[
Abbate, Janet (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aune, Margrethe (1996). The Computer in Everyday Life: Patterns of Domestication of a New Technology. In Merete Lie & Knut H. Sørensen (Eds.), Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology Into Everyday Life (pp. 91-120). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bader, Renate G. (1990). How Science News Sections Influence Newspaper Science Coverage – A Case Study. Journalism Quarterly, 1, 88-96.10.1177/107769909006700114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bardini, Thierry (1994). A Translation Analysis of the Green Revolution in Bali. Science, Technology & Human Values, 19(2), 152-168.10.1177/016224399401900202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauer, Martin W., & Bucchi, Massimiano (Eds.). (2007). Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauer, Martin W., & Gregory, Jane (2007). From journalism to corporate communication in post-war Britain. In Martin W. Bauer & Massimiano Bucchi (Eds.), Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations (pp. 33-51). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baum, Matthew A., & Gussin, Phil (2007). In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science(3), 1-31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berman, Morris (1978). Social Change and Scientific Organization: The Royal Institution, 1799-1844. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borup, Mads, Brown, Nik, Konrad, Kornelia, & Lente, Harro van (2006). The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298.10.1080/09537320600777002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daling, Unn Kristin, & Thomassen, Øyvind (2006). Internett.no/historie (Vol. Report 2006-74): NTNU.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dan, Viorelia, & Ihlen, Øyvind (2011). Framing expertise: a cross-cultural analysis of success in framing contests. Journal of Communication Management, 15(4), 368-388.10.1108/13632541111183352
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, Robert M. (2007). Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication, 57, 163-173.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, Robert M. (2010). Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4), 389-408.10.1177/1464884910367587
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, Robert M., Matthes, Jörg, & Pellicano, Lynn (2009). Nature, Sources, and Effects of News Framing. In Karin Wahl-Jorgensen & Thomas Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 175-190). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fenn, Jackie (2007). Understanding Gartner’s Hype Cycles: Gartner Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flichy, Patrice (2007). The Internet Imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.10.1177/1077800405284363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flyvbjerg, Bent (2008). Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. European Planning Studies, 16(1), 3-21.10.1080/09654310701747936
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamson, William A., & Lasch, Kathryn E. (1983). The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy. In Shimon E. Spiro & Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives (Vol. 95, pp. 397-415). Paris: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamson, William A., & Modigliani, Andre (1987). The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. Research in Political Sociology, 3, 137-177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally, Allansdottir, Agnes, Allum, Nick, Castro, Paula, Esmer, Yilmar, et al. (2010). Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of Change? European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. Brussels.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gripenberg, Pernilla, Sveiby, Karl-Erik, & Segercrantz, Beata (2012). Challenging the Innovation Paradigm: The Prevailing Pro-innovation Bias. In Karl-Erik Sveiby, Pernilla Gripenberg & Beata Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the Innovation Paradigm (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Göpfert, Winfried (2007). The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism. In Martin W. Bauer & Massimiano Bucchi (Eds.), Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations (pp. 215-226). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartmann, Maren (2009). Everyday: Domestication of Mediatization or Mediatized Domestication? In Knut Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: concepts, changes, consequences (pp. 225-242). New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hetland, Per (2012). Internet between Utopia and Dystopia: The Narratives of Control. Nordicom Review, 33(2), 3-15.10.2478/nor-2013-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holsti, Ole R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jasanoff, Sheila (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, Ronald (2003). Resisting Consumer Technologies in Rural America: The Telephone and Electrification. In Nelly Oudshoorn & Trevor Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies (pp. 51-66). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LaFollette, Marcel C. (1990). Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science, 1910-1955. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leckner, Sara, & Facht, Ulrika (2011). A Sampler of International Media and Communication Statistics 2010. Gothenburg: NORDICOM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lievrouw, Leah A., & Pope, Janice T. (1994). Contemporary Art as Aesthetic Innovation. Science Communication, 15(4), 373-395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovallo, Dan, & Kahneman, Daniel (2003). Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives’ Decisions. Harvard Business Review, 2003(July), 57-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCurrey, David S. (2000). Multimedia Knowledge and Culture Production: On the Possibility of a Critical and Ethical Pedagogy Resulting From the Current Push for Technology in the Classroom. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 20(2), 100-105.10.1177/027046760002000203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morgan, Mary S. (2011). Travelling Facts. In Peter Howlett & Mary S. Morgan (Eds.), How Well Do Facts Travel? (pp. 3-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelkin, Dorothy (1995). Selling Science. How Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perrault, Sarah T. (2013). Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137017581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ragas, Matthew W., Kim, Jinsoo, & Kiousis, Spiro (2011). Agenda-building in the corporate sphere: Analyzing influence in the 2008 Yahoo!-Icahn proxy contest. Public Relations Review, 37, 257-265.10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reese, Stephen D. (2010). Prologue – Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research. In Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy & August E. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 7-32). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, Everett M., & Shoemaker, F. Floyd (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silverstone, Roger, & Haddon, Lesley (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In Robin Mansell & Roger Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies (pp. 44-74). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toy, Jennifer (2002). The Ingelfinger Rule: Franz Ingelfinger at the New England Journal of Medicine 1967-1977. Science Editor, 25(6), 195-198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wyatt, Sally (2003). Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet. In Nelly Oushoorn & Trevor Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (pp. 67-79). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
