[Adolphs, S., B. Brown, R. Carter, P. Crawford, and O. Sahota. 2004. “Applying Corpus Linguistics in a Health Care Context.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 9-28.10.1558/japl.1.1.9.55871]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos,M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyzanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodologic Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19: 273-306. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962.10.1177/0957926508088962]Search in Google Scholar
[Blumer, H. 1973. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Coosto. 2014. The Facts Webpage. Available at: http://www.coosto.nl/home/about/feiten and in English at http://www.coosto.co.uk/home/about/facts (accessed March 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Daas, P.J.H. and M.J. Puts. 2014. “Social Media Sentiment and Consumer Confidence.Statistics Paper Series, No. 5. European Centeral Bank.” Available at: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpsps/ecbsp5.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Daas, P.J.H. and M.J. Puts. 2014a. “New and Emerging Methods: Big Data as a Source of Statistical Information.” The Survey Statistician 69. Available at: http://isi.cbs.nl/iass/N69.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Daas, P.J.H., M.J. Puts, B. Buelens, and P.A.M. van den Hurk. 2013. “Big Data and Official Statistics.” In Proceedings of the NTTS (New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics) 2013, March 5-7, Brussels. Available at: http://www.cros-portal.eu/sites/default/files/NTTS2013fullPaper_76.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Daas, P.J.H., M. Roos, M. van de Ven, and J. Neroni. 2012. “Twitter as a Potential Data Source for Statistics.” Discussion paper 201221. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/04B7DD23-5443-4F98-B466-1C67AAA19527/0/201221x10pub.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabrielatos, C. and P. Baker. 2008. “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press 1996-2005.” Journal of English Linguistics 36: 5-38. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247.10.1177/0075424207311247]Search in Google Scholar
[Giesen, D. 2012. “Exploring Causes and Effects of Perceived Response Burden.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys (ICES IV), Montreal, 11-14 June, 2012. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2012/papers/302171.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 2011. “Three Eras of Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 861-871. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr057.10.1093/poq/nfr057]Search in Google Scholar
[Guion, L.A., D.C. Diehl, and D. McDonald. 2011. Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fy394 (accessed June 1, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G. 2013. “Quality Issues in Business Surveys.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, H. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 83-125. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch03]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G., J. Jones, D. Giesen, and L.-C. Zhang. 2013. “Understanding and Coping with Response Burden.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, H. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 219-252. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch06]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardt-Mautner, G. 1995. Only Connect. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics. UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Homans, G.C. 1958. “Social Behavior as Exchange.” Americal Journal of Sociology 63: 597-606.10.1086/222355]Search in Google Scholar
[Jehn, K.A. and L. Doucet. 1996. “Developing Categories from Interview Data: Text Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling. Part 1.” Field Methods 8: 15-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jehn, K.A. and L. Doucet. 1997. “Developing Categories for Interview Data: Consequences of Different Coding and Analysis Strategies in Understanding.” Field Methods 9: 1-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, K.B. 2012. A Handbook of Media and Communication Research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, K.B. and R. Helles. 2011. “The Internet as a Cultural Forum: Implications for Research.” New Media and Society 13: 517-533. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810373531.10.1177/1461444810373531]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, G. 1992. “Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance.” In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, edited by J. Svartvik, 105-122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mautner, G. 2007. “Mining Large Corpora for Social Information: The Case of Elderly.” Language in Society 36: 51-72. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070030.10.1017/S0047404507070030]Search in Google Scholar
[Nattinger, J.R. and J.S. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching.Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pennebaker, J.W., M.E. Francis, and R.J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LWIC): A Computerized Text Analysis Program. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers Poon, P., G. Albaum, and F. Evangelista. 1999. “An Empirical Test of Alternative Theories of Survey Response Behaviour.” International Journal of Market Research 41: 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, G.W. and H.R. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15: 85-109. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569.10.1177/1525822X02239569]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, G.R. and T. Weisner. 1996. “Analyzing Words in Brief Descriptions: Fathers and Mothers Describe Their Children.” Field Methods 8: 13-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seale, C., S. Ziebland, and J. Charteris-Black. 2006. “Gender, Cancer Experience and Internet Use: A Comparative Word Analysis of Interviews and Online Cancer Support Groups.” Social Science and Medicine 62: 2577-2590. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.01616361029]Search in Google Scholar
[Silverman, D. 2000. “Analyzing Talk and Text.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 821-834. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. 2012. “Toward a Benefit-Cost Theory of Survey Participation: Evidence, Further Tests, and Implications.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 379-392.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. 2008. “Getting Data for Business Statistics: A Response Model.” Paper presented at the 4th European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Rome.Available at: http://q2008.istat.it/sessions/25.html (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. 2009. “Getting Data for (Business) Statistics: What’s new? What’s next?” Paper presented at the 2009 NTTS Conference (New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics). Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1001617/4398389/S5P2-GETTING-DATA-FOR-STATISTICS-SNIJKERS.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., B. Berkenbosch, and M. Luppes. 2007. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys (ICES-III). 18-21 June, 2007. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1048-1059. Available at: https://www.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2007/proceedings/TOC.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., R. Go¨ttgens, and H. Hermans. 2011. “Data Collection and Data Sharing at Statistics Netherlands: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.” Paper presented at the 59th plenary session of the Conference of European Statisticians, 14-16 June, 2011, Geneva.Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/2011/20.e.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. and J. Jones. 2013. “Business Survey Communication.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, H. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 359-430. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch09]Search in Google Scholar
[Stieglitz, S. and L. Dang-Xuan. 2012. “Social Media and Political Communication: A Social Media Analytics Framework.” Social Network Analysis and Mining 3: 1277-1291. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3.10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Tesch, R. 1990. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York: Falmar Press. Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, and M. Bavdazˇ. 2014. In Search of Motivation for Business Survey Response Task. Journal of Official Statistics 30: 579-606. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/JOS-2014-0039.10.2478/jos-2014-0039]Search in Google Scholar
[Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, M. Bavdazˇ, and S. Biffignandi. 2011. “Motivation in Business Surveys.” BLUE-ETS Conference on business’ burden and motivation in official surveys, Statistics Netherlands, March 22-23 edited by D. Giesen and M. Bavdazˇ. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/23FD3DF5-6696-4A04-B8EF-1FAACEAD995C/0/2011proceedingsblueets.pdf (accessed April 16, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Vroenhoven, J. 2006. “Storend!” In Humor om te huilen: Zwartboek doorgeslagen regelgeving, 22-23. Tilburg: Brabants-Zeeuwse Werkgeversvereniging (BZW).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenemark, M., A. Persson, H. Noorlind Brage, T. Svensson, and M. Kristenson. 2011. “Applying Motivation Theory to Achieve Increased Response Rates, Respondent Satisfaction and Data Quality.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 393-414.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D. and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and Its Implications for the Survey Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, H. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 39-82. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02]Search in Google Scholar
[Wodak, R. 2007. “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry.” Journal of Pragmatics and Cognition 15: 203-227. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod. 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod]Search in Google Scholar