[ALCARAZ-MÁRMOL, G., 2015. Dispersion and frequency: Is there any difference as regards their relation to L2 vocabulary gains? IJES, vol. 15, no.2, pp.1-16.10.6018/ijes/2015/2/201471]Search in Google Scholar
[BACHMAN, L. F. and PALMER, A. S., 1996. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[BASTERRECHEA, M., MAYO, M.P.G. and LEESER, M. J., 2014. Pushed output and noticing in a dictogloss: Task implementation in the CLIL classroom. Porta Linguarum, vol. 22, pp. 7-22.10.30827/Digibug.53643]Search in Google Scholar
[BEGLAR, D., 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, vol.27, no.1, pp.101-118.10.1177/0265532209340194]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMONIKOLASOVÁ, J. and STAŠKOVÁ, J., 2005. Some difficulties facing native speakers of Czech and Slovak in writing in English. Theory and Practice in English Studies, vol.3, pp. 53-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[COBB, T. (n.d.) VocabProfiler. [Computer software]. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/]Search in Google Scholar
[COH-METRIX 3.0. (n.d.). [Computer software]. Retrieved July 2010 - August 2014, from http://tool.cohmetrix.com/]Search in Google Scholar
[COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (n.d.). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/framework_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[DALLER, H., MILTON, J. and TREFFERS-DALLER J. eds., 2007. Editors' introduction. In: Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-32.10.1017/CBO9780511667268.003]Search in Google Scholar
[DALLER, H. and PHELAN D., 2007. What is in a teacher’s mind? Teacher ratings of EFL essays and different aspects of lexical richness. In: H. Daller, J. Milton and J. Treffers-Daller, eds. Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234-244.10.1017/CBO9780511667268.016]Search in Google Scholar
[DAVIES, M., 2010. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 9, no.1, pp. 25-28.10.1093/llc/fqq018]Search in Google Scholar
[DE VAUS, D. A., 2002. Surveys in social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.10.4135/9781446263495]Search in Google Scholar
[DUNN, L.M. and DUNN, D.M., 2007. Peabody picture vocabulary test. (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education.10.1037/t15144-000]Search in Google Scholar
[FAN, M., 2000. How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners. RELC Journal, vol.31, pp.105-119.10.1177/003368820003100205]Search in Google Scholar
[HENRIKSEN, B., 1999. Three dimensions of vocabulary development. SSLA, vol. 21, pp. 303-317.10.1017/S0272263199002089]Search in Google Scholar
[HULSTIJN, J. H., 2001. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In: P. Robinson, ed. Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258-286.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011]Search in Google Scholar
[LAUFER, B., 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, vol.19, pp. 255-271.10.1093/applin/19.2.255]Search in Google Scholar
[LAUFER, B., ELDER, C., HILL, K. and CONGDON P., 2004. Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, vol.21, pp. 202-226.10.1191/0265532204lt277oa]Search in Google Scholar
[LAUFER, B., and GOLDSTEIN Z., 2004. Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, vol.54, no.3, pp. 399-436.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x]Search in Google Scholar
[LAUFER, B., and NATION, I.S.P., 1999. A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, vol.16, no.1, pp. 33-51.10.1177/026553229901600103]Search in Google Scholar
[LAUFER, B. and PARIBAKHT, T., 1998. The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, vol.48, pp. 365-391.10.1111/0023-8333.00046]Search in Google Scholar
[LEE, S.H., 2003. ESL learners vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System, vol.31, pp. 537-561.10.1016/j.system.2003.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[LEECH, G., RAYSON, P. and WILSON A., 2001. Companion website for: Word frequencies in written and spoken English based on the British National Corpus. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEWIS, M., 1993. The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCCARTHY, P., 2012. The Gramulator 6.0. [Computer software]. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from https://umdrive.memphis.edu/pmmccrth/public/software/software_index.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[MCCARTHY, P. and JARVIS, S., 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, vol.42, no.2, pp. 381-392.10.3758/BRM.42.2.381]Search in Google Scholar
[MEARA, P., 1980. Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching, vol.13, pp. 221-246.10.1017/S0261444800008879]Search in Google Scholar
[MEARA, P. (n.d.). P_Lex v2.0: A program for evaluating the vocabulary used in short texts. [Computer software]. Retrieved October 16, 2011, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/index.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[MILTON, J., 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692092]Search in Google Scholar
[MONDRIA, J. and WIERSMA, B., 2004. Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In: P. Bogaards and B. Laufer, eds. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 79-100.10.1075/lllt.10.08mon]Search in Google Scholar
[NATION, I.S.P., 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759]Search in Google Scholar
[NATION, I.S.P., 2012. The Vocabulary Size Test. Unpublished. Retrieved September 10, 2012, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[NATION, I.S.P. and BEGLAR, D., 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, vol.31, no.7, pp. 9-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATION, I.S.P. and MEARA, P., 2010. Vocabulary. In: N. Schmitt, ed. An introduction to applied linguistics. London, Hodder Education, pp. 34-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[NUNNALLY, N.C., 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[PLAUEN, E. O., [1952] 1996. Vater und Sohn, Band 2. Ravensburger Taschenbuch.]Search in Google Scholar
[READ, J., 2000. Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732942]Search in Google Scholar
[READ, J., 2007. Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. IJES, vol.7, no.2, pp. 105-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHMITT, N., 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge English Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHMITT, N., 2010. Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230293977]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHMITT, N., 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, vol.64, no.4, pp. 913-951.10.1111/lang.12077]Search in Google Scholar
[SKETCH ENGINE. (n.d.). Sketch Engine [Computer software]. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from https://ske.fi.muni.cz/login/]Search in Google Scholar
[SWAIN, M., 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: S. Gass and C. Madden, eds. Input in second l anguage acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 235-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠAFFKOVÁ, Z., 2001. The teaching of writing in the Czech Republic. In: D. Klooster, J. Steele and P. Bloem, eds. Ideas Without Boundaries: International Educational Reform through Reading, Writing and Critical Thinking. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠIŠKOVÁ, Z., 2015. Lexical richness and textual cohesion in free written production of Slavic EFL learners. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Reading, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[TREFFERS-DALLER, J., 2011. Operationalizing and measuring language dominance. International Journal of Bilingualism, vol.15, no.2, pp. 147-163.10.1177/1367006910381186]Search in Google Scholar
[TREFFERS-DALLER, J., 2013. Measuring lexical diversity among L2 learners of French: An exploration of the validity of D, MTLD and HD-D as measures of language ability. In: S. Jarvis and H. Daller, eds. Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.47.05ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[TSCHIRNER, E., 2004. Breadth of vocabulary and advanced English study: An empirical investigation. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, vol.1, pp. 27-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[VERMEER, A., 2001. Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, vol.22, pp. 217-234.10.1017/S0142716401002041]Search in Google Scholar
[WARING, R., 1997a. A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata [occasional papers of Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama], vol.1, pp. 53-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[WARING, R., 1997b. A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards. Studies in foreign languages and literature, vol.21, pp. 94-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[WARING, R., 1998. Receptive and productive foreign language vocabulary size II. Retrieved June, 16, 2016, from http://www.robwaring.org/papers/various/RPII.html]Search in Google Scholar
[WEBB, S., 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.27, no.1, pp. 33-52.10.1017/S0272263105050023]Search in Google Scholar
[WEBB, S., 2008. Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.30, pp. 79-95.10.1017/S0272263108080042]Search in Google Scholar
[WEBB, S., 2009. The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, vol.40, no.3, pp. 360-376.10.1177/0033688209343854]Search in Google Scholar
[WEIGLE, S., 2002. Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732997]Search in Google Scholar
[YAMAMOTO, Y.M., 2011. Bridging the gap between receptive and productive vocabulary size through extensive reading. The Reading Matrix, vol.11, no.3, pp. 226-242.]Search in Google Scholar