Libre de lecture

Discovery of ‘click’ 1,2,3-triazolium salts as potential anticancer drugs

Ivana Steiner

Ivana Steiner

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Steiner, Ivana
, 
Nikolina Stojanovic

Nikolina Stojanovic

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stojanovic, Nikolina
, 
Aljosa Bolje

Aljosa Bolje

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Bolje, Aljosa
, 
Anamaria Brozovic

Anamaria Brozovic

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Brozovic, Anamaria
, 
Denis Polancec

Denis Polancec

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Polancec, Denis
, 
Andreja Ambriovic-Ristov

Andreja Ambriovic-Ristov

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ambriovic-Ristov, Andreja
, 
Marijana Radic Stojkovic

Marijana Radic Stojkovic

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stojkovic, Marijana Radic
, 
Ivo Piantanida

Ivo Piantanida

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Piantanida, Ivo
, 
Domagoj Eljuga

Domagoj Eljuga

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Eljuga, Domagoj
, 
Janez Kosmrlj

Janez Kosmrlj

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kosmrlj, Janez
 et 
Maja Osmak

Maja Osmak

Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Osmak, Maja
  
19 juil. 2016
Discovery of ‘click’ 1,2,3-triazolium salts as potential anticancer drugs's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Research Article
Publié en ligne: 19 juil. 2016
Pages: 280 - 288
Reçu: 23 nov. 2015
Accepté: 17 mars 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0027
Mots clés
© Radiol Oncol 2016
This content is free.

Figure 1

The structures of triazoles 1 and triazolium salts 2.
The structures of triazoles 1 and triazolium salts 2.

Figure 2

Effects of 2b on the cell cycle of H460 cells. Logarithmically growing H460 cells were treated with 29.7 and 110 μM of 2b for indicated period of time. Afterwards they were harvested for cell cycle analysis measured by FACS as described in Materials and methods. Representative data of three experiments are shown.
Effects of 2b on the cell cycle of H460 cells. Logarithmically growing H460 cells were treated with 29.7 and 110 μM of 2b for indicated period of time. Afterwards they were harvested for cell cycle analysis measured by FACS as described in Materials and methods. Representative data of three experiments are shown.

Figure 3

DNA as possible target of compound 2b. Thermal denaturation curves of ct-DNA (c(ct-DNA) = 2 x 10–5 M, r[compound]/[ct-DNA] =0.3) at pH 7.0 (sodium cacodylate buffer, I = 0.05 M) upon addition of compound 2b. Error in DTm values: ±0.5°C.
DNA as possible target of compound 2b. Thermal denaturation curves of ct-DNA (c(ct-DNA) = 2 x 10–5 M, r[compound]/[ct-DNA] =0.3) at pH 7.0 (sodium cacodylate buffer, I = 0.05 M) upon addition of compound 2b. Error in DTm values: ±0.5°C.

Figure 4

Formation of ROS by 2b in H460 cells. Logarithmically growing H460 cells were stained for 1 hour with 10 mM CM-H2DCFDA and then either treated with 110 μM 2b during indicated time points (A) or treated with indicated concentrations of 2b for 180 min (3 hours) (B). Afterward ROS formation was determined by flow cytometry as described in Materials and methods section. Dose-dependent formation of ROS was additionally presented by cell count and fluorescence intensity of CMH2DCFDA. M1 line is positioned to designate MFI value of the non-treated sample (white histogram) compared to signals obtained upon cell treatment with indicated concentrations of 2b.
Formation of ROS by 2b in H460 cells. Logarithmically growing H460 cells were stained for 1 hour with 10 mM CM-H2DCFDA and then either treated with 110 μM 2b during indicated time points (A) or treated with indicated concentrations of 2b for 180 min (3 hours) (B). Afterward ROS formation was determined by flow cytometry as described in Materials and methods section. Dose-dependent formation of ROS was additionally presented by cell count and fluorescence intensity of CMH2DCFDA. M1 line is positioned to designate MFI value of the non-treated sample (white histogram) compared to signals obtained upon cell treatment with indicated concentrations of 2b.

Figure 5

The effects of ROS scavenger on survival of H460 cells treated with 2b determined by MTT assay. H460 cells were seeded and next day pretreated for 2 hours with 5 mM of NAC or 1 mM tempol. Afterwards different concentrations of 2b were added. The cell survival was determined 72 hours later by MTT assay as described in Materials and methods section. Each point represents the mean ±SD of at least three independent experiments. All data are expressed as the average percentage of survival values relative to an untreated control ± SD or samples treated with antioxidants alone. The significance in differences is indicated (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
The effects of ROS scavenger on survival of H460 cells treated with 2b determined by MTT assay. H460 cells were seeded and next day pretreated for 2 hours with 5 mM of NAC or 1 mM tempol. Afterwards different concentrations of 2b were added. The cell survival was determined 72 hours later by MTT assay as described in Materials and methods section. Each point represents the mean ±SD of at least three independent experiments. All data are expressed as the average percentage of survival values relative to an untreated control ± SD or samples treated with antioxidants alone. The significance in differences is indicated (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

Figure 6

The effect of ROS scavenger on survival of HEp-2 (A) and H460 (B) cells treated with 2b determined by colony-forming assay. HEp-2 and H460 cells were seeded and next day pretreated for 2 hours with 5 mM of NAC or 1 mM (HEp-2 cells) or 0.125 mM (H460 cells) tempol. Afterwards different concentrations of 2b were added. Ten days later the colonies were counted. Non-treated cells and cells treated with antioxidants alone were used as controls. Each point represents the mean ±SD of at least three independent experiments. All data are expressed as the average percentage of survival values relative to an untreated control ± SD or samples treated with antioxidants alone. The significance in differences is indicated (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
The effect of ROS scavenger on survival of HEp-2 (A) and H460 (B) cells treated with 2b determined by colony-forming assay. HEp-2 and H460 cells were seeded and next day pretreated for 2 hours with 5 mM of NAC or 1 mM (HEp-2 cells) or 0.125 mM (H460 cells) tempol. Afterwards different concentrations of 2b were added. Ten days later the colonies were counted. Non-treated cells and cells treated with antioxidants alone were used as controls. Each point represents the mean ±SD of at least three independent experiments. All data are expressed as the average percentage of survival values relative to an untreated control ± SD or samples treated with antioxidants alone. The significance in differences is indicated (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

IC50 values of triazolium salts and some parent triazoles against cervical carcinoma HeLa cells

CmpdIC50 (μM)

IC50 is the concentration of the triazoles and triazolium salts inducing 50% cell growth inhibition after 72 h incubation. The results are shown as mean values of at least three experiments (± SD).

1a> 100
1b> 100
1f> 100
2a91.6 ± 3.9
2b57.0 ± 12.9
2c> 100
2d> 100
2e55.4 + 9.4
2f–

Triazolium salt precipitated promptly after the addition to the growth medium and thus the cytotoxicity could not be measured accurately.

2g–

The range of concentrations 10 – 1000 μM reduced survival from about 60 to 40%, and therefore the exact IC50 was difficult to determine.

2h88.9 + 7.5
2i54.4 + 14.7
2j54.9 + 3.5
2k> 100
2l–

The range of concentrations 10 – 1000 μM reduced survival from about 60 to 40%, and therefore the exact IC50 was difficult to determine.

Effect of compound 2b on the cell cycle of H460 cells

Conc. (μM)24 h48 h72 h
G1SG2/MsubG1G1SG2/MsubG1G1SG2/MsubG1
0543115259261527313142
29.7612415261261356517186
11078913378913157951635

Cytotoxic activity of 2b against different cell lines

Cell lineIC50 (μM)

IC50 is the concentration of 2b that induces 50% cell growth inhibition after 72 h incubation.

T.I.

T.I. refers to therapeutic index, calculated from the ratio of cytotoxicity (IC50) on normal fibroblasts and cytotoxicity (IC50) on tumour cells.

HeLa57.0 ± 12.94.01
HEp-287.0 ± 28.52.63
7T111.7 ± 7.62.05
H46029.7 + 4.57.69
HCT-11651.9 ± 7.24.40
Fibroblasts228.5 ± 5.6–
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Médecine clinique, Médecine interne, Hématologie, oncologie, Radiologie
RSS Feed de la revue