The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary of Slavic EFL learners

ALCARAZ-MÁRMOL, G., 2015. Dispersion and frequency: Is there any difference as regards their relation to L2 vocabulary gains? IJES, vol. 15, no.2, pp.1-16.10.6018/ijes/2015/2/201471Search in Google Scholar

BACHMAN, L. F. and PALMER, A. S., 1996. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

BASTERRECHEA, M., MAYO, M.P.G. and LEESER, M. J., 2014. Pushed output and noticing in a dictogloss: Task implementation in the CLIL classroom. Porta Linguarum, vol. 22, pp. 7-22.10.30827/Digibug.53643Search in Google Scholar

BEGLAR, D., 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, vol.27, no.1, pp.101-118.10.1177/0265532209340194Search in Google Scholar

CHAMONIKOLASOVÁ, J. and STAŠKOVÁ, J., 2005. Some difficulties facing native speakers of Czech and Slovak in writing in English. Theory and Practice in English Studies, vol.3, pp. 53-59.Search in Google Scholar

COBB, T. (n.d.) VocabProfiler. [Computer software]. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/Search in Google Scholar

COH-METRIX 3.0. (n.d.). [Computer software]. Retrieved July 2010 - August 2014, from http://tool.cohmetrix.com/Search in Google Scholar

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (n.d.). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/framework_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

DALLER, H., MILTON, J. and TREFFERS-DALLER J. eds., 2007. Editors' introduction. In: Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-32.10.1017/CBO9780511667268.003Search in Google Scholar

DALLER, H. and PHELAN D., 2007. What is in a teacher’s mind? Teacher ratings of EFL essays and different aspects of lexical richness. In: H. Daller, J. Milton and J. Treffers-Daller, eds. Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234-244.10.1017/CBO9780511667268.016Search in Google Scholar

DAVIES, M., 2010. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 9, no.1, pp. 25-28.10.1093/llc/fqq018Search in Google Scholar

DE VAUS, D. A., 2002. Surveys in social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.10.4135/9781446263495Search in Google Scholar

DUNN, L.M. and DUNN, D.M., 2007. Peabody picture vocabulary test. (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education.10.1037/t15144-000Search in Google Scholar

FAN, M., 2000. How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners. RELC Journal, vol.31, pp.105-119.10.1177/003368820003100205Search in Google Scholar

HENRIKSEN, B., 1999. Three dimensions of vocabulary development. SSLA, vol. 21, pp. 303-317.10.1017/S0272263199002089Search in Google Scholar

HULSTIJN, J. H., 2001. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In: P. Robinson, ed. Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258-286.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011Search in Google Scholar

LAUFER, B., 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, vol.19, pp. 255-271.10.1093/applin/19.2.255Search in Google Scholar

LAUFER, B., ELDER, C., HILL, K. and CONGDON P., 2004. Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, vol.21, pp. 202-226.10.1191/0265532204lt277oaSearch in Google Scholar

LAUFER, B., and GOLDSTEIN Z., 2004. Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, vol.54, no.3, pp. 399-436.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.xSearch in Google Scholar

LAUFER, B., and NATION, I.S.P., 1999. A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, vol.16, no.1, pp. 33-51.10.1177/026553229901600103Search in Google Scholar

LAUFER, B. and PARIBAKHT, T., 1998. The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, vol.48, pp. 365-391.10.1111/0023-8333.00046Search in Google Scholar

LEE, S.H., 2003. ESL learners vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System, vol.31, pp. 537-561.10.1016/j.system.2003.02.004Search in Google Scholar

LEECH, G., RAYSON, P. and WILSON A., 2001. Companion website for: Word frequencies in written and spoken English based on the British National Corpus. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/.Search in Google Scholar

LEWIS, M., 1993. The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.Search in Google Scholar

MCCARTHY, P., 2012. The Gramulator 6.0. [Computer software]. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from https://umdrive.memphis.edu/pmmccrth/public/software/software_index.htmSearch in Google Scholar

MCCARTHY, P. and JARVIS, S., 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, vol.42, no.2, pp. 381-392.10.3758/BRM.42.2.381Search in Google Scholar

MEARA, P., 1980. Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching, vol.13, pp. 221-246.10.1017/S0261444800008879Search in Google Scholar

MEARA, P. (n.d.). P_Lex v2.0: A program for evaluating the vocabulary used in short texts. [Computer software]. Retrieved October 16, 2011, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/index.htmSearch in Google Scholar

MILTON, J., 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692092Search in Google Scholar

MONDRIA, J. and WIERSMA, B., 2004. Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In: P. Bogaards and B. Laufer, eds. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 79-100.10.1075/lllt.10.08monSearch in Google Scholar

NATION, I.S.P., 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759Search in Google Scholar

NATION, I.S.P., 2012. The Vocabulary Size Test. Unpublished. Retrieved September 10, 2012, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

NATION, I.S.P. and BEGLAR, D., 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, vol.31, no.7, pp. 9-13.Search in Google Scholar

NATION, I.S.P. and MEARA, P., 2010. Vocabulary. In: N. Schmitt, ed. An introduction to applied linguistics. London, Hodder Education, pp. 34-52.Search in Google Scholar

NUNNALLY, N.C., 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

PLAUEN, E. O., [1952] 1996. Vater und Sohn, Band 2. Ravensburger Taschenbuch.Search in Google Scholar

READ, J., 2000. Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732942Search in Google Scholar

READ, J., 2007. Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. IJES, vol.7, no.2, pp. 105-125.Search in Google Scholar

SCHMITT, N., 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge English Education.Search in Google Scholar

SCHMITT, N., 2010. Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230293977Search in Google Scholar

SCHMITT, N., 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, vol.64, no.4, pp. 913-951.10.1111/lang.12077Search in Google Scholar

SKETCH ENGINE. (n.d.). Sketch Engine [Computer software]. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from https://ske.fi.muni.cz/login/Search in Google Scholar

SWAIN, M., 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: S. Gass and C. Madden, eds. Input in second l anguage acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 235-253.Search in Google Scholar

ŠAFFKOVÁ, Z., 2001. The teaching of writing in the Czech Republic. In: D. Klooster, J. Steele and P. Bloem, eds. Ideas Without Boundaries: International Educational Reform through Reading, Writing and Critical Thinking. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.Search in Google Scholar

ŠIŠKOVÁ, Z., 2015. Lexical richness and textual cohesion in free written production of Slavic EFL learners. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Reading, UK.Search in Google Scholar

TREFFERS-DALLER, J., 2011. Operationalizing and measuring language dominance. International Journal of Bilingualism, vol.15, no.2, pp. 147-163.10.1177/1367006910381186Search in Google Scholar

TREFFERS-DALLER, J., 2013. Measuring lexical diversity among L2 learners of French: An exploration of the validity of D, MTLD and HD-D as measures of language ability. In: S. Jarvis and H. Daller, eds. Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.47.05ch3Search in Google Scholar

TSCHIRNER, E., 2004. Breadth of vocabulary and advanced English study: An empirical investigation. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, vol.1, pp. 27-39.Search in Google Scholar

VERMEER, A., 2001. Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, vol.22, pp. 217-234.10.1017/S0142716401002041Search in Google Scholar

WARING, R., 1997a. A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata [occasional papers of Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama], vol.1, pp. 53-68.Search in Google Scholar

WARING, R., 1997b. A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards. Studies in foreign languages and literature, vol.21, pp. 94-114.Search in Google Scholar

WARING, R., 1998. Receptive and productive foreign language vocabulary size II. Retrieved June, 16, 2016, from http://www.robwaring.org/papers/various/RPII.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

WEBB, S., 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.27, no.1, pp. 33-52.10.1017/S0272263105050023Search in Google Scholar

WEBB, S., 2008. Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.30, pp. 79-95.10.1017/S0272263108080042Search in Google Scholar

WEBB, S., 2009. The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, vol.40, no.3, pp. 360-376.10.1177/0033688209343854Search in Google Scholar

WEIGLE, S., 2002. Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732997Search in Google Scholar

YAMAMOTO, Y.M., 2011. Bridging the gap between receptive and productive vocabulary size through extensive reading. The Reading Matrix, vol.11, no.3, pp. 226-242.Search in Google Scholar