[Bhatia, V. K. (1989). Legislative writing: A case of neglect in EA/OLP courses. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 223-238.10.1016/0889-4906(89)90014-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruce, N. (2002). Dovetailing language and content: Teaching balanced argument in legal problem answer writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 321-345.10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00040-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, M. (1987). Reading cases. The Modern Law Review, 50(4), 409-431.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1987.tb01719.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartig, A. J. (forthcoming). Connecting language and content in English for Specific Purposes: Case studies in law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, C. (2011). Using discourse analysis methodology to teach “legal English”. International Journal of Law, Language, & Discourse, 1(2), 1-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, C., & Tyler, A. (2008). United States legal discourse: Legal English for foreign LLMs. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howe, P. (1993). Planning a pre-sessional course in English for academic legal purposes. In G. M. Blue (Ed.), Language, learning and success: Studying through English (pp. 148-157). London: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[In re George B, 279 Cal. Rptr. 388 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)]Search in Google Scholar
[Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liebenberg, E. (2012). Using images as an effective tool to facilitate teaching legal concepts. Cahiers de l’APLIUT, XXXI(1), 44-59.10.4000/apliut.2260]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203966273]Search in Google Scholar
[Northcott, J. (2013). Legal English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 213-226).West Sussex:Wiley- Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[People v. Huggins, 60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997).]Search in Google Scholar
[People v. McElroy, 48 P. 718 (Cal. 1897).]Search in Google Scholar
[People v. Williams, 12 Cal. Rptr. 2d 243 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sierocka, H. (2014). Cultural dimensions of legal discourse. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 38(51), 189-196. doi: 10.2478/slgr-2014-003910.2478/slgr-2014-0039]Search in Google Scholar
[Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, J. (1985). A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Language across the curriculum. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783091409]Search in Google Scholar
[White, G. (1979). The subject specialist and the ESP teacher Lexden Papers [Essays on Teaching English for Specific Purposes by the staff of the Colchester and Bedford Study Centres] (Vol. 2, pp. 9-14). Oxford: Lexden Centre.]Search in Google Scholar