January 2023 on the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia, applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14, 43439/14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 23 May 2023 on the case of Buhuceanu and Others v. Romania, applications nos. 20081/19 and 20 others.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 1 June 2023 on the case of Maymulakhin and Markiv v. Ukraine, application no. 75135/14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 December 2023 on the case of Przybyszewska and Others v. Poland, applications nos. 11454/17 and 9 others.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Spanish Constitutional Court of 6 November 2012 no. 198/2012 (BOE 286).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kochenov, D., % Belavusau, U. (2020). Same-sex spouses: More free movement, but what about marriage? Coman: Case C-673/16, Coman et al. v. Inspectoratul General Pentru Imigrări, Judgement of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2018, EU:C:2018:385. Common Market Law Review, 57(1), 227–242.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kogovšek Šalamon, N. (2016). Pravice istospolno usmerjenih oseb in njihovih otrok v. praksi ESČP in Sodišča EU. Podjetje in delo, 6(7), 1073–1083.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovacic Markic, L. (2020). The past and future of same-sex relationship in Europe (the analysis of EU and ECtHR law standards in view of their influence on national constitutional standards). EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 4, 1320–1359.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kużelewska, E. (2019). Same-sex marriage – a happy end story? The effectiveness of referendum on same-sex marriage in Europe. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 24(1), 13–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kużelewska, E., % Michalczuk-Wlizło, M. (2021). Same-sex marriage and the Catholic Church: Any chance for understanding? Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 66(2), 261–281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łącki, P. (2018). Zmiana znaczenia pojęcia małżeństwa w niemieckiej ustawie zasadniczej. O meandrach dynamicznej wykładni postanowień konstytucyjnych. Forum Prawnicze, 2(46), 25–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mariano, J.C. (2013). O Direito de Família na jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional Português. Uma breve crónica. JULGAR, 21, 27–45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez de Aguirre, C. (2016). Same-sex marriage in Spanish law. Prawo w działaniu, 25, 206–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martinico, G. (2015). Time and comparative law before courts: The subversive function of the diachronic comparison. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(2), 195–212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miranda, J. (2010). O Tribunal Constitucional em 2009. Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, 14, 517–570.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mulder, J. (2018). Dignity or discrimination: What paves the road towards equal recognition of same-sex couples in the European Union? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2017.1414430.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Novak, B. (Ed.). (2019). Komentar Družinskega zakonika, Uradni list Republike Slovenije.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Spanish Constitutional Court of 11 July 1994, no. 222/1994 (1.101–1993). ECLI:ES:TC:1994:222A. https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/cs-CZ/Resolucion/Show/AUTO/1994/222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Portilla, F.J.M. (2013). Interpretación evolutiva de la constitución y legitimidad del matrimonio formado por personas del mismo sexo. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 31, 535–554.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Presno, M. A. (2013). Comentario a la Sentencia 198/2012 del Tribunal Constitucional Español sobre el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. Diritti Comparatti. ComparIre i diritti fondamentali in Euopa. https://www.diritticomparati.it/comentario-a-la-sentencia-1982012-del-tribunal-constitucional-espanol-sobre-el-matrimonio-entre-pers/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radonjić, A. (2023). European Court of Human Rights caselaw on the right of the same-sex couples to marry: A view from a social justice perspective. Politič ke Perspektive, 13(1), 81–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Portugal. (1966). Portuguese Civil Code – Código Civil of 25 November 1966 (Diário do Governo. 274/1966, Série I).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Portugal. (1976). Portuguese Constitution – Constituição da República Portuguesa of 2 April 1976 (Diário da República 86/1976, Série I).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Portugal. (2009). Government Bill (Proposta de Lei) no. 7/XI of 22 December 2009, Permite o casamento civil entre pessoas do mesmo sexo (Diário da República II, Série A, no. 18 XI/1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Portugal. (2010). Law no. 9/2010 of 31 May 2010, Permite o casamento civil entre pessoas do mesmo sexo (Diário da República 105/2010, Série I).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Slovenia. (2005). Same-Sex Civil Partnership Registration Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 65/05).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Slovenia. (2023). Act Amending the Family Code of 31 January 2023 (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 5/23).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Spain. (1889). Spanish Civil Code – Código Civil of July 25, 1889 (BOE-A-1889–4763).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Spain. (1978). Spanish Constitution – Constitución Española of 29 December 1978 (BOE-A-1978–31229).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Spain. (2005). Law no. 13/2005 of 1 July 2005 Amending the Civil Code Concerning the Right to Enter into Matrimony (BOE-A-2005–11364).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roca Trias, E. (2017). Family law as a right to freedoms: The case of same-sex marriage in Spain. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31, 79–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosas, A. (2022). The Court of Justice of the European Union: A human rights institution? Journal of Human Rights Practice, 14(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruling of the Portuguese Constitutional Court of 2009, Ruling no. 359/2009. https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/acordaos/20090359.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruling of the Portuguese Constitutional Court of 2010, Ruling no. 121/2010. https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/en/acordaos/20100121.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shahid, M. (2017). The Right to Same-Sex Marriage: Assessing the European Court of Human Rights’ Consensus-Based Analysis in Recent Judgments Concerning Equal Marriage Rights. Erasmus Law Review, 10 (3), 184–198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szczerba-Zawada, A. (2019). Równość jako fundament Unii Europejskiej. Studium kryteriów równego traktowania w konstrukcji rynku wewnętrznego. Warszawa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tryfonidou, A. (2020). Positive state obligations under European law: A tool for achieving substantive equality for sexual minorities in Europe. Erasmus Law Review, 13(3), 98–112. DOI:10.5553/ELR.000149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948, General Assembly Resolution 217 A.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Sloot, B. (2014). Between fact and fiction: An analysis on the case-law on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 26(4), 397–420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waaldijk, K. (2021). The right to marry as a right to equality: About same-sex couples, the phrase ‘men and women’, and the travaux préparatoires of the Universal Declaration. In N. M. Blokker, D. Dam-de Jong, % V. Prislan (Eds.), Furthering the frontiers of international law: Sovereignty, human rights, sustainable development (457–472). Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waaldijk, K. (2024). Same-sex couples under the international right to marry: Some recognition of their right but more recognition for their exclusion from it and for their existing marriages. In A.R. Ziegler, M. Lysander Fremuth % B.E. Hernandez-Truyol (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of LGBTI law. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willems, G. (2022). Same-sex marriage as a human right: How the Strasbourg court could draw inspiration from the US Supreme Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to affirm marriage equality. Oňati Socio-Legal Series 14(1).176–212. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000–0000–0000–1347.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wojewoda, M. (2022). Rodzicielstwo osób tej samej płci w orzecznictwie Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej – glosa do wyroku TSUE z dnia 14 grudnia 2021 w sprawie C-490/20. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 27(3), 259–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziyadov, N. (2019). From justice to injustice: Lowering the threshold of European consensus in Oliari and Others versus Italy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 26(2), 631–672.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Žuber, B., % Kaučič, I. (2019). Referendum challenges in the Republic of Slovenia. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 24(1), 135–148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Žuber, B., % Kaučič, I. (2021). ‘New’ European democracies: Slovenia. In D. Moeckli, A. Forgács % I. Henri (Eds.), The legal limits of direct democracy (135–154). Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 